Connect with us

Ethics

Define for me if you will… “Raising the Bar”

Published

on

The 2007 Dogwood Track Classic was held at Lannigan Field at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, VA on April 28, 2007.

Alienation or Amelioration?

It’s been a catch phrase since my first day of licensing class… I remember distinctly the instructor saying, “We need to increase professionalism in this industry and good education is the key.”  He then proceeded to ask each student to read a section of the proceeding chapters out loud.   And that’s what we did for sixty hours.  We read out loud, had some nominal discussions about agency and then took a test.  All the while being reassured the the licensing program had little to do with actually practicing Real Estate – great.  What a waste of potential time to influence the next wave of practitioners…

Now I am an educator and have also served clients both as an agent and broker.  I have worked with some of the best and the worst the industry has to offer, but all the while I’ve heard and participated in talk about “Raising the Bar”. This is almost always on the heals of an agent getting scorned in some way.  At some juncture an agent finds something unfair or unsettling about a transaction or practice and shares it with anyone who will hear.  Will they gossip and complain about it? Yes.  Will they reduce it to writing and put their name to it?  Rarely.

The concern I have today is that many people who declare that the “Bar” needs to be raised aren’t utilizing that tools that are out there to actually bring some change to the practice of another agent.  I’ve heard the rationale of inaction, but sometimes I don’t think it’s justified.  Could it hurt your future dealings – maybe.  Could it label you as a tattle-tale – probably.  Will it make you any friends – never.  Regardless, the real aspiration to change is usually in direct proportion for potential repercussion of indiscretion. 

Therefore I am left with the question:  Why would a group of people who have the ability to pursue justice desire to not do so and then ask for more regulation?  Wouldn’t more requirements simply be just more rules to infringe upon with no real deterrent? Or is it that many would simply like the requirements of education to be higher in order to dissuade individuals from getting or keeping a license thus eliminating competition without the need for actual action?

How High(or low) will You Go?

Mandatory Education as a tool against nefarious action is myth.  Mandatory Education as a tool to increase professionalism is a scheme without foundation. People will swim across dry deserts if they think there is an easy reoccurring six figure income at the end.  You can increase pre-licensing education all you want, but without actually using the time to teach something of value it’s pointless.  Mandating excessive educational requirements in the hope that problematic people will go away, is a waste of good legislation.  We can mandate 100’s of hours a year of education for REALTORS®, but all you will have are weary and bitter practitioners in your classrooms… Yeah, that’s a great learning environment.  Covering Fair Housing for three hours every year, when it hasn’t changed in my state since 1988, is a great waste of time.  Look, I’m not knocking Fair Housing training.  Frankly, I think it’s one of the most important issues we sometimes face – but, it hasn’t changed.  If you limit someone’s right to live peacefully, because of their color – you’re an idiot and nothing in my lecture is going to change that.  This point is compounded by the fact that only 2% (according to some reports) of Fair Housing violation deal with Residential Sales (83% of practitioners) and deals mainly with rentals (4% of agents).  Only enforcement of the rules will dissuade you from acting that way, not laboring that point with people who aren’t misbehaving.

Giving educators more time in the front-end of licensing will help to better prepare the agent, if we’re allowed to use that time for budgeting, marketing, business planning, professional development etc.  I’m all for that. That better prepares the agent to go serve the pubic – but it wont’ make them more responsive, more ethical or change their desire to put money before people. 

At what point do we stop ‘Raising the Bar”?  Is it when there is such a high requirement of mandatory education and manure to wade thru that you can’t possible have time to actually find and work with a client.  This industry is highly regulated – it’s simply that no one is initiating the process.

The Case Against Mandatory Education

I am all for education – it’s the silver bullet that sets us apart from one another.   However, some jurisdictions have taken this too far and have enacted or proposed regulations to make education something agents will resent and not embrace. 

