Connect with us

Housing News

Realtors, would you give to charity in exchange for leads?

Published

on

Leads for charity?

Recently launched Investing in Communities (IIC) , built from the ground up by real estate broker Michael Pink is a nonprofit platform that “connects socially conscious clients with socially responsible professionals” in what they call “market-driven philanthropy.”

Despite philanthropy becoming more a part of the American culture and less a part of high society or hippie life, nonprofits in the real estate space are sparse. Consumers are looking to buy energy efficient bulbs and cars, recycling, becoming more educated on toxins, volunteering is on the rise, and the internet has been a major catalyst in educating and connecting non profits with consumers and businesses.

IIC replaces lead-generation and referral fees with philanthropy. When Realtors receive a lead through IIC, you don’t pay a referral fee, you pay 10% of the commission to the nonprofit selected by your client.

Nonprofits like Chicago House (HIV services) promote IIC to their base and word spreads organically.

IIC charges Realtors $150 annually to “keep the lights on” because they’re a nonprofit and receive nothing from the commission. We assume this goes toward staff and marketing and it seems like a reasonable cost.

So the ultimate question:

In Austin, Laurie Loew of Give Realty has been giving 25% of every commission to charity for years and has openly encouraged others to follow suit. When in practice, Benn gave 10% of all commissions to charity and we know of select few who do the same, but most do not. Perhaps agents would be more inclined to give to charity if they didn’t have to work for the lead?

So the ultimate question is, would you give 10% of your commission to a charity in exchange for a lead? Tell us in comments your thoughts!

Visit the Investing in Communities website or their blog.

Lani is the Chief Operating Officer at The American Genius and sister news outlet, The Real Daily, and has been named in the Inman 100 Most Influential Real Estate Leaders several times, co-authored a book, co-founded BASHH and Austin Digital Jobs, and is a seasoned business writer and editorialist with a penchant for the irreverent.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
19 Comments

19 Comments

  1. Rachel LaMar, J.D.

    April 19, 2011 at 3:35 pm

    I think this is a great idea, no matter where the client comes from. I donate a portion of my total annual sales to my favorite causes: adoption and the foster care system. I encourage all agents to do the same…it doesn't have to be much, but every little bit counts. I gather that more agents would do it if the leads were a given.

    • Lani Rosales

      April 19, 2011 at 6:11 pm

      Rachel, I think most Realtors are naturally philanthropic, but for those that are not, the incentive of a lead could help!

  2. Andy Hubba

    April 19, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    I love the idea and approached my local SPCA about contributing 10% of commissions generated off of "I saw your info at the SPCA or on the website" but their fears were how to track the lead source as to know which deals apply and don't. How would I get ICC to contact local non-profits because I see a huge opportunity here in Virginia Beach and Hampton Roads VA. Thanks!

    • Lani Rosales

      April 19, 2011 at 6:45 pm

      IIC has been made aware of this article, hopefully they will contact you via your website or you could contact them via theirs. I love the idea!

    • IIC

      April 20, 2011 at 3:17 pm

      Hi Andy,

      We're glad you see the opportunity for IIC to benefit you and your community! IIC is always looking for qualified NGOs to join our roster of outstanding Partners. You can refer NGOs you care about to IIC by visiting the "Refer an Nonprofit" page at IIConline.org: iiconline.org/Refer_a_Nonprofit

      You can also notify IIC of a prospective Partner in your community by emailing us at info at iiconline.org

      All IIC Members will soon have access to a Member Toolbox containing materials that can be shared with prospective clients, as well as NGOs that Members would like to see participate in IIC.

      Thanks Andy!

  3. sfvrealestate

    April 19, 2011 at 6:09 pm

    Yes, Lani, I would. However, what if I'm uncomfortable with the charity my client picks? Certain political groups come to mind.

    • Lani Rosales

      April 20, 2011 at 11:04 am

      I totally understand, but it's almost like being a taxpayer and worrying where refunds are going- food? entertainment? political parties we don't agree with? If people want to give money, they're going to give. But YES, if someone wanted to give to Westboro, I'd be really disheartened if I were an agent.

