{"id":14577,"date":"2022-06-20T10:45:10","date_gmt":"2022-06-20T15:45:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/?p=14577"},"modified":"2022-06-21T03:30:54","modified_gmt":"2022-06-21T08:30:54","slug":"fyi-reverse-sexism-does-not-cure-sexism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/editorials\/fyi-reverse-sexism-does-not-cure-sexism\/","title":{"rendered":"FYI, reverse-sexism does NOT cure sexism!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sexism is and has virtually forever been, a glaring issue in all areas of the work environment &#8211; from recruiting and hiring all the way through invariable work interactions. While the proper \u201ccure\u201d for sexism may elude some employers, we know what absolutely DOESN\u2019T work: reverse sexism.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s get a bit of a disclaimer out of the way: The term \u201creverse sexism\u201d is often used to insinuate the notion that men are victims of gender-based discrimination on the same level as women &#8211; as if the current social and political environments could ever support such a thing.<\/p>\n<p>The idea of a male facing even a fraction of the societal limitations and <a href=\"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/corporate\/kb-homes-exec\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">microaggressions<\/a> with which the average woman has to contend is cry-yourself-to-sleep laughable, so to apply any notion of the same level of discrimination in reverse has no merit whatsoever.<\/p>\n<p><strong>However.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The entire point of rebelling against sexism is not &#8211; and should never be &#8211; that current sexist practices should be applied to men in addition to women; perhaps surprisingly, the opposite holds true: that women should be treated with the inherent respect and financial support that most men in the workplace enjoy.<\/p>\n<p>See, practicing any kind of discrimination &#8211; however small in scale &#8211; against any group of people only helps to perpetuate discrimination in general. Refusing to hire men because you\u2019re trying to avoid sexism toward women may seem like a good idea on paper, but it\u2019s really just enforcing the notion that sexism is okay in certain contexts when that just isn\u2019t the case.<\/p>\n<p>Are you with me so far? Good, because it seems that virtually innumerable companies are missing the mark: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/03\/04\/technology\/google-gender-pay-gap.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Google\u2019s solution<\/a> for the wage gap is to underpay men, and Bumble implements a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.inc.com\/suzanne-lucas\/no-bumble-its-not-okay-to-discriminate-against-men.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">women-only<\/a> hiring environment (though this has since been expanded to utilize more inclusive filters). Again, the idea behind this may have initially come from a good place, but the driving principles cause the execution to fall flat when held up against ACTUAL sexism-free practices.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s a thought: Instead of treating your male employees with less respect in order to match your behavior to all genders across the board, or refusing to hire a gender outright, try treating all of your employees (regardless of gender) the same. It\u2019s a little-known tactic known as common decency, and guess what? Doing so is not the least bit sexist.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(EDITORIAL) Sexism is still around in 2021; it seems some want to try reverse-sexism, but that just isn&#8217;t the way equality works. Just try respect.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":337375,"featured_media":14578,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"wds_primary_category":0,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[254],"tags":[253,1234,641],"class_list":["post-14577","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-editorials","tag-editorial","tag-real-estate-news","tag-sexism"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/337375"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14577"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14577\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18830,"href":"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14577\/revisions\/18830"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14578"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theamericangenius.com\/housing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}