Connect with us

Opinion Editorials

Snuck up on ya?

Published

on

ag-head-on

It’s easy to look back & think “how did they FAIL to see that coming”?

As we moved into the information age, so many intermediary business sectors seemed to be blindsided when the Interwebs made them non-essential.  A couple examples include travel agencies and stock brokerages.  Gadgets also are disruptive.  For example, how might Kindle impact book sellers?

Are realtors/agents failing to see it coming?

Right about now, Redfin may come to mind.  But, is Redfin truly a disruptive technology?  Or do they replicate the same processes virtually?  Disruptive technologies change/streamline processes.  Certain elements of process, now automated by technology, are made obsolete.  Typically it’s the middlemen that are jettisoned from the process.     

The internet continues evolve, it makes sense that we will see transformation and change that offers great opportunities to buyers and sellers of homes, but also great risk to agents. 

In defense of agents

Agents provide great value.  Agents provide guidance in the complicated legal aspects of the transaction:  contract preparation, negotiation, etc.  to avoid pitfalls on both the buy and sell sides.  (Yes, that’s watered down)     

Take off your agent hat

Imagine knowing what you know now, travelling back to 1990 and chatting with an attorney.  You talk of a day not too far in the future where people can form a corporation, get a divorce, prepare a will and more without meeting attorney and often for about $500.  Wouldn’t he/she cling to the argument that their knowledge of the transaction can’t possibly be reduced in value?  That it’s not wise to neglect their counsel?

Ah yes … but you counter “But, Mr(s). Esquire, over the next two decades, information will be indexed, searchable and commoditized.  You will no longer be able to justify your current fees for certain services”. 

In the transaction examples listed above, an attorney is involved, but acts more as a review and filing service.  Could that be the future role of agents?        

What’s that leave for agents?

Local expertise?  That begs the question: Will an agent, whose value could be marginalized by future disruptive technologies, offer enough value in the process to warrant 3%? 

Neighborhood docents?

Again, take off your agent hat.  This time, put on your futurist hat.  By compiling data, it’s safe to assume there will be technologies that offer real estate indices than marginalize the value of neighborhood expertise.  Such indices cold be derived via an algorithm, and be used for pricing, and future values by taking into account not only empirical data, but also a weighted version of the subtleties and attributes of a neighborhood.  The possibilities are endless. 

Tell us below:  What not-yet-invented technology do you see as the biggest threat? 

The times are changing

We are in a time of transformation that may be regarded by future generations as one of the most significant periods in history.  

How agents respond over the next decade will either bring praise for their acuity or have them wondering why they failed to grasp the evolutionary necessities so obvious to them, like the travel agents and stock brokers before them.

photo credit

Brandie is an unapologetically candid marketing professional who was recently mentioned on BusinessWeek as a Top Young Female Entrepreneur. She recently co-founded consulting firm MarketingTBD. She's held senior level positions with GE and Fidelity, as well as with entrepreneurial start-ups. Raised by a real estate Broker, Brandie is passionate about real estate and is an avid investor. Follow her on Twitter.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
16 Comments

16 Comments

  1. Ken Montville - The MD Suburbs of DC

    May 14, 2009 at 11:46 am

    This assumes, at some fundamental level, that people will want to interact with other people >as little as possible. I disagree with that assumption. Yes, there will always be the DIYers (FSBOs have been around for how long?) and the researcher/engineer types that are really much more comfortable with a machine and distrusting of fellow humans. There will also be tons of people who want to hear an authoritative voice from a human being consulting with them about important life issues.

    WebMD can help sift through symptoms and medical side effects of drugs. My guess is people will still want to see physicians. I, personally, work with a stock broker cum financial adviser because I want to be able to sit down and explain my goals and aspirations and elicit some empathy and understanding. Sure, eTrade and Sharebuilder are pennies compared to my Smith Barney guy but, to me, he’s worth it.

    Technology will continue to evolve and more and more information will become available to consumers of every type of product and service. Real Estate professionals that do not embrace technology will be replaced by Real Estate professionals that do not. In the end, people still need people (is there a song in there somewhere?) and providing that human interaction is what we’re all about.

  2. Ken Montville - The MD Suburbs of DC

    May 14, 2009 at 11:49 am

    Damn. I hate it when my proofreading sucks.

