Connect with us

Social Media

WordPress Direct, Have You Lost Your Mind??

Published

on

OMG are you effing insane?

Today comes the announcement that WordPressDirect.com has reached 10,000 users. WordPress Direct is a site that allows users to click a few buttons and potentially scrape steal kidnap plagiarize automatically post content from blogs by simply entering keywords. So now, sploggers (and apparently there are 10,000ish of them now) can enter keywords, set up an account with Google allowing them to be paid for page views, and VOILA, your content is on their site and making them money. Thanks, WordPress Direct.

From their press release: “Armed with little more than a desire to publish on a topic, users can create and maintain any number of content-packed, automatically-updated, search engine optimized (SEO) niche websites powered by the WordPress blog engine.

Every WordPressDirect site comes “pre-optimized” for maximum ranking and maximum traffic. By clicking a few radio buttons and entering a few search phrases, WordPressDirect will create a blog-driven website, create the blog categories, install the theme, and automatically post content. WordPressDirect contains special software that identifies relevant content and then automatically posts it to the site with proper categorization and tagging to aid visitors and searchers alike.

What do YOU think?

I think they sum it up best on their FAQ site when they answer a question, “We are a pretty sucky bunch, it’s true.” What do YOU think?

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!

Lani is the Chief Operating Officer at The American Genius and has been named in the Inman 100 Most Influential Real Estate Leaders several times, co-authored a book, co-founded BASHH and Austin Digital Jobs, and is a seasoned business writer and editorialist with a penchant for the irreverent.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
33 Comments

33 Comments

  1. Jack Leblond

    November 24, 2008 at 12:46 pm

    “Armed with little more than a desire to publish on a topic..” and obviously the inability (or desire) to publish original content. Hopefully people know about the Google spam reporting tools and will report every one of these they find.

  2. Vance Shutes

    November 24, 2008 at 12:47 pm

    Makes me glad I don’t have a WP blog!

  3. Jessica (from It's my life...)

    November 24, 2008 at 12:51 pm

    Protect yourself and your content. Make sure to write “Original content from XX.” at the bottom of each and every post.
    It’s brutally hard to stop scrappers, but at least you can make sure people know the information was lifted.

    Hateful people.

  4. Matthew Collinge

    November 24, 2008 at 12:54 pm

    I thought this was creepy from the minute I heard about it.

  5. Lani Rosales

    November 24, 2008 at 12:56 pm

    Clarification: WordPress Direct generates content from ALL user-generated content sites (like WordPress blogs, Blogger blogs, TypePad blogs, YouTube, Viddler, etc.) and RUNS on WordPress, making ALL blogs are vulnerable to this “service.”

    We have and will continue to cover how to fight content theft (or “borrowing” as some will surely call it).

  6. Vlad

    November 24, 2008 at 12:58 pm

    I wonder if they are playing with fire as far as trade mark is concerned. But if guys at WordPress own the trade mark they can probably challenge WordPressDirect.

  7. Tom Royce

    November 24, 2008 at 1:01 pm

    I recommend all bloggers who use wordpress and have an RSS feed to use this plug in.

    It adds a footer to your feed so worst case you get a link back to your post, best case it stops the splogger dead in their tracks.

  8. CTannStarr

    November 24, 2008 at 1:06 pm

    Oh my word… this really whomps! I am very particular about my stuff. It’s mine. I have Daffy Duck syndrome when it comes to my blog. MINE! Mine! MINE! Mine! (LOL). We gotta do something… Seriously. I want Lenn Harley and her attorney on my side when I start fighting about this. Thanks for the tweet. I love AG. I am so down with the program and agree that this major league sucks!

  9. Christina Ethridge - North Idaho Real Estate

    November 24, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    I’m wondering how I can utilize this to combine the content of all 3 of my blogs into another blog… hum…

  10. Mark Hulsey

    November 24, 2008 at 4:22 pm

    Not hard to write your own content.
    Jackholes! Guess this stays in line with everyone wanting to get something for nothing.

