Connect with us

Business Marketing

Who is your website for, anyway?



who am i

I’ve been writing my little fingertips off lately, but you wouldn’t know it by checking here or over at my regular blog.  Mostly, I’ve been cataloging my city and hunting down good resources online for my website re-do.

It seems the whole world is having some web work done – there’s a name for that effect that slips my mind at the moment.  Occasionally, someone will tweet the announcement of their web re-do, and I like to check out what other folks have done.

But for all of the slick features or social media tie-ins and whatnot that I’m seeing recently, it seems to me to be really all the same.  There’s the big 4 categories: buying, selling, about the area/neighborhoods, about the agent, and we’ll throw in relocation as a 5th.

The more similarities I draw between real estate websites, the more I look at them, I wonder: who is this for?

It’s like watching your favorite TV show and noticing that every commercial is not aimed at you.  Have you ever done that?  Pay attention to the commercials and decide who the target audience is for every commercial during your favorite show.  It’s an interesting thought exercise.

So I’m looking at these sites and thinking, who is this for? 

In my own online re-do, I’m trying to target a more specific audience.  The hyper-local stuff that’s been discussed elsewhere, yes to a degree, but not only where, also the who.  Is this a first time buyer?  Is this a relocating person?  Is this a move-up buyer?  A foreign national?  A vacation or investment property purchaser?

I can look at those different audiences and decide what that person wants to see, and then I need to present it to them in the proper manner at the proper time.  There’s a lot of overlap of information, but presentation is completely different.

For example.  The first time buyer and the vacation home buyer are both going to want to know about the areas.  The first timer and the vacation home buyer may need to learn about cost of home maintenance, as one has never owned and the other may not be familiar with homes in the area.  They both need financing information, but the first timer needs some hand holding, while the vacation home buyer has most likely been to that rodeo a couple of times.

One more example.  If I want to break into the luxury market, then I know that buyer is most likely a baby boomer and I need to emphasize lifestyle, I need neighborhood descriptions and amenities, not a huge section on schools.  I also know that the high end market tends to pick their agent largely from referral, and that’s not going to be easy for me to tap into – but – something like 9% of that group find their agent online.  And that 9% are most likely new to the area because they don’t have a network of people here to get an agent referral from: they are luxury relocaters and vacation home buyers. 

I can’t have the same website for my luxury relocating baby boomers as I do for my first-timers.  Totally different audiences need a totally different presentation of information.  And not only do they want to see different things at different times – if you’re really targeting a specific market segment, you’ve got to tailor to that segment.  I’m talking fonts, colors, navigation, not just the information itself.

It’s not just a website, anymore.  Not really.  It’s a whole conglomeration of platforms and themes and domains, specifically targeted to who I want to influence.

So that’s where I’m headed.  Will it worth the effort?  Only one way to find out.

Kelley Koehler, aka the Housechick, is usually found focused on her Tucson, Arizona, real estate business. You may also find her on Twitter, where she doubles as a super hero, at Social Media Training Camp, where she trains and coaches people on how to integrate social media into successful business practices, or at, a collection of all things housechick-ish. Despite her engineering background, Kelley enjoys translating complex technical concepts into understandable and clear ideas that are practical and useful to the striving real estate agent.

Continue Reading


  1. John Lauber

    April 6, 2008 at 12:42 pm

    Good thoughts Kelley. I too am going through a web “makeover”. I kicked off my blog, but I’m looking at changing out of my template site so it doesn’t look like so many others. Even though, as you noted, are they really different. I think these websites are sort of like print media. Sellers expect it, too a point. Hopefully, it pulls in some buyer leads as well. Then there’s syndication of listings to the major searches and IDX. I’m trying to figure out a niche, as well. People see so many websites that they expect certain things when they arrive at yours.

    Good luck with your redo.

  2. Scott P. Rogers

    April 6, 2008 at 12:59 pm

    Our company runs approximately 66 web sites — one for the company, and one for each web site. All sites have the following main site sections: searching, buying, selling, financing, moving, my services, blog. On all of the sites combined, we have over 100,000 visitors per month. Of all of the web traffic, an astounding 93% of page views are in the searching section. I believe it is important to focus on the blog (which I do), and the local info (which I still need to do), and the profiles of site users (which I still need to do), but in the end, the stats continue to reinforce for us that the majority of our time, energy and money needs to be focused on a creating a great IDX search experience.

  3. Kelley Koehler

    April 6, 2008 at 5:49 pm

    Scott – if a site visitor runs 5 different searches, is that 5 page views you’re counting towards search? If they look at the detail of 20 homes, is that 20 page views?

    I’m not discounting the impact of a good search interface, search is a big component, and we’re upgrading our search interface as well, and try to do so regularly. But if you’re competing on search coolness alone, then you’re competing with national players who have millions in the budget to make theirs better than yours.