    Real Estate professionals that do not embrace technology will be replaced by Real Estate professionals that do. [period]

  3. Ken Brand

    May 14, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    Always and interesting exercise – ponder the future and what does this mean to that as it relates to this and me and us and we.

    Also, it’s a great metaphor, but it’s a paradox, you can’t see what’s coming because you can’t see what’s coming.

    Thanks.

  4. Fred Romano

    May 14, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    Great post Brandie! The future of traditional agents is uncertain. I can say with more certainty that the future of “listing” agents is more clear. As the Internet evolves, consumers are becoming more aware of the value (or lack there of) of the Listing agent. This is why the flat fee model is flourishing.

    As for your statement “Agents provide guidance in the complicated legal aspects of the transaction”, It’s clear agents are not attorneys, so I would never use this idea to defend the “value” of agents.

    Where have all the travel agents gone? Book it online!

    If Realtor.com or Trulia.com ever open their doors to allow sellers to post their homes for sale direct, we are all done, including the flat fee brokers!

  5. Jonathan Dalton

    May 14, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    Interesting you chose Redfin …

    When it started, the idea was for buyers to do their own homework, Redfin would help shuffle the paperwork and they’d give a rebate at the end. Jump forward and Redfin looks more like a traditional brokerage set up … agents tour homes with buyers, for instance, because that’s what buyers wanted. The two differentiating factors are a slick website and a rebate.

    And so when you ask the question of whether Redfin really changed the real estate industry or did the real estate industry change Redfin, the answer’s the latter.

    Put another way, wake me when the evolution is over. We’ve talked about it for years and the nuts and bolts of this business – knowledge, customer service, etc. – still haven’t changed.

  6. Doug Francis

    May 14, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    Future technology? It will need to something like a holodeck (google it if you don’t know) or a in-home-simulator, like where they train pilots.

    Actually, I feel that my clients want to touch and smell the place… so maybe an afternoon when the door is left open so they can walk through. We can call it, Open House.

    Maybe using existing technology like a common lockbox system so we can easily show every listing… what are those agents thinking?

    Okay, you want the future? Watch for the Interweb 5.0

  7. Paula Henry

    May 16, 2009 at 12:14 am

    Brandi –

    There are more than enough business models in real estate to accomodate the knowledge of the consumer. In my area, I don’t see the flat fee model flourishing; the opposite is true.

    To deny the lack of knowledge we bring to the table is to assume the average client knows everything they neeed to know about the real estate process and transaction.

    I find it is not the case. My most recent clients have many questions and need guidance ( these are not first time home buyers). The question will become, not do we offer value, but what the client is willing to pay for the service and knowledge. I maintain there is room for all business models.

  8. Ruthmarie Hicks

    May 16, 2009 at 10:49 am

    This is just more of the same blather. On the technical end you would need more than a great web site, more than even the holodeck that Doug suggests. What you need is the transporter system a la Star Trek. “Beam me into the house for sale on Maple, Scotty!” Buyers need to actually SEE the house – in the flesh. Beyond that, local knowledge is key. There is no program that can calculate differences between individual homes. Real estate is a product like no other in that no two properties are EVER exactly the same. Finding a computer model that will recognize the minute differences between individual properties is a fantasy. But taking buyers from home to home and estimating a home’s worth is only a small part of what agents do.

    Personally, I think that it is just driving the venture capitalists and web developers CRAZY that they haven’t been able to crack the real estate egg open into a gold rush. They think they can smell the money and yet they can’t crack through and its just driving the nuts. All they have to do is create a “system” to reduce cost. Soooooo easy – NOT. So they create all sorts of conspiracy theories of real estate cartels and the like. I’m no fan of NAR but it lacks the power to stop a process like this if it were doable. The public wants it too much and the DOJ is NOT on NAR’s side.