Some of the worst white collar offenders are highly educated people.  That education just gave them the tools to steal more money, than those who weren’t as highly educated.  Way back when I worked in IT, my primary clients were schools.  I remember vividly the conversations amongst the teachers talking about the crappy performance of most of the teachers in the system.  In one long conversation the teachers pointed out that those educators with Masters Degrees and PhDs were so full of theories that there were no longer relevant to today’s learners.  (I don’t think that’s always the case, but I’ve personally been bored more often that not with the uber-educated.)  Every industry has good and bad employees…

There is something in people that makes them ideally suited for jobs they do well.  It’s the perfect aggregate of personality, intuitiveness and desire to do well.  Without the desire to do well, REALTORS® will continue to give poor service – that is not something we can change.

The higher the demands on mandatory education, the more it will push agents to take the path of least resistance.  They will go to the online schools that allow you to get 10 hours of credit for 25 minutes of reading and a quiz.  What will that accomplish?

No REALTOR® Left Behind

It dawns on me that Public School system as given the “No Student Left Behind” edict and has taken the actually learning process out, in order to ensure passing a test.  We’ve done the same with vocational education.  Many educators no longer even try to teach Critical Thinking Skills.  They simply read or lecture what’s given, never trying to help the REALTOR® actually put the pieces together.

Doesn’t the Infinite Monkey Theorem tell us that given enough time and enough monkeys that they could type the works of Shakespeare?  I don’t want to be trapped into to actually getting the attention of an agent in a learning environment, and then have to drill drivel about basic agency theories every year. Let’s make education count and not use it as a broadsword to sweep away competition.  Let’s use it as a tool to mold learners.  

The Real Answer

So as not to be accused of not wanting to increase professionalism, I want to be very clear.  I am of the opinion that professionals need to be held accountable and that we have a lot of growth to be done in this industry.  That said, the answer in my opinion is enforcement.  No one knows better than an agent what is legal and acceptable practices.  Why shouldn’t they also be the primary defense of the consumer against those agents who do not adhere to regulations? 

If agents do not want to be accountable to hold others accountable than the only other option is to increase licensing fees and hire people to do field reviews of transactions – but warned…  It’s been my experience that virtually no agent has practiced without a mistake somewhere.  The issues with investigators is that the will hunt to find something that will justify their existence – you’ve been warned.

I think clearer regulations, more agents holding others accountable and Brokers being made to suffer the same consequence as an agent who causes malice are all better steps to improving the industry than simply making people hate to get training…

What do YOU think will make a difference?

Matthew Rathbun is a Virginia Licensed Broker and Director of Professional Development for Coldwell Banker Elite, in Fredericksburg Virginia. He has opened and managed real estate firms, as well as coached and mentored agents and Brokers. As a Residential REALTOR®, Matthew was a high volume agent and past REALTOR® Rookie of the Year & Virginia Association Instructor of the Year. You can follow him on Twitter as "MattRathbun" and on Facebook. Matthew's blog is TheAgentTrainer.com.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
25 Comments

25 Comments

  1. Bob

    September 23, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    Ethics and moral behavior is a moving target, so you cannot depend on increased professionalism as a governor.

    I agree that enforcement is the key. There needs to be a deterrent to doing what is wrong, especially when trusted with something that carries the financial consequences (both good and bad) as real estate.

    The concept of ‘raising the bar’ only works if failing to clear it means falling on the bed of nails beneath it.

  2. Matt Stigliano

    September 23, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    Matthew – On the issue of “policing ourselves” I’m curious to see what your take is on this…

    I went for a listing appointment. One of my first ever. Didn’t get the listing. It went to another agent. That agent then used a little trickery to reset the cumulative days on market counter (moving the home to a different, but similar address for a short period of time – the address was so similar that it looked the same if you were reading it, but showed up on a different spot on the map). The home had languished on the market at a lower price and this particular agent cleared the records and then (gasp) raised the price. Had the listing history been there, no one would have wanted to buy that house at it’s new price, but since it was no longer an issue…

    (The house has not sold to this day.)

