Sunday, December 21, 2025

Unlock AG Pro Today

Why Now?

AG Pro gives you sharp insights, compelling stories, and weekly mind fuel without the fluff. Think of it as your brain’s secret weapon – and our way to keep doing what we do best: cutting the BS and giving you INDEPENDENT real talk that moves the needle.

Limited time offer: $29/yr (regularly $149)
✔ Full access to all stories and 20 years of analysis
✔ Long-form exclusives and sharp strategy guides
✔ Weekly curated breakdowns sent to your inbox

We accept all major credit cards.

Pro

/ once per week

Get everything, no strings.

AG-curious? Get the full-access version, just on a week-to-week basis.
• Unlimited access, no lockouts
• Full Premium archive access
• Inbox delivery + curated digests
• Stop anytime, no hoops

$
7
$
0

Get your fill of no-BS brilliance.

Pro

/ once per year

All in, all year. Zero lockouts.

The best deal - full access, your way. No timeouts, no limits, no regrets.
A year for less than a month of Hulu+
• Unlimited access to every story
• Re-read anything, anytime
• Inbox drop + curated roundups

$
29
$
0

*Most Popular

Full access, no pressure. Just power.

Free
/ limited

Useful, just not unlimited.

You’ll still get the goods - just not the goodest, freshest goods. You’ll get:
• Weekly email recaps + curation
• 24-hour access to all new content
• No archive. No re-reads

Free

Upgrade later -
we’ll be here!

Unlock AG Pro Today

Why Now?

AG Pro gives you sharp insights, compelling stories, and weekly mind fuel without the fluff. Think of it as your brain’s secret weapon – and our way to keep doing what we do best: cutting the BS and giving you INDEPENDENT real talk that moves the needle.

Limited time offer: $29/yr (regularly $149)
✔ Full access to all stories and 20 years of analysis
✔ Long-form exclusives and sharp strategy guides
✔ Weekly curated breakdowns sent to your inbox

We accept all major credit cards.

Pro

/ once per week

Get everything, no strings.

AG-curious? Get the full-access version, just on a week-to-week basis.
• Unlimited access, no lockouts
• Full Premium archive access
• Inbox delivery + curated digests
• Stop anytime, no hoops

$
7
$
0

Get your fill of no-BS brilliance.

Pro

/ once per year

All in, all year. Zero lockouts.

The best deal - full access, your way. No timeouts, no limits, no regrets.
A year for less than a month of Hulu+
• Unlimited access to every story
• Re-read anything, anytime
• Inbox drop + curated roundups

$
29
$
0

*Most Popular

Full access, no pressure. Just power.

Free
/ limited

Useful, just not unlimited.

You’ll still get the goods - just not the goodest, freshest goods. You’ll get:
• Weekly email recaps + curation
• 24-hour access to all new content
• No archive. No re-reads

Free

Upgrade later -
we’ll be here!

Seriously? Judge’s Ruling Based On “I’m Gonna Teach You a Lesson” Precedent?

Recently I read where a judge in Suffolk County, NY judge erased a Long Island couple’s >$500k in mortgage debt admittedly to teach the originator (and/or)servicer, OneWest, a lesson.

As is too common lately, sadly, the couple had fallen behind on their mortgage due to health issues and a change in their interest rate. OneWest refused to refinance.  So, after slamming OneWest for its “harsh, repugnant, shocking and repulsive” acts, he issued the bombshell decision.

The mortgage is hereby cancelled, voided, nullified, set aside and is of no further force and effect.

(Side note: Doesn’t that sound like the Jackie Chiles character on Seinfeld – the parody of Johnnie Cochran?)

In watching the video on the story, it also sounds as though they may have stripped equity through a refi at some point.  For some reason the news doesn’t really go into those details.  But, is using our home as an ATM really our fault?  (Yes, that’s snark-casm) 

WTH, Your Honor?

What rule of law can he possibly cite?  While I am no legal wiz, I doubt it can possibly be upheld through appeals.  Or, can a judge in NY essentially give away property legally owned by someone else?  Whatever the answer, for the time being he has set a precedent. 

He has also set into motion an action that will require the lender/servicer to accrue massive legal fees in appeal as will others when like lawsuits begin to pop up.

The Backlash?

Will this start a landslide of “my-lender-was-mean-to-me-because-I-couldn’t-pay” lawsuits?  Will we begin to see binding arbitration agreements added to the mounds of mortgage docs, much like employment agreements for new hires intended to mitigate the legal fees associated with any future employment lawsuit(s)?  If so, is the homeowner more or less protected?

For the record, I have very few details on this, and am commenting on what I see in the original news story.  Foreclosure is a heartbreaking reality these days, and it’s not my intent to diminish or marginalize this family’s ordeal. 

Related: If I can get the lenders on my mortgages to be mean to me, can I get the debt erased?  How about on my car lease?  I’m sure they aren’t so nice.

p.s.  The term Snark-Casm is not copyrighted.  Feel free to use it any time it’s applicable.

Brandie Younghttps://brandieyoung.wordpress.com
Brandie is an unapologetically candid marketing professional who was recently mentioned on BusinessWeek as a Top Young Female Entrepreneur. She recently co-founded consulting firm MarketingTBD. She's held senior level positions with GE and Fidelity, as well as with entrepreneurial start-ups. Raised by a real estate Broker, Brandie is passionate about real estate and is an avid investor. Follow her on Twitter.

28 COMMENTS

Subscribe
Notify of
wpDiscuz
28
0
What insights can you add? →x
()
x
Exit mobile version