    Many models exist, but they haven’t taken off – if anything – commission rates are creeping back as a result of the downturn. Why? Because most of these models don’t “get” what agents and brokers actually do and they fail to recognize that real estate is a transaction like no other. Homes aren’t ipods that have a fixed cost. Home buyers hem and haw and hesitate far longer than than for any other type of purchase . On the other side, sellers may toy with selling for years before they actually list. Getting to a meeting of the minds on issues such as price…can be very challenging and getting to the closing table can be fraught with obstacles. The result is a failure rate that is higher than for other purchases and a time-line that is far longer. What other model has a marketing plan that can extend for a year or more for one sale? Nurturing a single client and incubating leads necessitate building systems that will cultivate that person for months or even YEARS. The transaction itself is very complex and has many stages and is time consuming in the extreme. Each stage represents a potential abyss into which the deal can fall into. So from initial contact to closing, this is high-touch, VERY time consuming and expensive process with a high rate of “failure.” For these reasons, higher margins for profit are required or the cost of doing business will quickly overwhelm any profit gained from the transaction.

    The crazy skinny margins that some of these models propose prevent them from being viable. Also, the assumption that all agents in all areas are working for a lofty 3% are not really valid. Many rebaters are competing with full-service agents that have already sliced commissions to the bone.

  9. Brandie Young

    May 16, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    Hi Ken M – thanks for your thoughts. I think we need to agree to disagree on one point you made: that it’s an assumption “that people will want to interact with other people >as little as possible.” Consider the Millennials that have grown up with disruptive technologies as the norm. They’re likely to have always sought advice online. And, they’ve always had access to online services such as bill pay, travel booking, stock buying/selling and tax prep. Given that, interaction with real live people has never been a necessity to them, even though at one time people were an absolute necessity in the transaction.

    Hiya Ken – always great to hear from you.

    Hi Fred – thanks for the props! Good point on the flat fee brokers.

    Hi Jonathan – Don’t fall asleep … I don’t think the evolution of any business will ever be over. And I agree, the nuts and bolts haven’t changed, but that doesn’t mean the role of the agent may not as technology evolves.

    Hi Paula – I agree. There is room and necessity.

    Hi Ruthmarie – wow. Clearly your passionate on this, and I appreciate your thoughts. With the exception of my thoughts being referred to as “blather”. It sounds like what you’re saying is the role of the agent can’t change because an agent offers value that can not be duplicated by technology, nor will technology ever be able to demystify the transaction. I guess we will just need to check back in 5 – 10 years and see how it looks.

    On two of your points, I respectfully disagree based on first-hand knowledge:
    1. A program DOES exist that can calculate the differences between individual homes, plus it takes into account other area factors/economics/demographics (micro and macro). It will be introduced on a broad scale this year. The output isn’t just value, but potential.
    2. VC’s are currently running fast from RE tech investments as they haven’t realized any upside from their current portfolio companies.

  10. Doug Francis

    May 16, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    I’m not sure if you guys are interested in how to better understand how to interact with “Milllenials” and how they want to interact with people over 40, but there is an excellent book on the subject avail at Amazon that I read, “From Boomers to Bloggers…” by Misti Burmeister. Interesting observation.

    Is it ok to put in a link? https://www.amazon.com/Boomers-Bloggers-Success-Strategies-Generations/dp/0980220904

    I am 46 and deal with a lot of 28ish folks… and they want all experiences.

    They expect technology, want to get into homes, and be treated like adults.
    -doug

  11. Lani Rosales

    May 17, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    I have a few points to add:

    1. Regarding generational interaction, the digital natives (like me) that grew up with computer technologies still research online first, not in order to question an agent but for affirmation of their research when an agent agrees, for security that their thoughts are in line with reality and for saving time. Often, GenYers will have a list, want to see 3 homes and will pick one quickly because they’re armed with information. They still want someone to walk them through and affirm their decision and overwhelmingly here in Austin, they’re really hiring someone to walk them through negotiations, not to find a home. As for listings, many of them have bought an address-specific url, blogged about it and put interviews with their agents on YouTube to have their friends weigh in. None of this eliminates the agent, it just makes the process public.

    2. To answer your question about what technology could threaten agents: I think that standardization of forms nation-wide could possibly threaten the agent’s role as their value is not just in local expertise but in contract negotiation. IF all real estate transactions were standardized by law (which is excruciatingly unlikely), a company like Legal Zoom could easily supplant the industry. Thoughts?

