Connect with us

Economic News

Trulia says America’s dream of homeownership is not dead, but changed

Published

on

How has the dream of homeownership changed?

As threats of a second recession loom, housing remains a critical wound to the economy and political rhetoric heats up leading up to an election year, real estate practitioners are feeling the heat. Do Americans even care about owning a home any more? According to a Trulia.com study, 70 percent still say that homeownership is still central to their American dream which is unchanged from January despite declining economic conditions.

The dream of homeownership has changed, however, as demand for McMansion sized homes over 3,200 feet has declined 36.5 percent in just the last twelve months. Trulia cites a variety of reasons from environmental awareness, practicality and even the political discussion surrounding removal of the mortgage interest deduction (MID). If the MID is no longer offered to homeowners, it could reduce demand on larger homes which Trulia’s newly appointed Chief Economist, Dr. Jed Kolko said “could be a permanent shift.”

Although Americans still want a home, the dream of mansion living is being removed from the national ethos and being replaced by the idea of more compact, city living and as demand shifts from oversized suburban homes, suburbs won’t end up abandoned, rather, the absorption rate will take longer to recover than urban areas, according to Trulia.

Good news, bad news

The good news highlighted by the study is that there is long term demand for housing as the dream of homeownership is still alive. For example, 59 percent of current renters say they aspire to own and over two thirds of respondents over the age of 55 say they still plan on buying a second home.

The largest obstacle to those wishing to by is saving up for a down payment, according to half of everyone surveyed. This presents a problem on Capitol Hill as Congress has proposed requiring all home buyers to put 20% down. Furthermore, nearly one in three respondents cite job instability as a barrier to their owning a home, pointing out the toll unemployment has taken on housing. Independent of income, 36 percent feared they would not qualify for a mortgage.

Based on current data, Kolko told AGBeat that he expects to see the number of Americans aspiring to own a home to stay flat or increase in the next twelve months, noting there is pent up demand in the youngest demographic, many of whom are not living alone, but with parents which has held back demand and lowered expectations, therefore, demand has been deferred to the future.

The takeaway

Americans still want to own homes, but the dream is that of a smaller footprint, more urban living, and finances are the top obstacle that buyers perceive to be standing in their way. People over 55 still plan on buying a second home, and there is pent up demand with Americans under 34 who do not yet live alone. Housing may be limping, but the future looks hopeful based on the perception consumers have about homeownership- the dream is not dead, it’s just a different dream.

Click to enlarge any of the images below:



Lani is the Chief Operating Officer at The American Genius and sister news outlet, The Real Daily, and has been named in the Inman 100 Most Influential Real Estate Leaders several times, co-authored a book, co-founded BASHH and Austin Digital Jobs, and is a seasoned business writer and editorialist with a penchant for the irreverent.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
30 Comments

30 Comments

  1. Devery Rielly

    September 21, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    I just never understand why everyone keeps referring to the "Proposed" 20% downpayment? CAN WE PLEASE TALK ABOUT RIGHT NOW??? There are plenty of loan programs that require a very small downpayment (3.5%)to none at all. They are great programs – GREAT! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE Tell people about HomePath, tell people about VA, tell people about USDA, tell people about FHA. Quit trying to keep people out of the market by scaring them, misleading them and not truly helping them. I would love for a day to go by where I don't have to "dispell" the myths about home ownership that are out there and perpetuated by so called experts in our industry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economic News

Is the real estate industry endorsing Carson’s nomination to HUD?

(BUSINESS NEWS) Ben Carson’s initial appointment to HUD was controversial given his lack of experience in housing, but what is the pulse now?

Published

on

NAR strongly backs Dr. Carson’s nomination

When President-Elect Donald Trump put forth Dr. Ben Carson’s name as the nominee for Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, NAR President William E. Brown said, “While we’ve made great strides in recent years, far more can be done to put the dream of homeownership in reach for more Americans.”

At the time of nomination, the National Association of Realtors (the largest trade organization in the nation) offered a positive tone regarding Dr. Carson and said the industry looks forward to working with him. But does that hold true today?

The confirmation hearings yesterday were far less controversial than one would expect, especially in light of how many initially reacted to his nomination. Given his lack of experience in housing, questions seemed to often center around protecting the LGBT community and veterans, both of which he pledged to support.

In fact, Dr. Carson said the Fair Housing Act is “one of the best pieces of legislation we’ve ever had in this country,” promising to issue a “world-class plan” for housing upon his confirmation…

>>>>>Click to continue reading…<<<<<

#CarsonHUD

Continue Reading

Economic News

Job openings hit 14-year high, signaling economic improvement

The volume of job openings is improving, but not across all industries. The overall economy is improving, but not evenly across all career paths.

