Connect with us

Highlights

Foundation of Business Model Arguments Subject to Earth Fissures

Published

on

Let me clear my throat … check one, two …

Late last week I received an inquiry from a prospective buyer in Canada asking about earth fissures – the rather unpredictable phenomenon by which large cracks appear in the Valley’s soil. Leading theories say the fissures are caused by settling in the Phoenix area’s water table; they generally seem to appear after heavy rains start to filter back through the soil toward the water table.

These fissures also tend to be limited to a handful of areas in the Valley. And if you’re really interested in any of those, there’s a very helpful website you can visit.

None of this has anything to do with the point aside from this fact – homeowners whose homes are built upon soil subject to earth fissures may one day discover that the foundation they believed to be firm was, in fact, not.

The scrutiny of the real estate business model

And that does lead to today’s subject: the scrutiny of the so-called real estate business model as we enter 2009 and the nation’s second Era of Good Feelings.

(Side note: the feelings in the first Era of Good Feelings really weren’t that good, especially if you happened to be a closet Federalist. But in school texts, the four-word description always wins over reality.)

In this space once upon a time, Benn himself proposed the abolition of the phrase “business model.” While such an action would leave many real estate bloggers with little left to write, thus making abolition more than a little extreme, it would probably behoove us all if a disclaimer was included in any discussion about the so-called “business model.”

There is no single business model in real estate. There has not been a single business model in real estate in at least a generation and possible back to the days of the Era of Good Feelings. There are, in fact, dozens of different models based on varying price, service and exploitation of dogs.

Discussions of the real estate business model, especially those surrounding what the non-existent single model MUST become because of entrants such as Zillow, Trulia, Obama, IDX and Walter from Fringe, are almost always rooted in some utopian ideal that may or may not bear any resemblance to what the public really wants. Just because it’s what we believe the public should have doesn’t mean that it is what the public will embrace or even is clamoring for.

The rise of “REO brokerages”

The perfect example of this, at least in the Phoenix real estate market, has been the rise in the number of real estate brokerages who handle nothing but bank owned listings, more commonly known as REOs.

What does it take to become an REO brokerage?

  • You need a designated broker, per Arizona law
  • You need to have established contacts with the lenders and/or asset managers such that they will send you Broker Price Opinions and, hopefully, listings
  • You need MLS access.

What do you not need to run a successful REO brokerage?

  • Negotiating skill. You’re an order taker, relaying instructions up and back between buyer’s agent and the asset management and/or bank.
  • Lockboxes. Forget security, forget professionalism. Hire an outside vendor who can attach an $8 combination lock box you wouldn’t trust on a bicycle and call it good. As an added bonus, make sure it has the same code as 200 other boxes around the Valley.
  • Courtesy. No need to answer calls. In fact, it’s best you preface all of your listings with “don’t call, the status is the status” even if the status isn’t the status.
  • Salesmanship. There’s no selling involved. There’s almost no marketing. Put up the sign, stick it in the MLS and be done with it. If it sells it sells. If it doesn’t, who cares?

This is the model which is proliferating these days like pink eye in a kindergarten classroom. How many of these companies adapt when the market changes and actually selling skill will be involved, it’s hard to say. How many will even want to remain in business, it’s equally hard to say.

Sorry, but unicorns are mythical too

And this is where the mythical brokerage perfect in morals, ethics and Twitter Grade are losing the battle on the ground to a gaping market void to be filled.

How can this change? Only when the lenders and/or asset managers demand more from the listing agents (unlikely, since they care not what is done to sell a house as long as it sells), or only when the public rises up en masse and expects more from the listing agents (possible, though also unlikely since many in the general public don’t know what they don’t know in most cases.)

Similarly, there’s a near-constant debate over the future of the real estate brokerage as it relates to real estate agents. Splits should be higher. Splits should be lower. There needs to be more training. There needs to be less office infrastructure. Brokers should provide leads to agents. Agents should be self-sufficient as befitting any independent small business owner.

All agents care about is the split?