    People search on more than one site regularly, even if mine is coolest and shows them all the homes. I know they’ll search other places, to be sure. Many of my clients select me because of everything else on my site and blog, and not my search. They trot into my office holding printouts of searches from other companies and agents. But they picked me because of what else was there. My opportunity to influence them is the environment I place them in while they search, which I believe needs to be highly targeted.

  4. Shailesh Ghimire

    April 6, 2008 at 10:20 pm


    Different customers require different sites. With how “relatively” easy it is to customize sites for different customers I’ve always wondered why peole do these cookie cutter sites. Let me share and I idea I’ve had in the past, but not enough resources to pull together.

    I’ve wanted to create a database driven content library – all idexed by certain tags (as many as you like). Then build websites for different markets with their unique market focus. I as the webmaster write content for the database. The website picks up relevenat content for it’s market and posts the contnet.

    The reason why I like this model is becuase it allows you to compensate for the overlap in information and the priorty level of that informatoin for each market. It allows you to maintain as many websites as you like since you’re only maintaining one database it doesn’t kill you to maitain all of them. I would decouple the website from the database and only snchronize data on a pre-scheduled but regular time frame. This way the websites all exist independently of eachother.

    It’s an idea I’ve had – I’m sure there are many holes in it, but something I’d like to bounce off of some people. One of my many crazy thoughts…..

  5. Janice Bovee

    April 7, 2008 at 7:45 am

    I hear you, I think that my site is always in a state of perpetual makeover. It is next to impossible to be all things to all people. I’ve come to the conclusion that separate sites for different types of buyers would be the answer but who has the time? I think that a good property search is the most important part of the site and then answering as many questions as you can think of…although one can run the risk of overkill. You have given me some ideas to think about.

  6. Greg Cremia

    April 7, 2008 at 9:18 am

    I agree about multiple websites. I have 15 lead generating real estate sites developed for different geographic locations. I chose the geographic criteria because I could figure out what keyword phrases will likey be used and developed the sites around those keywords.

    Real estate is all about location and buyers search location. Therefore location is a good way to catch buyers. The luxury market is typically restricted to certain neighborhoods so to get those buyers a site about those hoods would get those buyers. Of course if you are not planning on using the internet to market these sites and plan to spend money to market them then keywords are irrelevant.

    I am curious what types of keyword phrases different types of buyers would use. Do buyers really use different search phrases depending on their social/economic standing?

  7. Kelley Koehler

    April 7, 2008 at 3:01 pm

    Shailesh – we did a very similar thing a couple years back for a non-RE project. The problem you run into is duplicate content issues with Google. If you tag very specifically and keep the overall number of sites to a smaller scale, you might be okay. We were doing it on a very large scale and started getting dinged. Ideally, you’d keep everything in a central repository, and just call it up on demand for the appropriate person, but you have to balance that with wanting the content to be indexed.

    Greg – I do adword campaigns, so keywords are big. I don’t think about the searchers in terms of socio/economics as much as who they are as it pertains to a real estate purchase or sale. The relocators might be searching for just general Tucson information, might even type in “relocation” and I can target that with my adwords, show them the right landing page for that search.

    Janice – I think the concept works on a smaller scale if you only want to do a single site. Instead of a bulk page of answers, what if you had a page specifically for first time buyers, or move-up buyers, or a condo buyer? Instead of making people filter through a huge section of Q and A, what if there was a page that answered what is most likely their top 10 questions?

  8. Carol D. O'Dell

    April 7, 2008 at 4:16 pm

    When my husband and I were searching for home in Florida, (we lived in Missouri), I found most websites inept at giving me a decent picture of the community (city, amenities, neighborhood, layout, etc.) We clearly knew what we needed: we needed a mother-in-law suite, plus 2-4 other bedrooms, we needed to be within a 20 mile radius of work. Is this so hard to do?

    More infuriating is that many homes you think are for sale are sold, or taken off the market. You get all excited, like the video tour, the layout, the price, and bam. No enchilada. Back to square one.

    In today’s market where people want and need their houses to sell, it seems that an up to date, functional, concise website would be the standard, not the exception.

    In creating my own website, for a very different business, I found that I couldn’t just follow a template, I had to follow my gut and include the things I most look for in a site.

    ~Carol D. O’Dell
    Author of Mothering-Mother: A Daughter’s Humorous and Heartbreaking Memoir

    available on Amazon

  9. Kelley Koehler

    April 8, 2008 at 11:50 am

    Hi Carol! I appreciate you giving us the consumer opinion. Your experience is exactly why an agent’s site should be targeted – as well as accurate.

