Connect with us

Business News

Know the impact before withdrawing syndicated listing data

In the fast and changing world of property data syndication, of threats, and closed door meetings, whether to syndicate or not is ultimately a business decision that should rest solely on the shoulders of the individual broker, and not other eager, and interested parties.



A long-running debate

Years ago, a real estate battle boiled over with Realtors and brokers educated on listing syndication arguing how data should or should not be shared with third party media sites. Since then, the debate over who should have what, how it should be presented, and who should get paid, has died down – until recently.

As more brokers either lose market share or become educated on listing syndication (or both), some are considering the option of pulling their listings from third party real estate sites, or from the MLS altogether, both of which have recently been achieved by a select few high profile brokerages, with several smaller groups with few listings pulling out with barely a notice.

Although the debate is not new, it has been reignited by select groups across the nation privately debating how their data is being handled. One of the models the industry has looked to is the Milwaukee brokerage, Shorewest, who pulled their listings from syndication last fall.

Shorewest pulls listings

WAV Group Partner, Victor Lund told AGBeat, “As you can see by the graph [below] – Shorewest is the #1 website in their market, and they do not syndicate – proving that brokers and agents do not need to syndicate to drive traffic and leads on their listings. In fact, this may argue that the opposite is true – if you do not syndicate, you provide consumers with an incentive to visit your broker or agent website to find the cheeze. In this case, the cheeze is listing accuracy, comprehensive listing inventory, and most of all, the service of a real estate professional.”

This now infamous graph has spread across Association committees and brokers’ desks like wild fire as Shorewest performs well in their market without their listings being featured in every real estate search site. The inherent problem is that alternative data contradicts this very chart that could lead some brokers to make business decisions for their companies (and their agents). Without getting into the validity or invalidity of each set of data and how it is measured, it is most important to note that any business making a decision about listing syndication should look at as many data sets as possible.

An alternative view

The graph above uses Experian Hitwise data, but comparing the numbers to comScore data presents an alternative picture. Just comparing the three most common real estate search sites with Shorewest in Milwaukee, WI in January presents an interesting picture:

Of note, neither measuring service takes mobile use into account. Although Trulia and Zillow could not determine their mobile use data in Milwaukee specifically, Curt Beardsley, Vice President of Customer and Industry Development at Move, Inc. told AGBeat that alone saw roughly 24,000 unique visitors in January through their mobile app, on top of the 89,000 unique visitors measured above.

Of the 89,000 unique visitors to Move sites, the company says 83,000 visited and asserts they are not losing market share. notes that Shorewest and have a “shared audience” of 17,000 people, according to comScore, meaning that 17,000 people visited both sites.

Picking winners and losers

Part of the story that many are not picking up on is that companies like Shorewest are within their right to pick winners and losers when it comes to syndication, for example, as of publication of this article, Shorewest is still syndicating their listings to, just not to Trulia or Zillow. Pulling listings is not always a black and white proposition.

The recent IDX battle in Austin makes it clear that there remains a great deal of market confusion not only over the differences between syndication and IDX, but of what rules reign where and what moves each brokerage is making regarding their data.

Many moving pieces of this puzzle

Despite many asserting that this is only a broker issue, there are many moving pieces regarding listing syndication, and each entity has a unique stake and agenda when it comes to data syndication. Realtors, brokers, and homeowners have far different objectives than third party real estate media sites who have different goals than MLSs, listing syndicators, association executives, association committees, and much different goals than the third party advisors and consultants to each of these entities that are in the thick of the debate. Although the comScore data compared to the Hitwise data is not a game changer for some, it should illuminate to the masses that using a single source to determine that opting out of listing syndication is best. It is notable that all three major search sites rely on comScore data for direct metrics.

In light of the fragmentation of the real estate data industry, the goal of all brokers deciding how to handle their data should be to do as much research as possible, and to understand not only how data works, but to obtain a real picture of what will happen if they pull listings from syndication – in some cases, a local site like Shorewest will perform well, in others, it will be crushed by the mega real estate sites. Seeing a single chart or hearing a single consultant speak on the topic can be inspiring, but should not be the sole reason for making a business-altering decision.

Continue Reading


  1. Jonathan Dalton

    March 19, 2012 at 8:17 pm

    Pretty charts, but to me the only number that matters is market share – not online market share, but hard and fast sales market share. If that hasn’t changed, clearly not being on Zillow or Trulia hasn’t made the slightest bit of difference.

    These two sites add zero value to the real estate space. End of story.

    • Kris Berg

      March 20, 2012 at 10:27 am

      Precisely. Unique visitors, hits, eyeballs, online traffic share — these things do not have any nexus to homes sold, sale price or market time. People walking through the door with their agents do. We seem to be repeatedly confusing agent marketing opportunities with property marketing.

