A lot of Realtors around the blogosphere love to beat up on NAR. They call them out on their talking points and basically use them to bash NAR over the head. I have no problem with that, but what it leaves me to wonder is why in the world do you pay your dues? Further, if you hate real estate licensing so much, then why are you licensed? If you hate what the industry has become, then why are you in it? I’m sure your reply will be, “to change the system!” Yeah, okay. I’m sure one out of ten buyers & sellers will believe you, but that leaves the rest of us who know differently.
The NAR is the world’s largest Association of Brokers in the free world. Great; I guess you know who NAR really works for- the Broker. Almost anyone that has ever had a real estate Broker knows that the Broker more than likely doesn’t care about you, much less even knows your name in most larger Brokerages. So it is no wonder why many of you hate the NAR. So why not just stand up and say it? Because you’re a coward? Because you are so amused by everything it says and does? If that is the case, get a life- and we all know it has nothing to do with whether you’re a yellow-belly or not. It’s all about protecting the career you’ve worked so hard to build.
I pay my Realtor dues not liking many things the local board passes down our way. Why? Because right now, 1.3 Million Realtors face what equates to a hostile corporate takeover by large VC Corporations that could care less about transparency, customer service, Realtor commissions, web2.o, or Redfin for that matter- they only care about the money. They’re content on using Redfin for the disruption. Whether or not Redfin succeeds as a model, they could care less- it’s the end result, the long-term goal… to ultimately control it (real estate). They’re not content with a piece of the pie, they want the whole thing, and they want to eat it too.
I pay my dues because I want to be a part of the 1.3 Million agents that will fight and win the corporate takeover. This has nothing to do with whether or not I like NAR. Honestly, before this all hit the CBS fan, I paid very little attention to NAR. It may or may not have had its use in the past, but it does have relevance today.
So all of you who have chosen to distance yourself from, attack, or expose the NAR, you may want to give some thought to the fact that in effect you are kicking 1.3 million other agents in the proverbial face that are in this battle with you. I know, I know, I’ll get some flames on this message, but let’s look at it this way- RE could use a lot of changing up, resorting, and deeper thought, but who would you prefer do that- Glenn Kelman? VC Corporations? Or… the 1.3 Million agents who operate independently via one voice- The NAR. My suggestion- stop yelling at the NAR, and start yelling through it. Start by yelling at your Broker, and if you are the broker, start yelling at your board.
We’ve allowed VC corporations to set the tone and perception and the only way the perception will be changed is to properly use the most powerful tool in our arsenal- The NAR. Not to change laws to limit competition, but to reach out to those that are soon to fall victim to the one thing consumers hate most in this world- BIG CORPORATIONS.
I’m with you, not the NAR. It’s time we began using NAR to its fullest possible potential, it will either bend and flex or it will break but either way, the perception will be that Realtors did more than bitch, moan, and complain. They stood up and operated the industry in the way it was meant to be run- the way it was described when we were all lulled into paying our splits and dues- otherwise you risk sounding like a hypocrite.
Austin tops the list of best places to buy a home
When looking to buy a home, taking the long view is important before making such a huge investment – where are the best places to make that commitment?
Looking at the bigger picture
(REALUOSO.COM) – Let us first express that although we are completely biased about Texas (we’re headquartered here, I personally grew up here), the data is not – Texas is the best. That’s a scientific fact. There’s a running joke in Austin that if there is a list of “best places to [anything],” we’re on it, and the joke causes eye rolls instead of humility (we’re sore winners and sore losers in this town).
That said, SelfStorage.com dug into the data and determined that the top 12 places to buy a home are currently Texas and North Carolina (and Portland, I guess you’re okay too or whatever).
They examined the nerdiest of numbers from the compound annual growth rate in inflation-adjusted GDP to cost premium, affordability, taxes, job growth, and housing availability.
“Buying a house is a big decision and a big commitment,” the company notes. “Although U.S. home prices have risen in the long term, the last decade has shown that path is sometimes full of twists, turns, dizzying heights and steep, abrupt falls. Today, home prices are stabilizing and increasing in most areas of the U.S.”
Average age of houses on the rise, so is it now better or worse to buy new?
With aging housing in America, are first-time buyers better off buying new or existing homes? The average age of a home is rising, as is the price of new housing, so a shift could be upon us.
The average home age is higher than ever
(REALUOSO.COM) – In a survey from the Department of Housing and Urban Development American Housing Survey (AHS), the median age of homes in the United States was 35 years old. In Texas, homes are a bit younger with the median age between 19 – 29 years. The northeast has the oldest homes, with the median age between 50 – 61 years. In 1985, the median age of a home was only 23 years.
With more houses around 40 years old, the National Association of Realtors asserts that homeowners will have to undertake remodeling and renovation projects before selling unless the home is sold as-is, in which case the buyer will be responsible to update their new residence. Even homeowners who aren’t selling will need to consider remodeling for structural and aesthetic reasons.
Prices of new homes on the rise
Newer homes cost more than they used to. The price differential between new homes and older homes has increased from 10 percent traditionally to around 37 percent in 2014. This is due to rising construction costs, scarcity of lots, and a low inventory of new homes that doesn’t meet the demand.
Are Realtors the real loser in the fight between Zillow Group and Move, Inc.?
The last year has been one of dramatic and rapid change in the real estate tech sector, but Realtors are vulnerable, and we’re worried.
Why Realtors are vulnerable to these rapid changes
(REALUOSO.COM) – Corporate warfare demands headlines in every industry, but in the real estate tech sector, a storm has been brewing for years, which in the last year has come to a head. Zillow Group and Move, Inc. (which is owned by News Corp. and operates ListHub, Realtor.com, TopProducer, and other brands) have been competing for a decade now, and the race has appeared to be an aggressive yet polite boxing match. Last year, the gloves came off, and now, they’ve drawn swords and appear to want blood.
Note: We’ll let you decide which company plays which role in the image above.
So how then, does any of this make Realtors the victims of this sword fight? Let’s get everyone up to speed, and then we’ll discuss.
1. Zillow poaches top talent, Move/NAR sues
It all started last year when the gloves came off – Move’s Chief Strategy Officer (who was also Realtor.com’s President), Errol Samuelson jumped ship and joined Zillow on the same day he phoned in his resignation without notice. He left under questionable circumstances, which has led to a lengthy legal battle (wherein Move and NAR have sued Zillow and Samuelson over allegations of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and misappropriation of trade secrets), with the most recent motion being for contempt, which a judge granted to Move/NAR after the mysterious “Samuelson Memo” surfaced.
Salt was added to the wound when Move awarded Samuelson’s job to Move veteran, Curt Beardsley, who days after Samuelson left, also defected to Zillow. This too led to a lawsuit, with allegations including breach of contract, violation of corporations code, illegal dumping of stocks, and Move has sought restitution. These charges are extremely serious, but demanded slightly less attention than the ongoing lawsuit against Samuelson.
2. Two major media brands emerge
Business Marketing1 week ago
Free shipping is everywhere… how can small businesses keep up?
Business Marketing1 week ago
Why you must nix MLM experience from your resume
Business Marketing1 week ago
How many hours of the work week are actually efficient?
Opinion Editorials7 days ago
The truth about unemployment from someone who’s been through it
Tech News1 week ago
Star Citizen: A cautionary tale of Kickstarter and crowdfunding
Opinion Editorials12 hours ago
Ways to socialize safely during quarantine
Business Finance2 days ago
Is the convenience of payment apps worth the risk of fraud?
Opinion Editorials2 weeks ago
5 insights into building a culture with your remote teams