    Of course, I was a bit bitter because I had lost the listing, but the more I thought about it, the more I got frustrated by the other agent “not playing by the rules.” So I went to the board with it. After three weeks, they still couldn’t understand what the problem was. I drew it out for them, sent them a detailed email of how it occurred, sent them MLS numbers and links supporting my complaint – everything. And they still couldn’t see it. It was plain as day to everyone else (agents) who saw it.

    The problem was that the people at the board that were to deal with the issue didn’t even understand how the MLS worked or how this could be possible. So nothing was ever done, because in the end, I had a business to run and couldn’t spend another hour on the phone with someone who couldn’t understand how to look up and compare two properties (that were actually the same thing).

    It was frustrating to say the least and my first experience with dealing with something like that. I have not sworn off “policing” when necessary, but have not had the most confident response to it in the first place.

    So I’m curious to see what your solution would have been.

  3. Lani Rosales

    September 23, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    @mattrathbun you hit the nail on the head here of one of the things that drives me absolutely effing insane about the real estate industry… too many “raise the bar” screams but little enforcement. Like you, I don’t think over policing is the answer but shoring up the existing infrastructure is.

    Although I can’t remember the name of the city, there is a New England town that sits atop a massive water supply line that is so decrepit and old that they cannot empty it to repair it because the pressure of the water is holding it together. Surrounding cities with good infrastructures are screaming that infrastructure money for the state should be devoted to mandating solar panels on all homes while this one particular town could potentially be eternally flooded and destroyed if not somehow repaired.

    That is kind of how I see the “raising the bar” issue- it’s a bellow of the yarping masses that equates to screaming for solar panels. Great, hug a tree, hippie, but my house might be completely underwater for eternity if a problem I didn’t create that no one knows the cure to becomes disastrous.

    So what is the answer? Revitalizing the existing infrastructure of the real estate industries starting with massive audits of instructors and teaching methods all the way down to allowing anonymous complaints to the board (with the burden of proof being on the complaint lodger). Holding brokers to a higher standard to enforce the bar is the easiest solution, however and also the least likely as the industry standard is still to be a slash and burn recruiting model.

    I don’t know, Matt, there’s not a realistic answer and the “police yourself” thing is a freakin joke- tell a crackhead not to smoke the crack you conveniently left on the counter and walk out and just SEE if you don’t come back to a crackless counter and a dude licking your walls and rearranging your furniture.

  4. Matthew Rathbun

    September 23, 2009 at 10:00 pm

    Matt,

    That’s a great question, but I think you answered your own question. It’s not that there wasn’t enforcement options, but it was that you didn’t feel the issue arose to the level that it was more important to pursue your other work than to spend the time to write the complaint.

    I would imagine that your state has regulations against deceptive or misleading marketing, if not the Code of Ethics does. So even if the MLS committee was a bunch of wing-nuts, there were still options for you.

    You decided directly or indirectly that your energy was better spent elsewhere. That’s ok… Not ever battle is yours. But the burden of proof of a potential infraction should be yours to put together – otherwise we just have people filing complaints just to harass you and investigators spinning their wheels on complaints with no basis; all the while detracting their attention from honest-to-goodness issues.

    Lani,

    The policing-yourselves may be a joke… but it is what is. With the exception of sting operations, most of America’s justice system is based on someone needing to sign a complaint somewhere. There may be some independent police work to the contrary; but the vast majority of those law enforcement actions still require a victim or witness to call the Police to file a report or to go to the magistrate and swear out a warrant. I can’t call 911 and say that someone just beat the crap out of me, hang up and never to speak to someone expecting that the assailant will get found arrested and disciplined without my involvement.

  5. Dan Connolly

    September 23, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    @Matthew, this is a great post! You have really hit the bulls eye. I am tired of the endless calls for more education and higher entry fees. Ethics can’t be force fed. I have always felt that either you believe it and live it or you don’t. No amount of education will change that belief, but fear of punishment may change the behavior and give the same result.

