“We wanted to make a deposit.”
“We wanted to make a deposit. Unfortunately they don’t want to take our deposit,” Boston resident Lisa Hines said of the ten large black trash bags residents collected from a deteriorating foreclosed home owned by Bank of America. This morning, 15 volunteers spent two hours cleaning up the Boston property and transported the trash to a local Bank of America Branch, chanting “Bank of America, bad for America” as they attempted to make their “deposit.”
Trash ranged from tree limbs to toys, an abandoned television from the yard and a gutter that was hanging from the house. Residents were frustrated at the deteriorated property, noting the blight is not only an eyesore and unsafe, but they fear it will lower their home values as buyers judge the neighborhood and assume it is rundown because of the Bank of America owned vacant property.
Bank of America says they had recently sent in workers to clean up the property, but residents say the home still has furniture, toys and trash in the home, but some leaves might have been raked.
A peaceful protest to make a point
Protesters knew that local branch might not be charged with the property and police showed up when the chanting drew out the branch manager who protesters said politely listened yet refused the “deposit.” Protestors posed for local media with the trash, loaded the bags up and left peacefully.
“It was just very energizing to feel like you’re making a difference and doing something,” Hines told the Boston Globe. She added that Malden residents will help with a similar protest in Everett next month. “Basically they need to be accountable for their property. They foreclosed on these people, they wouldn’t renegotiate their mortgage, they kicked them out, and the place is overgrown and it’s a mess. The message is: Take care of your property. If you’re going to kick people out and you’re not going to let people stay there and take care of their own property, they should take care of that.”
A Bank of America spokesperson said that they “take immediate action” when contacted at fieldservices.bankofamerica.com when any of their one million plus properties is in disrepair.
Austin tops the list of best places to buy a home
When looking to buy a home, taking the long view is important before making such a huge investment – where are the best places to make that commitment?
Looking at the bigger picture
(REALUOSO.COM) – Let us first express that although we are completely biased about Texas (we’re headquartered here, I personally grew up here), the data is not – Texas is the best. That’s a scientific fact. There’s a running joke in Austin that if there is a list of “best places to [anything],” we’re on it, and the joke causes eye rolls instead of humility (we’re sore winners and sore losers in this town).
That said, SelfStorage.com dug into the data and determined that the top 12 places to buy a home are currently Texas and North Carolina (and Portland, I guess you’re okay too or whatever).
They examined the nerdiest of numbers from the compound annual growth rate in inflation-adjusted GDP to cost premium, affordability, taxes, job growth, and housing availability.
“Buying a house is a big decision and a big commitment,” the company notes. “Although U.S. home prices have risen in the long term, the last decade has shown that path is sometimes full of twists, turns, dizzying heights and steep, abrupt falls. Today, home prices are stabilizing and increasing in most areas of the U.S.”
Average age of houses on the rise, so is it now better or worse to buy new?
With aging housing in America, are first-time buyers better off buying new or existing homes? The average age of a home is rising, as is the price of new housing, so a shift could be upon us.
The average home age is higher than ever
(REALUOSO.COM) – In a survey from the Department of Housing and Urban Development American Housing Survey (AHS), the median age of homes in the United States was 35 years old. In Texas, homes are a bit younger with the median age between 19 – 29 years. The northeast has the oldest homes, with the median age between 50 – 61 years. In 1985, the median age of a home was only 23 years.
With more houses around 40 years old, the National Association of Realtors asserts that homeowners will have to undertake remodeling and renovation projects before selling unless the home is sold as-is, in which case the buyer will be responsible to update their new residence. Even homeowners who aren’t selling will need to consider remodeling for structural and aesthetic reasons.
Prices of new homes on the rise
Newer homes cost more than they used to. The price differential between new homes and older homes has increased from 10 percent traditionally to around 37 percent in 2014. This is due to rising construction costs, scarcity of lots, and a low inventory of new homes that doesn’t meet the demand.
Are Realtors the real loser in the fight between Zillow Group and Move, Inc.?
The last year has been one of dramatic and rapid change in the real estate tech sector, but Realtors are vulnerable, and we’re worried.
Why Realtors are vulnerable to these rapid changes
(REALUOSO.COM) – Corporate warfare demands headlines in every industry, but in the real estate tech sector, a storm has been brewing for years, which in the last year has come to a head. Zillow Group and Move, Inc. (which is owned by News Corp. and operates ListHub, Realtor.com, TopProducer, and other brands) have been competing for a decade now, and the race has appeared to be an aggressive yet polite boxing match. Last year, the gloves came off, and now, they’ve drawn swords and appear to want blood.
Note: We’ll let you decide which company plays which role in the image above.
So how then, does any of this make Realtors the victims of this sword fight? Let’s get everyone up to speed, and then we’ll discuss.
1. Zillow poaches top talent, Move/NAR sues
It all started last year when the gloves came off – Move’s Chief Strategy Officer (who was also Realtor.com’s President), Errol Samuelson jumped ship and joined Zillow on the same day he phoned in his resignation without notice. He left under questionable circumstances, which has led to a lengthy legal battle (wherein Move and NAR have sued Zillow and Samuelson over allegations of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and misappropriation of trade secrets), with the most recent motion being for contempt, which a judge granted to Move/NAR after the mysterious “Samuelson Memo” surfaced.
Salt was added to the wound when Move awarded Samuelson’s job to Move veteran, Curt Beardsley, who days after Samuelson left, also defected to Zillow. This too led to a lawsuit, with allegations including breach of contract, violation of corporations code, illegal dumping of stocks, and Move has sought restitution. These charges are extremely serious, but demanded slightly less attention than the ongoing lawsuit against Samuelson.
2. Two major media brands emerge
Business Marketing2 weeks ago
Coworkers are not your ‘family’ [unpopular opinion]
Business News2 weeks ago
Everyone should have an interview escape plan
Business Finance6 days ago
Freelancers: How to get away from billing hourly
Opinion Editorials7 days ago
How strong leaders use times of crises to improve their company’s future
Tech News5 days ago
Hiding from facial recognition is a booming business
Business Entrepreneur2 weeks ago
Why and how to acquire a business – 4 tips for radical success
Tech News5 days ago
Spike helps you stay on top of website issues before they happen
Tech Gadgets1 week ago
Recording your smartphone’s screen is easier than you think