Facebook has long dominated the web as one of the top social media platforms. It’s no surprise, then, that Facebook has decided to branch out into the physical world vis-a-vis its own brand of hardware.
The persuasion of the hardware in question, however, is baffling.
Facebook’s first full-on foray into the hardware world comes in the shape of Aloha, a 13- to 15-inch speaker and screen combination that specializes in video calls and web management. Think of it as an Amazon Echo with a screen.
You’ll be able to perform searches and order stuff, all the while having a lovely chat with your grandma.
It will be interesting to see how the Aloha stacks up against similar devices. Consumers may not feel the need to have another device with a screen in their homes, given that there are several notable mobile and desktop apps that allow for video calls and chatting for free.
As mentioned, Aloha’s most attractive feature is its touch screen and video-calling capabilities. Rather than simply imitating the Echo’s sound-only presentation and function, Aloha can be used to initiate and sustain high-quality video calls with other Facebook users, allowing you to chat while keeping your phone and computer on their respective chargers.
Aloha can also use facial recognition to turn itself on, meaning that you need only walk into view for the camera and screen to activate. While this may raise some privacy concerns, Facebook has guaranteed that—
Wait, back up. Did I read that correctly?
Aloha’s camera is always on, just waiting for you to appear? Is this real life? The product page recommends placing Aloha in bedrooms—how much more invasive can you get?! Seriously, what the heck.
Trust the Zuck
Ultimately, though, the Aloha is about as stupid-sounding as the Amazon Echo with which it’s meant to compete—and those units are basically selling themselves.
Look at it this way: Mark Zuckerberg built a web empire from the ground up, and while transitions from the digital realm to the physical world are rarely seamless, it’s downright irresponsible to write off the debut hardware entry from one of the largest groups of tech giants in our present time.
If you’re excited about having another screen in your house, be sure to look for the Aloha in stores and online in Spring of 2018.
Why your Instagram follower counts might be jacked
(SOCIAL MEDIA) What’s going on with Instagram follower counts? It’s a v-day bug, of course!
Yesterday, I did what I usually do on Instagram – peruse through my own profile because I enjoy my photos. Though my follower count is nothing to write home about, I was confused when I noticed I had lost about 10 followers and had mysteriously unfollowed about the same number of people.
To quote Alicia Silverstone in Clueless, “I was like, totally buggin’”. Turns out, bug was the operative prefix as a bug was cause for the issue, and many users were feeling the bite.
TechCrunch shared that Instagram confirmed the bug was the problem causing follower counts to change. The social media platform also said that the issue should be resolved by 9 a.m. PST on Valentine’s Day (because the only love worth celebrating is that of your follower count!)
At first, many users, myself included, assumed that the decrease in followers came from an attempt from Instagram to remove fake spam accounts. However, when we noticed that our following count had also gone down, that was when people took to Twitter to complain.
One user wrote, “so I just lost like 4K on Instagram and it unfollowed like 100 people within a matter of minutes? what’s going on [whining emoji] like I’m not mad about my follower count cause I’d rather have less spam followers and better engagement but like why is it unfollowing people?!”
Instagram also used Twitter as a way to explain the issue, which is where they shared that the problem should be fixed by Thursday morning. “We’re aware of an issue that is causing a change in account follower numbers for some people right now. We’re working to resolve this as quickly as possible,” the company tweeted on February 13. “Update: we’re expecting to have this issue resolved by 9 a.m. PST tomorrow. We understand this is frustrating, and our team is hard at work to get things back to normal.”
My follower/following count went back to normal a few hours after I noticed the issue, but it may take just a bit longer for all users to see the counts restored.
Share with us below if this issue threw off your social media game yesterday!
Fallout from Facebook’s shady program spying on children
(SOCIAL MEDIA) Facebook is barely even trying to be sneaky anymore, paying children to allow them to spy. Shameless.
Facebook recently landed in hot (boiling) water when it was uncovered that Facebook has been paying teens to install a “research” VPN on their devices that would allow the tech giant to see all of the teen’s cellular and web usage, for about $20 worth of gift cards each month.
The participants were largely recruited into the program as a result of targeted Snapchat and Instragram ads, and offered participants additional incentives to refer friends into the program too.
The purpose of this Big Brother program was not to empower young minds with technological innovation, but to use all of this data to track Facebook’s competitors, keep track of emerging trends, and otherwise be creepin’ on the kids. The program reportedly went so far as to ask users to share screenshots of their Amazon order history pages.