      • Benn Rosales

        March 20, 2012 at 10:55 am

        The only confusion I see is a fundamental ignorance in understanding pieces of a sales funnel, and what each piece intricately means to the final result you describe. Web search is inherent, and agent marketing via search sites may or may not be a viable means of obtaining a consumer – this article simply says as a broker, you’d better know before you pull your plug.

        The article is about broker choice, not public pressure, or the push from the crowd from a cliff. 90k uniques is a ton of uniques to a market, and that’s just Milwaukee focused.

        I found it insanely interesting that purports 17k uniques between themselves and shorewest website, it tells me there is a connection/delivery from point a to point b.

  2. Ted

    March 19, 2012 at 10:36 pm

    One of my listings was hurt by an online 3rd party value. That value was $65k below our list. It was off by a mile. Many buyers find a property and then check the value via those sites – if that value is wrong, the seller is hurt and the buyer is given an improper expectation.

    What I find ridiculous and amusing is the agents who mis-represent this story. A property these days does not need to be syndicated up the Wazzoo to be found. Otherwise the search term “”insert the name of your city here” real estate or homes for sale” would not be the highest cost adsense real estate search term at google 😉 Consumer’s will find the properties – piece of cake. I watch techno-tards do it everyday.

    Most buyers I deal with are frustrated by the inaccuracy’s of the 3rd party real estate sites, because those sites have inventory that is stale. Buyers typically give me the addresses and I call back explaining those properties have either sold or are under contract. Additionally some of the 3rd party sites list the defaulted properties from the public records as for sale at the price of the default amount and buyers think they can buy those properties for 10 cents on the dollar.

    Syndication just for syndication sake is a goofy argument. What has been going on for the last several years is a mess and part of it is the fault of the MLSs and part is the fault of the 3rd party vendors. Listings are a private employment contract between seller and broker, the MLS is a private agreement between brokers to share listing inventories and cooperate on compensation – there is no public right to this data. The 3rd party vendors are lucky that the brokers were not smart enough to offer a robust platform before the 3rd parties beat them to the punch.

    The buyers are getting the shaft right now. No I am not a fan of single agent dual agency – outlaw it and I would be fine. But I would not mind if I could get a chance to tell a buyer about property features that may not be available via IDX or 3rd party sites – that is something that the buyer’s agent will not be able to do without talking to me or visting the property.

    I have yet to see data that shows that homes sell faster and for more money because they are syndicated up the Wazoo. What selles a house is Price, Condition and Location. Get those right and the properties sell.

    You can market the #$%^ out of an over priced listing – syndicated it up the Wazoo, Fly the Goodyear Blimp over your overpriced listing with an advertisement and it still wont sell. Funny how when homes are priced right their DOM is very very short.

  3. Ivan Ronskonski

    May 1, 2012 at 7:01 pm

    Come on – your buyers get information from you (via MLS) on every matching listing before they hit any of the web sites. So when selling those sites do nothing to find real buyers. Unqualified lookers early in the process, sure. But all you need to sell the house is price, condition, and accurate MLS entry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Business News

Ageism: How to properly combat this discrimination in the workplace

(BUSINESS) Ageism is still being fought by many companies, how can this new issue be resolved before it becomes more of a problem?



Ageism void

Workers over the age of 55 represent the fasting growing sector in labor. The U.S. Department of Labor estimates that 25% of the labor force will be over age 55 by 2024. A 2018 AARP survey found that over 60% of the respondents reported age discrimination in their workplace. The figure is even higher among older women, minorities, and unemployed seniors. Age discrimination is a problem for many.

Unfortunately, age discrimination lawsuits aren’t uncommon. We have covered cases for Jewel Food Stores, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Inc., AT&T, and iTutorGroup, all alleging age or disability discrimination in some form or fashion. This could be from using vocabulary such as “tenured,” hiring a younger employee instead of promoting a well-season veteran, or pressuring older employees with extra responsibilities in order to get them to resign or retire early.

How can your organization create an age-inclusive workforce?

It is difficult to prove age discrimination but fighting a lawsuit against it could be expensive. Rather than worrying about getting sued for age discrimination, consider your own business and whether your culture creates a workplace that welcomes older workers.

  1. Check your job descriptions and hiring practices to eliminate graduation dates and birthdates. Focus on worker’s skills, not youthful attributes, such as “fresh graduate” or “digital native.” Feature workers of all ages in your branding and marketing.
  2. Include age diversity training for your managers and employees, especially those that hire or work in recruiting.
  3. Support legislative reforms that protect older workers. Use your experience to create content for your website.

Changing the culture of your workplace to include older workers will benefit you in many ways. Older workers bring experience and ideas to the table that younger employees don’t have. Having mixed-age teams encourages creativity. There are many ways to support older workers and to be inclusive in your workplace.