    • IIC

      April 20, 2011 at 2:29 pm

      The question sfvrealestate raises is a good one. IIC accommodates this concern by allowing Members to specify on their Member profile any preference for / exclusive commitment to a certain IIC NGO Partner or focus area.

      For example, if you wish to donate exclusively to Environmental organizations, or to exclusively support a specific IIC Partner focused on Cancer research, you may elect to do so. Placing this information on your profile page enables prospective clients know your preferences upfront.

      Hope that helps!

  4. Chris Rodriguez

    April 20, 2011 at 8:35 am

    My experience shows that REALTORS® do give back, socially or politically; they tend to volunteer to their cause quite generously.

    • Lani Rosales

      April 20, 2011 at 11:06 am

      Hi Chris! I agree that many agents already give and what I enjoy about the IIC concept (who I'm not affiliated with in any way) is that instead of paying standard lead gen companies, they seek to take those proceeds and give to charity. That is totally in line with the standard agent ethos, like you said.

  5. Krista Lombardi

    April 20, 2011 at 9:16 am

    Absolutely! I do give to charities, however if I could cut the cold callers and businesses that currently sell leads to me and give that same money to charity then that is even better!

  6. Ryan Saul, Realtor®

    April 20, 2011 at 9:26 am

    Just checked it out- doesn't seem as though my $150 a year is going very far to market my services to prospective clients. Great idea in theory, but what are the chances that anyone is going to find this site???

    • Lani Rosales

      April 20, 2011 at 11:08 am

      I think the mission ends up being organic growth through the charities- so if American Cancer Society was a partner, ACS would have on their site/emailers, "use IIC agents for your next purchase and 10% of their commission comes to us" kind of deal.

      Now if that $150 went toward prequalifying leads, I think 100% of the agent population would jump on that bandwagon, don't you?

    • IIC

      April 20, 2011 at 4:02 pm

      Hi Ryan,

      Thanks for your thoughts. Lani more or less hit the nail on the head, but let me expand a bit further. IIC has 154 NGO Partners, with more joining daily. Many of them choose to notify their supporters of IIC through their website donation page, or "other ways to give," etc. Aids Foundation of Chicago is a good example: https://www.aidschicago.org/donate-home/others-way-to-give

      IIC also provides materials for Partners to share IIC with their corporate and individual supporters.

      Though IIC is growing daily, we're still a new kid on the block. That's why the "clock" on your IIC annual Membership doesn't start ticking until there is at least one IIC NGO Partner signed up in your region. If you join IIC a whole year before there is an IIC NGO Partner in your community, then your $150 is good for two years of Membership!

      Finally, IIC participates in strategic publicity initiatives with our Partners as appropriate – such as Coaches vs. Cancer's recent national convention.

      The beauty of IIC is the benefit it offers all participants – Members, NGOs, and clients. We think that enlightened self-interest will prove to be a very powerful source of exposure for IIC and its Members.

      To learn more, visit https://iiconline.org/RealEstateWork

      Thanks Ryan!

  7. Cliff Stevenson

    April 20, 2011 at 9:47 am

    I support numerous charities already, but I would absolutely contribute more this way. If this existed in Canada, I would be very interested in them contacting us.

    • Lani Rosales

      April 20, 2011 at 11:13 am

      Cliff, add your email to the comments if you'd like, they'll be checking back in (use format name at domain dot com if you'd like). Cheers!

      • Cliff Stevenson

        April 21, 2011 at 1:29 pm

        Thanks Lani. I'll contact them with the info above in Andy's post.

  8. Lee Bridges, GRI

    June 20, 2016 at 4:06 pm

    I would gladly give 10% of my commission to the charity of the clients choice in return for leads that turn into a sale. I believe this would be a really good thing. The going percentage for the real estate industry is 25% for a lead from another Realtor that turns into a sale or a listing that turns into a sale so in reality I probably would actually give more than 10% to a qualified charity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Austin

Austin tops the list of best places to buy a home

When looking to buy a home, taking the long view is important before making such a huge investment – where are the best places to make that commitment?

Published

on

Looking at the bigger picture

(REALUOSO.COM) – Let us first express that although we are completely biased about Texas (we’re headquartered here, I personally grew up here), the data is not – Texas is the best. That’s a scientific fact. There’s a running joke in Austin that if there is a list of “best places to [anything],” we’re on it, and the joke causes eye rolls instead of humility (we’re sore winners and sore losers in this town).

