Connect with us

Business Marketing

Define “Real Estate Professional”

Published

on

real estate professional word art

Graphic by Lani Anglin-Rosales

In a recent post by Teresa Boardman, she asked “What do Agents Really Want?”

The post was interesting and it generated a lot of comments. In those comments, an issue was raised about what a real estate professional was. I offered the following definition:

A party who acts as an intermediary between sellers/landlords and buyers/tenants of real property.

I offered that definition because I feel that putting aside your class of license or agency relationship, people who serve in those capacities have common experiences and challenges that are not faced by those who operate in our industry in other capacities.

For example, I think a full time real estate investor is an investor, not a real estate professional. I think that a full time appraiser is a Professional Appraiser, not a real estate professional, and that a Loan Officer is a Mortgage Industry Professional. But of course, it’s just my opinion.

What do you think?

Bill is an unusual blend of Old & New - The CEO Century 21 Advantage Gold (Philadelphia's Largest Century 21 company and BuzzBuilderz (a Social Media Marketing Company), He is a Ninja CEO, blending the Web 1 and 2.0 world together in a fashion that stretches the fabric of the universe. You can follow him on twitter @Billlublin or Facebook or LinkedIn.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
25 Comments

25 Comments

  1. Mark Harrison

    June 23, 2008 at 4:54 am

    I can see a justification for realtors calling themselves “Real Estate SALES Professionals”, but just “Real Estate Professionals” to the exclusion of all others? I don’t think so.

    I’m a landlord in the UK. This means that I have to:

    1: Understand the law of renting out homes

    1i: What’s the difference between Section 8 and Section 21 possession and which should you use?
    1ii: What becomes mandatory for all new tenancies on the 1st October this year?
    1iii: What is a CORGI certificate, and how often do you need a new one?
    1iv: Which are the (6) professional bodies whose members may carry out electrical installation / repair work on rental properties?
    1v: How do you find out the class rent for your local authority if you want to let to DSS tenants?
    1vi: Of the previous six questions, for which TWO has the answer NOT changed in the last 12 months?)

    2: Understand the law of buying and selling houses / apartments

    2i: Do you need a contaminated land report BEFORE you list a 3-bedroom house with an agent?
    2ii: What about a 2-bedroom house?
    2iii: For which of the above has the answer changed in the last 12 months?

    3: Provide a great customer experience to my tenants (so they renew)

    4: Understand market cycles / discounted cashflow / cash on cash returns

    5: Understand the tax law of landlording

    5i: If a husband owned a rental property prior to being married, how is the rent income split between him and his wife once they are married?

    Under your definition, how many “real estate professionals” could answer those questions?

    There was only ONE question above where the impact of getting it wrong didn’t run the risk of going to court and being hit with a fine or in some cases, prison time!

    OK, I accept that you’re in the US, and I’m in the UK, but I’d be surprised if the majority of UK Estate Agents (what we call realtors) could answer those questions…

  2. Bill Lublin

    June 23, 2008 at 5:13 am

    Mark; Thank you for your comment – As a semi-frequent visitor to the UK, I was fascinated by your response. And as a landlord here in the US, I agree there are a lot of things that we need to know to operate our buildings properly, but any competent property manager here in the US should know those things to act as an agent for a landlord. I actually had to learn the local equivalents to your questions in order to manage property for others in my marketplace. When I was able to own my own real estate, the knowledge was, of course, very useful in operating those properties.

    In looking at your list, I didn’t see anything that I would not want to be familiar with if I were to become an Estate Agent in the UK. I’m not really familiar with the licensing laws ,professional real estate organizations, or standards of practice in the UK, so I would be very interested in anything you can share. I would point out that not being a real estate professional (by my definition here) does not in any way diminish how professional an individual may be in a real estate related business.

    That being said, is it possible that your question is one of competency rather then definition?

  3. Mark Harrison

    June 23, 2008 at 5:27 am

    My question is one of definition.

    My feeling is that ANY professional who works in real estate should meaningfully be described as a “real estate professional”… not just sales intermediaries.

    I do agree that there’s a big difference between the “Professional landlord” and the “chap who thought that he could make easy money buying a rental property last year but acts as a computer programmer by day”.