  12. Ruthmarie Hicks

    May 17, 2009 at 11:52 pm

    With all respect Brandi – A program can’t SMELL a house…get views from every window….check the garbage in the neighbors back yard and whether the grass is mowed, be sure that the bathroom updates include tumbled marble (or is it just ceramic tile??) be sure that the electric is totally updated and that there is no hint of water in the basement. Certainly it can’t measure how well the home owner took care of the property or the impact of the broken dishwasher and dirty dishes in the sink.

    The fact that you are touting a program that measures demographics on a macro and micro level but doesn’t take into account all of the nitty gritty above -shows just how little you understand the consumer in this matter.

    I came into this field from a science background thinking I’d leave everyone in the dust using the technology. To me, the traditional models were stodgy and outdated. And on the brokerage level, I’d agree that many models are outdated. But the feeling that I had that there was plenty of fat in the system – lots of room to offer nice discounts…didn’t hold up under close scrutiny. Agents weren’t just being “greedy.” Like you, I grossly underestimated the difficulties involved in the sales process. I wanted it neat and tidy. Real estate is messy. You can try to quantify the variables all you want – the nature of the beast does not lend itself to rational algorithms, websites and computer programs. Those who try to predict the demise of real estate agents and their commissions need to do what I did: get a license and LEARN.

    Learn what it means to deal with the public who are NOT rational about the value of their homes or about how much a home they want to buy should cost.

    Learn what it takes to take get two sides that are miles apart and bring them to an agreement – and keep them together long enough for the transaction to close.

    Learn how a petty dispute over a $500 light fixture can put a $500k transaction in jeopardy.

    Learn how homes on the same block can vary tremendously in value depending on how they were kept and updated and even the impact of a messy neighbor on property values.

    Learn the true costs of fronting money marketing a listing for months on end only to have no transaction take place.

    Learn how long it takes to cultivate a real estate lead into a client and then an actual transaction.

    It’s also interesting that you just fall back to your computer “models” and don’t address a lot of the issues I brought up. More substance on the messy issues that aren’t going away any time soon might help legitimize your point of view. But you don’t go there.

    Also, I have to say that when working with buyers, finding the home is the “easy part.” Most of what I’m worth is tied to negotiation and holding the transaction together – and in the event of a listing – pricing the home appropriately as well as positioning it for sale and marketing it to attract appropriate buyers. You pretty much gloss over those issues as insignificant.

  13. Brandie Young

    May 18, 2009 at 2:17 am

    Wow, Ruthmarie, so you know, your comments come across to me as personal and somewhat of an attack. Not a problem, I’m always up for a stimulating conversation, but not a catfight. However, if you prefer the latter, I invite you to contact me at Brandie@marketingTBD.com or 510.599.2785. That said …

    My personal practice is to form opinions based on facts I can gather. Let me point out a few things I believe you assumed, and therefore got wrong, based on your comments:

    1. You made an assumption on the technology I mentioned.
    While a program can not “smell”, all the things you mentioned are just points of data. Other ways of compiling/slicing/aggregating data at the property level DO exist. i.e. MLS listings, and agents comments/notes, which include the details of tumbled marble vs. ceramic tile, updates to electrical, the chicken farm next door, condition of property, etc. And, once they are created, they are indexed and forever associated with the street address and parcel number.

    Another fact you didn’t have prior to your comment is the team outlining the program had nearly a century of real estate experience between us. Given that, of course intangibles were a huge consideration! We’re not obtuse.

    I’m not sure where “I didn’t go” with regard to any “messy issues”, but again, I’m happy to do so if you need me to. I simply ask you clarify what you need me to address.

    2. Next, I doubt you have a complete understanding
    of my knowledge of the consumer, nor my knowledge in real estate (but in all fairness, how could you). The points you suggest I learn: dealing with irrational buyers/sellers, negotiation, variations in value, marketing costs, the intricacies of a transaction – I, in fact, know quite well having observed 2 parents in the business (before it was a boon). My father (now a retired broker) survived nearly 40 years in the business, and my mother was an agent for approx. 26 years. That said, I NEVER underestimate the difficulties involved in the process. It was exactly those difficulties that led to a lack of “COE” written on my father’s desktop calendar during tough times. I learned at a very young age when COE isn’t written on the calendar for one, two or three months at a time, it’s bad. And, during my 18 years at my childhood home, there was more than one down-cycle.

