The now laughable and completely pathetic ‘Great Society’ launched by Lyndon Johnson has proven the socialist school of economics as an ideology for losers. The War on Poverty? The latest and most epic fail directly attributable to this thought process is the late but never to be lamented USSR. (Apologies to genuine thinkers everywhere.) After a few generations on the Taker Diet, the USSR died as a third world country with a world class war machine, the best athletes science could produce, and an economy that couldn’t even consistently feed its own people.
How effective was the Taker approach to economics there? They had to resort to force, often murder, in order to keep their citizens within the nation’s boundaries. Same goes for Cuba and its magnificent economic system of what I’ve come to call, Prison Economics. There’s a tried ‘n true process for this leftist economic tragedy.
First, control of the government is seized, almost always via murderous force.
Second, the populace is told their aim as the new leaders is completely altruistic. They only want what is fair for the ‘people’. No more poverty. Blah blah blah
Then it begins.
Slowly, only for their own good, of course, the peoples’ rights are taken away. It’s about what’s good for everyone, not just for the selfish few, who have, after all, been lucky — and worse, selfish. It’s time somebody stood up for the poor. Turns out, the way to do that, is by a wholesale redistribution of the country’s wealth. Those who created it must give it up to those who didn’t.
What they always figure out when it’s far too late.
Folks begin to notice there seem to be those who’re doin’ a lot better than 98% of everybody else. The government favors those 2% or so in one form or another. Meanwhile, the average man and woman is told their patriotic duty is to work hard — for their country and their neighbor. After all, if we all buy into that nonsense, none of us will ever be poor or hungry, or without medical service, or anything else ever again.
Their neighbors? They see some of them hardly working, while they continue working hard themselves. They see the slackers being rewarded no differently than they are. They then put 2 and 2 together, coming to the only conclusion possible, based upon the empirical evidence.
You’ll get paid, have enough food, and a roof over your head whether you work hard or very little. The idea is to appear as if you’re doing what’s required. Since the plague of collectivism began in earnest in recent history, the 19th century, it’s caused the death of 10’s of millions through mass murder, starvation, and war. See, when your economic M.O. fails on an epic national scale, you either parish or grab the other guy’s ‘stuff’. If a segment of your population complains too much and/or too loudly, you jail them or kill ’em. When John makes a fuss about the obvious shortcomings of the geniuses forcing Taker Economics on them, then John disappears, folks tend to get the message.
Shut up or pay the price.
It’s a slower process in a Democratic Republic, but it still works every time it’s tried.
We had no income tax in America for the first 130+ years. Citizens were outraged for the most part. The top rate was not even double digits. We’ve been like the frog in the pot of water. We’re so conditioned as a nation to the government dictating pretty much everything we can and cannot do, we’re numb to the water’s ever increasing temperature.
As the Takers have gained more and more political power, their minions among us have now reached the tipping point in terms of numbers. It’s almost surreal to even hafta write this figure, but nearly one out of every two of us are recipients of ‘entitlement’ income from the government. There are two words in that sentence in great need of clarification. They’ve been so bastardized by the Takers in power the last few generations, they’ve completely lost their meaning.
Entitlement — The Taker politicians define it as those who’re literally entitled to Producers’ earnings and/or profits — via physical force and/or imprisonment if required.
Government — Takers define government as the real producer of all things. They don’t much adhere to the constitution’s definition, which stubbornly insists government is synonymous with ‘the people’.
Am I my brother’s keeper?
You bet. But even then it’s cuz I choose to, freely and from my own volition, completely sans coercion. Know what I’m not? I’m not your’s or YOUR brother’s keeper — unless I so choose. Or, unless the government gives me the choice of prison or handing the fruits of my efforts over to you. See, Takers become outraged when Producers talk of free will. Though Takers sincerely wish we Producers would willingly share our hard-earned wealth with ’em, they’ll take it regardless of our free choice to do so.
What outrages Takers more than anything?