  11. Sherry Baker

    November 24, 2008 at 5:46 pm

    Interesting that this ‘tool’ came from WordPress. WTH are they thinking? Thanks for bringing it to our attention, Lani — I saw a news item about it earlier today and blew right past it.

  12. Lani Rosales

    November 24, 2008 at 5:53 pm

    Sherry, as far as I can tell, there is no affiliation and Vlad is right that this could potentially be a trademark violation. Benn told me in conversation today that most companies using the word “WordPress” in their company name or URL have removed it and I suspect WordPress is aware of WPDirect.

    Like I said on Twitter, I don’t get mad easily, but I’m already so tired of the SEVERAL blogs we have that we continually monitor, this just sucks more time out of our week having to be vigilant, and despite plug-ins, footers and the like, it still happens.

  13. Sherry Baker

    November 24, 2008 at 5:57 pm

    Thanks for the DM, Lani. That WPDirect is not part of WP *really* pisses me off — can just imagine what WP thinks about it. Probably nothing we can do to stop this company except continue to monitor like we’re doing now. Think I’ll be a little more diligent now.

  14. Jim Gatos

    November 24, 2008 at 6:39 pm

    If anyone else here is using Typepad (which I absolutely LOVE, btw), please let me know if Typepad is doing anything about this. I don’t think Typepad and WordPress absolutely love each other LOL…

  15. january

    November 24, 2008 at 8:12 pm

    Don’t worry.

    I tried to sign up for an account to see what it was about… total hilarity. Typos in their calls-to-action, 3 sets of ARE YOU SURE YOU DON’T WANT TO BUY THIS?? messages, and an error message as you try to sign up.

    The site I tried to set up was wpd_sucks.profitcruiser.com, so if you are looking for that URL, I have taken it.

  16. Elaine Reese

    November 24, 2008 at 8:28 pm

    It still seems to me that the only reason sploggers exist is make money with Google Ads. I suppose Google makes tons of money from those ads, but it would sure be nice if they found another way. That would eliminate 90% of the plagiarism.

    Even if WP does challenge them on the trademark of their name, those folks will just set up a new name. What a scam! Wonder if they’ve advised those 10K people that they are risking being sued for copyright violation.

  17. Craig Barrett

    November 24, 2008 at 9:00 pm

    Pretty sucky bunch is right. They seriously need to check their integrity and invoke some self-control.

  18. Vicki Moore

    November 24, 2008 at 11:42 pm

    Subject change. Ding. That post title is the funniest thing I’ve seen in a long time.

    Okay. Back to the topic. How does Jay attach that footer: If you’re reading this outside your feed reader…? Could you put some key words in there that you could do Google Alerts on to catch sploggers?

  19. Vlad

    November 25, 2008 at 1:44 am

    Vicki, sorry for misspelling your name.

  20. Kris Berg

    November 25, 2008 at 9:56 am

    Finally, my total failure in SEO is paying off! My blog has absolutely no keywords of value and no posts worth scraping. I’m safe.

  21. Brad Rachielles

    November 25, 2008 at 10:54 am

    Lani, I am probalby mistaken about this, and I am clearly not up on copywrite laws, but it seems to me that copywriting content would at least offer creators some recourse, or is everything placed on the web now considered “public domain”? What is the latest word on this aspect of creative protection?

  22. Shailesh Ghimire

    November 25, 2008 at 4:05 pm

    This is insanity. Someone has to do something here. I suggest boycotting all Google ads (banner ads as well) – seriously we will survive without those ads! They won’t.

  23. Mark Hulsey

    November 25, 2008 at 4:07 pm

    Amen!!!

  24. Paula Henry

    November 27, 2008 at 8:46 am

    “We are a pretty sucky bunch, it’s true.”

    What more could one say? They describe themselves well!

  25. Steve Simon

    November 28, 2008 at 11:15 am

    To those that assume there is viable recourse:
    While I understand the outrage, know this, most battle that are successful in this arean have Goliath besting David. Meaning the large concern usually wins over the small content thief; the reason is enforcement is never guaranteed, it is time consuming, costly and with limited reward to the victor.
    Sad but there are no “Content Police”, and there is no shortage of those who feel no remorse for taking the words of another as their own. Your best options have been outlined already (the footer and active links to your site in the post’s body).
    You might add, if comments are permitted on the site that word burgled, a comment saying you wrote this post and the person publishing the blog stole it?