Paraphrasing what one broker said on Twitter last week, agents don’t care about leads, training, broker assistance or infrastructure (paid signs, lockboxes, etc.) All they want is higher splits.

For some agents that’s absolutely correct. For others it’s absolutely wrong. There’s no universally right answer for everyone in this business.

So while we can discuss what we feel an ideal brokerage will look like, those that don’t match that vision will continue to remain in business so long as agents are willing to hang their license there. And as long as the cash flow remains positive, the business will remain active.

One final thought …

The idea of “have to” is a red herring. Nothing “has to” change (even though change is coming to Main Street near you in just eight days, or so I’ve been told.) And even if there is a “have to” it doesn’t necessarily need to be the have to that you envision.

Put another way, change is inevitable. But the odds of you correctly guessing the path of evolution are thin at best.

Photo courtesy of the AZGS website. Original photo by Todd C. Shipman and Meagan Shoots

Jonathan Dalton is a Realtor with RE/MAX Desert Showcase in Peoria, Arizona and is the author of the All Phoenix Real Estate blog as well as a half-dozen neighborhood sites. His partner, Tobey, is a somewhat rotund beagle who sleeps 21 hours a day.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
7 Comments

7 Comments

  1. Marvin Jensen

    January 12, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    Jonathan,

    All good points.. When the watering hole dries up, the sheep go to another watering hole. Simular to the 2600 agents that left the Salt Lake Board of Realtors this month. Sitting at home waiting for the phone to ring… doesn’t work any more.

    I think a lot of discounts brokerages will be next.It’s hard to keep the doors open for $495 a transaction, when your transactions are half what they were.

  2. Lisa Sanderson

    January 12, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    I always wonder if some of the foreclosures would sell for more money if any effort was spent in the marketing of them. Do the banks really only care about the paperwork they require being done, or is there some interest in minimizing their losses? Don’t REO agents have fiduciary duty to their bank clients, too? Just random thoughts….

  3. Jim Gatos

    January 12, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    Very very smart and “in your face with blatant honesty” post… I had 4 reo sales (I was representing the buyer) and only one was a “Normal” sale. The others? I dealt with the biggest JERKS I ever dealt with, one agent didn’t do a THING. As far as I’m concerned these banks get what they deserve when they hire “Ass”-et” management companies to do the job; most of these “Ass”-et” management companies collect hefty referral fees from the listing agent. Serves them right!…

    Sorry, just venting. At least they don’t seem to be “skimping” on the buyer agent’s side, and they shouldn’t. Someone has to do all the running around!

  4. Ken Brand

    January 12, 2009 at 8:02 pm

    Brimmed up with hot shots and insight Jonathan.

    Variations of old, new and in-between themes, in the end, if it’s skewed towards the broker, agents leave, broker goes broke. Skewed toward the agent, broker eventually goes broker, agents leave in search of new host. And on and on and on.

    My guess for the future: Balance plus the X factor. X factor = leadership, execution and imagination. (If one of these three is missing > Fail)

    When, where, who, how and when, like you say, ” a guess is a guess”.

    Thanks

  5. Paula Henry

    January 14, 2009 at 4:24 am

    Jonathan – I guess the lack of “business” model in the REO industry is a universal practice. These transactions have always been the worse for me. Never mind, the number which have been broken into, copper scrapped, A/C gone – it’s ridiculously funny to call these people asset managers.

    It also shows, at least independently, one must have a business model for themselves. One of pride in their work and dedication to their obligatory duties to their client.

    When the market changes and it will, they will not have a business to speak of. Their reputation will be tainted.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business Marketing

“House has spark” – burning up the MLS with typos and other bloopers

Published

on

The year is starting a march toward its natural ending, friends…and it seems a few real estate careers may be also. This week I found some real head-scratchers in local real estate ads and the MLS.  However, I get submissions from all over the U.S., so no one is safe from the eyes of  the Blooper Scooper. Check out these blunders:

Do You Smell Smoke?

“House has spark” (Apparently your real estate career isn’t the only thing going up in smoke.)

“Big pep area in kitchen” (Is that the cookie jar where Mommy Dearest stashes her uppers?) 