It infuriates them when we demonstrate their economic system has, over and over proved to be a gigantic and guaranteed FAIL. But what makes ’em bat^%&# crazy is when we point out that everywhere it’s tried it must be administered by brute force. The other side of that same coin is when it’s shown conclusively that people living in TakerNations will literally risk all, including their own and their loved ones’ lives to escape Taker Economies.
What pushes them over the edge of sanity is when we show that 100% of the time the end game of their escape plan is to live in a ProducerNation. Go figure.
Cubans build barely seaworthy boats to escape their homeland. For many of them, the 90 miles to the Land of the Free might as well be 9 million. Before that, those imprisoned by our aforementioned USSR TakerThugs risked all to get over, under, or around the infamous Berlin Wall. All they wanted was to be left alone to succeed or fail on their own merits.
Oops! I said another banned word — merit. It has no place in a Taker Economy. It’s existence threatens all that they promote.
Will Americans vote to finish the TakerNation the Takers been erecting since the 1960’s? Or will they wake up and realize they are, well, Americans?
Before you vote, ask yourself: How’s that whole TakerNation thing been workin’ out for ya lately?
7 ways to carve out me time while working from home
(OPINION / EDITORIAL) It can be easy to forget about self-care when you’re working from home, but it’s critical for your mental health, and your work quality.
We are all familiar with the syndrome, getting caught up in work, chores, and taking care of others, and neglecting to take care of ourselves in the meantime. This has always been the case, but now, with more people working from home and a seemingly endless lineup of chores, thanks to the pandemic. There is simply so much to do.
The line is thinly drawn between personal and professional time already, with emails, cell phones, and devices relentlessly reaching out around the clock, pulling at us like zombie arms reaching up from the grave. Working from home makes this tendency to always be “on” worse, as living and working take place in such close proximity. We have to turn it off, though.
Our brains and bodies need down time, me-time, self-care. Carving out this time is one of the kindest and most important things you can do for yourself. If we can begin to honor ourselves like this, the outcome with not only our mental and physical health, but also our productivity at work, will be beneficial. When we make the time to do things we love, our body untenses, our mind’s gears slow down that constant grinding. Burnout behooves nobody.
Our work will also benefit. Healthier, happier, more well rested, and well treated minds and bodies can work wonders! Our immune systems also need this, and we need our immune systems to be at their peak performance this intense season.
I wanted to write this article, because I have such a struggle with this in my own life. I need to print it out and put it in my workspace. Last week, I posted something on my social media pages that so many people shared. It is clear we all need these reminders, so I am paying it forward here. The graphic was a quote from Devyn W.
“If you are reading this, release your shoulders away from your ears, unclench your jaw, and drop your tongue from the roof of your mouth.”
There now, isn’t that remarkable? It is a great first step. Let go of the tension in your body, and check out these ways to make yourself some healing me-time.
- Set aside strict no-work times. This could be any time of day, but set the times and adhere to them strictly. This may look like taking a full hour for lunch, not checking email after a certain hour, or committing to spending that time outdoors, reading, exercising, or enjoying the company of your loved ones. Make this a daily routine, because we need these boundaries. Every. Single. Day.
- Remember not to apologize to anyone for taking this me-time. Mentally and physically you need this, and everyone will be better off if you do. It is nothing to apologize for! Building these work-free hours into your daily schedule will feel more normal as time goes on. This giving of time and space to your joy, health, and even basic human needs is what should be the norm, not the other way around.
- Give yourself a device-free hour or two every day, especially before bedtime. The pinging, dinging, and blinging keeps us on edge. Restful sleep is one of the wonderful ways our bodies and brains heal, and putting devices away before bedtime is one of the quick tips for getting better sleep.
- Of course, make time for the things you absolutely love. If this is a hot bath, getting a massage, reading books, working out, cooking or eating an extravagant meal, or talking and laughing with a loved one, you have to find a way to get this serotonin boost!
