Connect with us

Business News

Petition urges Olive Garden to clean up their act

Over 50 organizations have banded together to start the “Good Food Now!” campaign, directed at DRI, to “adopt better labor practices and greener menus” supporting not only the environment, but also farmers, animals, customers, and the staff at their restaurants.

Published

on

Better practice organizations banding together

We have reported on Darden Restaurant Inc. in the past, parent company of Olive Garden, which has more than 1,500 casual-dining restaurants around the world, and it’s considered the largest full-service restaurant employer in the United States.

bar
Over 50 organizations have banded together to start the “Good Food Now!” campaign, directed at DRI, to “adopt better labor practices and greener menus” supporting not only the environment, but also farmers, animals, customers, and the staff at their restaurants.

An historic coalition

According to one manager, never before have environmental, worker justice, animal welfare, and public concern organizations come together under one umbrella to target the restaurant industry. The focus of the campaign is on Olive Garden, even though DRI also owns Bahama Breeze, Longhorn Steakhouse, and a number of other popular restaurants. Olive Garden accounts for the majority of the sales of DRI.

The petition sent to Darden urges the company to support:
• A valued workforce
• Environmental sustainability
• Local economics
• Good nutrition
• Animal welfare

GoodFoodNow demanding local, nutritious and fair

The campaign wants Darden to make a commitment to providing a better experience to its customers by sourcing ingredients locally and at fair prices. To promote animal welfare, the organizations want DRI to source proteins that are certified humane raised and handled and raised without the use of anti-biotics. In addition, DRI is being asked to provide smaller portion sizes, more vegetarian and vegan entrée options, and to improve nutrition through including more fruits and vegetables.

Is it possible for Darden to take action?

The principles which outline the GoodFoodNow campaign are those being used in the LA Unified School District to govern the entities which purchase food for the school district. According to GoodFoodNow supporters, Darden claims to support and value animal welfare, their employees, and their customers, but they don’t demonstrate their commitment to these key issues. The group has requested a meeting with DRI, but to date, Darden has not granted a meeting or acknowledged the issues raised by the coalition.

#GoodFoodNow

Dawn Brotherton is a staff writer at The American Genius, and has an MFA in Creative Writing from the University of Central Oklahoma. Before earning her degree, she spent over 20 years homeschooling her two daughters, who are now out changing the world. She lives in Oklahoma and loves to golf. She hopes to publish a novel in the future.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Tiffany

    March 25, 2016 at 9:49 pm

    It seems to me that its just someones thought and hope to have restaurants participate in their plan. As i see it , The company shouldnt have to discuss what they do regarding this. I dont blame them for not talking to them.

    • Tiffany

      March 25, 2016 at 9:51 pm

      I personnally think if people want a restaurant running the way they propose , maybe they should start their own restaurant.

  2. Kathy

    July 12, 2016 at 5:34 pm

    Sorry this post got longer than I intended, but I found myself making the points for the group that the group should have been making themselves. This article is too short.

    It’s absolutely correct to approach Darden with the idea that they need to clean up their act. Red Lobster has already been sold. But you can only expect so much from major old chains like the Olive Garden. I doubt if Darden will make all the changes the group is demanding, at least not all at once, or address them at all, since Olive Garden may be sold next. And although vegetarian choices are nice (I’m not one), it sounds whiny to a big chain and there are bigger fish to fry, like the crap that’s in the food itself that needs to go.

    Sourcing locally is great but not always feasible. When you eat at a major chain you get what they can buy to deliver to ALL their locations. But I agree that something organic, like tomato sauce, is reasonable and readily available anywhere. Not speaking for everyone, but also many people are aware of the toxic ingredients in our food these days. And I’ve found that different regions of the US have more awareness than others.

    I use to love Olive Garden and Red Lobster until about six years ago when it seemed the quality was going down hill. But I also discovered you can look up the food ingredients and allergens online. I found there is so much Monosodium Glutamate (MSG), preservatives, and other chemicals in the food. These two chains, and especially fast food, are riddled with MSG! No wonder the food tastes good (sort of), that’s what MSG does. Hey, restaurant owners, ever hear of actual real spices! I cook very simply at home, and it tastes really good, and with no chemicals and MSG.

