Google invests $50M in good for Google, bad for consumers?

March 10, 2014

Google Capital Invests Big Bucks in

The online real estate auction site,, landed a monstrous investment from Google Capital. In a press release on the website, the largest online auction site for buying a selling homes announced that Google Capital invested $50 million dollars in their Irvine, California-based company.

According to the Jeff Frieden, CEO and Co-Founder of, “Google is the world’s greatest Internet company and we’re thrilled to have the opportunity to work closely with them. This will give us an opportunity to tap into their deep expertise in digital marketing and mobile, as well as in building world-class products.”

In speaking about their decision to extend funding, Google Capital Partner David Lawee is equally enthusiastic. He states, “We think can fundamentally change how real estate, and particularly commercial real estate, can be bought and sold, leveling the playing field for smaller investors.”

Since Google is widely recognized as a forward-thinking business leader, one might want to take stock in their decision to back such a company.

Advertise with The American Genius

Real Estate Consumers and Professionals May Want to Take a Second Look

While this cash infusion may lead to some fundamental changes in how real estate is bought and sold, currently has some noteworthy practices.

Nationstar Mortgage Short Sales

One of the largest contributors of properties to the website is Nationstar Mortgage. Nationstar requires borrowers who want to sell their homes as short sales to auction those properties through the website, and this process is not without its criticism.

For one, the Nationstar/ process is a little bit disjointed. A real estate agent lists a property, obtains an offer, and submits the paperwork (including the fully executed purchase contract) to Nationstar. Nationstar then requires the property to be listed on the website, and the bidding on this property is now open to the public.

Many agents complain that this process completely ignores the existing purchase contract between buyer and seller. Given the fact that the seller (not the bank) is the rightful owner until the property, it is the seller who should determine the best purchase offer on the property. The existing contract should not be ignored. Surcharge

Another hot button issue for consumers is that requires a surcharge when you purchase a property through their site. For some properties, the surcharge is $2500. But, for those short sale properties that came via Nationstar bank, the surcharge is 5 percent. So, if you bid $250,000 for a property listed on the site, your total purchase (excluding settlement fees) could be $262,500. In effect, homebuyers may end up overpaying for a property.

Possible Price Inflation

Most consumers have the impression that an “auction” begets a deal. In some instances, that may be the case. However, in an auction, people bid against one another and that raises the price, often even causing a buying frenzy, which clearly works to the benefit of the seller.

Elizabeth Story, a San Diego County Realtor® at Allison James Estates & Homes, points out the following unfair consumer practice: “’s properties listed for sale have unpublished reserves that allow the seller to decline the transaction, even if you are the winning bidder. In order to encourage bidding up to the unpublished reserve, will bid against buyers in its own auctions.” It’s true that does not publish their reserve amounts on their site, unlike other sites (such as ebay) where the reserve is visible to the consumer.

But, unlike other auction sites, does actually reserve the right to bid against the consumer. In their Reserve Auction Terms and Conditions, states, “The starting bid is not the Reserve Price. Except where prohibited by law, during a live bidding event (online or otherwise) the Auctioneer may open bidding on any Property by placing a bid on behalf of the Seller and may further bid on behalf of the Seller up to the amount of the Reserve Price by placing successive or consecutive bids for a Property, or by placing bids in response to other bidders.”

Homebuyers need to understand that the Auctioneer may be bidding against them and, as a result, inflating the price paid to the property to their own benefit and the benefit of the seller.

Online Bidding May Benefit Sellers

The truth is that the online bidding process may also benefit those home sellers that list their homes for sale on the site. In situations of properties where there has been limited interest at the local level through common real estate advertising practices, sellers may be able to increase their buying pools. In the example of luxury homes valued in the millions of dollars, widening the buying pool could possibly lead to a quicker closing.

Thinking of buying a home on Think that if it’s good for Google, it’s good for me? “It’s important to know the facts,” Story says. “Buyers need to know that they are not shortchanging themselves.”

It’s true that the online real estate auction site may have some good features, but as always… caveat emptor!

Two hidden privacy issues you need to know about If you use Google Chrome, there are two privacy issues, regarding the deletion of your browsing history, you need to know about. Even though you think you have successfully removed all traces, there are two more issues are hiding, and while…
homebuyer information
Home buyer preferences by race, ethnicity Although our nation has become more color blind as the American melting pot has pleasantly blurred every line imaginable, marketers still view preferences on race, ethnicity, age, geography, and so forth. This practice has become more convoluted because there aren't really citizens who don't…

Melissa Zavala is the Broker/Owner of Broadpoint Properties and Head Honcho of Short Sale Expeditor®, and Chief Executive Officer of Transaction 911. Before landing in real estate, she had careers in education and publishing. Most recently, she has been able to use her teaching and organizational skills while traveling the world over—dispelling myths about the distressed property market, engaging and motivating real estate agents, and sharing her passion for real estate. When she isn’t speaking or writing, Melissa enjoys practicing yoga, walking the dog, and vacationing at beach resorts.


  1. Thanks Melissa, I tried to use it for myself for a condo in TN. I sat there and watched the bids go up. The scary part of your post is that they can bid up the price. There was a discussion on FB about this a few days ago and most folks said the paper work was horrendous. Makes me concerned for the consumers.

  2. I am a 26 year old bachelor with no kids. I have no current plans to buy a home. But, my philosophy has pretty much always been “if it’s Google, it’s better.” Apparently, that is no longer valid. Thank you so much for this enlightening article. I will stay away from

  3. In theory, if the seller’s reserve is not met by the market, then the
    seller will not sell the property. That same concept holds true on ebay,
    where there is a reserve and if it’s not met then the product doesn’t
    sell. So what’s the difference is the seller bids up to the reserve or
    doesn’t? The same theoretical framework holds true. I feel this article
    is a misinformed, judgmental piece based on analogous insight that’s not
    actual validated through a conceptual framework. Stay away from
    publishing such opinion with such assertion and matter-of-fact

    • What if the buyer made the last bid (which was inflated by and puts it over the reserve price?

  4. Please consider signing this petition: We don’t want in our listings

Leave A Comment