    I wouldn’t include that chap as a “real estate professional”, but would include:

    – Realtors
    – Professional landlords
    – Real estate lawyers
    – Property managers
    – Valuers / appraisers
    – Real estate bankers
    – Property developers

  4. Barry Cunningham

    June 23, 2008 at 5:30 am

    Bill your semantics and manipulation of the word professional can only be meant to justify the sacrosanct commission and other than that you are playing with words to justify some kind of ill designed caste system.

    You also have the great ability to make giant leaps of categorization. If you truly believe that the only qualification for one to be a “professional” in this industry is to be a “party who acts as an intermediary between sellers/landlords and buyers/tenants of real property” you are sadly ill-informed and your definition is whacked.

    I bet a lot of stagers, title agents, etc would also consider themselves as professionals in this industry.

    Your argument is pointless and much less than I would expect from an “Agentgenius”. Hey…if it makes you sleep better at night thinking you’re looked at in a different light then so be it.

    Reason being that I now find myself indifferent to that what you believe or assume to know. The consumer, the client..those we do business…it is their opinion of what is and what is not a professional that matters to me and in that regard, I find solace in not having to have someone like you define that which we do and succeed at.

  5. Glenn fm Naples

    June 23, 2008 at 6:03 am

    The use of real estate professional appears to be an umbrella term used to cover the many specialities of the real estate industry.

    The term “full-time” implies that an individual devotes all (full) time to specific aspect of the real estate profession.

  6. Bill Lublin

    June 23, 2008 at 6:06 am

    Barry; You’re obviously so upset that you’re having trouble being coherent. Or you didn’t read the post (though it was very short). I actually wrote the post to get some other input on what people thought about that definition.

    I didn’t say anything about commissions, and I certainly never indicated that I viewed commissions or fees as sacrosanct. And your comment about a caste system is just so off the wall I don’t understand it. Are you indicating that I think that we are somehow superior because we are intermediaries?

    My post does not indicate that any professionals in any related field are not professional, they are just different. They may be staging professionals, or Title professionals, or mortgage professionals, but they are not IMHO real estate professionals.

    Title Professionals that I know (including the ones that work in my title company) do not consider themselves real estate professionals, though they are professionals who work in a real estate related business. They are in the Title Insurance Business. They have their own professional organizations, and their own issues. They are in fact Insurance Professionals, not real estate professionals.

    As far as my argument being pointless, I wasn’t making any argument, as I mentioned earlier, I was looking for other people’s opinions.

    Contrary to your assertion this isn’t about how I look at myself, or even how I look at others. Most people are defined in many different ways. They can be a coach or referee or real estate professional , Dad, Son, brother, Investor, or Lawyer, all at once. Me, I’m a Father, Husband,Friend, Business Owner, Landlord, Tenant, Mortgage Lender, Real Estate Professional, Instructor, Writer, Entrepreneur, Eagles & Sixers fan, Comic Book Collector, Reader, and much more. And after Father, Husband, and Friend, and then being prioritized first to business and then to leisure, those things come in no particular order of importance to me.

    And finally in response to your statement “I find solace in not having to have someone like you define that which we do and succeed at.” – You seem very insecure – What in this post indicates to you that I am trying to define what you do or what success is for you? All I’m trying to do is find out what other people think about a definition of a term. Don’t take it so personally Barry – Its really not all about you.

  7. Bill Lublin

    June 23, 2008 at 6:07 am

    @Glenn – SO how would you write a definition then? All suggestions welcomed 😉

  8. Barry Cunningham

    June 23, 2008 at 6:41 am

    Bill this post was borne from the comment thread on Teresa’s post where you most assuredly stated that I was not a real estate professional and the the definition that you proffered there, YOUR definition, was on that thread. So this not being about me is a back pedal now.

    In any event, this won’t be a 100 comment thread, at least not one I am going to be participating in, so you can have the last word as always. Done with this. This “non-real estate professional” actually has some houses to buy and sell today. Have a great week.

