The end is near
By this time, you’re probably aware of Twitter’s controversial hints about upgrading its signature character count from 140 to 10,000—a feature similar to the one already implemented in their messaging service (for those living under a rock, this article by SocialTimes offers a pretty comprehensive overview). Naturally, social media troglodytes near and far are coming out of the woodwork to defend or decry the proposed change.
Oh, the humanity
25 years ago, few would have thought that one-sentence summaries and six-second videos would be the preferred marketing trend, but one need only look at platforms such as Twitter, Instagram, and Vine to ascertain low attention span pertinence in modern-day advertising. The average social media user doesn’t want to read more than approximately 250 words, and the prevalence of mobile users means information needs to be clean, quick, and readable on a screen. With this in mind, it’s easy to see why Twitter’s proposed character limit revision is giving hardcore users heartburn.
Well, take a couple of tums and relax, you guys; the 10,000 character limit is, ultimately, a good thing.
“But Jack,” you protest, “Twitter’s appeal lies in its ability to deliver information in a concise and readable manner! Doesn’t upping the character limit to 10,000 negate Twitter’s entire purpose?” You bring up a good point, imaginary dissenter—but no, changing the character limit doesn’t void Twitter’s mission.
Your timeline won’t show over 140
For starters, the change will only affect the amount of information you CAN upload—you still won’t see more than 140 characters’ worth of text when scrolling through your timeline.
In other words, your browsing experience won’t change insofar as you won’t see any more text on your screen than you’re used to, and those pesky swarms of broken tweets in your feed will likely be condensed into one short paragraph. This also means that small businesses and content managers can still hook customers with the first 140 characters, with the option of providing more information.
Facilitating reads over clicks
That leads us to the simple matter of content consolidation. We’re much more likely to read a couple hundred words than click on a link, especially on mobile platforms. If companies can provide a quick and painless summary within the same platform as their soundbite, the next logical step is increased consumer growth. Convenience is chief among modern marketing aspects, and the 10,000 character limit will absolutely facilitate it.
Consumers are adaptive
“I don’t know, Jack,” you whine, “It seems like customers are going to be confused with a block of content on the page.” Again, that’s a fair point—as speed readers and skimmers, we seem to be startled at the sight of more than a few words—but you’re not giving enough credit to consumers OR businesses.
Consumers are all about convenience; for example, Facebook businesses often have a customer service function on their pages, whereas such functionality is impaired on Twitter, with most businesses defaulting to linking customers to a separate service page—which, in turn, fosters inconvenience and loss of business.
It’s also worth noting that neither consumers nor business content managers are stupid, and both are highly adaptive in their natural habitats.
This, too, is ephemeral
Of course, when all is said and done, the angst over this development is going to pass in the blink of an eye. Look at all the drastic changes in social media interfaces and functionality in the last 6 months; who’s still talking about Twitter’s layout renovation or Facebook’s timeline overhaul? Neither of these platforms is even close to becoming defunct as a result of such changes, and business is still booming on both of them.
Remember, convenience is King—and Twitter is pushing for ownership of the social media kingdom.
Why Trump’s lawsuit against social media still matters
(SOCIAL MEDIA) Former President Trump snagged headlines for suing every large social media platform, and it has gone quiet, but it still deeply matters.
It was splashed across headlines everywhere in July: Former President Trump filed a lawsuit against social media platforms that he claims unrightfully banned him during and after the fallout of the January 6th capitol riots. The headlines ran for about a week or so and then fell off the radar as other, fresher, just-as-juicy news headlines captured the media’s eye.
Many of us were left wondering what that was all about and if anything ever became of it. For even more of us, it probably passed out of our minds completely. Lack of public awareness for these things is common after the initial media blitz fades.
Lawsuits like these in the US can take months, if not years between newsworthy milestones. The most recent news I could find as of this publishing is from August 24, 2021, on Yahoo! News from the Washington Examiner discussing the Trump camp’s request for a preliminary injunction in the lawsuit.
This particular suit shouldn’t be left to fade from memory in the shadows though, and here’s why:
In the past few years, world powers have been reigning in regulations on social media and internet commerce. The US is actually a little behind the curve. Trump may have unwittingly given us a source of momentum to get with the times.
In the European Union, they have the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), widely acknowledged to be one of the toughest and most thorough privacy laws in the world, a bold title. China just passed its own pair of laws in the past four months: The Data Security Law, which took effect on Sept. 1, and The Personal Information Law, set to take effect November 1st. The pair is poised to give the GDPR a run for its money for that title.
Meanwhile, in the US, Congress has been occupied with other things and, while there are five bills that took aim at tech monopoly currently on the table and a few CEOs had to answer some questions, little actual movement or progress has been made on making similar privacy protections a thing in the United States.
Trump’s lawsuit, while labeled by many as a toothless public relations move, may actually create momentum needed to push regulation of tech and social media forward in the US. The merits of the case are weak and ultimately the legislation that would give it teeth doesn’t exist yet.
You can’t hold tech companies accountable to a standard that doesn’t properly exist in law.
However, high profile attention and someone willing to continue to make noise and bring attention back to the subject, one of Trump’s strongest talents, could be “just what the doctor ordered” to inspire Congress to make internet user rights and data privacy a priority in the US, finally.
