Friday, December 26, 2025

Unlock AG Pro Today

Why Now?

AG Pro gives you sharp insights, compelling stories, and weekly mind fuel without the fluff. Think of it as your brain’s secret weapon – and our way to keep doing what we do best: cutting the BS and giving you INDEPENDENT real talk that moves the needle.

Limited time offer: $29/yr (regularly $149)
✔ Full access to all stories and 20 years of analysis
✔ Long-form exclusives and sharp strategy guides
✔ Weekly curated breakdowns sent to your inbox

We accept all major credit cards.

Pro

/ once per week

Get everything, no strings.

AG-curious? Get the full-access version, just on a week-to-week basis.
• Unlimited access, no lockouts
• Full Premium archive access
• Inbox delivery + curated digests
• Stop anytime, no hoops

$
7
$
0

Get your fill of no-BS brilliance.

Pro

/ once per year

All in, all year. Zero lockouts.

The best deal - full access, your way. No timeouts, no limits, no regrets.
A year for less than a month of Hulu+
• Unlimited access to every story
• Re-read anything, anytime
• Inbox drop + curated roundups

$
29
$
0

*Most Popular

Full access, no pressure. Just power.

Free
/ limited

Useful, just not unlimited.

You’ll still get the goods - just not the goodest, freshest goods. You’ll get:
• Weekly email recaps + curation
• 24-hour access to all new content
• No archive. No re-reads

Free

Upgrade later -
we’ll be here!

Unlock AG Pro Today

Why Now?

AG Pro gives you sharp insights, compelling stories, and weekly mind fuel without the fluff. Think of it as your brain’s secret weapon – and our way to keep doing what we do best: cutting the BS and giving you INDEPENDENT real talk that moves the needle.

Limited time offer: $29/yr (regularly $149)
✔ Full access to all stories and 20 years of analysis
✔ Long-form exclusives and sharp strategy guides
✔ Weekly curated breakdowns sent to your inbox

We accept all major credit cards.

Pro

/ once per week

Get everything, no strings.

AG-curious? Get the full-access version, just on a week-to-week basis.
• Unlimited access, no lockouts
• Full Premium archive access
• Inbox delivery + curated digests
• Stop anytime, no hoops

$
7
$
0

Get your fill of no-BS brilliance.

Pro

/ once per year

All in, all year. Zero lockouts.

The best deal - full access, your way. No timeouts, no limits, no regrets.
A year for less than a month of Hulu+
• Unlimited access to every story
• Re-read anything, anytime
• Inbox drop + curated roundups

$
29
$
0

*Most Popular

Full access, no pressure. Just power.

Free
/ limited

Useful, just not unlimited.

You’ll still get the goods - just not the goodest, freshest goods. You’ll get:
• Weekly email recaps + curation
• 24-hour access to all new content
• No archive. No re-reads

Free

Upgrade later -
we’ll be here!

California sues Standard & Poor’s for $4 billion

New type of post-housing crash lawsuit

Although the housing crisis took place several years ago, recent news shows its effects still exist today. The state of California has filed a lawsuit against credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s citing the False Claims Act as the basis for the action.

The state of California claims the agency violated this act in its recommendations that mortgage-backed securities were low risk; following this advice, California and several other states invested pension funds in these securities, resulting in later billion dollar losses, much to the dismay of teachers and other public employees whose pensions were affected.

Standard & Poor’s sued for $4 billion in damages

Los Angeles Times report says the state is seeking $4 billion in damages from S&P, as the funds are believed to have been invested based on decisions derived solely from the agency’s ratings and recommendations. Agency ratings are received under the expectation that they are objective and unbiased; however several years later, many other organizations have also received blame for recommending and extending mortgage-backed securities that applicants couldn’t plausibly afford.

The proliferation of these securities resulted in huge losses, and the report states that two of California’s largest pension funds each lost approximately $1 billion in funding.

Similar lawsuits filed

Twelve other states, as well as the U.S. Department of Justice and District of Columbia, have filed similar lawsuits to recover losses that stem from these investments. Filing a lawsuit with the violation of the False Claims Act as the basis is unique in that it holds agencies to the same standard as an advertiser or marketer; these industries are heavily regulated in order to guard against selling products and services under false pretenses to consumers, and some believe that holding credit ratings agencies to these standards is the only way to cut down on the false representations that were regularly promoted

By implementing this same strictness in the investment industry and filing under the False Claims Act, the states are looking to hold agencies accountable for their recommendations and  make them pay careful attention to the risk ratings that they assign. These losses have huge effects on a number of public employees, and state officials are going back to the influencers in the market to seek damages for the sake of those that have been affected by the advice they provided.

Destiny Bennett, Staff Writer
Destiny Bennett is a journalist who has earned double communications' degrees in Journalism and Public Relations, as well as a certification in Business from The University of Texas at Austin. She has written stories for AustinWoman Magazine as well as various University of Texas publications and enjoys the art of telling a story. Her interests include finance, technology, social media...and watching HGTV religiously.
Subscribe
Notify of
wpDiscuz
0
0
What insights can you add? →x
()
x
Exit mobile version