“Where does it end?”
Guess who now owns even more of Bank of America’s disastrous mortgage portfolio? You do, America. Because Fannie Mae is not a government sponsored entity, you own Fannie and because Fannie just bought the servicing rights to a substantial amount of bad loans from Bank of America, you just gave a sneaky backdoor bailout to BoA.
“Where does it end?” asks Fortune Magazine’s Abigail Field. Fannie Mae bought the loans for more than $500 million, despite BoA getting more bailout funds from the government (as part of TARP) than any other bank. According to the Wall Street Journal, an undisclosed number of loans were purchased by Fannie, but prior to the sneaky bailout, “seven million loans [were] still causing the most problems.”
BoA has had a tough year with failing loans, federal, state and homeowner lawsuits, and stock that that has taken a 40% nosedive in 2011 alone, putting them in the position to need to raise capital. Enter your tax dollars, but not in the traditional form of TARP funds.
Field noted, “the $500 million is surely more than the servicing rights are worth in an arms-length transaction. How do we know? Beyond the comment that the loans are expected to “deteriorate further,” the goal of the intervention can only be to fix Bank of America’s capital structure, which is easier for the government to do if it overpays for the rights.”
Buying up defaulted loans is normal, but in this case? Not so much.
The purchase of defaulted loans is not an uncommon practice, and can be lucrative if “cheaply produced foreclosure paperwork isn’t questioned, and if the foreclosures have equity and can be resold easily with lots of junk fees,” Field says, “but the mortgage servicing rights Fannie Mae bought are stinkers: they have a 13% delinquency rate, which means lots of foreclosures and loan modifications.”
Fortune Magazine reports that Fannie Mae is purchasing “the servicing rights in order to transfer the day-to-day management of those loans to a different company” which they deem a signal that Fannie is overpaying and if the rights were worth what they paid, a private company would have just bought directly from BoA, but instead, Fannie gave them a bailout.
The purchase is confusing as Fannie Mae just sought a bailout of their on in the form of $5.1 billion just last week. This feels a lot like a political move to pick winners and losers in the private sector, and there are more questions than there are answers about what appears to be Fannie bailing out Bank of America.
Austin tops the list of best places to buy a home
When looking to buy a home, taking the long view is important before making such a huge investment – where are the best places to make that commitment?
Looking at the bigger picture
(REALUOSO.COM) – Let us first express that although we are completely biased about Texas (we’re headquartered here, I personally grew up here), the data is not – Texas is the best. That’s a scientific fact. There’s a running joke in Austin that if there is a list of “best places to [anything],” we’re on it, and the joke causes eye rolls instead of humility (we’re sore winners and sore losers in this town).
That said, SelfStorage.com dug into the data and determined that the top 12 places to buy a home are currently Texas and North Carolina (and Portland, I guess you’re okay too or whatever).
They examined the nerdiest of numbers from the compound annual growth rate in inflation-adjusted GDP to cost premium, affordability, taxes, job growth, and housing availability.
“Buying a house is a big decision and a big commitment,” the company notes. “Although U.S. home prices have risen in the long term, the last decade has shown that path is sometimes full of twists, turns, dizzying heights and steep, abrupt falls. Today, home prices are stabilizing and increasing in most areas of the U.S.”
Average age of houses on the rise, so is it now better or worse to buy new?
With aging housing in America, are first-time buyers better off buying new or existing homes? The average age of a home is rising, as is the price of new housing, so a shift could be upon us.
The average home age is higher than ever
(REALUOSO.COM) – In a survey from the Department of Housing and Urban Development American Housing Survey (AHS), the median age of homes in the United States was 35 years old. In Texas, homes are a bit younger with the median age between 19 – 29 years. The northeast has the oldest homes, with the median age between 50 – 61 years. In 1985, the median age of a home was only 23 years.
With more houses around 40 years old, the National Association of Realtors asserts that homeowners will have to undertake remodeling and renovation projects before selling unless the home is sold as-is, in which case the buyer will be responsible to update their new residence. Even homeowners who aren’t selling will need to consider remodeling for structural and aesthetic reasons.
Prices of new homes on the rise
Newer homes cost more than they used to. The price differential between new homes and older homes has increased from 10 percent traditionally to around 37 percent in 2014. This is due to rising construction costs, scarcity of lots, and a low inventory of new homes that doesn’t meet the demand.
Are Realtors the real loser in the fight between Zillow Group and Move, Inc.?
The last year has been one of dramatic and rapid change in the real estate tech sector, but Realtors are vulnerable, and we’re worried.
Why Realtors are vulnerable to these rapid changes
(REALUOSO.COM) – Corporate warfare demands headlines in every industry, but in the real estate tech sector, a storm has been brewing for years, which in the last year has come to a head. Zillow Group and Move, Inc. (which is owned by News Corp. and operates ListHub, Realtor.com, TopProducer, and other brands) have been competing for a decade now, and the race has appeared to be an aggressive yet polite boxing match. Last year, the gloves came off, and now, they’ve drawn swords and appear to want blood.
Note: We’ll let you decide which company plays which role in the image above.
So how then, does any of this make Realtors the victims of this sword fight? Let’s get everyone up to speed, and then we’ll discuss.
1. Zillow poaches top talent, Move/NAR sues
It all started last year when the gloves came off – Move’s Chief Strategy Officer (who was also Realtor.com’s President), Errol Samuelson jumped ship and joined Zillow on the same day he phoned in his resignation without notice. He left under questionable circumstances, which has led to a lengthy legal battle (wherein Move and NAR have sued Zillow and Samuelson over allegations of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and misappropriation of trade secrets), with the most recent motion being for contempt, which a judge granted to Move/NAR after the mysterious “Samuelson Memo” surfaced.
Salt was added to the wound when Move awarded Samuelson’s job to Move veteran, Curt Beardsley, who days after Samuelson left, also defected to Zillow. This too led to a lawsuit, with allegations including breach of contract, violation of corporations code, illegal dumping of stocks, and Move has sought restitution. These charges are extremely serious, but demanded slightly less attention than the ongoing lawsuit against Samuelson.
2. Two major media brands emerge
Tech News6 days ago
Internet of Things and deep learning: How your devices are getting smarter
Opinion Editorials2 weeks ago
Improve UX design by tracking your users’ eye movements
Business News2 weeks ago
Driverless delivery startup raises half a billion dollars to transport local goods
Business News2 weeks ago
Movie theaters explore renting out their space to survive COVID
Tech News2 weeks ago
First wireless, now headphoneless headphones? Enter, Soundbeamer
Tech News2 weeks ago
Microsoft engineer *almost* gets away with $10 million
Business Marketing2 weeks ago
This new Chipotle location will be fully digital
Tech News2 weeks ago
Google is giving back some privacy control? (You read that right)