- Use the sunshine shortcut. It isn’t a cure-all, but sunlight and Vitamin D are mood boosters. At least when it’s not 107 degrees, like in a Texas summer. But as a general rule, taking in at least a good 10-15 minutes of that sweet, sweet Vitamin D provided by the sun is good for us.
- Spend time with animals! Walk your dog, shake that feathery thing at your cat, or snuggle either one. Whatever animals make you smile, spend time with them. If you don’t have pets of your own, you could volunteer to walk them at a local shelter or even watch a cute animal video online. They are shown to reduce stress. Best case scenario is in person if you are able, but thankfully the internet is bursting with adorable animal videos, as a backup.
- Give in to a bit of planning or daydreaming about a big future trip. Spending time looking at all the places you will go in the future and even plotting out an itinerary are usually excellent mood-boosters. It’s a bit different in 2020, as most of us aren’t sure when we will be able to go, but even deciding where you want to go when we are free to travel again can put a positive spin on things.
I hope we can all improve our lives while working from home by making time for regenerating, healing, and having fun! Gotta run—the sun is out, and my dog is begging for a walk.
Why robots freak us out, and what it means for the future of AI
(OPINION / EDITORIAL) Robots and humans have a long way to go before the social divide disappears, but research is giving us insight on how to cross the uncanny valley.
We hate robots. Ok, wait, back up. We at least think they are more evil than good. Try it yourself – “are robots” in Google nets you evil before good. Megatron has higher SEO than Optimus Prime, and it’s not just because he’s so much cooler. It cuz he evil, cuz. It do be like that.
It’s not even a compliment to call someone robotic; society connotes this to emotionless preprogrammed shells of hideous nothing, empty clankbags that walk and talk and not much else. So, me at a party. Or if you’re a nerd, you’re a robot. (Me at a party once again.)
Let’s start by assuming robots as human-like bipedal machines that are designed with some amount of artificial intelligence, generally designed to fulfill a job to free up humanity from drudgery. All sounds good so far. So why do they creep us out?
There’s a litany of reasons why, best summed up with the concept of the uncanny valley, first coined by roboticist Masahiro Mori (Wow he’s still alive! The robots have not yet won) in 1970. Essentially, we know what a human is and how it looks and behaves against the greater backdrop of life and physics. When this is translated to a synthetic being, we are ok with making a robot look and act like us to a point, where we then notice all the irregularities and differences.
Most of these are minor – unnaturally smooth or rigid movements, light not scattering properly on a surface, eyes that don’t sync up quite right when they blink, and several other tiny details. Lots of theories take over at this point about why this creeps us out. But a blanket way to think about it is that our expectation doesn’t match what we are seeing; the reality we’re presented with is off just enough and this makes us uncomfortable .
Ever stream a show and the audio is a half second off? Makes you really annoyed. Magnify that feeling by a thousand and you’re smack in the middle of the uncanny valley. It’s that unnerving. One possible term for this is abjection, which is what happens the moment before we begin to fear something. Our minds – sensing incompatibility with robots – know this is something else, something other , and faced with no way to categorize this, we crash.
This is why they make good villains in movies – something we don’t understand and given free will and autonomy, potentially imbued with the bias of a creator or capable of forming terrifying conclusions all on its own (humans are a virus). But they also make good heroes, especially if they are cute or funny. Who doesn’t love C3PO? That surprise that they are good delights us. Build in enough appeal to a robot, and we root for them and feel empathy when they are faced with hardships. Do robots dream of electric sheep? Do robots have binary souls? Bits and zeros and ones?
Professor Jaime Banks (Texas Tech University’s College of Media & Communication) spends a lot of time thinking about how we perceive robots. It’s a complex and multifaceted topic that covers anthropomorphism, artificial intelligence, robot roles within society, trust, inherently measuring virtue versus evil, preconceived notions from entertainment, and numerous topics that cover human-robot interactions.
The world is approaching a future where robots may become commonplace; there are already robot bears in Japan working in the healthcare field. Dressing them up with cute faces and smiles may help, but one jerky movement later and we’ve dropped all suspension.
