Two wrong addresses demolished within 24 hours
According to the local CBS affiliate in Dallas Fort Worth, the City of Fort Worth has ceased all demolition operations in light of yet another building being torn down by their contractor that was not supposed to be demolished. The City’s spokesperson, Bill Begley called it “human error,” and the official in charge of oversight is now on paid leave while the city investigates how this could happen.
In July, the City was supposed to demolish a fire damaged building, but also took out the neighboring home as part of the demolition order, a mistake officials said at the time would be investigated fully so as not to happen again.
Same crew, same code enforcement officer
CBS has now uncovered that the crew hired to demolish the fire damaged building in July also tore down a vacant but structurally sound house rather than the condemned house next door. Neighbors noticed the crew was tearing down a home in good shape instead of the dilapidated building next door, and while utilities were turned off at the address and no one was home, it most certainly was not the correct house, a mistake neighbors note was obvious by outward appearance of the homes.
The second accidental demolition only came to the public’s attention as part of an investigation of the first demolition, both overseen by the same code enforcement officer and subcontractor.
City is working to rectify
“There is a common thread,” Begley told CBS. “It was the same contractor with the same code supervisor in charge and the same code supervisor on site. That said, in both instances there were honest mistakes made. And that’s why we’re putting policies in place to ensure we have safe guards. At Lagonda [the first mistake reported] the contractor took it a step too far, at Watercress [this specific incident coming to light today] we had a city staffer inappropriately mark the house. So in both instances there was a human error.”
The contractor isn’t talking, and Begley said the city is working to “do what is right” for the property owners.
Austin tops the list of best places to buy a home
When looking to buy a home, taking the long view is important before making such a huge investment – where are the best places to make that commitment?
Looking at the bigger picture
(REALUOSO.COM) – Let us first express that although we are completely biased about Texas (we’re headquartered here, I personally grew up here), the data is not – Texas is the best. That’s a scientific fact. There’s a running joke in Austin that if there is a list of “best places to [anything],” we’re on it, and the joke causes eye rolls instead of humility (we’re sore winners and sore losers in this town).
That said, SelfStorage.com dug into the data and determined that the top 12 places to buy a home are currently Texas and North Carolina (and Portland, I guess you’re okay too or whatever).
They examined the nerdiest of numbers from the compound annual growth rate in inflation-adjusted GDP to cost premium, affordability, taxes, job growth, and housing availability.
“Buying a house is a big decision and a big commitment,” the company notes. “Although U.S. home prices have risen in the long term, the last decade has shown that path is sometimes full of twists, turns, dizzying heights and steep, abrupt falls. Today, home prices are stabilizing and increasing in most areas of the U.S.”
Average age of houses on the rise, so is it now better or worse to buy new?
With aging housing in America, are first-time buyers better off buying new or existing homes? The average age of a home is rising, as is the price of new housing, so a shift could be upon us.
The average home age is higher than ever
(REALUOSO.COM) – In a survey from the Department of Housing and Urban Development American Housing Survey (AHS), the median age of homes in the United States was 35 years old. In Texas, homes are a bit younger with the median age between 19 – 29 years. The northeast has the oldest homes, with the median age between 50 – 61 years. In 1985, the median age of a home was only 23 years.
With more houses around 40 years old, the National Association of Realtors asserts that homeowners will have to undertake remodeling and renovation projects before selling unless the home is sold as-is, in which case the buyer will be responsible to update their new residence. Even homeowners who aren’t selling will need to consider remodeling for structural and aesthetic reasons.
Prices of new homes on the rise
Newer homes cost more than they used to. The price differential between new homes and older homes has increased from 10 percent traditionally to around 37 percent in 2014. This is due to rising construction costs, scarcity of lots, and a low inventory of new homes that doesn’t meet the demand.
Are Realtors the real loser in the fight between Zillow Group and Move, Inc.?
The last year has been one of dramatic and rapid change in the real estate tech sector, but Realtors are vulnerable, and we’re worried.
Why Realtors are vulnerable to these rapid changes
(REALUOSO.COM) – Corporate warfare demands headlines in every industry, but in the real estate tech sector, a storm has been brewing for years, which in the last year has come to a head. Zillow Group and Move, Inc. (which is owned by News Corp. and operates ListHub, Realtor.com, TopProducer, and other brands) have been competing for a decade now, and the race has appeared to be an aggressive yet polite boxing match. Last year, the gloves came off, and now, they’ve drawn swords and appear to want blood.
Note: We’ll let you decide which company plays which role in the image above.
So how then, does any of this make Realtors the victims of this sword fight? Let’s get everyone up to speed, and then we’ll discuss.
1. Zillow poaches top talent, Move/NAR sues
It all started last year when the gloves came off – Move’s Chief Strategy Officer (who was also Realtor.com’s President), Errol Samuelson jumped ship and joined Zillow on the same day he phoned in his resignation without notice. He left under questionable circumstances, which has led to a lengthy legal battle (wherein Move and NAR have sued Zillow and Samuelson over allegations of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and misappropriation of trade secrets), with the most recent motion being for contempt, which a judge granted to Move/NAR after the mysterious “Samuelson Memo” surfaced.
Salt was added to the wound when Move awarded Samuelson’s job to Move veteran, Curt Beardsley, who days after Samuelson left, also defected to Zillow. This too led to a lawsuit, with allegations including breach of contract, violation of corporations code, illegal dumping of stocks, and Move has sought restitution. These charges are extremely serious, but demanded slightly less attention than the ongoing lawsuit against Samuelson.
2. Two major media brands emerge
Business Marketing2 weeks ago
Unpopular opinion: Coworkers are not your ‘family’
Business Marketing2 weeks ago
How many hours of the work week are actually efficient?
Opinion Editorials2 weeks ago
The truth about unemployment from someone who’s been through it
Opinion Editorials2 days ago
Easy ways to help an unhappy customer
Business News2 weeks ago
Everyone should have an interview escape plan
Business Entrepreneur2 weeks ago
How can a small business beat a large competitor moving in next door?
Business News2 weeks ago
Fake news? Well, what about fake reviews?
Business Entrepreneur5 days ago
How to choose the right software for your business