Even solopreneurs are doing live commerce online – it’s not just QVC’s game anymore
(SOCIAL MEDIA) When you think of watching a show and buying things in real time, it invokes thoughts of QVC, but social media video has changed all that.
After the year everyone has had, one wouldn’t be remiss in thinking that humanity wants a break from live streaming. They would, however, be wrong: Live online commerce – a method of conversion first normalized in China – is the next evolution of the ubiquitous e-commerce experience, which means it’s something you’ll want on your radar.
Chinese company, Alibaba first live streamed on an e-commerce site in 2016, allowing buyers to watch, interact with, and buy from sellers from the comfort of their homes. In 2020, that same strategy netted Alibaba $7.5 billion in presale revenue – and it only took 30 minutes, according to McKinsey Digital.
But, though western audiences have proven a desire to be just as involved with sellers during the buying process, live commerce hasn’t taken off here the way it has elsewhere. If e-commerce merchants want to maximize their returns in the next few years, that needs to change.
McKinsey Digital points out a couple of different benefits for organizations using live commerce, the main one being an influx in traffic. Live streaming events break the buying experience mold, and consumers love being surprised. You can expect that prospective buyers who wouldn’t necessarily visit your store under normal circumstances would find value in attending a live event.
Live events also keep people on your site for longer, resulting in richer conversion opportunities.
The sense of urgency inherent in in-person shopping doesn’t always translate to online markets, but having a stream showing decreasing inventory or limited-availability items being sold inspires people to act expeditiously rather than sitting on a loaded cart–something that can kill an e-commerce conversion as quickly as it starts one.
There are a ton of different ways to incorporate live events into your e-commerce campaigns. Virtual auctions are popular, as are markets in which individual sellers take buyers through inventory. However, the live event could be tangentially related–or even just something impressive running in parallel with the sale–and still bring in a swell of revenue.
Screen fatigue is real, and there isn’t a true substitute for a brick-and-mortar experience when done correctly. But if you have an e-commerce shop that isn’t utilizing some form of live entertainment–even just to bring in new buyers–you’re going to want to try this strategy soon.
LinkedIn is nixing Stories this month (LinkedIn had Stories!?)
(SOCIAL MEDIA) LinkedIn tried to be like the cool kids and launched “Stories,” but the video feature is being shelved and “reimagined.” Ok.
Creating the next big thing is essential for social networks to stay relevant, continue growing, and avoid shutting down. Sometimes, this leads to businesses trying to ride along with the success of another app’s latest feature and creating their cloned version. While the logic of recreating something already working makes sense, the results aren’t universal.
This time around, LinkedIn is saying goodbye to its short-lived Snapchat-like video product, Stories. In a company post, LinkedIn says it’s removing its Stories experience by the end of September.
Why is LinkedIn retiring Stories?
According to a post by Senior Director of Product at LinkedIn Liz Li, “[LinkedIn] introduced Stories last year as a fun and casual way to share quick video updates.”
After some testing and feedback, they learned this is not what users wanted. Seems like they could have beta tested with users and heard the same thing, but I digress.
“In developing Stories, we assumed people wouldn’t want informal videos attached to their profile, and that ephemerality would reduce barriers that people feel about posting. Turns out, you want to create lasting videos that tell your professional story in a more personal way and that showcase both your personality and expertise,” said Li.
What does this mean for users?
Starting on September 30, 2021, users will no longer be able to create Stories for Pages. If you’ve already planned to have an image or video ads run in-between Stories, they will now appear on the LinkedIn feed instead. For those who used Campaign Manager to promote or sponsor a Story directly from your Page, the company says “these paid Stories will not appear in the LinkedIn feed”, and the user will need to recreate the ad in Campaign Manager.
What’s next for LinkedIn?
According to Li, LinkedIn is taking what it learned from its finding to “evolve the Stories format into a reimagined video experience across LinkedIn that’s even richer and more conversational.” It plans on doing so by using mixed media and the creative tools of Stories.
“As we reimagine what is next, we’re focusing on how we can provide you with a short-form, rich interactive video format that is unique to our platform and that better helps you reach and engage your audiences on LinkedIn. We’re always excited to try out new things and learn as we go, and will continue to share updates along the way,” the company said.
Although Stories didn’t work well for LinkedIn as they hoped, one thing is for sure. LinkedIn isn’t giving up on some form of interactive video, and we can only hope they “reimagine” something unique that keeps users coming back for more.
Business Entrepreneur2 weeks ago
6 entrepreneurial tools to keep startup productivity high
Opinion Editorials1 week ago
Why tech talent is in the process of abandoning Austin
Business Entrepreneur3 days ago
‘Small’ business was once a stigma, but is now a growing point of pride
Opinion Editorials3 days ago
Minimalism doesn’t have to happen overnight
Business Entrepreneur3 days ago
Why and how to acquire a business – 4 tips for radical success
Business Entrepreneur2 weeks ago
Here’s why you shouldn’t start that startup
Opinion Editorials2 weeks ago
Why robots freak us out, and what it means for the future of AI
Business Marketing2 weeks ago
7 Low-budget marketing ideas for small businesses [sponsored]