Appeals court rejects dismissal
Barely two weeks after Bank of America-owned Countrywide settled with the U.S. Department of Justice for $335 for steering minorities into costlier loans, the largest residential discriminiation settlement in U.S. history, the lender has had another legal setback. Today, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in California ordered Countrywide to face a lawsuit by Victor and Belen Balderas, a Hispanic couple alleging they were pressured to refinance their home without their translator present, and were not allowed to cancel their refinancing as allowed under the federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA), according to Reuters.
In a written opinion, Judge Kozinski said the lower court was wrong to dismiss the complaint. The couple said a Countrywide broker called them out of the blue, pressuring them to switch to a mortgage they could not afford but would allow them to cash out $50,000, based on documents overstating their income by over $40,000 and showed up at their house the same night for signatures, allegedly refusing to leave or reschedule so their translator could help decipher the documents they did not understand. Court documents show the broker spent six hours applying “unrelenting pressure” until they finally signed after midnight, only to rescind the next day after they learned what they had actually signed, which under TILA they are allowed to do but were allegedly denied.
Judge Kozinski said it was premature to reject the couple’s claims that they were not properly advised of their rights regarding rescission and that they were entitled to prove that Countrywide did not allow them to keep copies of the relevant disclosures that the broker had them sign then took with him. In his written opinion, Judge Kozinski said, “it defies both the purposes of the TILA and common sense” to accept that signatures on documents they could not understand proved proper notice. “When you have pizza delivered, you don’t sign for it and let the deliveryman take it back to the restaurant,” the judge wrote. “And when a newspaper boy delivers a paper, he doesn’t show you the headlines and then return it to the printer.”
Austin tops the list of best places to buy a home
When looking to buy a home, taking the long view is important before making such a huge investment – where are the best places to make that commitment?
Looking at the bigger picture
(REALUOSO.COM) – Let us first express that although we are completely biased about Texas (we’re headquartered here, I personally grew up here), the data is not – Texas is the best. That’s a scientific fact. There’s a running joke in Austin that if there is a list of “best places to [anything],” we’re on it, and the joke causes eye rolls instead of humility (we’re sore winners and sore losers in this town).
That said, SelfStorage.com dug into the data and determined that the top 12 places to buy a home are currently Texas and North Carolina (and Portland, I guess you’re okay too or whatever).
They examined the nerdiest of numbers from the compound annual growth rate in inflation-adjusted GDP to cost premium, affordability, taxes, job growth, and housing availability.
“Buying a house is a big decision and a big commitment,” the company notes. “Although U.S. home prices have risen in the long term, the last decade has shown that path is sometimes full of twists, turns, dizzying heights and steep, abrupt falls. Today, home prices are stabilizing and increasing in most areas of the U.S.”
Average age of houses on the rise, so is it now better or worse to buy new?
With aging housing in America, are first-time buyers better off buying new or existing homes? The average age of a home is rising, as is the price of new housing, so a shift could be upon us.
The average home age is higher than ever
(REALUOSO.COM) – In a survey from the Department of Housing and Urban Development American Housing Survey (AHS), the median age of homes in the United States was 35 years old. In Texas, homes are a bit younger with the median age between 19 – 29 years. The northeast has the oldest homes, with the median age between 50 – 61 years. In 1985, the median age of a home was only 23 years.
With more houses around 40 years old, the National Association of Realtors asserts that homeowners will have to undertake remodeling and renovation projects before selling unless the home is sold as-is, in which case the buyer will be responsible to update their new residence. Even homeowners who aren’t selling will need to consider remodeling for structural and aesthetic reasons.
Prices of new homes on the rise
Newer homes cost more than they used to. The price differential between new homes and older homes has increased from 10 percent traditionally to around 37 percent in 2014. This is due to rising construction costs, scarcity of lots, and a low inventory of new homes that doesn’t meet the demand.
Are Realtors the real loser in the fight between Zillow Group and Move, Inc.?
The last year has been one of dramatic and rapid change in the real estate tech sector, but Realtors are vulnerable, and we’re worried.
Why Realtors are vulnerable to these rapid changes
(REALUOSO.COM) – Corporate warfare demands headlines in every industry, but in the real estate tech sector, a storm has been brewing for years, which in the last year has come to a head. Zillow Group and Move, Inc. (which is owned by News Corp. and operates ListHub, Realtor.com, TopProducer, and other brands) have been competing for a decade now, and the race has appeared to be an aggressive yet polite boxing match. Last year, the gloves came off, and now, they’ve drawn swords and appear to want blood.
Note: We’ll let you decide which company plays which role in the image above.
So how then, does any of this make Realtors the victims of this sword fight? Let’s get everyone up to speed, and then we’ll discuss.
1. Zillow poaches top talent, Move/NAR sues
It all started last year when the gloves came off – Move’s Chief Strategy Officer (who was also Realtor.com’s President), Errol Samuelson jumped ship and joined Zillow on the same day he phoned in his resignation without notice. He left under questionable circumstances, which has led to a lengthy legal battle (wherein Move and NAR have sued Zillow and Samuelson over allegations of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and misappropriation of trade secrets), with the most recent motion being for contempt, which a judge granted to Move/NAR after the mysterious “Samuelson Memo” surfaced.
Salt was added to the wound when Move awarded Samuelson’s job to Move veteran, Curt Beardsley, who days after Samuelson left, also defected to Zillow. This too led to a lawsuit, with allegations including breach of contract, violation of corporations code, illegal dumping of stocks, and Move has sought restitution. These charges are extremely serious, but demanded slightly less attention than the ongoing lawsuit against Samuelson.
2. Two major media brands emerge
Business Entrepreneur1 week ago
Entrepreneurs face higher rates of mental illness [part one]
Business Entrepreneur1 week ago
Many entrepreneurs facing mental health issues don’t get help [part two]
Business Marketing4 days ago
The use of offline marketing can still be advantageous in a digital world
Business News3 days ago
How to apply to be on a Board of Directors
Business Finance1 week ago
Follow these 7 steps to get outstanding invoices paid to you ASAP
Opinion Editorials2 days ago
3 reasons to motivate yourself to declutter your workspace (and mind)
Tech News2 weeks ago
Sometimes tech is a sight for sore eyes – others it’s the cause of them
Business Entrepreneur1 day ago
Having client difficulties? Protect yourself with an exit strategy clause