  9. Bill Lublin

    June 23, 2008 at 7:10 am

    Barry; You’re absolutely correct thsi was born of the other post, but it is not and never was about you – As I saide earlier, All I’m trying to do is find out what other people think about a definition of a term.. And I hope we see some other definitions if people disagree with the one I proposed.
    Hope you have a great week also.
    🙂

  10. Jim Duncan

    June 23, 2008 at 8:29 am

    Regardless of the above commentary, my definition of a “real estate professional” is not so constrained.

    My definition of a “real estate professional,” and only for myself is this –

    I advocate for and represent my clients’ best interests. I guide and advise as appropriate and necessary; my clients come first. My commission is vital to my success and survival, but it is not my focus. My word is my bond and I will not sacrifice my integrity for anybody or any transaction, even if my survival depends on that sacrifice; the Realtor Code of Ethics is secondary.

  11. Benn Rosales

    June 23, 2008 at 8:49 am

    The license you hold makes this not semantics because it determines by its definations a legal minimum responsibility to consumers and other licensees.

    I am a licensed real estate professional, not a Mortgage Professional because I may help someone get prequalified or apply myself for a real estate loan.

    In saying this does not detract from the fact that one is professional in all that they do.

  12. Mark Harrison

    June 23, 2008 at 9:06 am

    Ben,

    You were a Licenced Real Estate BROKER.

    I am a Professional Landlord. (In the UK licencing sense, not just in terms of how I describe myself.)

    Both of us are “Real Estate Professionals”.

    There is a huge difference between saying:

    1: “We, as Realtors, are Real Estate Professionals”.
    or
    2: “We, as Realtors, are the ONLY Real Estate Professionals. Professional Landlords, Property Managers, Attorneys specialising in Real Estate, Appraisers, Property Developers, and Bankers are NOT Real Estate Professionals.”

    Realtors are salespeople, or brokers…. sales and brokerage is by far from the only part of the industry that can be called a “profession.”

  13. Benn Rosales

    June 23, 2008 at 9:26 am

    We’ll, I am not a Broker, on purpose.

    I am a licensed real estate professional. I am a member of the national association of Realtors.

    Do not misquote me:

    I have never in a million years ever said “because I am a Realtor” – If anything I am using the basic fundamental licensing as a boiler plate bottom line for entry as it requires a professional standard.

    A standard is what seperates the titles (regardless of whether you like the standard set or not).

    I do not believe that I will change your opinions on the matter, so I’ll simply agree here to strongly disagree. =]

  14. Bill Lublin

    June 23, 2008 at 9:51 am

    JIm; I would want your definition to be that of any professional with integrity or perhaps even any honorable man. I think its much broader then our business definition (Maybe thats why I like you so much)

    Mark: Here a Broker’s licence is a class of licence (thanks for giving me the excuse to use the English spelling – it just feels so classy) and agents, and rental managers (who do not have specific licences here in Pennsylvania). Our landlords are not licensed as such in Pennsylvania (though rental licences are required for properties, and business licences are required to collect rents) For that reason, though I understand your point, I would respectfully disagree here in the US. Maybe this is an example of George Bernard Shaw’s famous quote,”America and England, two countries separated by a common language.”

    The differences in the business environment fascinate me, so I hope you don;t mind a couple of questions. Does the Landlord Licence in the UK require specific courses or examinations? Does it vary across the UK? Where in the UK are you?

  15. Benn Rosales

    June 23, 2008 at 10:00 am

    I need to clarify something I said:

    [A] not [the] license would establish the term Professional. That is where the disconnect is and one I would assume if someone wanted to sue you and hold you to that professional standard, that distinction would have to be made.

  16. Heath Coker

    June 23, 2008 at 11:39 am

    I have used “real estate professional” in place of broker/agent. The public often doesn’t understand the difference. Of course, you could also add the further designations of buyer/lister/facilitator/dual/agent|buyer/lister/facilitator/dual/broker, etc. Other parts of the real estate transaction are a more specific with their “title”.

  17. Mark Harrison

    June 23, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    Ben,

    I think there are two different arguments going on.

    1: Should we use the word “Professional” to mean “Licenced.”

