Is there room for more?
At its highest point in history, membership levels at the National Association of Realtors (NAR) hit 1.37 million in October of 2006, and has declined by nearly 30 percent, yet in states like Arizona, the number of Realtors per capita is tremendously high. Although membership levels change seasonally, and they are currently stable, and even rising in some months recently, it is an interesting study to look at membership levels more locally.
According to NAR, the top 10 states with the most Realtors per capita are:
- Arizona, where 1 in every 168 residents is a Realtor
- Hawaii, where 1 in every 173 residents is a Realtor
- Florida, where 1 in every 175 residents is a Realtor
- D.C., where 1 in every 193 residents is a Realtor
- Nevada, where 1 in every 200 residents is a Realtor
- New Jersey, where 1 in every 201 residents is a Realtor
- Connecticut, where 1 in every 229 residents is a Realtor
- California, where 1 in every 241 residents is a Realtor
- Colorado, where 1 in every 257 residents is a Realtor
- Idaho, where 1 in every 267 residents is a Realtor
Each state has a unique reason for being so highly populated with Realtors, but the most common reason is opportunity. Some would argue that with numbers like these, educational standards and even apprenticeship should be required to protect consumers from the fly by night hobbyist Realtor, while others see this as a golden opportunity to recruit in lower population states. Imagine getting a postcard that says, “did you know that Pennsylvania has one of the lowest Realtor density counts? Competition is low, pay is high, call today!”
Realtors care about the density levels because it speaks to the competitiveness of a given state – if the density is high, everyone in the state has a cousin, brother, friend, or pastor who is a Realtor, and procuring new business can be a challenge. Most of all, however, these density numbers are just plain interesting:
Austin tops the list of best places to buy a home
When looking to buy a home, taking the long view is important before making such a huge investment – where are the best places to make that commitment?
Looking at the bigger picture
(REALUOSO.COM) – Let us first express that although we are completely biased about Texas (we’re headquartered here, I personally grew up here), the data is not – Texas is the best. That’s a scientific fact. There’s a running joke in Austin that if there is a list of “best places to [anything],” we’re on it, and the joke causes eye rolls instead of humility (we’re sore winners and sore losers in this town).
That said, SelfStorage.com dug into the data and determined that the top 12 places to buy a home are currently Texas and North Carolina (and Portland, I guess you’re okay too or whatever).
They examined the nerdiest of numbers from the compound annual growth rate in inflation-adjusted GDP to cost premium, affordability, taxes, job growth, and housing availability.
“Buying a house is a big decision and a big commitment,” the company notes. “Although U.S. home prices have risen in the long term, the last decade has shown that path is sometimes full of twists, turns, dizzying heights and steep, abrupt falls. Today, home prices are stabilizing and increasing in most areas of the U.S.”
Average age of houses on the rise, so is it now better or worse to buy new?
With aging housing in America, are first-time buyers better off buying new or existing homes? The average age of a home is rising, as is the price of new housing, so a shift could be upon us.
The average home age is higher than ever
(REALUOSO.COM) – In a survey from the Department of Housing and Urban Development American Housing Survey (AHS), the median age of homes in the United States was 35 years old. In Texas, homes are a bit younger with the median age between 19 – 29 years. The northeast has the oldest homes, with the median age between 50 – 61 years. In 1985, the median age of a home was only 23 years.
With more houses around 40 years old, the National Association of Realtors asserts that homeowners will have to undertake remodeling and renovation projects before selling unless the home is sold as-is, in which case the buyer will be responsible to update their new residence. Even homeowners who aren’t selling will need to consider remodeling for structural and aesthetic reasons.
Prices of new homes on the rise
Newer homes cost more than they used to. The price differential between new homes and older homes has increased from 10 percent traditionally to around 37 percent in 2014. This is due to rising construction costs, scarcity of lots, and a low inventory of new homes that doesn’t meet the demand.
Are Realtors the real loser in the fight between Zillow Group and Move, Inc.?
The last year has been one of dramatic and rapid change in the real estate tech sector, but Realtors are vulnerable, and we’re worried.
Why Realtors are vulnerable to these rapid changes
(REALUOSO.COM) – Corporate warfare demands headlines in every industry, but in the real estate tech sector, a storm has been brewing for years, which in the last year has come to a head. Zillow Group and Move, Inc. (which is owned by News Corp. and operates ListHub, Realtor.com, TopProducer, and other brands) have been competing for a decade now, and the race has appeared to be an aggressive yet polite boxing match. Last year, the gloves came off, and now, they’ve drawn swords and appear to want blood.
Note: We’ll let you decide which company plays which role in the image above.
So how then, does any of this make Realtors the victims of this sword fight? Let’s get everyone up to speed, and then we’ll discuss.
1. Zillow poaches top talent, Move/NAR sues
It all started last year when the gloves came off – Move’s Chief Strategy Officer (who was also Realtor.com’s President), Errol Samuelson jumped ship and joined Zillow on the same day he phoned in his resignation without notice. He left under questionable circumstances, which has led to a lengthy legal battle (wherein Move and NAR have sued Zillow and Samuelson over allegations of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and misappropriation of trade secrets), with the most recent motion being for contempt, which a judge granted to Move/NAR after the mysterious “Samuelson Memo” surfaced.
Salt was added to the wound when Move awarded Samuelson’s job to Move veteran, Curt Beardsley, who days after Samuelson left, also defected to Zillow. This too led to a lawsuit, with allegations including breach of contract, violation of corporations code, illegal dumping of stocks, and Move has sought restitution. These charges are extremely serious, but demanded slightly less attention than the ongoing lawsuit against Samuelson.
2. Two major media brands emerge
Opinion Editorials6 days ago
Questions you wished recruiters would answer
Business Entrepreneur14 hours ago
15 tips to spot a toxic work environment when interviewing
Business Entrepreneur5 days ago
Zen, please: Demand for mental health services surges during pandemic
Opinion Editorials6 days ago
6 skills humans have that AI doesn’t… yet
Business Entrepreneur5 days ago
This startup makes managing remote internships easier for all
Tech News14 hours ago
The paradox of CAPTCHAs: Too smart for humans vs AI?
Business Entrepreneur2 weeks ago
Paper Source files for bankruptcy, leaving many small craft businesses in a jam
Business Finance6 days ago
India bans cryptocurrency prior to releasing their own