Connect with us

Economic News

Could a trillion dollar coin solve the debt ceiling crisis?

Because of a loophole in minting laws, rumors began swirling that a trillion dollar coin would be minted to solve the debt crisis – is it true? Will it happen?



eb-5 program dollar

trillion dollar coin

Trillion dollar coin: fact or fiction?

There have been numerous discussions of the trillion dollar coin and how it could possible solve the looming debt ceiling problem. If you’re rooting through your wallet wondering why you aren’t in possession of one of these, calm down.

As of now, these coins don’t exist and are only discussed in theory as a possible solution to the U.S. debt problem. However, this past weekend the Treasury shut down any possibility of minting these coins, so it’s back to the drawing board to find another solution. Nonetheless, how did the discussion even begin in the first place?

Trillion dollar coin loophole

There is a limit to how much money the U.S. is permitted to circulate in regards to paper money, as well as gold, silver and copper coins. However, under Title 31 of the United States Code, there is no limit to the amount of platinum coinage the U.S. Treasury makes.

In essence, the Treasury could create trillion dollar coins at its own discretion. The suggested plan recommended the President deposit the coins at the Fed, after which they would be put into the Treasury and used to pay bills and other debts, thereby decreasing the probability of default. However, as proved by the recent rejection of the proposition, such an action by the Treasury would be highly unlikely.

Dispelling consideration of minting the coin

“Congress can pay its bills or it can fail to act and put the nation into default,” wrote White House Press Secretary Jay Carney in a statement released Saturday, further dispelling any serious consideration of minting a trillion dollar coin to solve the debt ceiling problem.

Since no solution was created during the recent fiscal cliff discussions, government officials still have a more than $16 trillion borrowing deficit to grapple with. While interesting to speculate on, a trillion dollar coin will not be the savior to these problems; and if the fiscal cliff negotiations were any indicator, this will take a lot of serious thought and back and forth before an actionable solution is reached.

Destiny Bennett is a journalist who has earned double communications' degrees in Journalism and Public Relations, as well as a certification in Business from The University of Texas at Austin. She has written stories for AustinWoman Magazine as well as various University of Texas publications and enjoys the art of telling a story. Her interests include finance, technology, social media...and watching HGTV religiously.

Continue Reading


  1. JoeLoomer

    January 15, 2013 at 6:53 am

    The global supply of money has already more than doubled in the last twelve years – hence the pretty much global recession. You can’t spend your way out of debt – even if you’ve got a magic money tree.

    Navy Chief, Navy Pride

  2. Gabriel

    January 15, 2013 at 8:05 am

    why dont we just drink ourselves sober lol. i wish i can put my self in debt to pay off more debt Jesus man i dont know if the people running the country are being ignorant or just plain dumb everybody can see that printing magic money will make everything worse as it did to Germany in the 1920’s

  3. Gabriel

    January 15, 2013 at 8:10 am

    its about that time were taxes need to be increased on everybody in order for us to pay off the actual debt if not its just going to keep being pushed back for another day and then when the debt is at an even higher standard our kids and grand kids will be slaves of the government paying off the debt that we accumulated thanks mr. PRESIDENTS for our great treasury system (NOT) it totally sucks its as if its made to fail. we cant even pay off the interest on the money we have already loaned!!!!!

    • Hassan Snap

      January 16, 2013 at 12:54 am

      yeah but taxes need to increase and spending needs to be cut

      • Gabriel

        January 16, 2013 at 11:48 am

        Yeah it sounds bad but its going to happen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economic News

Is the real estate industry endorsing Carson’s nomination to HUD?

(BUSINESS NEWS) Ben Carson’s initial appointment to HUD was controversial given his lack of experience in housing, but what is the pulse now?



NAR strongly backs Dr. Carson’s nomination

When President-Elect Donald Trump put forth Dr. Ben Carson’s name as the nominee for Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, NAR President William E. Brown said, “While we’ve made great strides in recent years, far more can be done to put the dream of homeownership in reach for more Americans.”

At the time of nomination, the National Association of Realtors (the largest trade organization in the nation) offered a positive tone regarding Dr. Carson and said the industry looks forward to working with him. But does that hold true today?

The confirmation hearings yesterday were far less controversial than one would expect, especially in light of how many initially reacted to his nomination. Given his lack of experience in housing, questions seemed to often center around protecting the LGBT community and veterans, both of which he pledged to support.