According to the report: “Facebook sidesteps the App Store and rewards teenagers and adults to download the Research app and give it root access to network traffic in what may be a violation of Apple policy so the social network can decrypt and analyze their phone activity.”
Oh, and if the privacy concerns of this whole program weren’t terrifying enough; it has been going on since 2016.
Almost immediately after the news broke, Apple banned Facebook’s Research VPN and shut down the iOs version of the Research app, before Facebook could suspend the program voluntarily. Apple also released a statement condemning the program and Facebook’s shady choice to hide it in the iOs Developer certificate rather than the App Store (where apps that collect personal data have been banned since last summer).
This entire debacle highlights the murky borders of online consent when children and teens are involved. Not only are teens less likely to be aware of the risks of sharing their data, but also often parental “consent” is not real. There’s no verification of parental consent; if a teen checks a box in an online form saying that they are their parent—the website is none the wiser. The same is true for many age verification processes.
If you are a real parent reading this and want to check to make sure that your teen’s not selling their personal data for pennies, you LifeHacker has instructions to help you identify whether or not they are in the program (and get them out of it!).
This entire debacle is a nice reminder that large tech companies may offer innovative services, high salaries to employees, and strange new ways of keeping in touch with people we’d probably forgotten by now, but the product is not the social networks they build.
The product that Facebook, Google, Amazon, and other giants are really interested in is data – we’ve been reporting that for over a decade now. Their treatment of people that may not even be able to consent to sharing their data highlights this narrow goal. If you a not a person, but rather a collection of market insights, what does your age matter? It’s just another variable for the algorithms (robots).
The upside of this entire debacle is that many parents previously unaware of this type of program are now talking to their children about this topic.
Further, this gives politicians more tangible evidence of why media companies like Facebook should never get a free pass for bad behavior.
We’re skeptical of FB’s reason for killing the Moments app
(SOCIAL MEDIA) Facebook is killing Moments. Turns out, most people don’t know it exists – here’s what we’ll all be missing.
January was the longest year ever, amirite guys? Now all that’s over, we can finally say goodbye to toxic things like Whole 30 oversharers and, if we’re lucky, terrible products from tech giants.
I love writing about tech companies’ failed attempts at ~cool~ new products. Honestly, it’s become a personal hobby, or, dare I say, delight. Nothing warms my ice cold heart like seeing Google Glass, Google+, and the Facebook “Moments” app go up in flames.
Wait, hold up… there was a Facebook Moments app? What the heck is (or was) the Moments app?
In case if you didn’t know like most people, here’s what you need to know:
Moments was originally created in 2015 as a way for Facebook users to privately share photos outside of the standard Facebook platform. The app implemented machine learning and facial recognition technology to help group photos, and then “recommended” who to share the photos with based off who was in the picture.
Get off my lawn.
If there’s anything we learned in 2018, it’s that we can totally trust Facebook with very private and personal information!
And I know what you’re thinking: why would this crappier and creepier version of Google Photos be necessary? Spoiler alert: it’s not.
In a moment of temporary sanity, Facebook announced it’s shutting down Moments and the app in its entirety on February 25th, citing a notable lack of downloads.
Here’s the interesting bit, though: no other reasons were mentioned like security or privacy concerns, and they insisted it’s pulling the plug only because not enough people downloaded it.
Considering Facebook bullied hundreds of thousands of users into downloading the app, so much so that in 2016 it was #1 in the App Store for several days, do we really believe the “no user base” excuse?
What else is going on under the hood of Moments that isn’t being revealed?
Given the recent controversies surrounding Facebook’s lack of data transparency and unethical decision making in this realm of personal data, I have a hunch something else might be behind this sudden “no downloads” rhetoric.
Only time, and perhaps another amusing congressional hearing, will tell.
In the off chance you’re one of the seven people with photos on Moments, you’ve been forewarned, and make sure to delete all of your data from it in case if Zuck pulls another Cambridge Analytica.
Opinion Editorials2 days ago
20 bullsh*t buzzwords that should be banned from tech forever
Tech News2 days ago
For meetings that should be an email? There’s an app for that
Opinion Editorials2 days ago
How to encourage your childrens’ entrepreneurship
Opinion Editorials3 days ago
How to crush your next remote job interview
Tech News21 hours ago
The fascinating future of technology in healthcare
Business News20 hours ago
Is insecurity the root of overworking in today’s workforce?
Opinion Editorials3 days ago
Why it’s grammatically okay to use ‘they’ as a pronoun for an individual
Opinion Editorials3 days ago
Do women that downplay their gender get ahead faster?