What steps are you taking in your organization to reduce ageism in your workplace?

Continue Reading

Business News

AI-generated content is against Google’s guidelines, so what now?

(BUSINESS) Google’s Search Advocate, John Mueller, says that AI-generated content is against webmaster guidelines. What does mean for content strategy?



Google homepage on computer representing AI-generated content.

John Mueller, Google’s Search Advocate, stated that AI-generated content is against Google’s webmaster guidelines in a weekly online question and answer session.

Let’s review what that means for you and your content strategy going forward.

First of all, what is AI Generated Content?

Simply put, Medium defines it as

“[a]utomatically generated or Auto-Generated content is content that’s been created with the help of machine learning and artificial intelligence tools.”

Tools like writesonic or jasper are examples of AI content creation tools made to create content for a blog, social media, etc. If you check these websites, you will find that Google is listed as one of the many companies that use their services.

So, Google can use it but others will be penalized for using it. Can Google recognize when a user takes advantage of AI-generated content services for use on the web?

In the video Q&A, Mueller doesn’t confirm or deny whether or not Google is capable of recognizing AI-generated content. He is quoted as stating,

“I can’t claim that. But for us, if we see that something is automatically generated, then the webspam team can take action on that.”

After countless searches about the Google webspam team and what actions they can take, it’s not immediately clear, but what seems to be the consensus is that it could negatively impact Google rankings and SEO.

What can you do?

If you are already using AI-generated content, the first thing to consider is do you need to do most of the heavy lifting or are you using it to generate ideas or a starting point? If you’re using it to fully write your next blog post, you need to reconsider this position and be sure to have a human add personal touches to your online content.

According to Mueller, using AI-generated content in ANY capacity is considered unacceptable. He states,

“[c]urrently it’s all against the webmaster guidelines. So, from our point of view, if we were to run across something like that, if the webspam team were to see it, they would see it as spam.”

Your best bet is to keep doing it yourself because right now Google has all the power over search and rankings. At least, until something changes.

Continue Reading

Business News

Social media and depression go hand-in-hand, studies show

(BUSINESS) Maybe this won’t come as a surprise, but the statistics sure are telling- having depression and social media usage are linked.



Upside down photo of man holding iphone case saying "social media seriously harms your mental health" representing dopamine.

Researchers from the University of Pennsylvania believe they have found evidence of a link between depression and social media use. Many studies have attempted to show that social media use can be detrimental to your mental health, but the parameters of these studies are often limited in scope or were unrealistic situations. The UPenn study collected usage data tracked by the phone rather than relying on self-reporting.

Psychologist Melissa G. Hunt, the author of the published study, says the bottom line is: “Using less social media than you normally would lead to significant decreases in both depression and loneliness. These effects are particularly pronounced for folks who were more depressed when they came into the study.”

It should be noted that the study participants were college students who were randomly assigned to either use social media as they normally would or be in the experimental group that limited time on the three most popular platforms, Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram. Hunt doesn’t believe that it’s realistic not to use social networks at all, but it is important to find a way to manage your use to avoid negative effects.

Depression is a serious problem for Americans, but is social media responsible?

The CDC reported that between 2013 and 2016, 8.1% of Americans over the age of 20 experienced depression in a 2-week period. About 80% of these people had difficulty with daily activities due to depression. However, “over a 10-year period, from 2007–2008 to 2015–2016, the percentage of adults with depression did not change significantly.” On the other hand, social network use increased exponentially during this time.

There have been other studies that link social media use and depression. It might be that the more platforms accessed increase the risk for depression. Another study found that it was the way people used social media that increased depression. Using it to compare yourself to others or feeling addicted to social media increased the feelings of depression.

But it’s unknown whether depression or social media use came first. Studies haven’t quite agreed on whether it exacerbates existing problems, or creates them.

How should we approach social media use?

Another report suggests that Facebook knew from the start that they were creating addictions. The people closest to tech believe that there are inherent risks for their children to be on social media. Scary? It should make you think about how and why you use tech.

If you find yourself having negative feelings after using social networks, consider limiting the amount of time you spend on those platforms. Get out and connect with others. Relationships can often reduce the risk of depression. Get involved in your community. It’s important to find balance in using social media and having connections with others. Spend time on what makes you feel better about your life.

There are still a lot of questions about how social networks and technologies affect society. In the meantime, pay attention to how you use these sites and be conscious of not getting sucked into the comparison trap.

If you are depressed and lonely, there is help available, and we ask you to make that difficult step and reach out – call the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) Helpline at 800-950-6264 or text NAMI to 741741. You can also visit their website to find your local NAMI.

Continue Reading

Our Great Partners

American Genius
news neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list for news sent straight to your email inbox.

Emerging Stories

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!