    MSG has an effect on the brain that makes the food taste good. It also has an effect of making you start to crave that food. It also can cause diabetes, high blood pressure, weight gain, adrenal gland malfunction, and even seizures (info from Global Healing Center). Look around at people who frequently eat at these places. Their health and quality of life goes down hill. So was my families until I made changes and now cook at home everyday.

    But even with all the MSG you still can’t hide microwaved, frozen, processed reheated food. That’s like putting an air freshener in a garbage can!

    I remember going into a grocery store with some friends in about 1982, and one of the guys bought a spice. He said this makes food taste really good. The label said Monosodium Glutamate. They actually use to sell it right along with all the other spices! It’s funny how it’s not sold anymore, but yet they allow restaurants to put in abundance in their food! MSG and all it’s forms need to be banned, right along with High Fructose Corn Syrup. But I digress.

    Another thing the restaurants need to get smart about is the massive use of GMO oils in the use and process of their food. These days people are really concerned about that, even other countries. I have made phone calls to ask what kind of oil is used to fry food. The most frequent answer I get is Soy. That’s because of a new-fangled GMO one that makes machines it’s used in easier to clean, among other reasons. And when I ask if it’s Non-GMO, they say “it doesn’t say on the label.” If it doesn’t say, then it is GMO. For those of you who aren’t aware of GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms) food, please do the research. It’s too much of an overreach to explain it here.

    On some points, the group is making valid concerns. On other points they may be that businesses like Olive Garden can’t make huge changes overnight, so they should stick to the most important priorities first, like ditch the chemicals and MSG, and hormone free meat. That’s a huge start. They might get more notice that way.

    Panera Bread is slowly cleaning up it’s food item by item, and to my surprise not doing a bad job. So I sent them an email thanking them for that, but then also pointed out that they should switch to Non-GMO wheat flour. I said since many people are concerned about GMOs that they would be really noticed for that, especially since they are Panera BREAD, bread being their main identifier! Sure, I’d like organic wheat while they’re at it, but too much demand might result in nothing at all, so I’ll except Non-GMO for now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business News

Skilled workers can live in any city they wish and still get work [study]

(BUSINESS NEWS) A 2018 study reveals that remote work is on the rise, and the ultra skilled workers can work from any city they wish.

Published

on

skilled workers

A 2018 study that surveyed 1,005 hiring decision makers commissioned by Upwork sheds some interesting insights on the attitudes around remote workers and the challenges hiring managers are experiencing finding talent. The remote workforce is the future after all and this study offers both insight into challenges and solutions.

It was noted that talent is becoming harder and harder to find (up to three times more difficult than in past years). Meanwhile, remote work is on the rise, according to 55 percent of managers.

The overarching attitude toward offices becoming temporary anchor points is increasing, indicating that commutes are becoming less common (albeit slightly). Companies are increasingly embracing remote work, and according to 38 percent of those surveyed, it will become the predominant workforce.

A major challenge remains that company policies aren’t caught up to remote work – they are lagging behind or non-existent according to 57 percent of organizations.

Over half of all companies surveyed are using more temporary, contract, or freelance workers and the majority of hiring managers believe agile teams will become the norm in the near future.

Perhaps the juiciest tidbit, the fact that skills are viewed as more important than location suggests that at the end of the day…

remote workforce

If you have the skills, you can live basically anywhere. Remote and freelance work offers a variety of opportunities and means you don’t have to be synchronously local to a team to get work done. This means that you don’t need to be in a big city like New York or Los Angeles to get the big work and have access to opportunity.

Companies are struggling to find talent, and despite a lack of policy support, are opening up to remote work. Adding to this challenge is that more and more Americans are less mobile, due to concerns about cost of living (or other things in our lives), hiring managers are having a harder time finding the right talent to fill their own vacancy.

Skilled workers (those who have the abilities that are in demand and desired by their industry) have the ability to pick and choose where they want to live and it looks like now and the future, companies are coming to meet them. This is good news, and offers more and more opportunities, as well as flexibility for hiring managers.