  10. Eric Blackwell

    April 8, 2008 at 5:35 pm


    Excellent points! We are just finishing up our EXTREME HOME SITE MAKEOVER (REALTOR EDITION) grin… It has been three years and we are due with our main RE site. I thought your best point was right here:

    “I can look at those different audiences and decide what that person wants to see, and then I need to present it to them in the proper manner at the proper time. There’s a lot of overlap of information, but presentation is completely different.”

    well done!

  11. Matthew Rathbun

    April 8, 2008 at 9:03 pm

    I hated redoing my real estate marketing plan, but when I did, I saw a great return on my investment of time. I think everyone would do well to make over their web marketing plans about every six months or so.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business Marketing

Ghost Reply has us asking: Should you shame a recruiter who ghosted you?

(BUSINESS MARKETING) Ghost Reply will send an anonymous “kind reminder” to recruiters who ghost job candidates, but is the sweet taste of temporary catharsis worth it?



Stressed woman at a laptop with hands on head, considering if she should send a Ghost Reply.

People hate to get “ghosted” in any situation, personal or professional. But for job seekers who may already be struggling with self-esteem, it can be particularly devastating. Ghost Reply is a new online service that will help you compose and send an email nudge to the ghoster, sending a “kind reminder” telling them how unprofessional it is to leave someone hanging like that.

Ghost Reply wants to help you reach catharsis in all of this stressful mess of finding a job. Almost all of the problems and feelings are compounded by this confounded pandemic that has decimated areas of the workforce and taken jobs and threatened people’s financial security. It is understandable to want to lash out at those in power, and sending a Ghost Reply email to the recruiter or HR person may make you feel better in the short term.

In the long run, though, will it solve anything? Ghost Reply suggests it may make the HR person or recruiter reevaluate their hiring processes, indicating this type of email may help them see the error of their ways and start replying to all potential candidates. If it helps them reassess and be more considerate in the future and helps you find closure in the application/interview process, that would be the ideal outcome on all fronts. It is not likely this will happen, though.

The Ghost Reply sample email has the subject line “You have a message from a candidate!” Then it begins, “Hi, (name), You’re receiving this email because a past candidate feels like you ghosted them unfairly.” It then has a space for said candidate to add on any personal notes regarding the recruiter or process while remaining anonymous.

I get it. It’s upsetting to have someone disappear after you’ve spent time and energy applying, possibly even interviewing, only to hear nothing but crickets back from the recruiter or HR person you interacted with. It’s happened to me more than once, and it’s no bueno. We all want to be seen. We all want to be valued. Ghosting is hurtful. The frustration and disappointment, even anger, that you feel is certainly relatable. According to several sources, being ghosted after applying for a job is one of the top complaints from job seekers on the market today.

Will an anonymous, passive-aggressive email achieve your end? Will the chastened company representative suddenly have a lightbulb go off over their heads, creating a wave of change in company policy? I don’t see it. The first sentence of the sample email, in fact, is not going to be well received by HR.

When you start talking about what’s “unfair,” most HR people will tune out immediately. That kind of language in itself is unprofessional and is a red flag to many people. Once you work at a company and know its culture and have built relationships, then, maybe, just maybe, can you start talking about your work-related feelings. I believe in talking about our feelings, but rarely is a work scenario the best place to do so (I speak from experience). Calling it unprofessional is better, less about you and more about the other person’s behavior.

However, it’s unclear how productive Ghost Reply actually is. Or how anonymous, frankly. By process of deduction, the recipient of the email may be able to figure out who sent it, if it even makes it through the company’s spam filters. Even if they cannot pinpoint the exact person, it may cast doubts on several applicants or leave a bad taste in the recruiter’s mouth. It sounds like sour grapes, which is never a good thing.

There may be any number of reasons you didn’t get the job offer or interview, and they may or may not have something to do with you. Recruiters answer your burning questions, including why you may have been ghosted in this recent article in The American Genius.

Ultimately, you will never know why they ghosted you. If it makes you feel better or at least see the issue from both sides, the amount of job candidates ghosting recruiters after applying and even interviewing is equally high. Some people simply either have awful time management skills or awful manners, and at the end of the day, there’s not much you can do about that.

Focus on your own survival while job hunting, instead of these disappointing moments or the person who ghosts you. It will serve you better in the long run than some anonymous revenge email. There are other ways to deal with your frustration and anger when you do get ghosted, though. Try the classic punching your pillow. Try taking a walk around the block. If it helps to put your frustration into words, and it very well may, then do so. Write it on a piece of paper, then burn it. Or type it all in an email and delete it. For your own sake, do NOT put their email address in the “To” line, lest you accidentally hit “Send.”

The sooner you can let it go, the sooner you can move on to finding a better job fit for you.

Continue Reading

Business Marketing

Free shipping is everywhere… how can small businesses keep up?

[BUSINESS MARKETING] Would you rather pay less but still pay for shipping, or pay more with free shipping? They may cost the same, but one appeals more than the other.



