And Agents Should Form Their Own Membership (Union)
I think that maybe NAR and local boards in their zeal to capitalize on dues by a larger membership may have bitten off more than they can chew when they allowed regular agents to join the boards (as is evident by continued tensions between the boards and average agents on the ground).
The Punted Football That Has Become The General Membership
It’s true, in every instance we’re told to get involved, however, involvement has become to complicated, that one hand has no idea what the other is doing. Rules are consistently created by Broker boards, and enforced and agreed upon by the NAR that have absolutely no Agent interest protected.
So Maybe It’s Time to Protect Ourselves
Once upon a time, the membership really was Broker only, and maybe it needs to be that way again. The birth of an actual membership of agents could be born with a proper voice at the table, similar to a real trade union with real votes in our best interest.
Such representation could beat down costs for Realtor.com, and other services we’re producing content for, thus reducing costs to the agent. Such representation could seek out better, more competitive boards that would spring up in contrast to existing boards and the NAR. It’s conceivable that an opportunity such as this could fracture the entire MLS cluster flip, allowing for possibly a smaller more nimble MLS that could be provided to the agent membership at a much more fair price as it has now cut out the middle men.
The Time May be Near..
…that enough is enough, that when and if a rule greatly disrupts the agents’ ability to adopt new technology, that a simple vote of no says that the massive bureaucracy that has become the collective board needs to clean up, scale down, and take it’s policies back to the drawing board for a decision that weighs all things equally.
The Broker Can Pick Up the Shortfall for NAR
This would force the Broker to pay a larger premium to the board and the NAR I’m sure, but in reality, that in and of itself would force Brokers to become more competitive where the rights and interests of their agents were concerned.
NAR would only need engage with Brokers, simplifying the conversation of progression.
The Agent Membership Now Represented
- Has a larger voice, and choices.
Yeah, if they really want to go backwards in time, maybe we should. And yes, I am aware that there are independent versions of the current NAR that have never really taken hold, but if the current state of affairs continues, I can see a day in the future where the concept has a more stronger footing.
Jeff Brown
February 7, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Haven’t seen it better said.
Regardless of who wins in November, we should all record benchmarks of various subjects. A review after each year of the new president’s administration takes office will let us know how their walking is compared to their talking.
Bush hasn’t done real well with this. Sad, but true.
Dale Chumbley
February 7, 2008 at 1:15 pm
Very well put Benn. Should be an interesting year.
Corey
February 7, 2008 at 1:23 pm
Why is Ron Paul not listed as a remaining candidate?
Jeff Brown
February 7, 2008 at 1:28 pm
Because so far, only about 1 in 20-23 voters take him seriously as a candidate.
That’s not a qualitative judgment on my part, just a statistical fact.
Benn Rosales
February 7, 2008 at 1:51 pm
Ron who? but I’ll add this Ron fellow if you think he has a chance of winning…
Daniel Rothamel
February 7, 2008 at 1:58 pm
As a card-carrying member of the GOP, I think I’m gonna be sick. . .
Jay Thompson
February 7, 2008 at 2:07 pm
I may move to Canada.
Charleston real estate blog
February 7, 2008 at 3:35 pm
Sadly, it doesn’t matter who you vote for, you generally get the same dismal results.
Jay, it’s cold in Canada.
Benn Rosales
February 7, 2008 at 4:35 pm
I see a distinct difference in two of these from the other 2 plus one who is much like the first two.
Corey
February 7, 2008 at 4:38 pm
So you vote based on who you think will win, not who should actually be elected?
Ron can’t win because people like to believe what the media tells them, or does not tell them.
McCain may be the main stream “front-runner” at this point, but he will not have the necessary delegates by June, thus we will be dealing with a Brokered Convention, at which time Ron will most certainly still be in the running.
Pull your heads out.
Jonathan Dalton
February 7, 2008 at 5:33 pm
> Regardless of who wins in November, we should all record benchmarks of various subjects.
Solid, except there’s a carryover. Seeds of economic revival can be pinpointed back to the tax increase that cost the original Bush re-election. Signs of economic issues started to appear at the tale end of Clinton’s second term (if anyone remembers weekly earnings warnings pre-Tech bubble burst.)
Sort of like the sports comparison of a college coach winning with the former coach’s recruits. Was it really the coach or being in the right place at the right time?
(That answer, to me, depends on the coach … sometimes it’s the former, sometimes the latter.)
Personally, there are more candidates worth of a vote than we had four years ago. That alone is a positive. Of course, my preferred candidate from my registered party’s still around.
Jonathan Dalton
February 7, 2008 at 5:35 pm
Corey – I think the last dark horse that dark may have been Garfield. I can’t see someone taking the lead in a brokered convention when few find him viable and none in the party structure find him palatable. Of course, he just may be electable when running against the other side but even that’s a bit of a stretch. And that’s all that the powers that be will be concerned with … who can win against either Hillary or Obama.
Jeff Brown
February 7, 2008 at 5:42 pm
Your point is well taken Jonathan. Those of us who pay attention know what was already in the works before a new president takes office.
What I refer to most importantly is what the new guy actually DOES. Look at Carter’s first couple years and compare them to either Bush, or of Reagan, or Clinton. Talk vs Walk is pretty easy to chart.
This is why Pelosi et al are all bitin’ the big green weenie with their base. They got elected by promising an end to the war and delivered warm air.
Benn Rosales
February 7, 2008 at 6:13 pm
Hey Corey- no need to get personal.
Jonathan Dalton
February 7, 2008 at 6:23 pm
I agree, Jeff … there’s a reason there are so many studies, not of the first year, but of the first 100 days. Which actually is more like five months when you include two to lay the groundwork from the election to the inauguration.
Eric Blackwell
February 7, 2008 at 7:49 pm
I could not agree with your sentiments more, Benn…the best man in the race just pulled out and we are left with squat. A very sad day indeed.
Sadly, all of the remaining candidates to my knowledge have made the VAST majority of their money at the public trough (read: my wallet).
Your right Jay! What does it take to get a RE license in BC or Calgary –grin
Eric
Larry Yatkowsky
February 7, 2008 at 11:37 pm
Jay, Eric et al
It’s prettier in Super Natural B.C. but the politics are just as crazy!
Your good ‘ol boys and girls do however, offer great sport. Thanks for that.
– License – start here https://www.bcrea.bc.ca/.
Bring your cheque book and 6 months of time.
As for Calgary – what is that? It’s too cold for anything that is alive.
ps.: You’ll bring lots of experience with you when the 2010 Olympics are done and we head into a down market. .>)