BeReal is one of several “Real” apps exploding in growth with young users who crave real connections with people they know in real life.
According to data.ai, BeReal ranks 4th by downloads in the US, the UK, and France for Q1 2022 to date, behind only Instagram, Snapchat, and Pinterest.
BeReal flies in the face of what social media has become. Instead of curated looks that focus on the beautiful parts of life, BeReal users showcase what they’re doing at the moment and share those real photos with their friends. Their real friends.
It’s real. And real is different for a generation of social media users who have been raised on influencers and filters.
As the app says when you go to its page:
Be Real.
Your Friends
for Real.
Every day at a different time, BeReal users are notified simultaneously to capture and share a Photo in 2 Minutes.
A new and unique way to discover who your friends really are in their daily life.

The app has seen monthly users increase by more than 315% according to Apptopia, which tracks and analyzes app performance.
“Push notifications are sent around the world simultaneously at different times each day,” the company said in a statement. “It’s a secret on how the time is chosen every day, it’s not random.”
The app allows no edits and no filters. They want users to show a “slice of their lives.”
Today’s social media users have seen their lives online inundated with ultra-curated social media. The pandemic led to more time spent online than ever. Social media became a way to escape. Reality was ugly. Social media was funny, pretty, and exciting.
And fake.
Enter BeReal where users are asked to share two moments of real life on a surprise schedule. New apps are fun often because they’re new. However, the huge growth in the use of BeReal by college-aged users points to something more than the new factor.

For the past several years, experts have warned that social media was dangerous to our mental health. The dopamine hits of likes and shares are based on photos and videos filled with second and third takes, lens changes, lighting improvements, and filters. Constant comparisons are the norm. And even though we know the world we present on our social pages isn’t exactly an honest portrayal of life, we can’t help but experience FOMO when we see our friends and followers and those we follow having the times of their lives, buying their new it thing, trying the new perfect product, playing in their Pinterest-worthy decorated spaces we wish we could have.
None of what we see is actually real on our apps. We delete our media that isn’t what we want to portray and try again from a different angle and shoot second and third and forth takes that make us look just a little better.
We spend hours flipping through videos on our For You walls and Instagram stories picked by algorithms that know us better than we know ourselves.
BeReal is the opposite of that. It’s simple, fast, and real. It’s community and fun, but it’s a moment instead of turning into the time-sink of our usual social media that, while fun, is also meant to ultimately sell stuff, including all our data.
It will be interesting to watch BeReal and see if it continues down its promised path and whether the growth continues. People are looking for something. Maybe reality is that answer.