    @Lani Wow you can really paint a picture! “just SEE if you don’t come back to a crackless counter and a dude licking your walls and rearranging your furniture.”

  6. Matthew Rathbun

    September 23, 2009 at 10:10 pm

    @laniar @Dan… Honestly I had to re-read her “licking the walls” comment to make sure that was really a “w”… #justsayin you never know what may come out of her keyboard

  7. Bill Lublin

    September 23, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    Matt R. great post but , with all due respect, you really don;t provide credit for the efforts of the pro standards committees in every associaiton in the country. Those are people that are devoted to raising the bar – and they work on it all the time

    Matt S. Go back to your board and make a formal complaint that the agent violated Article 12 of the Code of Ethics – that’s the “true picture” article of the code – If the agent failed to present a true picture in thier representations to the public, they can be found in violation of the code – If you need help framing the complaint just call me or DM me on twitter – but you have the basis of a legit complaint – which the hearing panel may or may not determine constitutes a violation of the code – but that’s due process –

    Lani – The enforcement mechanism for our industry is not the crack addicts, they’re the five-oh – the po-po – the Professional Standards committees – and they’re generally not the bad guys – just use them – its why they volunteer
    😉

  8. Jim Duncan

    September 23, 2009 at 11:48 pm

    I’ve said my piece on this several times, but I’ll say it again here, with an example.

    I was in a recent meeting with a bunch of top Realtors, discussing this very issue. I asked the dozen or so Realtors in the room how many had ever *ever* filed an ethics complaint. Only one raised his hand.

    Until we get our leaders to buy into the “policing our own” façade, how can we expect “boots on the ground” Realtors to abide by either the ethics or the policing option?

    Another example – in a Realtor board of 10k+ agents, last year there were 40 ethics complaints, ~ 10 of which were filed by the public. Does anyone think that there are so few violations?

    The system is broken.

    All I can do is lead by example.

  9. Jillayne Schlicke

    September 24, 2009 at 12:14 am

    A code of ethics with no sanctions for violations is like having no code of ethics at all.

    The Bar association has a test that lasts for 5 days. One entire day is devoted only to a test on ethics. They ruthlessly self-regulate. When an attorney violates one of their code provisions, there’s a formal system in place to gather all the facts, etc. We offer members a mandatory 3 hour class every four years.

    Regulating ethical conduct takes time and money. If an industry wants to raise the bar on professional conduct and ethics, then the industry should be prepared to pay their due$ in order to raise the professional conduct for all.

    All attorneys must be a member of a state Bar.

    Not all real estate agents are required to be a member of their state assoc of Realtors.

    These changes can happen gradually but they must come from within the profession itself.

    Yes there will always be sociopaths in any profession much like what Lani describes. It is up to that profession to quickly identify them and kick them out.

    Sometimes they are the top producers…..

    Bill and Matthew are right. Realtors need to be educated on the long term (good) consequences of the minor time invested to make the industry better.

    There are many paths to follow.

    Here’s another suggestion. What about creating a mentorship system where new agents would be mentored for the first X number of years of their career? We’ve moved away from having sales managers or any kind of supervision of agents nowadays and I think we have a decade’s worth of agents who could use a Realtor Code of Ethics mentor, one on one.

    So many times I hear Realtors in class saying “that’s not ethical!” when talking about what one agent is doing. However, maybe that person’s conduct actually is ethical but the first Realtor was missing some key facts. When people talk WITH each other directly, without some scary enforcement mechanism looming overhead, we might see that instead of ethics problems we have communications problems instead.

  10. Paula Henry

    September 24, 2009 at 12:18 am

    Lani – only you could make me laugh at such a serious issue.
    Policing ourselves is a grand idea, but in practicality leaves the complainant open to retaliation by their peers.

