Connect with us

Opinion Editorials

Ideologies at battle: from Kennedy’s era to today

With the upcoming elections, some are looking backwards as a means of looking forward – comparing the ideologies of yesteryear compared to today which is fascinating, especially as it pertains to progressive ideas and pitting people against each other.



Coining terms

Citizens of TakerNation are of fond of calling their ideology ‘progressive.’ It’s a tactic used by all sides of the political spectrum. Define something as positive in nature so as to effectively demonize those who disagree. A recent historical example was Lyndon Johnson’s now infamous War on Poverty. Those who read history without filters now realize there are more Americans ‘living’ in poverty now than in the mid 1960s when LBJ so bravely declared war.

To be against his ‘war’ was to be for poverty, or at the least against its elimination.

Those against Johnson’s program were, in fact, only objecting to his strategy, not his goal. ‘Course that was never clarified in the press, as it quickly became  ProducerNation’s moral obligation to turn their pockets inside out while simultaneously screaming ‘Come and get it!’ to those who weren’t as ‘lucky’ as they’d obviously been. After all, poverty is almost always a matter of circumstances. It’s never a result of human behavior. The transfer of wealth from Producers to Takers would fix everything. It was so exciting. Blah blah blah.

TakerNation apologists deal with the obvious truth of their ‘war’s’ complete and abject failure by one of two techniques. They either rewrite history — or they say not enough money was thrown at the problem. It never dawns on ’em that it’s human behavior that produces wealth originally, and human behavior that produces poverty. At least that’s true in a relatively free society/culture allowing it’s citizens to choose how the spend their time.

America is such a place.

When limited to fighting in the arena of ideas, Takers are 0-for-history. If they can’t use personal attacks, rewrite history, change the subject, or my all time fav, answer uncomfortable questions with questions, their ideas die ugly deaths. It’s always been so.

An example is how the 20th century proved over and over again how we humans will modify our behavior when government takes significantly less of our hard earned paychecks. The Office of Management and Budget shows empirically that our economy has either flourished, or recovered from recession then flourished, after decent sized income tax cuts. In fact, as a direct consequence of markedly lowered taxes, both personal and business, the actual tax dollars collected by the Treasury increases. It’s happened every time it’s been tried. Don’t believe me, believe OMB. They’ve been irritating both sides for decades with their numbers.

Yet, Takers will argue everything but their own idea and its notable historic failures. They’ll attack their opponent’s idea tooth and nail. They’ll make up ‘facts’ as they go. But they won’t simply enter the arena of ideas and defend their own ideology sans the aforementioned diversions.

Why is that?

The answer is both simple and historically documented. Their ideas about economics fail every time they’ve been tried. They can’t get around that fact, and they know it. It’s failed around the world, and is failing now in our own economy. It’s exactly because they know this to be true, that they cannot and will not ever debate their ideology head to head. It’s like coming to a gunfight with a rubber knife.

Want the most recent empirically historic example?

When President Carter’s initial four years were coming to an end, his TakerNation economic policies had wreaked their inevitable, and therefore easily predictable devastation. Massive unemployment, ruinous double digit inflation, and truly onerous taxes. And still he reprimanded Americans for their ‘malaise’. Yeah, that’s the ticket. It’s malaise causing all this economic pain, not my ideology or its economic policies.

When the 1980 election campaign began in earnest, then Governor Reagan was about 20 points behind President Carter in almost all credible polls. Reagan, focused like a laser beam, insisted the campaign be about nothing BUT ideas. When forced into the arena of ideas, Carter had nothing in retort but his version of, ‘Oh yeah?!’. He was crushed that first Tuesday in November of 1980. Incredibly, he was greatly surprised. Not only was he a Kool-Aid drinker, apparently he also had his own recipe.

Much as JFK did in the summer of 1962, Reagan took the ProducerNation approach, which is raising revenue to the Treasury by seriously reducing both personal and business income taxes. Since the campaign was, for the most part limited to the arena of ideas, American voters discerned the obvious, putting Reagan in the White House via the aforementioned landslide.

Instead of quoting Reagan, or showing some of the debates’ ‘give ‘n takes’, here is one of TakerNation’s iconic leaders making manifest his ideas on what causes downtrodden economies to flourish. JFK was articulately brief in the explanation of his proposed personal and corporate tax cuts. Flourishing his idea-weapons in the televised arena of ideas, he took just over two minutes to rout any and all opponents. He stayed on point, no diversions, no slight of hand, just the facts. He was magnificent.