    In addition, I am a real estate investor and have built a successful carrier within and around the industry for nearly two decades. I get it. I’ve lived it.

    The point of the post was to opine on the future/evolving role of agents (I’ve watched it change substantially over the last 40 years) … and what it could morph into based on unforeseen emerging technologies – NOT to diminish nor disrespect agents in general.

  14. Brandie Young

    May 18, 2009 at 2:27 am

    Lani – Great thoughts, as usual. Thanks!

    I keyed in on “None of this eliminates the agent, it just makes the process public.” Interesting, since we are becoming firmly engrained in a time where crowd-sourcing opinions on everything is the norm…. It will be interesting to see how that evolves. For example, if agents will be pro or con user opinions on listings/neighborhood. To your point on national standardization – yeah, I don’t see that coming anytime soon. Too many chefs in the kitchen (and a few short order cooks as well)

  15. Matt Goyer - Redfin

    May 18, 2009 at 6:27 pm

    Interesting discussion!

    To be clear, Redfin doesn’t think that technology will eliminate agents. Heck the number of agents associated with Redfin is growing at a rapid clip!

    And as Jonathan points out we have adapted over the years to offer a blended service. Something we think that makes us different though is that we recognize when home buyers want to use the Internet (searching for homes) and when they want to talk to an agent (for instance to see homes or for guidance with the offer and closing process).

    However, I still think that we are disruptive. What I think makes us disruptive is our level of transparency. On our website we show you all the homes for sale, that we can, with as much information about those homes, without requiring any sort of registration or buyers agency agreement. I think we’re also very transparent about the quality of our agents and customer experience by surveying every Redfin home buyer and seller regardless of whether their offer/listing is successful and then posting those reviews online.

    We’re also disruptive in the sense that our agents aren’t paid on commission but instead earn a salary and earn bonuses based on those customer surveys. This is much different than most real estate companies. We also have structured our real estate team differently in order to make it more efficient. That is we have agents who specialize in showing homes while others specialize in negotiations and a third specialize in co-ordinating the transaction giving us a greater level of efficiency that lets us pass on a refund to the customer.

    What does the future hold? I think its greater efficiency through specialization.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion Editorials

7 ways to carve out me time while working from home

(OPINION / EDITORIAL) It can be easy to forget about self-care when you’re working from home, but it’s critical for your mental health, and your work quality.

Published

on

Woman in hijab sitting on couch, working from home on a laptop

We are all familiar with the syndrome, getting caught up in work, chores, and taking care of others, and neglecting to take care of ourselves in the meantime. This has always been the case, but now, with more people working from home and a seemingly endless lineup of chores, thanks to the pandemic. There is simply so much to do.

The line is thinly drawn between personal and professional time already, with emails, cell phones, and devices relentlessly reaching out around the clock, pulling at us like zombie arms reaching up from the grave. Working from home makes this tendency to always be “on” worse, as living and working take place in such close proximity. We have to turn it off, though.

Our brains and bodies need down time, me-time, self-care. Carving out this time is one of the kindest and most important things you can do for yourself. If we can begin to honor ourselves like this, the outcome with not only our mental and physical health, but also our productivity at work, will be beneficial. When we make the time to do things we love, our body untenses, our mind’s gears slow down that constant grinding. Burnout behooves nobody.

Our work will also benefit. Healthier, happier, more well rested, and well treated minds and bodies can work wonders! Our immune systems also need this, and we need our immune systems to be at their peak performance this intense season.

I wanted to write this article, because I have such a struggle with this in my own life. I need to print it out and put it in my workspace. Last week, I posted something on my social media pages that so many people shared. It is clear we all need these reminders, so I am paying it forward here. The graphic was a quote from Devyn W.

“If you are reading this, release your shoulders away from your ears, unclench your jaw, and drop your tongue from the roof of your mouth.”

There now, isn’t that remarkable? It is a great first step. Let go of the tension in your body, and check out these ways to make yourself some healing me-time.

