Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

The American GeniusThe American Genius

Austin

Why I’m glad Proposition 1 failed in Austin [editorial]

With an increasingly globalized economy, it’s difficult to be a conscious consumer. It’s not too much to ask for a company that can blend purpose and profit, which makes the failure of Proposition 1 a time of reflection for all.

Your problematic fave

I want your service but I don’t want you, Uber and Lyft. Just like you want my business but you don’t care about me.

So here we are, at a crossroads.

What do you do when you discover that one of your favorite artists, someone that you idolized for their work, has a record of problematic offenses? Knowing this information, listening to their songs or watching their films becomes a moral dilemma. You can’t choose the path of willful ignorance and turn a blind eye. You want them to be better. But is that even a possibility? There are plenty of other artists out there, ones who produce great work and generally strive to be good people. As art is a reflection of the artist, it’s hard for me to separate the two.

It’s not a perfect analogy, but it’s the problem I have with Uber and Lyft.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

After the headache-inducing madness of Proposition 1, their departure from Austin feels almost cathartic. There’s hope for a fresh start with a new ride-sharing company that preserves the innovation of the service while pairing it with genuine care for driver satisfaction and rider safety. The $8.6 million Ridesharing Works campaign felt false, like a lover who spends outrageous amounts of money when all I’m asking for is concern for my well-being.

bar

Prop 1’s failure was a public call for corporate ethics

The City of Austin needs ride-sharing companies.  We all know the spiel. Transportation network companies (TNCs) fill a gap in the market of our lively, boozy city that lacks the developed public transportation systems of other US metropolitan cities. They’re cheap and convenient. They provide jobs and reduce drunk driving.

There are definite benefits to the ride-sharing work of the world’s two most powerful TNCs. But in a debate over company ethics, the majority of Austin voters decided that the end doesn’t justify the means. And I’m with them.

The botched Prop 1 campaign was bad business in a larger sea of oil stains across the globe, the biggest stain being Uber’s notorious reputation for combating criticism with advertising influence (read: lots of money) instead of meaningful self-reflection.

Let us not forget: Uber’s VP of Business Emil Michael drew controversy in Nov. 2014 at a high-profile NYC dinner when he suggested that the company should hire a task force of its own researchers and journalists to dig up the personal information of reporters behind negative media coverage of Uber.

Dinner joke or not, off the record or not, his statement is illustrative of the standard by which Uber has reacted to lawsuits and attempts at government regulation around the world: With a well-funded plan of retaliation.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Can Uber play ethical catch up?

Jeff Cherry of The Conscious Company Magazine posed a reasonable question about the “missing link” of Uber’s ethics:

“How much better could the company be, how much more value could it be creating if only it paid as much attention to innovating on its cultural model as it has on its competitive model?”

It’s a conversation we need to be having, but with all the blame tossed and bad blood, it’s hard to bring people to the table to chat. Cherry argues that an ethical mindset is instilled in a startup at its inception. Could Uber, now a 7-year-old global company worth billions of dollars, play catch up, if it wanted to? And the more important question, do we want it to? Or is it time to invest in another TNC (eyes are on GetMe in Austin right now, as many Uber and Lyft drivers have already made the transition) to get things right?

Personal bias, because politics are personal

To put my perspective into context, here’s a quick profile on me and my relationship to TNCs:

Like many Austinites, I thought cabs in Austin were too expensive and didn’t use them often. I also didn’t get my driver’s license until my senior year of university, so I’ve had a lot of experience with Cap Metro. But bus routes are limited and navigating the system takes time, so I welcomed Uber and Lyft into the Austin market in 2014 with open arms and have used both services frequently since then. I’m also an infrequent Uber driver; I downloaded the partner app last March during SXSW when a friend referred me, but I don’t rely on the service as my main gig and I haven’t driven in months.

When I wrote about the proposed City Council regulations last November, I fed into the #KeepAustinUber campaign. Even though there was life before Uber, I couldn’t envision how I got from Point A to Point B in pre-2014 Austin. I’d grown dependent – even worse, complacent.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

I didn’t smell bullshit until later in the mess of the Prop 1 debate. Now there’s such a giant stain left behind, it’s impossible to ignore.

Uber’s regretful but “Thank You” mass email sent out to all drivers on Saturday night announcing its departure, with its disappointed tone and a promise that it’ll keep fighting for Austin, felt like a slap in the face to drivers.

uber lyft prop 1 austin letter

To be clear, I’m usually an early tech adopter and a big proponent of tech innovation to address societal issues. But as much as I want to use Uber and Lyft’s services, I can’t support them in good conscience. Not after Prop 1, or a simple Google search. The trust’s just not there.