    The answer IS to “keep on fighting” but like Matt S. said, at some point, you still have to do business. Of course, you could continue the fight and the other agent gets a slap on the wrist, a warning or nothing and you have wasted hours trying to fix an obvious problem.

    My own experience has been the powers that be like to hold up the “self policing proclamation”, while deciding who has to play by the rules.

    Regardless of how many times we write about it, the truth is, the process is time consuming and hinders our business.

  11. Matthew Rathbun

    September 24, 2009 at 6:29 am

    There are all great points. Let me give you three other thoughts not in my post…

    a.) The “Code of Ethics” is a inherently bad title. I cannot regulate “ethical” behavior… They are in fact a standard of practice, but I cannot make you ethical in a three hour class every two years. All I can do is teach you NAR’s rules of conduct. Too many times agents come to me with gripes about another agents such as “they never return phone calls” or “the other agent was just rude”. Those aren’t violations, they are bad business practices…or lack of “professional courtesy” There’s really no way to regulate that and it appears in every aspect of life.

    b.) The peer based NAR Professional Standards system is a good concept, but occasionally those panels are woefully under prepared. Our Association works hard at finding experienced and educated folks, but not all Associations do. I’d like to see a two day very demanding annual re certification program for all professional standards members. That’s just me…

    c.) I don’t know if anyone is doing this, but I’d like to see a highly trained state investigator in every local jurisdiction who is able to take on some of the ongoing issues, do random spot checks for Brokerage compliance and investigate complaints, using the complainant as a witness. Then taking the matter to the Pro Standards Committee or Real Estate Board for a hearing. It’s expensive and will terrorize even the good agents, but it’s the only option (IMHO) other than what we’re doing…

  12. Joe Sheehan

    September 24, 2009 at 8:01 am

    Responsibility also lies with brokers who’s primary interest is to fill seats with warm bodies.

    How about a little due diligence?

    I’ve sat on both sides of the interview desk on many occasions through my career. It’s OK to ask prospective agents questions. News travels fast in our industry.If there are anecdotes or gossip about someone’s ethics, ask them about it. Ask them for their side of the story. If they can’t adequately account for their behavior, send them down the street.

    If the brokers skillfully interview agents, they can keep the charlatans out before they commit ethics violations.

  13. Ken Brand

    September 24, 2009 at 10:08 am

    What a sticky-wicket. I don’t have anything brilliant to add to your points and those of the commenters.

    What does come to mind, is the nightmare of enforcement. Suppose next Monday all offenders were reported. I don’t know all the rules, but I guess they get a hearing. That means a jury. That means jury duty for someone. If it’s a committee member, will they have the time. What about an appeals process. I imagine an eventual lawsuit against the Board, restraint of trade, etc. would materialize and slow the enforcement process.

    It’s a freak’n mess for sure. I am encouraged by the evolving ability for consumers to rate their agents. Consumer power is the mightiest.

    Great points all….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ethics

The problem with a self-policing industry: you have to be a narc

Ethics violations in the real estate industry can make or break a Realtor’s career, depending on the severity, so it would stand to reason that all would be mindful of the rules, but there are always individuals in the field that act as if the Code of Ethics is irrelevant.

Published

on

An animated discussion on ethics training

“Does anyone else find it ironic that NAR – the trade association for Realtors – has to mandate that members take an ethics class every four years?” An agent who attended one of my company’s broker opens yesterday posed that question to the wine and cheese grazing attendees. Of course, that opened up an animated discussion on the value of etchics training and the lack of enforcement when the rules are violated.

One agent volunteered that the guy sitting next to her in her last ethics class played games on his cell phone and then cheated during the test at the end of the class. Seriously, dude? You cannot even pay attention long enough to pass what should be the easiest test you’ll ever have to take in your career? Perhaps he was just seeing how far he could push it by cheating during an ethics test, to see if anyone else around him caught the extreme irony there. None of the other agents around him – including the agent he cheated off – turned him in and the instructor didn’t notice.