  26. Tico

    December 2, 2008 at 10:20 pm

    I signed up for this service, BUT my foot hit the brake as soon as they asked for my ftp login information. It is one thing to ask for my WP self hosted user ID and pw but for the ftp root?

    I was able to install and learn about IonCube and with it installed what is the reason for the ftp access?

    Does anyone know this answer, it might be a simple one I am overlooking. Why would they need this root access, this is what seems very fishy to me. Easy to install programs that they could use to their advantage like bots…

    But maybe I am wrong..
    Original content from XX

    Is this the correct attribution?

    Thanks

  27. Nick Barnes

    January 14, 2009 at 7:57 pm

    This makes more more than angry to read this. We work hard to do what we do. Seriously, how difficult is it to write your own blog posts?

  28. Ron

    June 24, 2009 at 12:57 am

    Well, I tried it.

    Unfortunately, for me, I liked it.

    You see… the idea was they offered me a chance to load up a blog with content immediately. Obviously, I’m not greedy or lazy so I also wrote some of my own content.

    But, it was convenient to have an instant-and-ready blog.

    Everytime I post unoriginal content (maybe yours)… I ALWAYS include a link back to your site (thus increasing your ranking in Google) and allowing the reader a chance to check out your site (thus creating a testimonial and FREE advertising for you).

    I really don’t see what’s wrong with that. If it was stealing… I wouldn’t allow the reader to know who originally created the content and how to contact them. This system isn’t like that. I credit the originator.

    If you use this “tool” intelligently and not like everyone here is jumping to the conclusion and THINKS people are doing… it will really help your business.

    Heck, it helped mine tremendously!

    – Ron

    P.S. — I dunno. I probably shouldn’t have opened my big fat mouth because I’m the only one on this blog who uses WordPressDirect.

    I completely understand if you don’t agree with me. After all, I’m walking into a tiger den with everyone bashing the product.

    Just do me a favor… don’t judge the tool based on what scam-artists and content theives would use it for.

    Obviously, the developers should have made this a little more reserved and not open to the public. However, remember this tool is only available to those who are willing to spend over $100 per month to utilize. It’s not available to freebies and bottom-feeders.

    Sure, the basic product is free, but this particular feature called “auto-content” is only available to high-paying members.

    The system is advertised to help your business grow… and it does if used ethically and honestly.

    Just my two cents.

  29. Jerry

    August 6, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    Wowza, Does anyone do any research before commenting?

    Did you know that Yahoo! has a free feature called Yahoo Pipes! That you can put any rss feed information into and put the resulting code on any web page?

    RSS is made for this sort of thing.

    And how did Google get brought into this? roflmao
    There are plenty of ways to make money with a website besides Adsense. Most of the WPDirect sites are running affiliate ads rather than Adsense.

    As far as wpdirect goes, they aren’t out to steal your content. The content it ads to your site comes from places that make content syndication easy because that is what it is designed for. Blog rss feeds are for syndicating content, Youtube videos can be embedded in any webpage, etc.

    Spammers or Sploggers are going to steal content till the end of time and it’s just something you have to deal with. You don’t have to like it, but you can’t stop it.

    I have personally used WPDirect but I did not use it to steal content. The features that gather content and auto publish to your blog have to be enabled. The reason I would use it is to get a quick install and optimization of a blog without having to manually gather, install and setup all the plugins you need to SEO optimize your blog(which can take hours even when you know what your doing).

  30. Andy

    September 13, 2009 at 7:15 am

    Surely they are not scraping content, that would be illegal I think?

    As a blogger I only syndicate excerpts of my posts that people can do what they like with. Hopefully they also link back to my site.

  31. Andrew

    October 20, 2009 at 9:24 am

    I could be wrong but WPD are not “scraping” anyone’s personal blogs. It uses content that has been made available for syndication by the copyright owner (whether or not the owner realises that they have made it available for syndication). If you’ve ever posted a video to you tube or submitted content to an article directory then anyone can use it on their blog. This is no different.