Published

on

young executives

job openings

Job openings hit a high point

To understand the overall business climate, the U.S. Labor Department studies employment, today releasing data specific to job vacancies. According to the department’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLT) for April, job openings rose to 5.38 million, the highest seen since December 2000, and a significant jump from March’s 5.11 million vacancies. Although a lagging indicator, it shows strength in the labor market.

bar
The Labor Department reports that the number of hires in April fell to 5 million, which indicates a weak point in the strong report, and although the volume remains near recent highs, this indicates a talent gap and highlights the number of people who have left the labor market and given up on looking for a job.

Good news, bad news, depending on your profession

That said, another recent Department report notes that employers added 221,000 jobs in April and 280,000 in May, but the additions are not evenly spread across industries. Construction jobs rose in April, but dipped in professional and business services, hospitality, trade, and transportation utilities. In other words, white collar jobs are down, blue collar jobs are up, which is good or bad news depending on your profession.

Additionally, the volume of people quitting their jobs was 2.7 million in April compared to the seven-year high of 2.8 million in March. Economists follow this number as a metric for gauging employee confidence in finding their next job.

What’s next

If you’re in the market for a job, there are an increasing number of openings, so your chance of getting hired is improving, but there is a caveat – not all industries are enjoying improvement.

If you’re hiring talent, you’ll still get endless resumes, but there appears to be a growing talent gap for non-labor jobs, so you’re not alone in struggling to find the right candidate.

Economists suspect the jobs market will continue to improve as a whole, but this data does not pertain to every industry.

#JobOpenings

Continue Reading

Economic News

Gas prices are down, so are gas taxes about to go up?

Do low gas prices mean higher gas taxes are on the way? Budgeting for 2015 just got a bit more complicated, if some politicians have their way.

Published

on

gas tax

gas-tax

Gas taxes and your bottom line

Many industries rely heavily on time in their vehicle, not just truck drivers and delivery trucks. Sales professionals hop in their vehicles throughout the day, as do many other types of professionals (service providers like plumbers, and so forth). For that reason, gas prices and taxes are a relevant line item that must be budgeted for 2015, but with politicians making the rounds to push for higher gas taxes, budgeting becomes more complicated.

Gas prices are down roughly 50 cents per gallon compared to a year ago, which some analysts say have contributed to more money in consumers’ pockets. Some believe that this will improve holiday sales, but others believe the timing is just right to increase federal taxes on gas. The current tax on gas is 18.40 cents per gallon, and on diesel are 24.40 cents per gallon.

bar

Supporters and opponents are polar opposites

Supporters argue as follows: gas prices are low, so it won’t hurt to increase federal gas taxes, in fact, those funds must go toward improving our infrastructure, which in the long run, saves Americans money because smoother roads mean better gas mileage and less congestion.

Gas taxes have long been a polarizing concept, and despite lowered gas prices, the controversial nature of the taxes have not diminished.

While some are pushing for complete abolition of federal gas taxes, others, like former Pennsylvania Governor, Ed Rendell (D) tell CNBC, “Say that cost the average driver $130 a year. They would get a return on that investment” in safer roads and increased quality of life, he added.

The Washington Post‘s Chris Mooney points out that federal gas taxes have been “stuck” at 18 cents for over 20 years, last raised when gas was barely a dollar a gallon and that the tax must increase not only to improve the infrastructure, but to “green” our behavior, and help our nation find tax reform compromise.

Is a gas tax politically plausible?

Mooney writes, “So, this is not an argument that a gas tax raise is politically plausible — any more than a economically efficient tax on carbon would be. It’s merely a suggestion that — ignoring politics — it might be a pretty good idea.”

Rendell noted, “The World Economic Forum, 10 years ago, rated us the best infrastructure in the world,” adding that we “need to do something for our infrastructure, not in a one or two year period, but over a decade.”

Others would note that this rating has not crumbled in just a few years, that despite many bridges and roads in need of repair, our infrastructure is still superior to even the most civilized nations.

Regardless of the reasons, most believe that Congress won’t touch this issue with a ten-foot pole, especially leading up to another Presidential campaign season starting next year.

“I think it’s too toxic and continues to be too toxic,” Steve LaTourette (the former Republican congressman best known for his close friendship with his fellow Ohioan, Speaker John Boehner) tells The Atlantic. “I see no political will to get this done.”

Whether the time is fortuitous or not, and regardless of the positive side effects, many point to a fear of voters’ retaliation against any politician siding with a gas hike, so this matter going any further than the proposal stage is unlikely.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

The
American Genius
News neatly in your inbox

Join thousands of AG fans and SUBSCRIBE to get business and tech news updates, breaking stories, and MORE!

Emerging Stories