    In many areas in life the word “professional” means “does this as their main income” rather than “has a licence”. eg – Professional Actor (vs. local AmDram member), Professional Driver ( = taxi driver, trucker, bus-driver, or even F1 racing driver) as opposed to “someone who just drives him/herself to work and the kids to school.

    For example, I’m lead tenor in my local Church. If I sing for a wedding, I get paid, but that doesn’t make me a “Professional singer” in any meaningful sense.

    However, my friend Richard, who used to play Andre in the UK “Phantom or the Opera” and earns a good living in the Corporate Entertainment circuit by singing at company functions IS a professional singer… even though he has no “licence” as such.

    2: Should we use the word “Professional” to ONLY mean “Realtor”, or should the word apply to ANYONE who is (depending on the answer to question one [“Paid” or “Licenced”]) to work in the sector.

    If we said “licenced”, then “licenced realtor”, “licenced landlord”, “licenced property manager”, “licenced appraiser” could all be “Real Estate Professionals”. (Obviously, only Realtors would be able to describe themselves as “Realtors.”)

    If we say “main income”, then anyone whose main income was Landlording could call themselves as “professional landlord” (to distinguish them from the ranks of the middle class who bought a rental unit or two in the hope it would be a better pension than their pension).

    Your use of the term [A] Licence makes me think that we’re probably broadly in agreement.

    Mark

  18. Benn Rosales

    June 23, 2008 at 12:48 pm

    In the states, you do not have to be a “realtor” to practice real estate, but you must hold a license to be a real estate agent.

  19. Jim Lee

    June 23, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    Here’s what the IRS calls a “real estate professional:

    https://tinyurl.com/4dv56h

    “Qualifications. You qualified as a real estate professional for the year if you met both of the following requirements.

    *More than half of the personal services you performed in all trades or businesses during the tax year were performed in real property trades or businesses in which you materially participated.
    *You performed more than 750 hours of services during the tax year in real property trades or businesses in which you materially participated.”

    Here’s one of Webster’s definitions: “participating for gain or livelihood in an activity or field of endeavor often engaged in by amateurs”

  20. Jay Thompson

    June 23, 2008 at 3:24 pm

    To bastardize Supreme Court Justice Potter Smith’s quote:

    “Professional” may be hard to define, but I know it when I see it.

  21. Matthew Rathbun

    June 23, 2008 at 7:49 pm

    Um, I know that I am dumb and all, but I don’t care what you call yourself, so long as you have a license to do what your doing.

    I want my clients to to call me “honest, helpful and understanding.” I don’t care if they call me a Realtor, Consultant, Salesperson, Real-a-tor,Broker or Jim Bob so long as we meet their goals at the end of the transaction and they feel as if they made the right choice in hiring me to serve them.

    I think that people spend wayyy too much time trying to define themselves as opposed to just doing the job.

    I know that I am the village idiot here, but really you can call it Executive Assistant, Receptionist or Administrative Assistant… if you take notes, answer the phone and get coffee – you’re a secretary and the pay doesn’t change.

  22. Mark Eckenrode

    June 23, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    lively discussion and there’s good points raised regarding degree of knowledge or expertise. but…

    when does the ability to provide a quality of intangible service become a measure?

    sure, joe proagent may know what T’s to cross and how to keep me from being sued but if he’s a jerk… to what degree does mannerisms and intangible service enter the picture?

  23. Bill Lublin

    June 24, 2008 at 3:06 am

    @Jay Thompson – I love it 😉

    @Matthew I have to agree that our satisfaction has to come from doing the job right rather then any title – And I’m glad I wasn’t the only one to notice that all the secretaries disappeared 🙂

    @Mark – Really well made point about comportment in the performance of any set of services. It puts me in mind of an insufferable but exceptionally competent Doctor my wife once visited. Regardless of the quality of his services, he was impossible for us to work with him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business Marketing

Video is necessary for your marketing strategy

(BUSINESS MARKETING) As technology and social media move forward, so do marketing opportunities. Now is the time for video content social media marketing!

