Connect with us

Opinion Editorials

Will Realtors be replaced by technology by the year 2031? You respond

There is always talk of disintermediating the real estate industry, but could it happen by 2031? Some say yes, others emphatically say no. What say you?



We’ve written about and its question slash answer slash wiki community of users and their potential uses in the real estate industry. One of the topics I follow is “Real Estate Agents” to monitor consumer sentiment regarding the profession.

Recently, a Quora user asked “Will technology replace the need for human real estate agents in the next 10-20 years? Why or why not?”

Before I share my personal beliefs, it was interesting how the community weighed in.

The business of real estate will change

Quora user Lanny Baker who has no bio but whose Facebook profile is that of Zip Realty’s CEO, (so we cannot verify whether or not it is actually Baker, but nonetheless), Baker said, “Looking at the growth and scale of eBay Motors, eTrade & Charles Schwab, and TurboTax & QuickBooks there are at least a few interesting examples of technological solutions encroaching on well-entrenched human-powered services (used car sales, stock brokerage, tax and SMB accountancy), . Most of these are higher frequency activities for consumers than is residential real estate, which means the incentive to seek out a more efficient alternative, and the market opportunity for those alternatives, may be bigger in these other areas. In each of those examples though, the conventional wisdom for a long time was that “people will never do this online, it is too big, too complicated, the risks are too great.” And then, that changed…”

RealDirect CEO Doug Perlson said, “I believe the role of the real estate agent is changing, and while the agent may not “go away”, I envision a platform that lets sellers distribute their listing to every place a buyer may be looking (search, classifieds,social nets, MLS), use interaction data to allow the seller to make informed decisions on what to do next (pricing, etc.), and provide CRM like tools that make scheduling and contacts seamless through the sales process (think Open Table for home showings). A seller can use these tools to manage the process with the help of a real estate “consultant” who unlike a typical agent is motivated by commission, but is a salaried professional.”

Paperless Real Estate specialist Jessica Stoner pointed to the reasons time won’t change why consumers hire Realtors and answer the question simply, “Yes and No. There will remain a role for the the traditional full service agent. This will still be sought by a portion of the public. However, the online power of the people is changing real estate forever.”

Real estate and technology attorney Elizabeth Baum points to technology as more of a catalyst, “I don’t think technology will completely replace real estate agents in all transactions, but it will fundamentally change the role of the agent. There will always be some need for quality facilitation of a complicated (or at least intimidating and costly) transaction, and there will always be people who would prefer to outsource a lot of the steps involved in a real estate transaction (ie., sorting through the MLS, getting a house ready for sale).”

Agents aren’t going anywhere

Max Cangelosi, a consumer who is not involved in the real estate industry said, “With today’s technology in a vacuum….no. But I think it’s certainly possible in the residential space given the consumer protections in place.” Cangelosi continued with examples ranging from LegalZoom contract use to Zillow’s true understanding of a home, ending with “I think that the issue is less about technology as there are hundreds of thousands of incredibly hard working agents who built their careers in this industry.”

Austin Realtor Malita Jones points to the value proposition of agents, saying, “I always say it’s not about finding the house – it’s about representing clients through the contract process – I work on contracts and the house buying / selling process constantly – even my smartest clients get really confused on how things are handled or who pays for what – or what to do and not to do to keep themselves out of court in a few years.” CEO Matthew Holder said, “Its unlikely. A great example is Kelly Blue Book for cars. No matter how sophisticated Kelly Blue Book is at determining fair market vale (about as accurate as Zillow is at predicting home prices) people will still feel the need to negotiate. People will also feel the need to be protected from liability, which is where an agent comes in. This could only be replaced by a more sophisticated market structure where incentives and knowledge was more easily shared…not likely to happen since the incentives are towards hoarding information. There are many things that can be automated, but the future of real estate is in making the agent’s job easier, cheaper, and increased efficiency in the market.”

Where do you stand?

I lean toward the camp of a shifting value proposition of Realtors with technology acting as an aide to the industry rather than a replacement.

Do you think consumers can be swayed to believe that technology will replace Realtors or is the public level headed enough to see a simple shift? Where do you stand?

Continue Reading


  1. Joe Manausa

    March 8, 2011 at 9:05 am

    Lani, I think “replace” is a little strong, but certainly “redefine.” I see real estate agents evolving to more of a customer service solution, since the research and property selection tools on the internet are growing very fast. Perhaps a cross between a current “transaction coordinator” and a (other industry) customer service rep for pre and post closing Q&A.

