Tuesday, January 13, 2026

Unlock AG Pro Today

Why Now?

AG Pro gives you sharp insights, compelling stories, and weekly mind fuel without the fluff. Think of it as your brain’s secret weapon – and our way to keep doing what we do best: cutting the BS and giving you INDEPENDENT real talk that moves the needle.

Limited time offer: $29/yr (regularly $149)
✔ Full access to all stories and 20 years of analysis
✔ Long-form exclusives and sharp strategy guides
✔ Weekly curated breakdowns sent to your inbox

We accept all major credit cards.

Pro

/ once per week

Get everything, no strings.

AG-curious? Get the full-access version, just on a week-to-week basis.
• Unlimited access, no lockouts
• Full Premium archive access
• Inbox delivery + curated digests
• Stop anytime, no hoops

$
7
$
0

Get your fill of no-BS brilliance.

Pro

/ once per year

All in, all year. Zero lockouts.

The best deal - full access, your way. No timeouts, no limits, no regrets.
A year for less than a month of Hulu+
• Unlimited access to every story
• Re-read anything, anytime
• Inbox drop + curated roundups

$
29
$
0

*Most Popular

Full access, no pressure. Just power.

Free
/ limited

Useful, just not unlimited.

You’ll still get the goods - just not the goodest, freshest goods. You’ll get:
• Weekly email recaps + curation
• 24-hour access to all new content
• No archive. No re-reads

Free

Upgrade later -
we’ll be here!

Unlock AG Pro Today

Why Now?

AG Pro gives you sharp insights, compelling stories, and weekly mind fuel without the fluff. Think of it as your brain’s secret weapon – and our way to keep doing what we do best: cutting the BS and giving you INDEPENDENT real talk that moves the needle.

Limited time offer: $29/yr (regularly $149)
✔ Full access to all stories and 20 years of analysis
✔ Long-form exclusives and sharp strategy guides
✔ Weekly curated breakdowns sent to your inbox

We accept all major credit cards.

Pro

/ once per week

Get everything, no strings.

AG-curious? Get the full-access version, just on a week-to-week basis.
• Unlimited access, no lockouts
• Full Premium archive access
• Inbox delivery + curated digests
• Stop anytime, no hoops

$
7
$
0

Get your fill of no-BS brilliance.

Pro

/ once per year

All in, all year. Zero lockouts.

The best deal - full access, your way. No timeouts, no limits, no regrets.
A year for less than a month of Hulu+
• Unlimited access to every story
• Re-read anything, anytime
• Inbox drop + curated roundups

$
29
$
0

*Most Popular

Full access, no pressure. Just power.

Free
/ limited

Useful, just not unlimited.

You’ll still get the goods - just not the goodest, freshest goods. You’ll get:
• Weekly email recaps + curation
• 24-hour access to all new content
• No archive. No re-reads

Free

Upgrade later -
we’ll be here!

Pinterest users’ time on site nearly matches YouTube

How long do users stay on a site?

How long someone stays on a site is a common measure that content sites use as validation of not only the quality of what they are offering but to determine that they have something to offer visitors that they actually like. As time on site increases for a site, it means users are staying longer and longer.

YouTube users stay on the site for an average of 16.4 minutes per visit, while Pinterest users stay for 15.8 minutes, Facebook users stay for 12.1 minutes and Twitter users a mere 3.3 seconds.

YouTube and Pinterest – opposites yet the same

It is no surprise that Pinterest users stay on the site for considerable amounts of time, but it is fascinating that the time on site almost matches YouTube’s. Given the nature of YouTube is for a user to sit still and stare at a screen, the fact that Pinterest is creeping up reveals the high level of interest the visual bookmarking site has, and validates reports that it is a major traffic driver.

Why is a site like YouTube that demands full attention on a single object (video) commanding as much time as a site that does the opposite in the form of commanding attention from rapid scrolling through hundreds of photos? The answer is simple – both appeal to a user’s inner attention-deficit-disorder slash shiny-object-syndrome.

Although in the UK, more users are male than female, because 83 percent of American users are women, we are dealing with a stigma that Pinterest is for housewives with nothing better to do than share recipes – many equate Pinterest to a 1960s Tupperware party, and someone recently said to me that it is like “catnip for women.”

The stigma is not going away, in fact, Pinterest is widely to blame for the stigma, but I insist that Pinterest is not popular with women because they have a rack, it’s popular because it has a high visual impact yet a low interactive commitment and while it can clearly be a time suck, it is absolutely appealing to the multi-tasker, A.D.D. person who is balancing a phone call, a panicking co-worker (or baby in some cases).

Pinterest users’ time on site will likely go up over time and could soon surpass YouTube which is good news for the growing network and potentially for whatever advertisers they bring on board, but they have not been public about their revenue plans. Remember, the site appeals to people because it is visual and soothes users’ inner A.D.D., independent of what’s in their pants, which is why it will grow, not because women are dumb chicks at a Tupperware party.

Lani Rosales, Chief of Staffhttps://theamericangenius.com/author/lani
Lani is the Chief of Staff at The American Genius, has co-authored a book, co-founded BASHH, Austin Digital Jobs, Remote Digital Jobs, and is a seasoned business writer and editorialist with a penchant for the irreverent.

2 COMMENTS

Subscribe
Notify of
wpDiscuz
2
0
What insights can you add? →x
()
x
Exit mobile version