    Many bloggers and content creators use Creative commons licenses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_licenses because they WANT their content to be freely distributed to as wide an audience as possible. After all, why are you creating content? to be read right?
    And if you got a few 1000 extra subscribers because of all that exposure wouldn’t you be pretty happy?

    Another take on the issue anyway.
    Andrew

  32. Brian Fowler

    September 5, 2010 at 12:33 am

    I am not a WP Direct member, however I am researching the possibility of becoming a competitor. It has nothing to do with scraping or stealing copyright content.

    It is about providing a win/win situation for authors who wish to share their content in exchange for notoriety and backlinks to their websites, as well as providing a better experience for consumers who enjoy a variety of content mediums on a website.

    Many of my blogs provide a means for other bloggers to post their articles to my sites with backlinks in their signature to their own sites. It is a win/win for me (because I get content relevant to my choice of topics, while I get to spend time with my kids) and the author (who gets two powerful links to their site of choice).

    I admit, I intentionally place ads that are more likely to get clicked than the links to their sites. Call me a capitalist, I don’t care. I’m not a writer, blogger, website developer for my health. I do it as a business.

    However, the main reason they share their content and the reason I write articles and books to give away, is to get free advertising for my own businesses.

    No text content is provided through this or any other legal service, that hasn’t been agreed to be shared by signing up for Google’s Feed Burner RSS (Really Simple Syndication) service, or article directories that authors want to be shared.

    If Word Press Direct is thorough, as I would like my service to be, it would provide automatic image content, intentionally shared on sites like Flicker, PhotoBucket and other sharing sites as well as video from sharing sites like You Tube, Metacafe and others, to provide a more complete educational and pleasurable experience to one of it’s users sites. It should also provide easy access to relevant products from a variety of sources to keep the visitor from having to search further for what they want.

    Unfortunately, with all of the amazing talent and gifts God has given us, there simply is not enough time in the day for anyone of us to be everything we are capable of, by ourselves.
    Why not teem up with like minded individuals to produce a better product or experience for others?

    I know most of the posters here have concerns about thieves and those who demand something for nothing in return. However, I believe it is safe to assume that those lazy SOBs will never succeed (something to do with karma, maybe). However, there is a difference between laziness and finding or creating tools and partnerships to be more efficient.

    If you are struggling to get traffic to your website and content, it may be a good idea to share your talent on more websites. If you want your talented writing to be ultimately protected, why not convert the content to PDF format and sell it on Amazon.com, Clickbank or install a membership script on your website.

    From what I have seen from about 20 minutes of research on this company, is that WP Direct provides a service that benefits article, video and image syndicators, as well as webmasters and advertisers, by helping to provide a quality end result website that attracts and pleases visitors.

    It is not just Google who ranks multi-content authority sites high. Utilizing all of these mediums enables me to get my personally authored content in front of millions of people and ranking page 1 for hundreds of search terms, on multiple search engines.

    Instead of tar and feathering other businesses that you are not a part of, it may just benefit you to take a closer look at the service they provide (apparently to 10,000 needy people) and see if it is actually a needed service that may benefit millions. Maybe you, instead of me will build the best mouse trap in this niche.

    Are you up to it?
    Brian

    • Lani Rosales

      September 7, 2010 at 5:23 pm

      Brian, I understand your tone given that you are attempting to do something in the same vein as WPDirect, but I maintain my assertion (made two years ago as of publication of this article) that it is theft at best and illegal trademark violation at worst.

      There ARE companies like Pluck.com that allow blogs to opt IN and that is the only way for redistribution to work legally and ethically.

      Good luck in your company, we hope you make ethical and legal choices in order to grow your company rather than the shady, horrid tactics of this company mentioned above.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Social Media

Deepfakes can destroy any reputation, company, or country

(MEDIA) Deepfakes have been around for a few years now, but they’re being crafted for nefarious purposes beyond the original porn and humor uses.

Published

on

deepfakes

Deepfakes — a technology originally used by Reddit perverts who wanted to superimpose their favorite actresses’ faces onto the bodies of porn stars – have come a long way since the original Reddit group was banned.