Published

on

video content

As an entrepreneur, you’ve surely heard the phrase “pivot to video” countless times over the last few years. It’s the path a lot of media companies are on, but even brands that aren’t directly talking about this pivot have increased their video production. This shift stems in part from studies showing users spend more time on pages featuring video content. Social media has also played a significant role, and recently, new social platforms have made the pivot to video even more important.

Snapchat and TikTok are leading the social video sector as emerging social media platforms, but the audiences for these platforms skew especially young. The content on these platforms also tends toward the meme-worthy and entertaining, raising the question: are these platforms a good use of your time and resources? The answer depends on your industry, but whatever your field, you can certainly learn from the pros dominating these new platforms.

The promotional angle

One of the primary ways that businesses use video content across platforms is by creating promotional content, which range widely in style, cost, and content, but there are a few strategies that can really help a promotional video succeed.

First, a great promotional video hooks the viewer within the first few seconds. Social media has shrunk everyone’s attention span, so even if your video is on a longer form platform, the beginning has to be powerful. Having a strong start also means that your video will be more flexible, allowing it to gain traction across different platforms.

Audience matters

What you’re promoting – what your business does and who it serves – plays a critical role in what kinds of video content you make and what platforms you use. TikTok is a lot of fun, and it’s playing a growing role in business, but if your entire audience is age 30 and up, there’s not much point in trying to master the form and build a viewership there. You need a sufficient youth-heavy market to make TikTok a worthwhile investment, but Snapchat, which also serves a youth-heavy market, might be a different story.

Even if you don’t intend to make heavy use of Snapchat, the platform recently made a big splash in the video sector by opening up its story tools to other platforms. That means businesses will be able to use Snapchat’s tools on platforms like Facebook and Instagram, where they may already have an audience. It will also make crossover content easier, allowing you to maintain consistent branding across all platforms. You may never download Snapchat proper, but you may soon be using their tools.

It’s all about strategy

However you choose to approach video content, the fact is that today video is a necessary part of your content marketing strategy. In part this is because, while blogs aren’t going anywhere, and short-form social media is definitely ascendant, both make use of video, but that’s not the only reason. Video is so powerful because it’s deeply personal. It makes your audience feel that much more closely connected with you and your brand, and that alone is enough to change buying patterns.

Another key advantage of video is that, consumers genuinely enjoy well-made videos. Unlike blogs, which most users will typically only seek out if they need information, there are brands out there who are known for their video content. They’ve found a way to hook viewers and make them feel like they have two products: entertainment and whatever it is they actually sell. You, too, can do this with enough creativity and today’s social media tools.

It’s critical that you don’t let your brand fall behind on video right now, because if you even stop for breath, you will be left behind. As TikTok and Snapchat have made clear, video doesn’t stop for anyone. At this point, video isn’t the future of social media or ecommerce – it’s the present.

Continue Reading

Business Marketing

Marketing amidst uncertainty: 3 considerations

(BUSINESS MARKETING) As the end of the COVID tunnel begins to brighten, marketing strategies may shift yet again – here are three thoughts to ponder going into the future.

Published

on

Open business sign being held by business owner for marketing purposes.

The past year has been challenging for businesses, as operations of all sizes and types and around the country have had to modify their marketing practices in order to address the sales barriers created by the pandemic. That being said, things are beginning to look up again and cities are reopening to business as usual.

As a result, companies are looking ahead to Q3 with the awareness they need to pivot their marketing practices yet again. The only question is, how?

Pandemic Pivot 1.0: Q3 2020

When the pandemic disrupted global markets a year ago, companies looked for new ways to reach their clients where they were: At home, even in the case of B2B sales. This was the first major pivot, back when store shelves were empty care of panic shopping, and everyone still thought they would only be home for a few weeks.

How did this transition work? By building out more extensive websites, taking phone orders, and crafting targeted advertising, most companies actually survived the crisis. Some even came out ahead. With this second pivot, however, these companies will have to use what they knew before the pandemic, while making savvy predictions about how a year-long crisis may have changed customer behavior.

