FHFA forces Fannie and Freddie to comply
A recent Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) report noted that since 2003, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac knew that the law firms they had hired were fudging foreclosures so they could get paid by the number of foreclosures. Freddie Mac fired the firms, Fannie Mae said it would cost $5 million to transfer the files to another firm, they couldn’t afford to do so, and they refused, keeping on payroll the very law firms that had processed false foreclosures and abused the American public.
Now, the FHFA which regulates Fannie and Freddie is directing the agencies to transition away from their current foreclosure attorney network programs and move to a system where mortgage servicers will select law firms based upon uniform criteria as well as minimum qualifications as opposed to the current system wherein Fannie and Freddie assign law firms for each state based on their own separate criteria. The new system will be more uniform and servicers will be allowed to choose from a list of qualified firms.
Improving the foreclosure process
“FHFA believes these efforts will lead to greater transparency and benefit delinquent borrowers who become subject to the foreclosure process,” the FHFA said in a statement. “Further, the change will be supportive of the Consent Orders entered into by financial regulators and servicers.”
FHFA has ordered Fannie and Freddie to work together (a task that often eludes the Fannie half of the equation) to create and put into effect consistent policies, requirements and processes for managing foreclosure related legal services.
The dismantling of the current networks will take place after a transition period in which FHFA will seek input from regulators, servicers, lawyers and others, during which the existing contracts will remain in place so that foreclosures continue to be processed.
Austin tops the list of best places to buy a home
When looking to buy a home, taking the long view is important before making such a huge investment – where are the best places to make that commitment?
Looking at the bigger picture
(REALUOSO.COM) – Let us first express that although we are completely biased about Texas (we’re headquartered here, I personally grew up here), the data is not – Texas is the best. That’s a scientific fact. There’s a running joke in Austin that if there is a list of “best places to [anything],” we’re on it, and the joke causes eye rolls instead of humility (we’re sore winners and sore losers in this town).
That said, SelfStorage.com dug into the data and determined that the top 12 places to buy a home are currently Texas and North Carolina (and Portland, I guess you’re okay too or whatever).
They examined the nerdiest of numbers from the compound annual growth rate in inflation-adjusted GDP to cost premium, affordability, taxes, job growth, and housing availability.
“Buying a house is a big decision and a big commitment,” the company notes. “Although U.S. home prices have risen in the long term, the last decade has shown that path is sometimes full of twists, turns, dizzying heights and steep, abrupt falls. Today, home prices are stabilizing and increasing in most areas of the U.S.”
Average age of houses on the rise, so is it now better or worse to buy new?
With aging housing in America, are first-time buyers better off buying new or existing homes? The average age of a home is rising, as is the price of new housing, so a shift could be upon us.
The average home age is higher than ever
(REALUOSO.COM) – In a survey from the Department of Housing and Urban Development American Housing Survey (AHS), the median age of homes in the United States was 35 years old. In Texas, homes are a bit younger with the median age between 19 – 29 years. The northeast has the oldest homes, with the median age between 50 – 61 years. In 1985, the median age of a home was only 23 years.
With more houses around 40 years old, the National Association of Realtors asserts that homeowners will have to undertake remodeling and renovation projects before selling unless the home is sold as-is, in which case the buyer will be responsible to update their new residence. Even homeowners who aren’t selling will need to consider remodeling for structural and aesthetic reasons.
Prices of new homes on the rise
Newer homes cost more than they used to. The price differential between new homes and older homes has increased from 10 percent traditionally to around 37 percent in 2014. This is due to rising construction costs, scarcity of lots, and a low inventory of new homes that doesn’t meet the demand.
Are Realtors the real loser in the fight between Zillow Group and Move, Inc.?
The last year has been one of dramatic and rapid change in the real estate tech sector, but Realtors are vulnerable, and we’re worried.
Why Realtors are vulnerable to these rapid changes
(REALUOSO.COM) – Corporate warfare demands headlines in every industry, but in the real estate tech sector, a storm has been brewing for years, which in the last year has come to a head. Zillow Group and Move, Inc. (which is owned by News Corp. and operates ListHub, Realtor.com, TopProducer, and other brands) have been competing for a decade now, and the race has appeared to be an aggressive yet polite boxing match. Last year, the gloves came off, and now, they’ve drawn swords and appear to want blood.
Note: We’ll let you decide which company plays which role in the image above.
So how then, does any of this make Realtors the victims of this sword fight? Let’s get everyone up to speed, and then we’ll discuss.
1. Zillow poaches top talent, Move/NAR sues
It all started last year when the gloves came off – Move’s Chief Strategy Officer (who was also Realtor.com’s President), Errol Samuelson jumped ship and joined Zillow on the same day he phoned in his resignation without notice. He left under questionable circumstances, which has led to a lengthy legal battle (wherein Move and NAR have sued Zillow and Samuelson over allegations of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and misappropriation of trade secrets), with the most recent motion being for contempt, which a judge granted to Move/NAR after the mysterious “Samuelson Memo” surfaced.
Salt was added to the wound when Move awarded Samuelson’s job to Move veteran, Curt Beardsley, who days after Samuelson left, also defected to Zillow. This too led to a lawsuit, with allegations including breach of contract, violation of corporations code, illegal dumping of stocks, and Move has sought restitution. These charges are extremely serious, but demanded slightly less attention than the ongoing lawsuit against Samuelson.
2. Two major media brands emerge
Business Articles1 week ago
100+ inspirational quotes to motivate you to have prosperous new year
Business News7 days ago
80 reasons why you didn’t get the job interview or offer (brutally honest)
Business Marketing6 days ago
10 must-listen-to podcasts for business owners
Opinion Editorials1 week ago
Do these 3 things if you TRULY want to be an ally to women in tech
Opinion Editorials2 days ago
Job listings are popping up left and right, so what exactly *is* UX writing?
Opinion Editorials2 weeks ago
How to excel in your next remote job interview
Opinion Editorials1 week ago
Does your creativity dwindle as you get older? Science says its possible
Business News2 weeks ago
Get what you want through negotiation and persuasion, sans aggression