In fact, Dr. Carson said the Fair Housing Act is “one of the best pieces of legislation we’ve ever had in this country,” promising to issue a “world-class plan” for housing upon his confirmation…

>>>>>Click to continue reading…<<<<<


Continue Reading

Economic News

Job openings hit 14-year high, signaling economic improvement

The volume of job openings is improving, but not across all industries. The overall economy is improving, but not evenly across all career paths.



young executives

job openings

Job openings hit a high point

To understand the overall business climate, the U.S. Labor Department studies employment, today releasing data specific to job vacancies. According to the department’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLT) for April, job openings rose to 5.38 million, the highest seen since December 2000, and a significant jump from March’s 5.11 million vacancies. Although a lagging indicator, it shows strength in the labor market.

The Labor Department reports that the number of hires in April fell to 5 million, which indicates a weak point in the strong report, and although the volume remains near recent highs, this indicates a talent gap and highlights the number of people who have left the labor market and given up on looking for a job.

Good news, bad news, depending on your profession

That said, another recent Department report notes that employers added 221,000 jobs in April and 280,000 in May, but the additions are not evenly spread across industries. Construction jobs rose in April, but dipped in professional and business services, hospitality, trade, and transportation utilities. In other words, white collar jobs are down, blue collar jobs are up, which is good or bad news depending on your profession.

Additionally, the volume of people quitting their jobs was 2.7 million in April compared to the seven-year high of 2.8 million in March. Economists follow this number as a metric for gauging employee confidence in finding their next job.

What’s next

If you’re in the market for a job, there are an increasing number of openings, so your chance of getting hired is improving, but there is a caveat – not all industries are enjoying improvement.

If you’re hiring talent, you’ll still get endless resumes, but there appears to be a growing talent gap for non-labor jobs, so you’re not alone in struggling to find the right candidate.

Economists suspect the jobs market will continue to improve as a whole, but this data does not pertain to every industry.


Continue Reading

Economic News

Gas prices are down, so are gas taxes about to go up?

Do low gas prices mean higher gas taxes are on the way? Budgeting for 2015 just got a bit more complicated, if some politicians have their way.



gas tax


Gas taxes and your bottom line

Many industries rely heavily on time in their vehicle, not just truck drivers and delivery trucks. Sales professionals hop in their vehicles throughout the day, as do many other types of professionals (service providers like plumbers, and so forth). For that reason, gas prices and taxes are a relevant line item that must be budgeted for 2015, but with politicians making the rounds to push for higher gas taxes, budgeting becomes more complicated.

Gas prices are down roughly 50 cents per gallon compared to a year ago, which some analysts say have contributed to more money in consumers’ pockets. Some believe that this will improve holiday sales, but others believe the timing is just right to increase federal taxes on gas. The current tax on gas is 18.40 cents per gallon, and on diesel are 24.40 cents per gallon.


Supporters and opponents are polar opposites

Supporters argue as follows: gas prices are low, so it won’t hurt to increase federal gas taxes, in fact, those funds must go toward improving our infrastructure, which in the long run, saves Americans money because smoother roads mean better gas mileage and less congestion.

Gas taxes have long been a polarizing concept, and despite lowered gas prices, the controversial nature of the taxes have not diminished.

While some are pushing for complete abolition of federal gas taxes, others, like former Pennsylvania Governor, Ed Rendell (D) tell CNBC, “Say that cost the average driver $130 a year. They would get a return on that investment” in safer roads and increased quality of life, he added.

The Washington Post‘s Chris Mooney points out that federal gas taxes have been “stuck” at 18 cents for over 20 years, last raised when gas was barely a dollar a gallon and that the tax must increase not only to improve the infrastructure, but to “green” our behavior, and help our nation find tax reform compromise.

Is a gas tax politically plausible?

Mooney writes, “So, this is not an argument that a gas tax raise is politically plausible — any more than a economically efficient tax on carbon would be. It’s merely a suggestion that — ignoring politics — it might be a pretty good idea.”

Rendell noted, “The World Economic Forum, 10 years ago, rated us the best infrastructure in the world,” adding that we “need to do something for our infrastructure, not in a one or two year period, but over a decade.”

Others would note that this rating has not crumbled in just a few years, that despite many bridges and roads in need of repair, our infrastructure is still superior to even the most civilized nations.

Regardless of the reasons, most believe that Congress won’t touch this issue with a ten-foot pole, especially leading up to another Presidential campaign season starting next year.

“I think it’s too toxic and continues to be too toxic,” Steve LaTourette (the former Republican congressman best known for his close friendship with his fellow Ohioan, Speaker John Boehner) tells The Atlantic. “I see no political will to get this done.”

Whether the time is fortuitous or not, and regardless of the positive side effects, many point to a fear of voters’ retaliation against any politician siding with a gas hike, so this matter going any further than the proposal stage is unlikely.

Continue Reading

Our Great Partners

American Genius
news neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list for news sent straight to your email inbox.

Emerging Stories

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!