    • Lani Rosales

      March 8, 2011 at 9:16 am

      I agree, although I think the most skilled negotiators will end up in the top producer spots as much of the rest can be aided with tech. Thoughts?

  2. Matt Thomson

    March 8, 2011 at 9:42 am

    We’ll be replaced, but it won’t take til 2031. Think about it. There’s already self-check lines in many grocery stores. What we do isn’t any more complicated than grocery checking. I mean, if you can purchase groceries all by yourself, and if you can buy a $12,000 car with no legal ramifications whatsoever all by yourself, why will it be another 20 years before you choose to buy a $300,000 home with tons of legal ramifications all by yourself.

  3. Matt Thomson

    March 8, 2011 at 9:46 am

    You really need a “Delete” button on this blog for guys like me who it send before we think.
    Despite my dripping sarcasm, I am fully aware that our roles will change, as they already have dramatically in the past decade.
    Consumers are given a ton more information, and in many cases are better at sorting through the data than many real estate agents. That may be a result of the buyers knowing more of what they want so they can sort better, it may sadly be that many consumers feel the need to educate themselves while agents stop learning once they get their license.
    Changing roles doesn’t mean being replaced. Keeping up with tools and learning how others are using those tools and keeping a fiduciary rather than functionary mindset should keep agents in business for many many years.

    • Lani Rosales

      March 8, 2011 at 2:19 pm

      “Changing roles doesn’t mean being replaced,” you say and I agree!

  4. Lynda White via Facebook

    March 8, 2011 at 9:52 am

    Hee hee and I just commented on that very question on Quora about an hour ago! 🙂 No, we will always need the human touch.

  5. Joe Sheehan

    March 8, 2011 at 10:28 am

    As I was thinking about this question, I realized that if I am still above ground in 2031, I will be 76 years old. Hopefully I will be living in a warm-all-year-round climate and the most worrisome thing on my mind will be what restaurant offers an early-bird special and a good seniors discount. 🙂

    • Lani Rosales

      March 8, 2011 at 2:20 pm

      Joe, that’s an interesting point and one that must be nice to think about. I’m not a Realtor but I’m still in my 20s so I should probably think about Robots while you think about buffets, deal? 😉

  6. Jill Kipnis

    March 8, 2011 at 2:30 pm

    This is such an interesting question, and I wish I had a crystal ball! While technology has certainly changed industries including publishing (with eReader devices) and music (the downfall of the physical album), it’s hard for me to picture undergoing such a huge transaction like buying or selling my home without the assistance of a Realtor. I think Realtors will increasingly use technology to help with the paperwork for each transaction, but the process of pricing a home, staging a home, working with an inspector, etc. requires the human touch of a Realtor.

    At least in today’s market, I think we can agree that using a Realtor is critical:

    –Jill Kipnis, Community Builder

  7. cbass

    March 8, 2011 at 4:16 pm

    yes, but probably much sooner. most will soon be playing checkers in the park with former travel agents, book & music store owners, and blockbuster employees.

    • Jonathan Benya

      March 9, 2011 at 1:24 pm

      I’m so sick of the comparisons being made between Realtors and every other occupation that has been supplanted online. It’s a completely different ball of wax, guys! Yes, the role is evolving, yes it will continue to evolve, but replaced? Hardly!

  8. Jonathan

    March 9, 2011 at 2:57 pm

    Choosing a property is inherently a community decision. People love to share that experience with someone, or get advice from a trusted source. That want to be assured that they are making a good decision. For that reason I don’t think technology will replace Realtors.

  9. TJ Bell

    March 9, 2011 at 10:52 pm

    “Real Estate Consultant” sounds pretty 10 dollar an hourish to me with some of the work being outsourced to a call center in Thiruvananthapuram.

    I think that’s the real issue. The industry will continue to change but will the value proposition be there in 10 years for people to pay $12,000 in commissions on $200,000 transaction.

  10. Ralph Bell

    March 10, 2011 at 12:41 am

    I see mortgage brokers being replaced before REALTORS. I see the current compensation of REALTORS changing. But I also see pink elephants and flying monkeys.

    Regardless of what you think or not think about the future, REALTORS as always will have to adapt to change if they want to be successful.

    And maybe by 2031 HUD will finally accept the use of electronic signatures 31 years after the Electronic Signature Act was passed. And finally by 2031 my local MLS will allow you to access it with a web browser other than Internet Explorer.

