Louisiana sues 17 banks under RICO laws for MERS scheme

April 19, 2012

Louisiana stands up to big banks

In the State of Louisiana, 30 judges representing 30 parishes are suing 17 banks, stating that the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) is a “scheme” set up to illegally defraud the government of transfer fees, and that mortgages transferred through MERS’ recording system are illegal as the promissory note of any mortgage is inseparable from the mortgage, which is what MERS does.

MERS was initially established by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac nearly 20 years ago in conjunction with several major banks as a means to expedite the loan recording process as it used to be done through individual county clerk offices which was slow, and the founders went ahead even though most states did not have laws that authorized them to bypass the required filing with clerks.

Several states like Delaware and Ohio, along with the City of Dallas have already sued MERS and their bank partners, claiming millions were bypassed in filing fees due, and that the banks should have known that their filing system could lead to improper filing. These claims have been supported by numerous studies, one of which asserts that MERS destroyed the entire chain of title in America and is at the core of the housing crisis.

Advertise with The American Genius

RICO laws took down the Gambinos, may penalize banks as well

What is different with Louisiana’s lawsuit is that they are pulling out the big guns and suing under RICO laws (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act), alleging wire and mail fraud and a scheme intended to defraud the parishes out of their lawfully owed recording fees. RICO laws have taken down the Gambino crime family, the Genovese crime family, Hell’s Angels, and the Latin Kings and carry treble damages, which is triple the amount of actual damages.

The banks named in the suit, according to court documents are Bank of New York Mellon, Bank of America, Chase Home Mortgage of the Southeast, JP Morgan Chase, CitiMortgage, GMAC (now Ally Financial), HSBC, Merrill Lynch, Nationwide Advantage Mortgage Company, Suntrust Bank, United Guaranty Corporation, Washington Mutual (now owned by Chase), Wells Fargo, Deutsche Bank, U.S. Bank, and La Salle Bank.

For infractions dating back ten years, the 30 parishes are suing for the following and demanding a jury trial:

  1. Treble damages (which will likely be in the millions)
  2. Prejudgement interest as permitted by law
  3. Reasonable attorney’s fees and costs
  4. Interest on the judgment as provided by law
  5. A permanent injunction
  6. Such other relief as the Court deems just and proper

Maximizing email efficiency We have long advocated for using Gmail in your business, but have also admitted that it is an incomplete tool, but has many extensions and add-ons that can maximize the efficiency of your emailing habits, particularly for small business professionals' lives where every second counts. If you…
Branching out to be the boss In any economy, many branch out in an effort to become their own boss, be it in the real estate, marketing, design or other, seeking control over their finances or simply freedom from the corporate grind. In a down economy, some people do so…

Tara Steele is the News Director at The American Genius, covering entrepreneur, real estate, technology news and everything in between. If you'd like to reach Tara with a question, comment, press release or hot news tip, simply click the link below.


  1. MERS wouldn’t be a terrible system IF a.) it had actual transparency and b.) it didn’t subject borrowers to potential identity theft by requiring their SSN in order to obtain ANY clue as to who might be the owner of their promissory note. I say any clue because the best that MERS will do is give a borrower the name of the trustee of whatever trust their note is purported to be securitized into. MERS doesn’t give the name of the actual TRUST. MERS v. Johnston, MERS v Saunders and MERS v. Silverberg got it right, IMO.

Leave A Comment