That said, SelfStorage.com dug into the data and determined that the top 12 places to buy a home are currently Texas and North Carolina (and Portland, I guess you’re okay too or whatever).

They examined the nerdiest of numbers from the compound annual growth rate in inflation-adjusted GDP to cost premium, affordability, taxes, job growth, and housing availability.

“Buying a house is a big decision and a big commitment,” the company notes. “Although U.S. home prices have risen in the long term, the last decade has shown that path is sometimes full of twists, turns, dizzying heights and steep, abrupt falls. Today, home prices are stabilizing and increasing in most areas of the U.S.”

Click here to continue reading the list of the 12 best places to buy a home…

Continue Reading

Housing News

Average age of houses on the rise, so is it now better or worse to buy new?

With aging housing in America, are first-time buyers better off buying new or existing homes? The average age of a home is rising, as is the price of new housing, so a shift could be upon us.

Published

on

aging housing inventory

aging housing inventory

The average home age is higher than ever

(REALUOSO.COM) – In a survey from the Department of Housing and Urban Development American Housing Survey (AHS), the median age of homes in the United States was 35 years old. In Texas, homes are a bit younger with the median age between 19 – 29 years. The northeast has the oldest homes, with the median age between 50 – 61 years. In 1985, the median age of a home was only 23 years.

With more houses around 40 years old, the National Association of Realtors asserts that homeowners will have to undertake remodeling and renovation projects before selling unless the home is sold as-is, in which case the buyer will be responsible to update their new residence. Even homeowners who aren’t selling will need to consider remodeling for structural and aesthetic reasons.

Prices of new homes on the rise

Newer homes cost more than they used to. The price differential between new homes and older homes has increased from 10 percent traditionally to around 37 percent in 2014. This is due to rising construction costs, scarcity of lots, and a low inventory of new homes that doesn’t meet the demand.

Click here to continue reading this story…

Continue Reading

Housing News

Are Realtors the real loser in the fight between Zillow Group and Move, Inc.?

The last year has been one of dramatic and rapid change in the real estate tech sector, but Realtors are vulnerable, and we’re worried.

Published

on

zillow move

zillow move

Why Realtors are vulnerable to these rapid changes

(REALUOSO.COM) – Corporate warfare demands headlines in every industry, but in the real estate tech sector, a storm has been brewing for years, which in the last year has come to a head. Zillow Group and Move, Inc. (which is owned by News Corp. and operates ListHub, Realtor.com, TopProducer, and other brands) have been competing for a decade now, and the race has appeared to be an aggressive yet polite boxing match. Last year, the gloves came off, and now, they’ve drawn swords and appear to want blood.

Note: We’ll let you decide which company plays which role in the image above.

So how then, does any of this make Realtors the victims of this sword fight? Let’s get everyone up to speed, and then we’ll discuss.

1. Zillow poaches top talent, Move/NAR sues

It all started last year when the gloves came off – Move’s Chief Strategy Officer (who was also Realtor.com’s President), Errol Samuelson jumped ship and joined Zillow on the same day he phoned in his resignation without notice. He left under questionable circumstances, which has led to a lengthy legal battle (wherein Move and NAR have sued Zillow and Samuelson over allegations of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and misappropriation of trade secrets), with the most recent motion being for contempt, which a judge granted to Move/NAR after the mysterious “Samuelson Memo” surfaced.

Salt was added to the wound when Move awarded Samuelson’s job to Move veteran, Curt Beardsley, who days after Samuelson left, also defected to Zillow. This too led to a lawsuit, with allegations including breach of contract, violation of corporations code, illegal dumping of stocks, and Move has sought restitution. These charges are extremely serious, but demanded slightly less attention than the ongoing lawsuit against Samuelson.

2. Two major media brands emerge

Last fall, the News Corp. acquisition of Move, Inc. was given the green light by the feds, and this month, Zillow finalized their acquisition of Trulia.

…Click here to continue reading this story…

Continue Reading
Advertisement

The
American Genius
News neatly in your inbox

Join thousands of AG fans and SUBSCRIBE to get business and tech news updates, breaking stories, and MORE!

Emerging Stories