Deepfakes use artificial intelligence (AI) to create bogus videos by analyzing facial expressions to replace one person’s face and/or voice with another’s.

Using computer technology to synthesize videos isn’t exactly new.

Remember in Forrest Gump, how Tom Hanks kept popping up in the background of footage of important historical events, and got a laugh from President Kennedy? It wasn’t created using AI, but the end result is the same. In other cases, such technology has been used to complete a film when an actor dies during production.

The difference between these examples and that latest deepfake technology is a question of ease and access.

Historically, these altered videos have required a lot of money, patience, and skill. But as computer intelligence has advanced, so too has deepfake technology.

Now the computer does the work instead of the human, making it relatively fast and easy to create a deepfake video. In fact, Stanford created a technology using a standard PC and web cam, as I reported in 2016.

Nowadays, your average Joe can access open source deepfake apps for free. All you need is some images or video of your victim.

While the technology has mostly been used for fun – such as superimposing Nicolas Cage into classic films – deepfakes could and have been used for nefarious purposes.

There is growing concern that deepfakes could be used for political disruption, for example, to smear a politician’s reputation or influence elections.

Legislators in the House and Senate have requested that intelligence agencies report on the issue. The Department of Defense has already commissioned researchers to teach computers to detect deepfakes.

One promising technology developed at the University of Albany analyzes blinking to detect deep fakes, as subjects in the faked videos usually do not blink as often as real humans do. Ironically, in order to teach computers how to detect them, researchers must first create many deepfake videos. It seems that deepfake creators and detectors are locked in a sort of technological arms race.

The falsified videos have the potential to exacerbate the information wars, either by producing false videos, or by calling into question real ones. People are already all too eager to believe conspiracy theories and fake news as it is, and the insurgence of these faked videos could be created to back up these bogus theories.

Others worry that the existence of deepfake videos could cast doubt on actual, factual videos. Thomas Rid, a professor of strategic studies at Johns Hopkins University says that deepfakes could lead to “deep denials” – in other words, “the ability to dispute previously uncontested evidence.”

While there have not yet been any publicly documented cases of attempts to influence politics with deepfake videos, people have already been harmed by the faked videos.

Women have been specifically targeted. Celebrities and civilians alike have reported that their likeness has been used to create fake sex videos.

Deepfakes prove that just because you can achieve an impressive technological feat doesn’t always mean you should.

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!

Continue Reading

Social Media

Red flags to look for when hiring a social media pro

(SOCIAL MEDIA) Social Media is a growing field with everyone and their moms trying to become social media managers. Here are a few experts’ tips on seeing and avoiding the red flags of social media professionals.

Published

on

facebook digital marketing buffer managers

If you’re thinking about hiring a social media professional – or are one yourself – take some tips from the experts.

We asked a number of entrepreneurs specializing in marketing and social media how they separate the wheat from the chaff when it comes to social media managers, and they gave us some hints about how to spot whose social media game is all bark and no bite.

According to our experts, the first thing you should do if you’re hiring a social media professional is to check out their personal and/or professional social media pages.

Candidates with underwhelming, non-existent, out-of-date, or just plain bad social media pages should obviously get the chop.

“If they have no professional social presence themselves, that’s a big red flag,” says Chelle Honiker, CEO at Athenia Creative.

Another entrepreneur, Paul O’Brien of Media Tech Ventures, explains that “the only way to excel is to practice…. If you excel, why would you not be doing so on behalf of your personal brand?”

In other words, if someone can’t make their own social media appealing, how can they be expected to do so for a client?

These pros especially hated seeing outdated icons, infrequent posts, and automatic posts. Worse than outdated social media pages were bad social media pages. Marc Nathan of Miller Egan Molter & Nelson provided a laundry list of negative characteristics that he uses to rule out candidates, including “snarky,” “complaining, unprofessional” “too personal” “inauthentic,” and “argumentative.”

Besides eliminating candidates with poor social media presence, several of these pros also really hated gimmicky job titles such as “guru,” “whiz,” “ninja,” “superhero,” or “magician.”