This same agent later called one of my sellers and tried to convince him to break a listing contract with me, because he had a “guaranteed buyer” in the wings. The seller was an attorney, and this bozo tried to get me cut out of the deal, offering the seller a reduced fee to dump me. The seller held firm and directed the agent to call me, then the seller called to let me know about the conversation.

“But you know if you file something the other agent will know.”

It gets better. After the deal closed, I requested paperwork from our local Board of Realtors to file an ethics complaint. The person in charge said, “But you know if you file something the other agent will know.” Gee. Really? I asked her to send the paperwork over anyway.

I called the seller/attorney and asked him to repeat the conversation to me, because I was documenting it to file a complaint. He turned wishy washy on me at that point and his story changed from “The other agent tried to get me to dump you as the listing agent to cut you out” to “Well he really only asked a few questions and I told him to call you. He probably didn’t mean any harm by it.” So there goes my star witness, who doesn’t want to rock the boat.

I didn’t file the complaint. I resorted to the “turn the blind eye but never trust the sleazeball again” path. And that is what happens to almost all ethics issues I hear about / see in person.

That’s what happens when you have a self-policing group of “professionals” who would rather not “narc” on a fellow agent. After all you’re probably going to end up on the other side of a deal from this guy some day, right? The guy in my example has sold two of my houses since that run-in. Why tick him off by filing a complaint and going through all that hassle? If he stops bringing buyers to my properties then my sellers ultimately lose, right?

Boiling down the CoE

The NAR Code of Ethics takes up pages and pages of tiny print, and it runs each year in their trade magazine (I think it’s the January issue). Does anybody read that? Probably not many. I’d argue none of us ever should have to read it again. Simply follow this advice instead. The thousands of words in the Code boil down to one thing: Do unto other agents, and consumers, and clients, what you would have them do unto you. It’s the Golden Rule. Simple. Well, obviously not, for many agents and brokers.

The sad part is the agent in my example had no clue how close I was to filing that compaint, and if he did know he’d probably scratch his head and wonder why his actions were “wrong.” Making us take a one-day class every few years won’t “make” the unethical agents suddenly operate ethically. Most of them just don’t get it.

Continue Reading

Ethics

Ethics hearings in private a disservice to consumers?

Published

on

Fight Club and real estate

For those of you that saw the movie ‘Fight Club’ you’ll remember that Rule #1 is “You do not talk about fight club,” followed closely by Rule #2, “You DO NOT talk about fight club.” Which, believe it or not, brings me to today’s topic: The Real Estate Code of Ethics and Arbitration. Article 17 obligates Realtors to resolve fights disputes with another Realtor through arbitration (not litigation). Arbitration is conducted at the local board level, and I am not aware of a local board that doesn’t require arbitration to be confidential.

I respect that public internecine warfare amongst Realtors isn’t in the interest of our industry, and doesn’t belong in the public spotlight. I’m not here to advocate the collective airing of our dirty laundry. That said, I wonder if our collective agreement to keep our concerns confidential can inadvertently harm the consumer and ultimately makes all of us look a little shoddier?

To find the first arbitration guidelines created by NAR and distributed as a set of suggested rules for boards to follow, we have to travel all the way back in time to 1929. NAR’s first Code of Ethics & Arbitration Manual wasn’t created until 1973, and it credited a 1965 California Association of Realtors version as its model.

Appalling conduct

I can think of two instances in the past year where I was so appalled by the conduct of a fellow Realtor that I went to the trouble to inquire about how to lodge a Code of Ethics complaint with my local board. After weighing the time required to make a competent complaint and comparing it with the best case outcome (a closed-to-the-public hearing in which they were found to have violated the code of ethics), I decided not to pursue a complaint in both cases. My association’s bylaws (and probably yours) give it the power to discipline any member based on the results of a Code of Ethics hearing, “provided that the discipline imposed is consistent with the discipline authorized by the Professional Standards Committee of the National Association of REALTORS® as set forth in the Code of Ethics and Arbitration Manual of the National Association.”