“Dull Viking ovens” (Methinks there’s something in the cookie jar that will perk up those dull Vikings.)

“Large greenhose in back” (Large, naked Jolly Green Giant in yard.)

“Mush added to this house” (Was that the overflow from between your ears?)

I Think I See Flames

“Beautifully remolded guest” (Another cosmetically-altered Barbie hits the Hollywood party circuit.)

“Enjoy a drink poolslide” ( Hell, if the pool is sliding, I’ll need a whole pint of Jack.)

“Each bedroom has own bedrooom” (Hello-o-o, Alice, how are things down there in the rabbit hole?)

“Separate pod to build GH” (That should please my pea-sized buyers.)

“Play room for the kiss” (Something tells me this is the back seat of a ’67 Chevy.)

Still Smoldering…

“Ideal for gusts” (That’s great…if you want to live in a wind sock.)

“Impaccably detailed” (Incredibly challenged)

“Stylish pewder room” (Try burning a match.)

“Stone pillars flake driveway” (Flakey agent got stoned in driveway.)

Nothing But Embers (This Week’s Fave):

“From a bygone error” (You have just written your own epitaph.)

 

 

Continue Reading

Business Marketing

“New bd pans inc” – Making a Splash on the MLS

Published

on

I have two things to say this week: 1. When you drink, you can’t think. 2. When you drink you can’t- … uh, what was I saying? Oh, yes – the MLS.  It was so full of bloopers this week that I am led to conclude that happy hour started Monday and never stopped. Read these and tell me if it is any wonder I was driven to throw back a few martinis myself:

Booze ‘N’ Fools

“Free membership to gin inc” (It seems someone else beat us to it, Martini Mary.)

“Grab now use imagination” (That’s what Arnold said to his housekeeper.)

“House has new edition” (Agent lacks erudition.)

“Babblying broke runs in back” (Bumbling buffoon runs amuck.)

“Drop by for cocktail ho” (Oh, is the Sunset Strip for sale?)

Puff ‘N’ Stuff

“Near Sacramento airpot” (I believe his name is Jerry Brown.)

“Claw me for selling” (I’m too busy clawing my eyes out over your spelling.)

“Reduction on mid-century ner Holywod” (Another mid-sixties porn star is looking for work.)

“We can sake your home” (Can I get fried rice with my sake?)

Proof or Goof

“Nice streem” (Said Grandma to Grandpa after his diaper  exploded.)

“Nice for dog kids” (Uh, they’re called ‘puppies,” pal.)

“New bd pans included” (Thank you, Nurse Nancy – can you warm those first?)

“Good stable in neighborhood.” (Have you contacted Mary and Joseph?)

“Drawing for plasma” (Is this a blood-bank?)

And This Week’s Winner Is:

“Good school in areola” (Thanks for keeping me abreast of things.)

PROOF OR GOOF, FRIENDS – I’M WATCHING EWE 🙂

Continue Reading

Highlights

My secret office organization tip – Sharpies and tape

If you’re still practicing to be OCD, here is a secret I don’t typically share with anyone, but I’m willing to share with you today…

Published

on

Keeping organized

I used to be obsessed with the P-touch machine. I labeled everything. Drawers, shelves, folders, canisters, and anything that I could think of putting a label on.

But the label makers weren’t as pretty as my own handwriting and didn’t come in every color a Sharpie does, so I got the brilliant idea one day to write in light blue sharpie in my beautiful handwriting on clear tape, placed neatly on the shelves in the pantry. Visitors thought I had written on the cabinets, “what if you have to move things?” they asked. “It’s just tape, look!” I said as if I was performing a complicated magic trick.

Not just shelves!

It’s great to use this tip on files and folders so you can reuse them (especially if you have custom files or designer files), on drawers at the bottom of each section where pens and tape goes, and especially in the break room.

No more label maker, no more refill cartridges and no more mess, especially someone else’s mess! Trust me, this is an OCD person’s dream organizing tip!

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Our Great Partners

The
American Genius
news neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list for news sent straight to your email inbox.

Emerging Stories

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!