At some point, we have to make peace with the idea that they will be all over the place. Skynet, GLaDOS in Portal, the trope of your evil twin being a robot that your significant will have to shoot in the middle of your fight, that episode of Futurama where everything was a robot and they rose up against their human masters with wargod washing machines and killer greeting cards, the other Futurama episode where they go to a planet full of human hating murderous robots… We’ve all got some good reasons to fear robots and their coded minds.
But as technology advances, it makes sense to have robots take over menial tasks, perform duties for the needy and sick, and otherwise benefit humanity at large. And so the question we face is how to build that relationship now to help us in the future.
There’s a fine line between making them too humanlike versus too mechanical. Pixar solved the issue of unnerving humanoids in their movies by designing them stylistically – we know they are human and accept that the figure would look odd in real life. We can do the same with robots – enough familiarity to develop an appeal, but not enough to erase the divide between humanity and robot. It may just be a question of time and new generations growing up with robots becoming fixtures of everyday life. I’m down for cyborgs too.
Fearing them might not even be bad, as Banks points out: “…a certain amount of fear can be a useful thing. Fear can make us think critically and carefully and be thoughtful about our interactions, and that would likely help us productively engage a world where robots are key players.”
Also, check out Robot Carnival if you get the chance – specifically the Presence episode of the anthology.
4 simple tips to ease friction with your boss while working remotely
(OPINION / EDITORIAL) Find it challenging to get along with your boss while working from home? Here are a few things you can try to ease the tension.
Most people probably feel like their relationship with their boss is fine. If you’re encountering friction with your boss for any reason, though, remote work will often exacerbate it—this is one instance where distance doesn’t necessarily make the heart grow fonder. Here are a few ways to remove some of that friction without adding to your boss’ overflowing plate.
According to CNN, determining the problem that exists between you and your boss should be your first step. There’s one caveat to consider, however: Your boss’ boundaries. Problem-solving on your own time is fine, but demanding more of your boss’ time—especially when you’re supposed to be working—may compound the issue.
An easy way around this is a low-impact communique—e.g., an email—sent at the beginning or end of the workday. Since that’s a more passive communication style that takes only a minute or two out of your day, it’s less likely to frustrate your boss further.
If ironing out the issue isn’t your prerogative for now, examining your boss’ parameters for success is another place to start. Does your boss prefer to receive multiple updates throughout the day, or do they want one summative report each morning? Do you respect your boss’ preferred communication styles? These are important questions to ask during remote work. If you find yourself reaching out more than necessary, for example, it may be time to cut back.
It can also be difficult to satiate your boss if you don’t know their expectations. If you’re able to speak to them about the expectations regarding a project or task, do it; clarifying the parameters around your work will always help both of you. It is worth noting that some supervisors may expect that you know your way around some types of responsibilities, though, so err on the side of complementing that knowledge rather than asking for comprehensive instructions.
Finally, keep in mind that some bosses simply don’t communicate the same way you do. I’ve personally been blessed with a bevy of nurturing, enthusiastic supervisors, but we’ve all had superiors who refuse to acknowledge our successes and instead focus on our failures. That can be a really tough mentality to work with during remote periods, but knowing that they have a specific communication style that hampers their sociability can help dampen the effects.
As always, communication is key—even if that means doing it a little bit less than you’d like.
Opinion Editorials7 days ago
3 things to do if you *really* want to be an ally to women in tech
Business Marketing2 days ago
Video is necessary for your marketing strategy
Opinion Editorials2 weeks ago
Questions you wished recruiters would answer
Tech News2 days ago
Chatbots: Are they still useful, or ready to be retired?
Business Entrepreneur1 week ago
15 tips to spot a toxic work environment when interviewing
Opinion Editorials7 days ago
4 simple tips to ease friction with your boss while working remotely
Business Entrepreneur2 weeks ago
Zen, please: Demand for mental health services surges during pandemic
Opinion Editorials6 days ago
Why robots freak us out, and what it means for the future of AI