Connect with us

Business News

Main Street shopping is dying, retailers struggle to keep up with Amazon

(NEWS) As popularity in online shopping increases, the need for brick and mortar stores is rapidly declining.

Published

on

online shopping impulse spend

Good ol’ Main Street

Back in the day you could buy everything you needed on Main Street. Then Main Street was swapped out for malls and shopping centers and then those for Super Targets/Walmarts.

bar
Now Amazon (and a few others, but mostly Amazon) has come in and scooped up all of the foot traffic that used to go to those stores.

Brick and mortar break down

Brick and mortar is on the way out (honestly, it’s been on the way out) and Amazon just keeps picking up steam (at least 152 million active accounts)! Malls used to be filled with wandering teens and busy shoppers.

Who wants to go out to a store and buy something you don’t immediately need when it can be delivered to your doorstep in 48 hour’s time?

Timeliness is next to godliness

I think we all know the answer. Online is cheaper, faster, and more convenient. We don’t have to deal with parking or going to a store, only for them to not have the item we are looking to purchase.

Online, there are no crowds, no annoying sales people bugging us every five seconds when, in today’s culture, we know what we want, when we want it and how to get it, without anyone’s help.

Clicking a button or two and getting exactly what we want is the dream experience and it’s no longer a dream!

Amazon has got it goin’ on

According to a ReadyCloud.com article from February 2016, Amazon has 183 million products! What local store can say that?! With all of their goods they could stock 1290 Walmart Super Centers.

The number of monthly visitors to Amazon could fill 80 Mall of Americas or 60 Disney Lands.

And to further set themselves apart Amazon created this little thing you might have heard of, “Prime,” back in 2005 that offers two days guaranteed shipping!

A little bit of everyone is using Amazon

Nineteen percent of Millennials, 16 percent of Gen X-ers and 11 percent of Baby Boomers have a prime account and the number of Prime accounts (which comes with guaranteed two-day shipping) has increased 35 percent since 2015. Now, in 29 cities, those who have prime accounts can get items within an hour. In 1000 additional cities, Prime account holders can get same day shipping!

It’s pretty damn hard to compete with that and companies like Macy’s, JCPenny, and many others aren’t.

Several retail chains are closing storefronts left and right and while some try to salvage business by moving online, others are just dying out.

Moving past main street

As much as I like to romanticize Main Street and the role it has played in America’s history, it’s just not a sustainable concept. Just ask Wet Seal, J. Crew, Nine West, True Religion, and Payless (all of whom are on the chopping block). Macy’s has been dubbed a high credit risk this years by Moody’s which means they’re also in trouble, and Claire’s has a huge payment coming up on their $1.79B in bond debt and most doubt they’ll be able to make it, so they’re also in line for serious troubles.

The bottom line is that people want the cheapest and easiest shopping experience possible.Click To Tweet

In today’s society, easy shopping comes by a click of the mouse and a ring of the doorbell – not driving, walking, talking, searching and still maybe not finding what we are looking for. We already have zombie malls that are vacated and sometimes revitalized as schools, but most are just becoming dilapidated, abandoned lots – will this happen to brick and mortars small and large?

Whether it is Amazon or merely shopping on a company’s site instead at their store front, online is in and sadly, Main Street is out.

#ByeByeBrickAndMortar

Pam Garner is a Staff Writer for The American Genius with a bachelor’s degree from the University of Texas, currently pursuing her master’s degree in graphic and web design. Pam is a multi-disciplined creative who hopes to one day actually finish her book on all of her crazy adventures.

Business News

Former Budweiser exec says marijuana is the new craft beer

(BUSINESS NEWS) In light of a growing consumer demand and more states decriminalizing and legalizing, “Big Booze” casts sights on burgeoning marijuana market.

Published

on

cannabis marijuana weed smoking

Imagine all the Instagram photos. Imagine all those new hashtags (no pun intended).

A carefully placed pre-rolled joint next to a latte with a heart drawn in the foam, an iridescent glass pipe freshly filled held out at arm’s length with a mountain and a sunset at the horizon, and different strains or arrays of edibles displayed next to their branded packaging.

Weed: “It’s the new craft beer,” according to former marketing exec for Anheuser-Busch, makers of Budweiser beer, Chris Burggraeve.

Since leaving his position as Chief Marketing Officer, Burggraeve has begun investing in the marijuana industry, recently joining the advisory board of greenRush Group, the San Francisco-based startup that aims to be the “Amazon of weed” as the largest technology platform in the cannabis industry.

In addition to greenRush, Burggraeve also co-founded Toast, a company that makes luxury pre-rolled joints.

Research firm Cowen and Company released their findings last year that in legalized states such as Washington, Colorado, and Oregon, people have begun laying off the sauce as beer sales took a noticeable dip below the national average. According to a Gallup poll released last month, 64 percent of the U.S. population now wants to lift the federal ban on marijuana.

It was only a matter of time before those in the alcohol industry began to take notice. Just last month, Constellation Brands, the beer distributor who owns Corona and Svedka vodka, bought a 9.9 percent stake in Canopy Growth Corporation, an acquisition in anticipation of nationwide legalization of marijuana in the U.S.

Big companies like Amazon, however, have shied away from taking such leaps in the industry due to the current federal ban.