And finally: I didn’t (couldn’t) vote on Proposition 1. If I could, I would have voted against it.

Conscious consumerism in a globalized economy

With an increasingly globalized economy, it’s difficult to be a conscious consumer. The decision for conscious capitalism requires that we persistently challenge our purchases, from what we eat to where we shop, and now, which transportation initiatives we use.

But we have to try. It’s not too much to ask for a company that can blend purpose and profit, interacting with all of its stakeholders in an authentic way and addressing legitimate safety concerns without waging a war on regulation that sacrifices entire markets of people in the crossfires.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

So I challenge Uber and Lyft to be better and to use the loss of Proposition 1 as a moment of internal reflection. Not just in Austin, but all over the world. What’s ethical isn’t always convenient, but it’ll go a long way with consumers in the long-run. I’m thankful for the innovation, but I want the company values to back it up.

#ProblematicFave

Written By

Staff Writer Larisa Manescu cringes at the question "Where are you from?" because it's a long story, but it's one she loves to share if you ask her. Her interests include storytelling, social justice and choreographed group dance classes.

8 Comments

8 Comments

  1. Chris Lambert

    May 11, 2016 at 2:45 pm

    Hey Larisa. Thanks for the added context. By the end of the article, though, I’m still not sure what Prop 1 did, specifically, to lose your trust in Uber? You mentioned a “record of problematic offenses” but which ones? The only time I felt close to those concerns is when you said, “I can’t support them in good conscience. Not after Prop 1, or a simple Google search. The trust’s just not there.” That made me wonder, again, what was it about Prop 1 and what were you searching Google for? I’m not trying to argue that Prop 1 was great or that there’s nothing wrong with Uber/Lyft. Just that I’m wondering what things you specifically had issues with so I can have better insight into the larger conversation. Was it just the RideSharing Works campaign? Or was it actual details of the ordinance? Was Uber having conflict with drivers leading up to Prop 1 and you took issue with that? What changes are you hoping to see if Uber returns? What things would you hope a new ride sharing company does differently than Uber?

  2. Nate

    May 11, 2016 at 11:40 pm

    You’re so wrong. There is nothing cathartic about this. There is only your ignorance. If you were born 100 years ago you would have written the same thing about horseless carriages vs covered wagons. Accept the reality. Truth is truth. “Uber” is the future. Move on. We all will, with or without you.

  3. Mary Jane

    May 12, 2016 at 1:32 am

    I was in Columbus Ohio for a Rolling Stones concert called a cab from hotel was supposed to arrive at 5:30. I had called at 3 to set it up. Cab arrived at 6:30 one hour late. After concert called for cab waited in the cold rain for 1hr and 15 min still no cab. Called them back said they were on there way another 30 min still no cab. Called uber was there to pick us up in 10 min. So obviously there is a need for uber in big cities.

  4. John

    May 12, 2016 at 6:31 pm

    The thing that really hacks me off is that now the city is taking about deregulating taxis, which in Austin are, by and large, horrible — drivers constantly talking on their cellphones, not knowing where the hell they’re going, showing up really late, etc. Why should we be deregulating the taxi industry when one of the bones of contention in the Uber-Lyft debacle was about regulation — fingerprinting, to be exact. I don’t get it.

  5. V

    May 13, 2016 at 6:03 pm

    This is simple. TNC’s represent a decline in DWI arrests. Aka, a decline in City revenue. Thus Prop 1.

  6. Pingback: The Americanist

  7. Pingback: Will these bills bring ridesharing giants Uber and Lyft back to Austin? - The American Genius

  8. Pingback: Austin's newest ridesharing option is less innovation, more reinventing the wheel - The American Genius

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

The
American Genius
news neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list for news sent straight to your email inbox.

Advertisement

KEEP READING!

Business News

(BUSINESS) If you drive for popular delivery services as a side hustle or your full-time job, check out how much you could save on...

Business News

(BUSINESS) Uber isn't new to in-app expansion, especially since its grocery and goods delivery service took off - now, Uber will let you choose...

Business News

(BUSINESS NEWS) The battle for Uber and Lyft drivers' status continues, and despite company protests, the official ruling has been upheld.

Business News

[BUSINESS NEWS] Uber and Lyft must reclassify their drivers as employees, which could spell the end of the sharing economy as we know it....

The American Genius is a strong news voice in the entrepreneur and tech world, offering meaningful, concise insight into emerging technologies, the digital economy, best practices, and a shifting business culture. We refuse to publish fluff, and our readers rely on us for inspiring action. Copyright © 2005-2022, The American Genius, LLC.