  11. Missy Caulk

    May 3, 2011 at 7:33 am

    A few years ago, our GMM (General Membership Meeting) at the Ann Arbor Area Board had a newly relocated Google Executive in to speak.

    He said, he thought he could do it on his own, armed with Google Maps, the listings,the values etc…

    …but he couldn't because he still needed someone to let him in the houses.

    Rather than call all the listing agents he chose a buyer agent. I know the agent he chose and he is NOT technology minded at all, now retired.

    • Lani Rosales

      May 3, 2011 at 10:02 am

      Missy, that is SO telling. What a great story to tell clients! 🙂

  12. matthew holder

    May 3, 2011 at 10:14 am

    Hey all.

    I feel Realtors have more to fear from being replaced by attorneys than tech. People are quick to compare the real estate industry, which deals with selling assets of extreme variance from home to home and neighborhood to neighborhood. Cars, hotel rooms, etc. have a much smaller (and more manageable) variance between feature sets, which makes it easier to comparison shop and create fairly accurate valuation models. Combine that with the life decision and high investment of purchasing a home and you have one hot mess to sort out with a clean tech solution.

    Has anyone considered that real estate agents are the most efficient solution? And that tech will help increase their efficiency and help them further focus and specialize their efforts?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Opinion Editorials

Shady salary transparency is running rampant: What to look out for

(EDITORIAL) Employees currently have the upper hand in the market. Employers, you must be upfront about salary and approach it correctly.



Man holding money in the dark representing false salary transparency.

It’s the wild wild west out there when it comes to job applications. Job descriptions often misrepresent remote work opportunities. Applicants have a difficult time telling job scams from real jobs. Job applicants get ghosted by employers, even after a long application process. Following the Great Resignation, many employers are scrambling for workers. Employees have the upper hand in the hiring process, and they’re no longer settling for interviews with employers that aren’t transparent, especially about salary.

Don’t be this employer

User ninetytwoturtles shared a post on Reddit in r/recruitinghell in which the employer listed the salary as $0 to $1,000,000 per year. Go through many listings on most job boards and you’ll find the same kind of tactics – no salary listed or too large of a wide range. In some places, it’s required to post salary information. In 2021, the Equal Pay for Equal Work Act went into effect in Colorado. Colorado employers must list salary and benefits to give new hires more information about fair pay. Listing a broad salary range skirts the issue. It’s unfair to applicants, and in today’s climate, employers are going to get called out on it. Your brand will take a hit.

Don’t obfuscate wage information

Every employer likes to think that their employees work because they enjoy the job, but let’s face it, money is the biggest motivator. During the interview process, many a job has been lost over salary negotiations. Bringing up wages too early in the application process can be bad for a job applicant. On the other hand, avoiding the question can lead to disappointment when a job is offered, not to mention wasted time. In the past, employers held all the cards. Currently, it’s a worker’s market. If you want productive, quality workers, your business needs to be honest and transparent about wages.

Continue Reading

Opinion Editorials

3 reasons to motivate yourself to declutter your workspace (and mind)

(EDITORIAL) Making time to declutter saves time and money – all while reducing stress. Need a little boost to start? We all need motivation sometimes.



Clean work desk representing the need to declutter.

It’s safe to say that we’ve all been spending a lot more time in our homes these last few years. This leads us to fixate on the things we didn’t have time for before – like a loose doorknob, an un-alphabetized bookshelf, or that we’ve put off ‘declutter’ on our to-do list for too long.

The same goes for our workspaces. Many of us have had to designate a spot at home to use for work purposes. For those of you who still need to remain on-site, you’ve likely been too busy to focus on your surroundings.

Cleaning and organizing your workspace every so often is important, regardless of the state of the world, and with so much out of our control right now, this is one of the few things we can control.

Whether you’re working from a home office or an on-site office, take some time for quarantine decluttering. According to The Washington Post, taking time to declutter can increase your productivity, lower stress, and save money (I don’t know about you, but just reading those 3 things makes me feel better already).

Clutter can cause us to feel overwhelmed and make us feel a bit frazzled. Having an office space filled with piles of paper containing irrelevant memos from five years ago or 50 different types of pens has got to go – recycle that mess and reduce your stress. The same goes with clearing files from your computer; everything will run faster.

Speaking of running faster, decluttering and creating a cleaner workspace will also help you be more efficient and productive. Build this habit by starting small: try tidying up a bit at the end of every workday, setting yourself up for a ready-to-roll morning.