  1. Set aside strict no-work times. This could be any time of day, but set the times and adhere to them strictly. This may look like taking a full hour for lunch, not checking email after a certain hour, or committing to spending that time outdoors, reading, exercising, or enjoying the company of your loved ones. Make this a daily routine, because we need these boundaries. Every. Single. Day.
  2. Remember not to apologize to anyone for taking this me-time. Mentally and physically you need this, and everyone will be better off if you do. It is nothing to apologize for! Building these work-free hours into your daily schedule will feel more normal as time goes on. This giving of time and space to your joy, health, and even basic human needs is what should be the norm, not the other way around.
  3. Give yourself a device-free hour or two every day, especially before bedtime. The pinging, dinging, and blinging keeps us on edge. Restful sleep is one of the wonderful ways our bodies and brains heal, and putting devices away before bedtime is one of the quick tips for getting better sleep.
  4. Of course, make time for the things you absolutely love. If this is a hot bath, getting a massage, reading books, working out, cooking or eating an extravagant meal, or talking and laughing with a loved one, you have to find a way to get this serotonin boost!
  5. Use the sunshine shortcut. It isn’t a cure-all, but sunlight and Vitamin D are mood boosters. At least when it’s not 107 degrees, like in a Texas summer. But as a general rule, taking in at least a good 10-15 minutes of that sweet, sweet Vitamin D provided by the sun is good for us.
  6. Spend time with animals! Walk your dog, shake that feathery thing at your cat, or snuggle either one. Whatever animals make you smile, spend time with them. If you don’t have pets of your own, you could volunteer to walk them at a local shelter or even watch a cute animal video online. They are shown to reduce stress. Best case scenario is in person if you are able, but thankfully the internet is bursting with adorable animal videos, as a backup.
  7. Give in to a bit of planning or daydreaming about a big future trip. Spending time looking at all the places you will go in the future and even plotting out an itinerary are usually excellent mood-boosters. It’s a bit different in 2020, as most of us aren’t sure when we will be able to go, but even deciding where you want to go when we are free to travel again can put a positive spin on things.

I hope we can all improve our lives while working from home by making time for regenerating, healing, and having fun! Gotta run—the sun is out, and my dog is begging for a walk.

Continue Reading

Opinion Editorials

Why robots freak us out, and what it means for the future of AI

(OPINION / EDITORIAL) Robots and humans have a long way to go before the social divide disappears, but research is giving us insight on how to cross the uncanny valley.

Published

on

Close of R2D2 toy, an example of robots that we root for, but why?

We hate robots. Ok, wait, back up. We at least think they are more evil than good. Try it yourself – “are robots” in Google nets you evil before good. Megatron has higher SEO than Optimus Prime, and it’s not just because he’s so much cooler. It cuz he evil, cuz. It do be like that.

It’s not even a compliment to call someone robotic; society connotes this to emotionless preprogrammed shells of hideous nothing, empty clankbags that walk and talk and not much else. So, me at a party. Or if you’re a nerd, you’re a robot. (Me at a party once again.)

Let’s start by assuming robots as human-like bipedal machines that are designed with some amount of artificial intelligence, generally designed to fulfill a job to free up humanity from drudgery. All sounds good so far. So why do they creep us out?

There’s a litany of reasons why, best summed up with the concept of the uncanny valley, first coined by roboticist Masahiro Mori (Wow he’s still alive! The robots have not yet won) in 1970. Essentially, we know what a human is and how it looks and behaves against the greater backdrop of life and physics. When this is translated to a synthetic being, we are ok with making a robot look and act like us to a point, where we then notice all the irregularities and differences.

Most of these are minor – unnaturally smooth or rigid movements, light not scattering properly on a surface, eyes that don’t sync up quite right when they blink, and several other tiny details. Lots of theories take over at this point about why this creeps us out. But a blanket way to think about it is that our expectation doesn’t match what we are seeing; the reality we’re presented with is off just enough and this makes us uncomfortable .

Ever stream a show and the audio is a half second off? Makes you really annoyed. Magnify that feeling by a thousand and you’re smack in the middle of the uncanny valley. It’s that unnerving. One possible term for this is abjection, which is what happens the moment before we begin to fear something. Our minds – sensing incompatibility with robots – know this is something else, something other , and faced with no way to categorize this, we crash.

This is why they make good villains in movies – something we don’t understand and given free will and autonomy, potentially imbued with the bias of a creator or capable of forming terrifying conclusions all on its own (humans are a virus). But they also make good heroes, especially if they are cute or funny. Who doesn’t love C3PO? That surprise that they are good delights us. Build in enough appeal to a robot, and we root for them and feel empathy when they are faced with hardships. Do robots dream of electric sheep? Do robots have binary souls? Bits and zeros and ones?

