The road to a housing recovery
Although housing continues to present mixed signals, Trulia has offered a major vote of confidence in the sector, today retiring the Trulia Housing Barometer which they’ve measured since February 2012, rounding up construction starts, existing home sales, delinquencies and foreclosures relative to their worst point during the crash and their long-term, pre-bubble “normal” levels. As of August, Trulia reports the housing recovery is 67 percent back to normal, the highest level since the recession.
Leaving on a high note as the housing recovery begins to really gain traction (although not in “recovered” mode yet, only little more than half way there), Trulia reports this month’s index is led by improvements in sales, but welcome news is that delinquency and foreclosure rates that fell 8.86 percent to their lowest level in over five years, putting them squarely at 60 percent back to normal.
New home sector still down, existing sales way up
Additionally, the recovery is fueled by construction starts which rose 1.0 percent from July to 891,000, fully 40 percent back to normal. New home construction was the hardest hit sector, between restrictive financing for builders and buyers, and painful uncertainty in policy changes and unemployment. While 40 percent is the lowest read of the Barometer, it is improvement, nonetheless.
Existing home sales rose to their highest level in six and a half years, hitting 5.48 million, 99 percent of the way back to their normal 5.5 million level, even though foreclosures and short sales still make up roughly one eighth of all existing home sales.
A nod to Keynes
“When we created the Housing Barometer eighteen months ago,” Trulia Chief Economist, Dr. Jed Kolko, said, “all measures of the housing recovery were far from normal. Since then, the recovery has surged ahead in many ways but languished in others. Existing home sales are 99% back to normal, while construction is just 40% back to normal. Tracking the recovery’s progress as a single number is not the best approach anymore.”
Dr. Kolko noted that a great economist (possibly Keynes) once asked: “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?” Asserting that the facts have changed, Trulia will be announcing a new approach to tracking the progress of the housing recovery.
Austin tops the list of best places to buy a home
When looking to buy a home, taking the long view is important before making such a huge investment – where are the best places to make that commitment?
Looking at the bigger picture
(REALUOSO.COM) – Let us first express that although we are completely biased about Texas (we’re headquartered here, I personally grew up here), the data is not – Texas is the best. That’s a scientific fact. There’s a running joke in Austin that if there is a list of “best places to [anything],” we’re on it, and the joke causes eye rolls instead of humility (we’re sore winners and sore losers in this town).
That said, SelfStorage.com dug into the data and determined that the top 12 places to buy a home are currently Texas and North Carolina (and Portland, I guess you’re okay too or whatever).
They examined the nerdiest of numbers from the compound annual growth rate in inflation-adjusted GDP to cost premium, affordability, taxes, job growth, and housing availability.
“Buying a house is a big decision and a big commitment,” the company notes. “Although U.S. home prices have risen in the long term, the last decade has shown that path is sometimes full of twists, turns, dizzying heights and steep, abrupt falls. Today, home prices are stabilizing and increasing in most areas of the U.S.”
Average age of houses on the rise, so is it now better or worse to buy new?
With aging housing in America, are first-time buyers better off buying new or existing homes? The average age of a home is rising, as is the price of new housing, so a shift could be upon us.
The average home age is higher than ever
(REALUOSO.COM) – In a survey from the Department of Housing and Urban Development American Housing Survey (AHS), the median age of homes in the United States was 35 years old. In Texas, homes are a bit younger with the median age between 19 – 29 years. The northeast has the oldest homes, with the median age between 50 – 61 years. In 1985, the median age of a home was only 23 years.
With more houses around 40 years old, the National Association of Realtors asserts that homeowners will have to undertake remodeling and renovation projects before selling unless the home is sold as-is, in which case the buyer will be responsible to update their new residence. Even homeowners who aren’t selling will need to consider remodeling for structural and aesthetic reasons.
Prices of new homes on the rise
Newer homes cost more than they used to. The price differential between new homes and older homes has increased from 10 percent traditionally to around 37 percent in 2014. This is due to rising construction costs, scarcity of lots, and a low inventory of new homes that doesn’t meet the demand.
Are Realtors the real loser in the fight between Zillow Group and Move, Inc.?
The last year has been one of dramatic and rapid change in the real estate tech sector, but Realtors are vulnerable, and we’re worried.
Why Realtors are vulnerable to these rapid changes
(REALUOSO.COM) – Corporate warfare demands headlines in every industry, but in the real estate tech sector, a storm has been brewing for years, which in the last year has come to a head. Zillow Group and Move, Inc. (which is owned by News Corp. and operates ListHub, Realtor.com, TopProducer, and other brands) have been competing for a decade now, and the race has appeared to be an aggressive yet polite boxing match. Last year, the gloves came off, and now, they’ve drawn swords and appear to want blood.
Note: We’ll let you decide which company plays which role in the image above.
So how then, does any of this make Realtors the victims of this sword fight? Let’s get everyone up to speed, and then we’ll discuss.
1. Zillow poaches top talent, Move/NAR sues
It all started last year when the gloves came off – Move’s Chief Strategy Officer (who was also Realtor.com’s President), Errol Samuelson jumped ship and joined Zillow on the same day he phoned in his resignation without notice. He left under questionable circumstances, which has led to a lengthy legal battle (wherein Move and NAR have sued Zillow and Samuelson over allegations of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and misappropriation of trade secrets), with the most recent motion being for contempt, which a judge granted to Move/NAR after the mysterious “Samuelson Memo” surfaced.
Salt was added to the wound when Move awarded Samuelson’s job to Move veteran, Curt Beardsley, who days after Samuelson left, also defected to Zillow. This too led to a lawsuit, with allegations including breach of contract, violation of corporations code, illegal dumping of stocks, and Move has sought restitution. These charges are extremely serious, but demanded slightly less attention than the ongoing lawsuit against Samuelson.
2. Two major media brands emerge
Business News2 weeks ago
Brutally honest list of reasons you didn’t get the job interview or job offer
Business Entrepreneur4 days ago
How to effectively share negative thoughts with your business partner
Business Entrepreneur2 weeks ago
6 simple self-care tips to keep any busy entrepreneur sane
Business News2 weeks ago
5 factors driving the reshoring movement in America
Business News1 week ago
The future of work from home will be a hybrid, says Google CEO
Business Entrepreneur2 weeks ago
The success of your business could be tied to your succession plan
Business Finance7 days ago
Did… the US government just agree to start funding a cryptocurrency?
Tech News2 weeks ago
Google plans to make YouTube an integrated e-commerce destination