Cleaning also helps you take stock of stuff that you have so that you don’t end up buying more of it. Create a designated spot for your tools and supplies so that they’re more visible – this way, you’ll always know what you have and what needs to be replenished. This will help you stop buying more of the same product that you already have and save you money.

So, if you’ve been looking to improve your focus and clearing a little bit of that ‘quarantine brain’, start by getting your workspace in order. You’ll be amazed at how good it feels to declutter and be “out with the old”; you may even be inspired to do the same for your whole house. Regardless, doing this consistently will create a positive shift in your life, increasing productivity, reducing stress, and saving you money.

Continue Reading

Opinion Editorials

How to identify and minimize ‘invisible’ work in your organization

(EDITORIAL) Often meaningless, invisible tasks get passed down to interns and women. These go without appreciation or promotion. How can we change that?



Women in a meeting around table, inclusion as a part of stopping gender discrimination representing invisible work.

Invisible work, non-promotable tasks, and “volunteer opportunities” (more often volun-told), are an unfortunate reality in the workforce. There are three things every employer should do in relation to these tasks: minimize them, acknowledge them, and distribute them equitably.

Unfortunately, the reality is pretty far from this ideal. Some estimates state up to 75% or more of these time-sucking, minimally career beneficial activities are typically foisted on women in the workplace and are a leading driver behind burnout in female employees. The sinister thing about this is most people are completely blind to these factors; it’s referred to as invisible work for a reason.

Research from Harvard Business Review* found that 44% more requests are presented to women as compared to men for “non-promotable” or volunteer tasks at work. Non-promotable tasks are activities such as planning holiday events, coordinating workplace social activities, and other ‘office housework’ style activities that benefit the office but typically don’t provide career returns on the time invested. The work of the ‘office mom’ often goes unacknowledged or, if she’s lucky, maybe garners some brief lip service. Don’t be that boss that gives someone a 50hr workload task for a 2-second dose of “oh yeah thanks for doing a bajillion hours of work on this thing I will never acknowledge again and won’t help your career.”  Yes, that’s a thing. Don’t do it. If you do it, don’t be surprised when you have more vacancies than staff. You brought that on yourself.

There is a lot of top-tier talent out there in the market right now. To be competitive, consider implementing some culture renovations so you can have a more equitable, and therefore more attractive, work culture to retain your top talent.

What we want to do:

  1. Identify and minimize invisible work in your organization
  2. Acknowledge the work that can’t be avoided. Get rid of the blind part.
  3. Distribute the work equitably.

Here is a simple example:

Step 1: Set up a way for staff to anonymously bring things to your attention. Perhaps a comment box. Encourage staff to bring unsung heroes in the office to your attention. Things they wish their peers or they themselves received acknowledgment for.

Step 2: Read them and actually take them seriously. Block out some time on your calendar and give it your full attention.

For the sake of demonstration, let’s say someone leaves a note about how Caroline always tidies up the breakroom at the end of the day and cleans the coffee pot with supplies Caroline brings from home. Now that we have identified a task, we are going to acknowledge it, minimize it, and consider the distribution of labor.

Step 3: Thank Caroline at the team meeting for scrubbing yesterday’s burnt coffee out of the bottom of the pot every day. Don’t gloss over it. Make the acknowledgment mean something. Buy her some chips out of the vending machine or something. The smallest gestures can have the biggest impact when coupled with actual change.

Step 4: Remind your staff to clean up after themselves. Caroline isn’t their mom. If you have to, enforce it.

Step 5: Put it in the office budget to provide adequate cleaning supplies for the break room and review your custodial needs. This isn’t part of Caroline’s job description and she could be putting that energy towards something else. Find the why of the situation and address it.

You might be rolling your eyes at me by now, but the toll of this unpaid invisible work has real costs.  According to the 2021 Women in the Workplace Report* the ladies are carrying the team, but getting little to none of the credit. Burnout is real and ringing in at an all-time high across every sector of the economy. To be short, women are sick and tired of getting the raw end of the deal, and after 2 years of pandemic life bringing it into ultra-sharp focus, are doing something about it. In the report, 40% of ladies were considering jumping ship. Data indicates that a lot of them not only manned the lifeboats but landed more lucrative positions than they left. Now is the time to score and then retain top talent. However, it is up to you to make sure you are offering an environment worth working in.

*Note: the studies cited here do not differentiate non-cis-identifying persons. It is usually worse for individuals in the LGBTQIA+ community.

Continue Reading

Our Great Partners

American Genius
news neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list for news sent straight to your email inbox.

Emerging Stories

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!