Here it is — decide for yourself. Oh, and for the record? Kennedy got the results he predicted. 

Ideas strung together make up ideologies.

When ideologies go to battle, mano a mano so to speak, with only ideas to brandish as weapons, there are the victors and the vanquished. Whenever TakerNation ideology has entered the arena of ideas, it hasn’t been pretty. This is why we all know the coming election campaign must include numerous diversions. When you’re wielding rubber knives at a gunfight, you have no choice.

Jeff Brown specializes in real estate investment for retirement, has practiced real estate for over 40 years and is a veteran of over 200 tax deferred exchanges, many multi-state. Brown is a second generation broker and works daily with the third generation. With CCIM training and decades of hands on experience, Brown's expertise is highly sought after, some of which he shares on his real estate investing blog.

Continue Reading


  1. wes moore

    March 20, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    Jeff – you’re terrific. Thank you for this.

  2. Al Lorenz

    March 20, 2012 at 12:25 pm

    What’s the big idea? Just kidding, nicely put.

  3. Arn

    March 21, 2012 at 12:44 am

    Jeff, right on. Your distinction between goal and strategy is right on the money. As an example, let’s take global warming or climate change. This issue is spoken of in black and white – you either are Green or you are a flat-earther. The argument isn’t whether one acknowledges earth temp and CO2 levels are increasing. Those are facts. The debate is over 1) how dire is the problem? Will the current trend continue? After all Earth climate has been changing since Day 1 way before there were humans. 2) what is the time frame? 3) to what degree do we disrupt our existing economy? 4) how much money should the government spend pushing Green? 5) what is the probability these much ballyhooed Green technologies will provide any significant amount of energy? I believe most people are for cleaner energy technologies. The question is : how much do we invest in unproven technologies? To what degree do the current jobs and economy take precedence over Green? Understanding it may prove that NONE of these technologies work? Or they may have unintended consequences? Electricity is made from coal plants and hydroelectric sources (2 things HATED by Green) If we get rid of gas and go to more electric, demand for electric will go up – can we generate more electricity without negative results. The answer to many of these questions is WE DON’T KNOW. But if one does not buy Green hook line and sinker, you are a flat-earther ie stupid or a DENIER. Time to st this nonsense.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion Editorials

7 ways to carve out me time while working from home

(OPINION / EDITORIAL) It can be easy to forget about self-care when you’re working from home, but it’s critical for your mental health, and your work quality.



Woman in hijab sitting on couch, working from home on a laptop

We are all familiar with the syndrome, getting caught up in work, chores, and taking care of others, and neglecting to take care of ourselves in the meantime. This has always been the case, but now, with more people working from home and a seemingly endless lineup of chores, thanks to the pandemic. There is simply so much to do.

The line is thinly drawn between personal and professional time already, with emails, cell phones, and devices relentlessly reaching out around the clock, pulling at us like zombie arms reaching up from the grave. Working from home makes this tendency to always be “on” worse, as living and working take place in such close proximity. We have to turn it off, though.

Our brains and bodies need down time, me-time, self-care. Carving out this time is one of the kindest and most important things you can do for yourself. If we can begin to honor ourselves like this, the outcome with not only our mental and physical health, but also our productivity at work, will be beneficial. When we make the time to do things we love, our body untenses, our mind’s gears slow down that constant grinding. Burnout behooves nobody.

Our work will also benefit. Healthier, happier, more well rested, and well treated minds and bodies can work wonders! Our immune systems also need this, and we need our immune systems to be at their peak performance this intense season.

I wanted to write this article, because I have such a struggle with this in my own life. I need to print it out and put it in my workspace. Last week, I posted something on my social media pages that so many people shared. It is clear we all need these reminders, so I am paying it forward here. The graphic was a quote from Devyn W.

“If you are reading this, release your shoulders away from your ears, unclench your jaw, and drop your tongue from the roof of your mouth.”

There now, isn’t that remarkable? It is a great first step. Let go of the tension in your body, and check out these ways to make yourself some healing me-time.