They were especially turned off by candidates who called themselves “experts” without any proof of their success.

Jeff Fryer of ARM dislikes pros who call themselves experts because, he says “The top leaders in this field will be the first to tell you that they’re always learning– I know I am!” Steer clear of candidates who talk themselves up with ridiculous titles and who can’t provide solid evidence of their expertise.

According to our experts, some of them don’t even try. To candidates who say “’Social media can’t be measured,’” Fryer answer “yes it can[. L]earn how to be a marketer.”

Beth Carpenter, CEO of Violet Hour Social Marketing, complains that many candidates “Can’t talk about ROI (return on investment),” arguing that a good social media pro should be able to show “how social contributes to overall business success.” Good social media pros should show their value in both quantitative and qualitative terms.

While our experts wanted to see numerical evidence of social media success, they were also unimpressed with “vanity metrics” such as numbers of followers.

Many poo-pooed the use of followers alone as an indicator of success, with Tinu Abayomi-Paul of Leveraged Promotion joking that “a trained monkey or spambot” can gather 1,000 followers.

Claims of expertise or success should also be backed up by references and experience in relevant fields.

Several entrepreneurs said that they had come across social media managers without “any experience in critical fields: marketing, advertising, strategic planning and/or writing,” to quote Nancy Schirm of Austin Visuals. She explains that it’s not enough to know how to “handle the technology.” Real social media experts must cultivate “instinct borne from actual experience in persuasive communication.”

So, if you’re an aspiring social media manager, go clean up those pages, get some references, and figure out solid metrics for demonstrating your success.

And if you’re hiring a social media manager, watch out for these red flags to cull your candidate pool.

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!

Continue Reading

Social Media

Pinterest fights anti-vaxx info, urges Facebook to follow suit

(SOCIAL MEDIA) With misinformation continuing to spread online, Pinterest is putting their foot down and urging other networks to do the same.

Published

on

pinteres anti-vaxx

The World Health Organization calls anti-vaxxers one of the top 10 health threats in the world.

Pinterest decided to do something about misinformation being spread by anti-vaxxers. You can no longer search for vaccines on Pinterest and get any information, pro or con about vaccines.

You’ll get a message, “People have reported Pins from this search. Let us know if you see something that goes against our policies.” And “Sorry, we couldn’t find any Pins for this search.”

Pinterest’s policy prohibits “This includes promotion of false cures for terminal or chronic illnesses and anti-vaccination advice.”

Pinterest is disabling search for vaccines while it finds a better solution to allow material that is appropriate. Users should report pins that are against Pinterest’s policy.

There are ways to get around the general search terms. Type in measles. Fortunately, many of the pins are helpful and promote ways to avoid the measles, namely vaccines. With tons of search variations, there’s almost no way to prevent all misinformation.

The company has publicly urged other social networks to join them in this effort to combat anti-vaxx misinformation. But will they follow suit?

Search Google for the measles vaccine and the search engine provides good information for the most part. The first 10 results when I searched were from legitimate sites, the CDC, WebMD, vaccines.gov and the Mayo Clinic. On Facebook, it’s far less clear if the results from a search are coming from authentic, legitimate sites or anti-vaxxers.

CNBC reports that Pinterest’s ban on vaccines and its determination to stop the spread of misinformation pertaining to public health could put pressure on other companies to do the same. Bloomberg reported that Facebook is “exploring additional measures to best combat the problem.”

Tech companies do have an obligation to provide quality information. But given the problems with fake news on Facebook, I think it’s safe to say that no matter what these companies do, people are going to try and continue to find ways to share bad information.

It’s easy to be deceptive on Facebook and other social media sites. Many people continue to be fooled by fake news posts and phishing emails.

Does Pinterest’s move constitute responsibility or is it censorship that could be a slippery slope? Time will tell.

For now, question everything. Use your critical thinking skills to verify information. Maybe someone will come up with a solution to stop online hoaxes, but then the hoaxers will just find new ways to bend the rules.

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Our Great Partners

The
American Genius
news neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Emerging Stories

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!