Person standing over pacakge, sealing with masking tape.

When it comes to competing with huge corporations like Amazon, there are plenty of hurdles that smaller businesses have to cross. Corporations can (and do) undercut the competition, not to mention garner a much larger marketing reach than most small businesses could ever dream of achieving. But this time, we want to focus on something that most people have probably chosen recently: Free shipping.

How important is free shipping to consumers? Well, in a 2018 survey, Internet Retailer discovered that over 50% of respondents said that free shipping was the most important part of online shopping. In fact, when given a choice between fast or costless shipping, a whopping 88% of those surveyed chose the latter option.

Part of this has to do with the fact that shipping costs are often perceived as additional fees, not unlike taxes or a processing fee. In fact, according to Ravi Dhar, director of Yale’s Center for Customer Insights, if it’s between a discounted item with a shipping fee or a marked up item with free shipping, individuals are more likely to choose the latter – even if both options cost exactly the same amount.

If you’re interested in learning more, Dhar refers to the economic principle of “pain of paying,” but the short answer is simply that humans are weird.

So, how do you recapture the business of an audience that’s obsessed with free shipping?

The knee jerk reaction is to simply provide better products that the competition. And sure, that works… to some extent. Unfortunately, in a world where algorithms can have a large effect on business, making quality products might not always cut it. For instance, Etsy recently implemented a change in algorithm to prioritize sellers that offer free shipping.

Another solution is to eat the costs and offer free shipping, but unless that creates a massive increase in products sold, you’re going to end up with lower profits. This might work if it’s between lower profits and none, but it’s certainly not ideal. That’s why many sellers have started to include shipping prices in the product’s overall price – instead of a $20 necklace with $5 shipping, a seller would offer a $25 necklace with free shipping.

This is a tactic that the big businesses use and it works. If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em, right?

That said, not everyone can join in. Maybe, for instance, a product is too big to reasonably merge shipping and product prices. If, for whatever reason, you can’t join in, it’s also worth finding a niche audience and pushing a marketing campaign. What do you offer that might be more attractive than the alluring free shipping? Are you eco-friendly? Do you provide handmade goods? Whatever it is that makes your business special, capitalize on it.

Finally, if you’re feeling down about the free shipping predicament, remember that corporations have access to other tricks. Amazon’s “free” prime shipping comes at an annual cost. Wal-Mart can take a hit when item pricing doesn’t work out. Even if your business isn’t doing as well as you hoped, take heart: You’re facing giants.

Continue Reading

Business Marketing

How many hours of the work week are actually efficient?

(BUSINESS MARKETING) Working more for that paycheck, more hours each week, on the weekends, on holidays can actually hurt productivity. So don’t do that, stay efficient.



Clock pointed to 5:50 on a plain white wall, well tracked during the week.

Social media is always flooded with promises to get in shape, eat healthier and… hustle?

In hustle culture, it seems as though there’s no such thing as too much work. Nights, weekends and holidays are really just more time to be pushing towards your dreams and hobbies are just side hustles waiting to be monetized. Plus, with freelancing on the rise, there really is nothing stopping someone from making the most out of their 24 hours.

Hustle culture will have you believe that a full-time job isn’t enough. Is that true?

Although it’s a bit outdated, Gallup’s 2014 report on full-time US workers gives us an alarming glimpse into the effects of the hustle. For starters, 50% of full-time workers reported working over 40 hours a week – in fact, the average weekly hours for salaried employees was up to 49 hours.

So, what’s the deal with 40 hours anyway? The 40 hour work-week actually started with labor rights activists in the 1800s pushing for an 8 hour workday. In 1817, Robert Owen, a Welsh activist, reasoned this workday provided: “eight hours labor, eight hours recreation, eight hours rest.”

If you do the math, that’s a whopping 66% of the day devoted to personal needs, rather than labor!

Of course, it’s only natural to be skeptical of logic from two centuries ago coloring the way we do business in the 21st century. For starters, there’s plenty of labor to be done outside of the labor you’re paid to do. Meal prep, house cleaning, child care… that’s all work that needs to be done. It’s also all work that some of your favorite influencers are paying to get done while they pursue the “hustle.” For the average human, that would all be additional work to fall in the ‘recreation’ category.

But I digress. Is 40 hours a week really enough in the modern age? After all, average hours in the United States have increased.

Well… probably not. In fact, when hours are reduced (France, for instance, limited maximum hours to 35 hours a week, instead of 40), workers are not only more likely to be healthier and happier, but more efficient and less likely to miss work!

So, instead of following through with the goal to work more this year, maybe consider slowing the hustle. It might actually be more effective in the long run!

Continue Reading

Our Great Partners

American Genius
news neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list for news sent straight to your email inbox.

Emerging Stories

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!