“This is one of the fastest-growing categories globally,” Burggraeve told Bloomberg. “When consumers want something, you ignore it at your peril,” also noting that in order for booze companies to stay relevant in some fashion, they will have to conform to cannabis, whether they want to or not.

“The same way that craft beer started and, for the longest time, was ignored and then exploded, there’s no reason why the same thing wouldn’t happen in this space,” Burggraeve added, also noting that his colleagues should follow suit lest be left in the dust. “There will be part supplementing and part complementing. The jury is out on how and where that will happen.”

Continue Reading

Business News

FCC nixed a 40+ year old rule blocking broadcast media mergers

(BUSINESS NEWS) The FCC is on a tear this month, this time dismantling a decades-old rule that supporters and critics are butting heads over.

Published

on

ajit pai net neutrality

In a 3-to-2 vote last week, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) rolled back media merger rules that have been around since the 1970s. These 42-year-old regulations prevented a handful of companies from owning the majority of media outlets in a market.

One now defunct rule stipulated TV stations in the same market couldn’t merge if the combo would mean there were fewer than eight independently owned stations as a result. Another rule prohibited a single company in a market from simultaneously owning a TV station and a daily newspaper.

Additionally, the original stipulations restricted how many TV and radio stations a company could own in a single media market. The FCC also approved Next Gen TV, a new broadcast standard expected to improve targeted ads as well as higher quality video and audio for on-air television.

Further easing media creation, last month, the FCC voted to nix a rule that required broadcasters to have a physical studio in their licensed market.

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai says these long-standing rules have made it difficult for smaller outlets like websites, blogs, and podcasts to thrive in a media landscape vastly different from the one that originated the regulations.

“Few of the FCC’s rules are staler than our broadcast ownership regulations,” Pai said. By eliminating them, he said, “this agency finally drags its broadcast ownership rules to the digital age.”

The National Association of Broadcasters agreed with Pai, welcoming the changes. In a statement they noted the old rules “weakened the newspaper industry, cost journalism jobs and forced local broadcast stations onto unequal footing with our national pay-TV and radio competitors.”

However, opponents argue this change will lead to media monoliths, with even fewer companies controlling most media outlets. “Instead of engaging in thoughtful reform,” said Democratic FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, “this agency sets its most basic values on fire.”

Predictably, shortly after the vote, Comcast hit up 21st Century Fox all like, “Hey let us buy those parts of your company Disney wanted earlier this year but now we can have it because the FCC said so, I hope.” Previously Fox was talking about selling most of the company to Disney but keeping sports and news. Although the talks aren’t ongoing, apparently there may still be a Disney/Fox deal on the table. Verizon also noted interest in acquiring portions of Fox as well to provide mobile streaming content.

Senate Democrats called on the FCC inspector general to launch a probe regarding impartiality of the vote.

They cited concerns about how the deregulation may benefit conservative broadcasting company Sinclair, who expressed interest in buying Tribune Media for $3.9 billion dollars. This purchase could now be possible without Sinclair selling off their other stations to receive FCC approval.

“This merger would never have been possible without a series of actions to overturn decades-long, settled legal precedent by Chairman Pai,” wrote 14 lawmakers in a letter. Sinclair declined to comment, while Pai merely assured these changes “will open the door to pro-competitive combinations that will strengthen local voices.”

Guess we’ll just have to see how things go when Disney and like three other companies own everything.

Continue Reading

Business News

Apple under fire for alleged patent infringement

(BUSINESS NEWS) Apple is again under fire for patent infringement, this one appearing to be less patent-trolly than some other claims.

Published

on

apple iphone verizon social media

Apple is once again being investigated by the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) for a possible patent infringement.

The investigation is looking into a complaint from Aqua Connect Inc and its subsidiary, Strategic Technology Partners. They are Nevada-based companies with headquarters in Orange, California, filing their complaint with the US District Court for the Central District of California.

Apple is already being investigated by USITC because Qualcomm claims that the company is using in violation of its patent by using Qualcomm’s modems to power devices like iPhones.

Earlier this month, Apple was also sued by an Israeli company, Corephotonics, which claims that the tech giant has used its patented designs in the dual lens cameras on iPhone 7 Plus and iPhone 8 Plus.

Likewise, Aqua Connect and Strategic Technology Partners claim that the company is using their patented technology without consent for features like screen-sharing and remote desktop on some MAC computers, iPhones, iPads, iPods, and Apple TVs.

It appears that the USITC investigation will look into these claims, but may take a broader view and look into other possible patent infringements.

“Initially, our product had Apple’s full support. But years later, [they] built our technology into its macOS and iOS operating systems without our permission,” says Ronnie Exley, CEO of Aqua Connect.

Apparently, Aqua Connect created the first remote desktop for Mac computers in 2008, but later they incorporated that technology into new products without permission from Aqua Connect. “These lawsuits seek to stop Apple from continuing to use our technology in their macOS and iOS operating systems,” said Exley in a statement.

Because the USITC has the power to ban the sale of products in the U.S., most companies choose to settle out of court rather than risk such a ban. It remains to be seen how Apple will ultimately respond.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

The
American Genius
News neatly in your inbox

Join thousands of AG fans and SUBSCRIBE to get business and tech news updates, breaking stories, and MORE!

Emerging Stories