HAMP considered a failure
It has been a rocky road for the Obama Administration as their Home Affordability Modification Program (HAMP) comes under fire as the economy continues to sink. HAMP is a $75 billion program designed to lower borrowers’ monthly payments by reducing mortgage rates and extending loan terms.
A year after the launch of HAMP, only 750,000 of the projected 3 to 4 million borrowers have completed the application, and only 7% (65,000) of those signed up have actually completed the program, causing some to call the program a failure, according to the Star Tribune.
HAMP is said to lower borrowers’ credit scores and because paperwork was being lost and delayed for HAMP applicants, the White House sent “swat” teams into mortgage servicing offices to oversee the process, meanwhile Representative Barney Frank opined that the process had him “terribly frustrated” back in December.
Treasury Department “stepping it up”
This month, the Treasury Department (which oversees HAMP) vowed to “step up efforts” with HAMP which presumably begins with the recent announcement that they have issued new guidelines to help the HAMP program become more effective.
These new guidelines mean that at the time of application, borrowers must present three things:
- a form requesting a loan modification
- authorization for the servicer to get tax information from the IRS (rather than borrowers providing copies themselves)
- evidence of current income, such as two recent pay stubs
The Treasury is noting that by not just taking borrowers’ word (that their finances are in order, or that loan servicers will collect the paperwork in a timely manner) is no longer good enough and that the process will not begin until all three items are complete.
Joe Loomer
February 3, 2010 at 10:15 am
“taking borrowers’ word” ROFLMAO ! …..and we arrived at this conclusion HOW? Thanks Lani! I’ll be giggling about this one the rest of the day!
Navy Chief, Navy Pride
Lani Rosales
February 3, 2010 at 10:55 am
You caught that, did you? So, it’s not the Treasury Departments’ fault that HAMP is failing, losing paperwork, etc., it’s the BORROWERS’ fault for fudging numbers. I wonder if the Treasury is saying the several hundred thousand who have not gotten help that ARE eligible are not helped by the program because their paystubs aren’t in?
Another case of “it’s not our fault.”
Additionally, why would this NOT have been the policy in the first place, it reeks of no-doc-subprimes that weakened the market to begin with!?!?
Mercury213
February 6, 2010 at 8:31 pm
Looks like Congress wants some answers from Geithner on why HAMP has failed.
oversight.house.gov/images/stories/Correspondence/2-4-10-Honorable_Timothy_F._Geithner-Secretary-Dept_of_the_Treasury-Mortgage_Modification_Program.pdf
Rick
February 10, 2010 at 1:16 pm
As a participant in the HAMP program, I can only give you the “why” I applied for the program, and the likely end result. The reason boils down to unfunded mandates. I own an owner occupied 3 family house, that I bought 6 yrs ago. My mortgage at the time was $1300. Within the first 2 years a federal law was passed which persuaded me to get an equity loan to make my home lead safe, next the variable equity rate jumped, I refinanced. After property re-evaluation in 2007, my taxes went sky high, the mortgage now was $1900. I was now paying the same as my tenants to make the monthly mortgage payment. I dropped my health Ins. to help keep the costs in balance. Then in 2009 FEMA re-mapped the US, and now classified my home as being in a high risk flood zone. As I was challenging FEMA, the mortgage co. forced the flood insurace and increased my monthy payment, now the payment is $2488. At this point I applied for HAMP. Just a few days ago , My mortgage co. notified me that I was denied , and suggested a short sale or deed in liew of foreberance. I reviewed a local real estate internet site, and then found my home is about $90k less than my mortgage balance, not the mere $15K the mortgage company reported my BPO as being. I have documented most of my convervations with the mortgage company, and experienced several imcompetents, and requests for documentation that had been previously acknowledged as in the system , as they were quoted back to me as proof that they indeed were there all a long.
My gut feeling is the bank was just playing along because the treasury dept had some control over them while they were using taxpayer money, but when the treasury was paid back, the banks had little incentive to take the modifications seriously. Too bad for the bank, if they approved the modification, I would have been providing money to the bank with interest for another 30 yrs, but now they will likey end up with a deed on a house that has $90k negative equity, is 100 yrs, old( lead contaminated-lead safe) and is now in a FEMA hight risk flood zone.
Penny
September 1, 2010 at 1:19 am
The program won’t work until the requirements allow the formula to be this:
(1st mortgage + 2nd mortgage + taxes + insurance + home owners association fees) equal less than or equal to 31% of gross income. As it stands now, only the first, not the first and second are included. People got into financial distress due to interest only 1st mortgages, which have low payments. The problem is the SECOND mortgage… Until this is addressed, very few people qualify for HAMP. And if they don’t qualify for HAMP for the 1st, the 2nd mortgage company will not play ball….
Jerry Brooks
June 20, 2011 at 3:28 am
You are absolutely right on this post. We did qualify for the HAMP on our first loan. We also applied for a HAMP on the second at the same time, that was 6 months ago, and the second states they cannot approve the HAMP / CHAMP until the state sends them a letter stating that our HAMP was approved for the 1ST.
On the 13th of June we received a letter from the 2ND that they are going to start forclosure proceedings in 32 days unless we get paid current. Yes, we even had a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy and the 1ST is upside down, they want to take our home?
Can anyone tell me exactly who we can contact to get assistance with this matter? The 2ND is not "playing ball" with the HAMP, and yes, they received TARP money.
Thanks