Continue Reading

Business News

Indeed and Glassdoor are now owned by one Japanese company – what’s next?

(TECHNOLOGY) Now that Glassdoor and Indeed are owned by an international brand, how will their main competitors (and search engines) react?

Published

on

glassdoor indeed

This year, Glassdoor, one of the most popular job and recruiting sites, has been acquired by Recruit Holdings Co. Ltd. (RCRRF), a Tokyo-based firm in a $1.2 billion cash transaction to become part of Recruit’s growing Human Resources Technology segment.

Recruit Holdings operates Three areas of business: HR Technology, Media & Solutions, and Staffing. In 2012, they acquired CT-based Indeed, which continues to be the number one job site in the world. Glassdoor will continue to operate independently as a part of Recruit Holdings, which holds companies in North America, Europe, and Asia, but it is noteworthy that a Japanese company owns two of the biggest players in the job search game.

The possibilities from this merger are not yet clear, but given that Recruit holds both Indeed and Glassdoor, the opportunity for integration and grouped pricing could eventually be useful for recruiters and HR/Hiring professionals. Although the company has not formally announced that integration is a possibility, considering the stiff competition from LinkedIn Jobs – it would be a great way to gain some competitive advantage.

The acquisition could help Recruit take on Microsoft (who owns LinkedIn) and Google to keep the two from dominating the online job boards, to which are essential for job seekers and talent seekers.

Of course, nothing is set in stone, but the possibilities are there. Recruiters should consider the possibilities for pricing and plan for how they will use the platforms (and how they will integrate Google for Jobs) to best collect the candidates they need.

Job seekers be prepared for more logins and more search sites for jobs and recognize that the possibility of Google no longer indexing Glassdoor (just as Indeed is not indexing on Google jobs).

The conflict between Indeed/Glassdoor, Microsoft, Google, and maybe even Facebook (look at Facebook.com/Jobs) is going to be an interesting battle to watch. JobBoardDoctor described the conflict of Indeed vs. Google as an old-west shoot out at high noon.

I suspect that with all four players in – it’s going to be a cold war in the recruiting world. Sit tight folks. Let’s see whats next!

Continue Reading

Business News

This fake company weeds out crappy clients

(BUSINESS) The former CEO of Highrise used a fake website to weed out toxic clients. How can you keep problematic customers out of your business?

Published

on

weeding out toxic clients

Sorting through your client list to weed out potentially toxic customers isn’t a process which garners the same attention as a company removing problematic employees, but it’s every bit as important — and, in many cases, twice as tricky to accomplish. One innovative journalist’s solution to this problem was to set up a fake website to act as a buffer between unwanted clients and his inbox.

If you’re anything like Nathan Kontny, your inbox is probably brimming with unread emails, product pitches, and pleas from people with whom you’ve never met in person or collaborated; unfortunately, many of these “people” are simply automated bots geared toward generating more press for their services.

Nathan’s response to this phenomenon was to create a website called “Trick a Journalist” in order to see which potential clients would sign up for the service.

Hilariously enough, the trap worked exactly as planned. Anyone signing up for Trick a Journalist was blacklisted and prevented from signing up for Nathan’s CRM software, with Nathan’s justification being that the CRM software in question should never be used for something so egregiously predatory as Trick a Journalist.

By creating a product which sets apart unwanted clients from the rest of the pack, Nathan succeeded in both attracting and quarantining present and future threats to the integrity of his business.

While this model may not be practicable at face value, there’s an important lesson here: determining the lengths to which your clients will go to gain the upper hand BEFORE working for them is an important task, as your clients’ actions will reflect upon your product or services either way.

Ruthlessness in business isn’t unheard of, but you should be aware of your customers’ tendencies well in advance of signing off on their behavior.

Of course, one minor issue with Nathan’s model of operation is that, invariably, someone will connect Trick a Journalist to his brand and miss the joke entirely.

There are less risky routes to weeding out potentially problematic clients than blacklisting them via a satirical website — though one might argue such routes are less fun — but the end result is essentially the same: keeping unsavory clients out of your inbox and off of your product list.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Our Great Parnters

The
American Genius
news neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Emerging Stories