Think Brick And Mortar

As much as online businesses played a key role in the pandemic sales landscape, as the months wore on, people became increasingly loyal to local, brick and mortar businesses. As people return to their neighborhood for longer in-person adventures, brands should work on marketing strategies to further increase foot traffic. That may mean continuing to promote in-store safety measures, building a welcoming online presence, and developing community partnerships to benefit from other stores’ customer engagement efforts.

Reach Customers With PPC

Obviously brick and mortar marketing campaigns won’t go far for all-online businesses, but with people staying at home less, online shops may have a harder time driving sales. Luckily, they have other tools at their disposal. That includes PPC marketing, one of the most effective, trackable advertising strategies.

While almost every business already uses some degree of PPC marketing because of its overall value, but one reason it’s such a valuable tool for businesses trying to navigate the changing marketplace is how easy it is to modify. In fact, best practice is to adjust your PPC campaign weekly based on various indicators, which is what made it a powerful tool during the pandemic as well. Now, instead of using a COVID dashboard to track the impact of regulations on ad-driven sales, however, companies can use PPC marketing to see how their advertising efforts are holding up to customers’ rapidly changing shopping habits.

It’s All About The Platforms

When planning an ad campaign, what you say is often not as important as where you say it – a modern twist on “the medium is the message.” Right now, that means paying attention to the many newer platforms carrying innovative ad content, so experiment with placing ads on platforms like TikTok, Reddit, and NextDoor and see what happens.

One advantage of marketing via smaller platforms is that they tend to be less expensive than hubs like Facebook. That being said, they are all seeing substantial traffic, and most saw significant growth during the pandemic. If they don’t yield much in the way of results, losses will be minimal, but given the topical and local targeting various platforms allow for, above and beyond standard PPC targeting, they could be just what your brand needs as it navigates the next set of marketplace transitions.

The last year has been unpredictable for businesses, but Q3 2021 may be the most uncertain yet as everyone attempts to make sense of what normal means now. The phrase “new normal,” overused and awkward as it is, gets to the heart of it: we can pretend we’re returning to our pre-pandemic lives, but very little about the world before us is familiar, so marketing needs a “new normal,” too.

Continue Reading

Business Marketing

Advertising overload: Let’s break it down

(BUSINESS MARKETING) A new study finds that frequent ads are actually more detrimental to a brand’s image than that same brand advertising near offensive content.

Published

on

Advertising spread across many billboards in a city square.

If you haven’t noticed, ads are becoming extremely common in places that are extremely hard to ignore—your Instagram feed, for example. Advertising has certainly undergone some scrutiny for things like inappropriate placement and messaging over the years, but it turns out that sheer ad exhaustion is actually more likely to turn people off of associated brands than the aforementioned offensive content.

Marketing Dive published a report on the phenomenon last Tuesday. The report claims that, of all people surveyed, 32% of consumers said that they viewed current social media advertising to be “excessive”; only 10% said that they found advertisements to be “memorable”.

In that same group, 52% of consumers said that excessive ads were likely to affect negatively their perception of a brand, while only 32% said the same of ads appearing next to offensive or inappropriate content.

“Brand safety has become a hot item for many companies as they look to avoid associations with harmful content, but that’s not as significant a concern for consumers, who show an aversion to ad overload in larger numbers,” writes Peter Adams, author of the Marketing Dive report.

This reaction speaks to the sheer pervasiveness of ads in the current market. Certainly, many people are spending more time on their phones—specifically on social media—as a result of the pandemic. However, with 31% and 27% of surveyed people saying they found website ads either “distracting” or “intrusive”, respectively, the “why” doesn’t matter as much as the reaction itself.

It’s worth pointing out that solid ad blockers do exist for desktop website traffic, and most major browsers offer a “reader mode” feature (or add-on) that allows users to read through things like articles and the like without having to worry about dynamic ads distracting them or slowing down their page. This becomes a much more significant issue on mobile devices, especially when ads are so persistent that they impact one’s ability to read content.

Like most industries, advertisers have faced unique challenges during the pandemic. If there’s one major takeaway from the report, it’s this: Ads have to change—largely in terms of their frequency—if brands want to maintain customer retention and loyalty.

Continue Reading

Our Great Partners

The
American Genius
news neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list for news sent straight to your email inbox.

Emerging Stories

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!