“Sanctioning Guidelines” – (Appendix VII of Part 4 of the 2011 manual for the very curious), guides member boards to impose disciplinary consequences that are progressive and fair, taking all considerations into account. Sample first-time disciplinary actions include suggestions of a letter of warning, a fine (amounts range from $200 to $5,000 depending on the severity of the violation), and attendance at relevant education sessions. Not to sound defeatist, but a confidential letter of warning and a fine of around $200 doesn’t seem like an outcome worth investing much of my time in.

Practicing in the internet era

Given that we live and work in the internet era, and review sites like Yelp abound, it seems a bit odd to me that a local board might know of an agent with problem behavior that is documented yet choose to make that information unavailable to consumers. My understanding is that the results of a code of ethics hearing are confidential with disclosure authorized in a few situations, none of which deal with informing the public.

Many of my fellow colleagues feel that the best response to a bad agent is to be patient and give them enough time to work themselves out of business. I can respect and understand their hands-off approach. But what about the damage that individual does to our industry as a whole? While we whisper, warn in confidence and know amongst ourselves how awful they are, the public doesn’t get the benefit of our perspective. Deprived of it, they turn to consumer review sites like Yelp.

How do you think we, as an industry, can help consumers in their quest to find a trustworthy agent?

Continue Reading

Ethics

Realtors, we really need to get over ourselves already

Published

on

A letter from the child of a Realtor.

Real estate now vs. 1987

In Real Estate, some things are always changing, like financing, education, laws, rules and technology. The two that will always remain constant, as long as they are within the law, are following our clients’ directions, and working with their best interests in mind.  I’m not sure we always follow through with this, though.

Some of us knowingly take over priced listings.  Some of us take listings that are out of our area of expertise.  Some of us won’t show short sales or REOs.  Some of us won’t show homes with low co-op splits.  Some of us don’t have Supra/e-Keys, and miss out on those listings entirely.

Putting our interests first

When these things occur we are putting our own interests first, not our clients’.  We may think that by having as many listings as possible is a good thing, that’s what we’re taught after all, isn’t it?  It may not matter that some are overpriced, eventually, whether one month or four months down the line, the price will be reduced.  It’s just a matter of time and money, for our clients, after all.  The same can be said when we take listings outside our area of expertise, just to add on to our inventory.  If we don’t know what we’re doing, on a short sale listing, for example, it will only cost our clients a lot of time and money.  A lot.

By eliminating certain houses our clients see, that may already fit their criteria, we’re taking away their choices.  Distressed sales account for close to 40% of the market.  This is probably higher in some local markets.  There is no legitimate way to ignore roughly 1/3 of the homes being sold.  Co-op fees are often a touchy subject, especially when they are, not “enough.”  If everyone utilized a Buyer Broker Agreement that stipulated what their fee was, the issue would take care of itself.  Not being able to access listings with the use of Supra/e-Keys is a choice.   Choosing not purchase one will mean agents will not be able to access Fannie Mae (and eventually, probably additional Gov REO homes) along with the listings that are already using them.

Our priorities versus theirs

We totally need to get over ourselves already.  We are not bigger than our clients.  Our priorities are not more important than theirs when it comes to the actual listing and selling of homes.

Recently, my awesome parents dug through a few boxes and rounded up one of my first art projects. About 25 years ago I did the poster featured above about my Mom, and her Real Estate career.  It was for an Open House (no pun, honest!!!) for the elementary school where I attended first grade.  It was just, what she did according to me way back then.  Things are way more complicated now, than when I was six.  There’s a heck of a lot more paperwork for one.  But the same basic principle still applies.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Our Great Partners

The
American Genius
news neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list for news sent straight to your email inbox.

Emerging Stories

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!