I have been talking about this Legislation since President Obama spoke at a Home Depot last December about creating stronger incentives for Energy Efficient Retrofits. His position, it’s an opportunity to reduce the need for energy, create jobs for the hard hit construction industry, and would reduce homeowners annual utility expenses. It’s been through the House and now is working it’s way through the Senate.
What makes it so exciting is that it would provide rebates up to 50% of the cost to do the inspections and retrofits up to 8k, by far the most comprehensive offering yet to come. There are tiers of efficiency a home must meet in order to qualify but this also allows homeowners to create a budget that is doable and still see some significant results. There are incentives for builders to build green and incentives for individuals to go trough the training to become a home energy rater. It also has provisions for utilities, solar energy, vehicles, commercial and manufacturing. Here is a full summary.
This could most defintiely have some fairly far reaching impact on our industry in what I feel would be a completely positive way. Whereas as the first ime home buyer tax credit was just money back in someone’s pocket, this could reduce demand for power plants, fuel, and greatly reduce carbon pollution while also reducing monthly costs to own and live in a home. I.e. with historically low rates, homes still being priced pretty low, and some great incentives to seal it up and make it more efficient, homeownership could get a whole lot sweeter in the coming months.
Austin tops the list of best places to buy a home
When looking to buy a home, taking the long view is important before making such a huge investment – where are the best places to make that commitment?
Looking at the bigger picture
(REALUOSO.COM) – Let us first express that although we are completely biased about Texas (we’re headquartered here, I personally grew up here), the data is not – Texas is the best. That’s a scientific fact. There’s a running joke in Austin that if there is a list of “best places to [anything],” we’re on it, and the joke causes eye rolls instead of humility (we’re sore winners and sore losers in this town).
That said, SelfStorage.com dug into the data and determined that the top 12 places to buy a home are currently Texas and North Carolina (and Portland, I guess you’re okay too or whatever).
They examined the nerdiest of numbers from the compound annual growth rate in inflation-adjusted GDP to cost premium, affordability, taxes, job growth, and housing availability.
“Buying a house is a big decision and a big commitment,” the company notes. “Although U.S. home prices have risen in the long term, the last decade has shown that path is sometimes full of twists, turns, dizzying heights and steep, abrupt falls. Today, home prices are stabilizing and increasing in most areas of the U.S.”
Average age of houses on the rise, so is it now better or worse to buy new?
With aging housing in America, are first-time buyers better off buying new or existing homes? The average age of a home is rising, as is the price of new housing, so a shift could be upon us.
The average home age is higher than ever
(REALUOSO.COM) – In a survey from the Department of Housing and Urban Development American Housing Survey (AHS), the median age of homes in the United States was 35 years old. In Texas, homes are a bit younger with the median age between 19 – 29 years. The northeast has the oldest homes, with the median age between 50 – 61 years. In 1985, the median age of a home was only 23 years.
With more houses around 40 years old, the National Association of Realtors asserts that homeowners will have to undertake remodeling and renovation projects before selling unless the home is sold as-is, in which case the buyer will be responsible to update their new residence. Even homeowners who aren’t selling will need to consider remodeling for structural and aesthetic reasons.
Prices of new homes on the rise
Newer homes cost more than they used to. The price differential between new homes and older homes has increased from 10 percent traditionally to around 37 percent in 2014. This is due to rising construction costs, scarcity of lots, and a low inventory of new homes that doesn’t meet the demand.
Are Realtors the real loser in the fight between Zillow Group and Move, Inc.?
The last year has been one of dramatic and rapid change in the real estate tech sector, but Realtors are vulnerable, and we’re worried.
Why Realtors are vulnerable to these rapid changes
(REALUOSO.COM) – Corporate warfare demands headlines in every industry, but in the real estate tech sector, a storm has been brewing for years, which in the last year has come to a head. Zillow Group and Move, Inc. (which is owned by News Corp. and operates ListHub, Realtor.com, TopProducer, and other brands) have been competing for a decade now, and the race has appeared to be an aggressive yet polite boxing match. Last year, the gloves came off, and now, they’ve drawn swords and appear to want blood.
Note: We’ll let you decide which company plays which role in the image above.
So how then, does any of this make Realtors the victims of this sword fight? Let’s get everyone up to speed, and then we’ll discuss.
1. Zillow poaches top talent, Move/NAR sues
It all started last year when the gloves came off – Move’s Chief Strategy Officer (who was also Realtor.com’s President), Errol Samuelson jumped ship and joined Zillow on the same day he phoned in his resignation without notice. He left under questionable circumstances, which has led to a lengthy legal battle (wherein Move and NAR have sued Zillow and Samuelson over allegations of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and misappropriation of trade secrets), with the most recent motion being for contempt, which a judge granted to Move/NAR after the mysterious “Samuelson Memo” surfaced.
Salt was added to the wound when Move awarded Samuelson’s job to Move veteran, Curt Beardsley, who days after Samuelson left, also defected to Zillow. This too led to a lawsuit, with allegations including breach of contract, violation of corporations code, illegal dumping of stocks, and Move has sought restitution. These charges are extremely serious, but demanded slightly less attention than the ongoing lawsuit against Samuelson.
2. Two major media brands emerge
Tech News2 weeks ago
How to change your background on Zoom
Business Entrepreneur5 days ago
Entrepreneurs face higher rates of mental illness [part one]
Business Entrepreneur5 days ago
Many entrepreneurs facing mental health issues don’t get help [part two]
Business Marketing1 day ago
The use of offline marketing can still be advantageous in a digital world
Business News10 hours ago
How to apply to be on a Board of Directors
Social Media2 weeks ago
Easily spot if your social media marketing service provider is a con artist
Business Finance6 days ago
Follow these 7 steps to get outstanding invoices paid to you ASAP
Tech News1 week ago
Sometimes tech is a sight for sore eyes – others it’s the cause of them