Professor Jaime Banks (Texas Tech University’s College of Media & Communication) spends a lot of time thinking about how we perceive robots. It’s a complex and multifaceted topic that covers anthropomorphism, artificial intelligence, robot roles within society, trust, inherently measuring virtue versus evil, preconceived notions from entertainment, and numerous topics that cover human-robot interactions.

The world is approaching a future where robots may become commonplace; there are already robot bears in Japan working in the healthcare field. Dressing them up with cute faces and smiles may help, but one jerky movement later and we’ve dropped all suspension.

At some point, we have to make peace with the idea that they will be all over the place. Skynet, GLaDOS in Portal, the trope of your evil twin being a robot that your significant will have to shoot in the middle of your fight, that episode of Futurama where everything was a robot and they rose up against their human masters with wargod washing machines and killer greeting cards, the other Futurama episode where they go to a planet full of human hating murderous robots… We’ve all got some good reasons to fear robots and their coded minds.

But as technology advances, it makes sense to have robots take over menial tasks, perform duties for the needy and sick, and otherwise benefit humanity at large. And so the question we face is how to build that relationship now to help us in the future.

There’s a fine line between making them too humanlike versus too mechanical. Pixar solved the issue of unnerving humanoids in their movies by designing them stylistically – we know they are human and accept that the figure would look odd in real life. We can do the same with robots – enough familiarity to develop an appeal, but not enough to erase the divide between humanity and robot. It may just be a question of time and new generations growing up with robots becoming fixtures of everyday life. I’m down for cyborgs too.

Fearing them might not even be bad, as Banks points out: “…a certain amount of fear can be a useful thing. Fear can make us think critically and carefully and be thoughtful about our interactions, and that would likely help us productively engage a world where robots are key players.”

Also, check out Robot Carnival if you get the chance – specifically the Presence episode of the anthology.

Continue Reading

Opinion Editorials

4 simple tips to ease friction with your boss while working remotely

(OPINION / EDITORIAL) Find it challenging to get along with your boss while working from home? Here are a few things you can try to ease the tension.

Published

on

Woman stressed over laptop in remote work.

Most people probably feel like their relationship with their boss is fine. If you’re encountering friction with your boss for any reason, though, remote work will often exacerbate it—this is one instance where distance doesn’t necessarily make the heart grow fonder. Here are a few ways to remove some of that friction without adding to your boss’ overflowing plate.

According to CNN, determining the problem that exists between you and your boss should be your first step. There’s one caveat to consider, however: Your boss’ boundaries. Problem-solving on your own time is fine, but demanding more of your boss’ time—especially when you’re supposed to be working—may compound the issue.

An easy way around this is a low-impact communique—e.g., an email—sent at the beginning or end of the workday. Since that’s a more passive communication style that takes only a minute or two out of your day, it’s less likely to frustrate your boss further.

If ironing out the issue isn’t your prerogative for now, examining your boss’ parameters for success is another place to start. Does your boss prefer to receive multiple updates throughout the day, or do they want one summative report each morning? Do you respect your boss’ preferred communication styles? These are important questions to ask during remote work. If you find yourself reaching out more than necessary, for example, it may be time to cut back.

It can also be difficult to satiate your boss if you don’t know their expectations. If you’re able to speak to them about the expectations regarding a project or task, do it; clarifying the parameters around your work will always help both of you. It is worth noting that some supervisors may expect that you know your way around some types of responsibilities, though, so err on the side of complementing that knowledge rather than asking for comprehensive instructions.

Finally, keep in mind that some bosses simply don’t communicate the same way you do. I’ve personally been blessed with a bevy of nurturing, enthusiastic supervisors, but we’ve all had superiors who refuse to acknowledge our successes and instead focus on our failures. That can be a really tough mentality to work with during remote periods, but knowing that they have a specific communication style that hampers their sociability can help dampen the effects.

As always, communication is key—even if that means doing it a little bit less than you’d like.

Continue Reading

Our Great Partners

The
American Genius
news neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list for news sent straight to your email inbox.

Emerging Stories

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!