  1. Set aside strict no-work times. This could be any time of day, but set the times and adhere to them strictly. This may look like taking a full hour for lunch, not checking email after a certain hour, or committing to spending that time outdoors, reading, exercising, or enjoying the company of your loved ones. Make this a daily routine, because we need these boundaries. Every. Single. Day.
  2. Remember not to apologize to anyone for taking this me-time. Mentally and physically you need this, and everyone will be better off if you do. It is nothing to apologize for! Building these work-free hours into your daily schedule will feel more normal as time goes on. This giving of time and space to your joy, health, and even basic human needs is what should be the norm, not the other way around.
  3. Give yourself a device-free hour or two every day, especially before bedtime. The pinging, dinging, and blinging keeps us on edge. Restful sleep is one of the wonderful ways our bodies and brains heal, and putting devices away before bedtime is one of the quick tips for getting better sleep.
  4. Of course, make time for the things you absolutely love. If this is a hot bath, getting a massage, reading books, working out, cooking or eating an extravagant meal, or talking and laughing with a loved one, you have to find a way to get this serotonin boost!
  5. Use the sunshine shortcut. It isn’t a cure-all, but sunlight and Vitamin D are mood boosters. At least when it’s not 107 degrees, like in a Texas summer. But as a general rule, taking in at least a good 10-15 minutes of that sweet, sweet Vitamin D provided by the sun is good for us.
  6. Spend time with animals! Walk your dog, shake that feathery thing at your cat, or snuggle either one. Whatever animals make you smile, spend time with them. If you don’t have pets of your own, you could volunteer to walk them at a local shelter or even watch a cute animal video online. They are shown to reduce stress. Best case scenario is in person if you are able, but thankfully the internet is bursting with adorable animal videos, as a backup.
  7. Give in to a bit of planning or daydreaming about a big future trip. Spending time looking at all the places you will go in the future and even plotting out an itinerary are usually excellent mood-boosters. It’s a bit different in 2020, as most of us aren’t sure when we will be able to go, but even deciding where you want to go when we are free to travel again can put a positive spin on things.

I hope we can all improve our lives while working from home by making time for regenerating, healing, and having fun! Gotta run—the sun is out, and my dog is begging for a walk.

Continue Reading

Opinion Editorials

Why robots freak us out, and what it means for the future of AI

(OPINION / EDITORIAL) Robots and humans have a long way to go before the social divide disappears, but research is giving us insight on how to cross the uncanny valley.



Close of R2D2 toy, an example of robots that we root for, but why?

We hate robots. Ok, wait, back up. We at least think they are more evil than good. Try it yourself – “are robots” in Google nets you evil before good. Megatron has higher SEO than Optimus Prime, and it’s not just because he’s so much cooler. It cuz he evil, cuz. It do be like that.

It’s not even a compliment to call someone robotic; society connotes this to emotionless preprogrammed shells of hideous nothing, empty clankbags that walk and talk and not much else. So, me at a party. Or if you’re a nerd, you’re a robot. (Me at a party once again.)

Let’s start by assuming robots as human-like bipedal machines that are designed with some amount of artificial intelligence, generally designed to fulfill a job to free up humanity from drudgery. All sounds good so far. So why do they creep us out?

There’s a litany of reasons why, best summed up with the concept of the uncanny valley, first coined by roboticist Masahiro Mori (Wow he’s still alive! The robots have not yet won) in 1970. Essentially, we know what a human is and how it looks and behaves against the greater backdrop of life and physics. When this is translated to a synthetic being, we are ok with making a robot look and act like us to a point, where we then notice all the irregularities and differences.

Most of these are minor – unnaturally smooth or rigid movements, light not scattering properly on a surface, eyes that don’t sync up quite right when they blink, and several other tiny details. Lots of theories take over at this point about why this creeps us out. But a blanket way to think about it is that our expectation doesn’t match what we are seeing; the reality we’re presented with is off just enough and this makes us uncomfortable .

Ever stream a show and the audio is a half second off? Makes you really annoyed. Magnify that feeling by a thousand and you’re smack in the middle of the uncanny valley. It’s that unnerving. One possible term for this is abjection, which is what happens the moment before we begin to fear something. Our minds – sensing incompatibility with robots – know this is something else, something other , and faced with no way to categorize this, we crash.