Eric Bramlett
August 21, 2008 at 9:27 pm
Does a carpenter’s hammer suck? Websites are tools. I try to use the best & most effective tools available. The best tool for me comes with lots of pagerank & pageviews, which help drive traffic to my slick IDX interface that then delivers me leads.
Eric Bramlett
August 21, 2008 at 9:42 pm
*edit* pagerank turns into pageviews….
John Lockwood
August 22, 2008 at 12:48 am
Which one? I have several of them.
Actually my clients tell me over and over again that they work well, have good information, and are user-friendly.
More to the point from a business perspective, they consistently have made me money since 2002.
Speak for yourself. You’re not “there with me.” My web sites work just fine.
Of course I can’t be defined by unique views. I can’t be defined by what I had for lunch, either, but it doesn’t follow that eating sucks.
Book of Genesis? Did you expect the Internets to be in there? Yikes.
Paula Henry
August 22, 2008 at 6:48 am
Daniel – I get it! My website is an extension of me and right now – I am looking at an overhaul. personally and professionally. My site is not bringing me the business I want; maybe because it does suck, but I won’t take that personally.
Yes, I am freaking awesome, but my sites need some work. I’m thinking more simplistic – I don’t think the comsumer cares about all the tools and gadgets.
A good website does give us the first point of contact with many clients and if we blow it after that, then maybe it;s not our website that sucks.
Bob
August 22, 2008 at 7:21 am
pointless.
Mark Eckenrode
August 22, 2008 at 11:02 am
a website that doesn’t contribute to a guiding strategy sucks hard. one that does, will work for you all day and night and on holidays and weekends.
Dan Connolly
August 22, 2008 at 11:51 am
Hmm, Not really sure what you are looking for here. My website generates clients and sales on a pretty consistent basis, are you saying that you don’t think anyone’s site is successful? Websites are like yard signs. They make the phone ring or the email come in, what happens after that is up to the agent. If your site isn’t generating clients, maybe you should rework it!
Carolyn Gjerde-Tu
August 22, 2008 at 1:24 pm
Can a website replace personal contact? I hope not, but I hope my website is seen as an extension of my business and demonstrate to someone I have had no prior personal contact with that I am someone they want to work with.
Daniel, the Real Estate Zebra
August 22, 2008 at 3:07 pm
GM was once the most profitable, succesful auto manufacturer in the United States. They did what worked. People were buying their cars. Slowly, the whole world was changing. They ignored it, or didn’t want to acknowledge it. By the time they got on board, the consumer had left them behind. Now, Toyota is king, and the beat goes on . . .
I want you to stretch your brains, I want you to think beyond, “my website generate leads, therefore it works.”
Can’t we come up with something more than that? Can’t we do more than what we are doing now? Is this it? Really, is what we know as the real estate website the best we can really do?
I don’t think it is. But, if we are going to find out what is possible, we are going to have to admit that “good enough” isn’t good enough.
When I was at NAR last November, I heard famous football coach Lou Holtz speak. Lou Holtz said that the thing he regretted most about his career was his early success at Notre Dame. He said that his success made everyone in the program, himself included, complacent. They stopped trying to get better because they already thought they had acheived everything they could acheive. Next thing you know, Notre Dame is struggling for national relevance, and most recruits don’t even think of it in their top 5 programs. That is what can happen when you rest on current success.
We should always strive for more. Demand more. More from vendors, more from our associations, more from our brokers (or agents), more from OURSELVES.
Eric Bramlett
August 22, 2008 at 3:20 pm
Lead generation is exactly what I want out of my websites. What more do you suggest we strive for?
Bob
August 22, 2008 at 3:29 pm
I do not understand where you are coming from with
Dan Connolly
August 22, 2008 at 6:36 pm
Personally I do not aspire to be a Nobel Laureate of all things Real Estate. I just want to sell houses…One or two a week. With honesty and ethics. period. If a site makes the phone ring and keeps me as busy as I can be, then it’s working and I’m happy.
Kelley Koehler
August 22, 2008 at 7:29 pm
Hiya Zebra – I’m trying to understand where you want us our minds to go. If I may summize:
a) the site sucks because it isn’t me and can’t deliver a personal relationship.
b) you want us to demand more from our websites, but not fancy gizmos if they don’t reinforce a).
c) but even if we demand more, a site can never make life easier, more convenient, better, or do what I can’t/won’t have time to do.
c) is where you loose me. But here are my thoughts, FWIW:
I think that as the internet and technology – and the general level of ‘tech’ ability among people – evolves, our sites must evolve as well. A fabulous lead generating site today may not do the same thing in 10 years. Or sooner. So I see value in imagining the next evolution and working towards it.
If we say the next evolution revolves around the whole social media movement, around the development of relationships online, then there’s an inherent difficulty with creating a unique, personal experience given the medium. It’s a one-to-many, not a one-to-one medium.
As an agent who wants to do business, I need to hold back some personality or I risk appealing to too small of an audience. I need broad appeal.
However – I think that if I want my site – as a business tool and relationship builder – to deliver more and/or more commited people to my doorstep, then I think the best appeal that I can make is one that attempts to deliver the kind of information that person wants to see, at the time they want to see it. The right information, to the right person, at the right time. There was a discussion about DISC assessments and their usage over on Bloodhound a while back, and while I’m not incredibly familiar with that particular broad quantification of personality, I can say that people make decisions either fast or slow, and based on logic or emotion. And I can design a site that will make sense for all of those types of people. So that they feel more comfortable, and so that the site acts more human in that it interprets a user’s previous choices, and provides future choices based on past real action.
Given the one-to-many nature of the medium, I’m not sure we can do much better than that. Or at least until the next paradigm shift.
Eric Bramlett
August 22, 2008 at 9:05 pm
I think the next evolution will involve lots of holograms & robots. Let’s all work towards that.
Bob
August 23, 2008 at 10:26 am
Kelley, that was absolutely brilliant.
I would say sooner. Much sooner.
Exactly. IMO, this is the highest and best use, and what the blog component of a site does better than anything else.
Not just with online evolutions, but with market evolutions. If you think in those terms, then this attitude dovetails with the previous quote about delivering the right information to the right person at the right time. This has been my approach to blog content. I could care less if agents read it – I want clients, and I get them via the listings or as a result of delivering the information that they were specifically looking for and then found on my site. That person receives immediate gratification, thus perceiving greater value, expertise, etc.
I took Daniel’s point to be that of d) we have tools we don’t know how to use. If he meant c) then I disagree because d) would apply. In order to determine either, you have to define your end goal as Dan has done. Once you have the goal, exam the results. For Dan and most others, if they are getting buyers to sell or sellers to list, then the tool is doing the job.
If you are not getting the desired results, I would suggest that d) applies and the tool is being used incorrectly or inefficiently.
Start by
a) defining the goal. Once that is clearly defined, then
b) analyze the results. In the context of the results,
c) evaluate the methodology in light of
1) increasing conversion if results are satisfactory, then look for ways to increase conversion.
2) increasing leads If conversion is maximized, then look for ways to reach more potential leads to convert.
3) results that are not satisfactory – are you
(please no flames about “people are not leads” – this is marketing and ‘lead’ is an appropriate term for the purpose of the discussion).
Mack in Atlanta
August 24, 2008 at 8:44 am
Between Dan, Kelley and Bob there is nothing else to say on this. Superb points folks.
Glenn fm Naples
August 24, 2008 at 9:06 am
Have to agree with Mack the subject was extremely well covered by the comments – hats off to all.