This is why they make good villains in movies – something we don’t understand and given free will and autonomy, potentially imbued with the bias of a creator or capable of forming terrifying conclusions all on its own (humans are a virus). But they also make good heroes, especially if they are cute or funny. Who doesn’t love C3PO? That surprise that they are good delights us. Build in enough appeal to a robot, and we root for them and feel empathy when they are faced with hardships. Do robots dream of electric sheep? Do robots have binary souls? Bits and zeros and ones?

Professor Jaime Banks (Texas Tech University’s College of Media & Communication) spends a lot of time thinking about how we perceive robots. It’s a complex and multifaceted topic that covers anthropomorphism, artificial intelligence, robot roles within society, trust, inherently measuring virtue versus evil, preconceived notions from entertainment, and numerous topics that cover human-robot interactions.

The world is approaching a future where robots may become commonplace; there are already robot bears in Japan working in the healthcare field. Dressing them up with cute faces and smiles may help, but one jerky movement later and we’ve dropped all suspension.

At some point, we have to make peace with the idea that they will be all over the place. Skynet, GLaDOS in Portal, the trope of your evil twin being a robot that your significant will have to shoot in the middle of your fight, that episode of Futurama where everything was a robot and they rose up against their human masters with wargod washing machines and killer greeting cards, the other Futurama episode where they go to a planet full of human hating murderous robots… We’ve all got some good reasons to fear robots and their coded minds.

But as technology advances, it makes sense to have robots take over menial tasks, perform duties for the needy and sick, and otherwise benefit humanity at large. And so the question we face is how to build that relationship now to help us in the future.

There’s a fine line between making them too humanlike versus too mechanical. Pixar solved the issue of unnerving humanoids in their movies by designing them stylistically – we know they are human and accept that the figure would look odd in real life. We can do the same with robots – enough familiarity to develop an appeal, but not enough to erase the divide between humanity and robot. It may just be a question of time and new generations growing up with robots becoming fixtures of everyday life. I’m down for cyborgs too.

Fearing them might not even be bad, as Banks points out: “…a certain amount of fear can be a useful thing. Fear can make us think critically and carefully and be thoughtful about our interactions, and that would likely help us productively engage a world where robots are key players.”

Also, check out Robot Carnival if you get the chance – specifically the Presence episode of the anthology.

Continue Reading

Opinion Editorials

4 simple tips to ease friction with your boss while working remotely

(OPINION / EDITORIAL) Find it challenging to get along with your boss while working from home? Here are a few things you can try to ease the tension.



Woman stressed over laptop in remote work.

Most people probably feel like their relationship with their boss is fine. If you’re encountering friction with your boss for any reason, though, remote work will often exacerbate it—this is one instance where distance doesn’t necessarily make the heart grow fonder. Here are a few ways to remove some of that friction without adding to your boss’ overflowing plate.

According to CNN, determining the problem that exists between you and your boss should be your first step. There’s one caveat to consider, however: Your boss’ boundaries. Problem-solving on your own time is fine, but demanding more of your boss’ time—especially when you’re supposed to be working—may compound the issue.

An easy way around this is a low-impact communique—e.g., an email—sent at the beginning or end of the workday. Since that’s a more passive communication style that takes only a minute or two out of your day, it’s less likely to frustrate your boss further.

If ironing out the issue isn’t your prerogative for now, examining your boss’ parameters for success is another place to start. Does your boss prefer to receive multiple updates throughout the day, or do they want one summative report each morning? Do you respect your boss’ preferred communication styles? These are important questions to ask during remote work. If you find yourself reaching out more than necessary, for example, it may be time to cut back.

It can also be difficult to satiate your boss if you don’t know their expectations. If you’re able to speak to them about the expectations regarding a project or task, do it; clarifying the parameters around your work will always help both of you. It is worth noting that some supervisors may expect that you know your way around some types of responsibilities, though, so err on the side of complementing that knowledge rather than asking for comprehensive instructions.

Finally, keep in mind that some bosses simply don’t communicate the same way you do. I’ve personally been blessed with a bevy of nurturing, enthusiastic supervisors, but we’ve all had superiors who refuse to acknowledge our successes and instead focus on our failures. That can be a really tough mentality to work with during remote periods, but knowing that they have a specific communication style that hampers their sociability can help dampen the effects.

As always, communication is key—even if that means doing it a little bit less than you’d like.

Continue Reading

Our Great Partners

American Genius
news neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list for news sent straight to your email inbox.

Emerging Stories

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!