Connect with us

Tech News

Your phone is keeping tabs on your location: how to opt out

(Tech News) Location tracking isn’t unique to Apple iPhones, as Google is keeping tabs on everywhere you go. The good news is that you can opt out.

Published

on

google location tracking

google location tracking

Guess who’s following you now? You guessed it – Google

You are probably thinking, “I know my GPS keeps track of me,” but did you know it goes beyond simple GPS locations? According to TechCrunch, Google’s Location History will show you every place you visited during the day, on any day.

bar
The tool was originally launched when Latitude was being used. Even though Latitude is no longer a part of Google’s services, the tool the keeps the data is still very much active. This is an opt-in tool. Any time you install a Google-based app on your iOS device, or set up a new Android device, you are asked to share location data; if you agree, your information is stored in a database. There is a way to opt-out however, if this sounds like too much data collecting for your liking.

If you are an Android user:

There are two separate features which use Google’s location services: location reporting and location history. Location reporting is a feature that feeds apps like Google Now, Twitter, and Foursquare your position. Without this feature your phone does not know where you are when you check in. Location history is your tracker. It keeps track of which addresses you navigate to and where “home” and “work” are located. To disable either of these features you will need to follow these steps:

  1. Open the App Drawer and navigate to “settings.”
  2. Scroll down and tap “location.” Scroll down again and tap “Google Location Settings.”
  3. You can then tap “location reporting” or “location history.”
  4. Also, you can delete your phone’s location cache by tapping “delete location history.”

You will need to repeat these steps for each Google account your have on your device.

Please note: if you disable these services, Google Maps will not work, or it will ask you every time if it can access your position. The best option, in my opinion, is to disable location history and leave location reporting alone. This way you can enjoy location services without the fear of having your every move tracked and stored. If you are wondering what happens to the database information, I will cover that too.

If you are an iOS user:

The steps here will restrict Google’s access, to get started:

  1. Open the “Settings” app and scroll down to “privacy.” Tap “location services.”
  2. Disable all location services by swiping the slider across the top, or scrolling down to disable location services for specific apps (consider
  3. Google and Google Maps your most pressing concern).
  4. Finally, select “system services” to deny location data from specific aspect so the app (“Frequent Locations” or “Near Me”).
  5. Again, please note: if you disable these features, you will get a pop-up every time you use an app that wants your location asking for permission to “read” your location.
    Once you have deleted your information from your device, you may still want to empty Google’s database of your location from the web. Accessing this site via your mobile device is the only way the delete the history in the case of iOS users. You can turn off Google’s access with the steps above, but you will need to visit the site to clear your data completely.

    Location services can be immensely useful to find something new around your current location, but if you are not a fan of your phone storing your information, the steps above should have you covered.

Jennifer Walpole is a Senior Staff Writer at The American Genius and holds a Master’s degree in English from the University of Oklahoma. She is a science fiction fanatic and enjoys writing way more than she should. She dreams of being a screenwriter and seeing her work on the big screen in Hollywood one day.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. chattabox

    December 27, 2013 at 7:05 am

    Google are going too far….

  2. Jon Hardison

    December 29, 2013 at 1:39 am

    I just left a really informative, long comment explaining tons of technical reasons why doing any of the above is basically useless, but then your comment system tossed it out while I was trying to create an account. I’m not typing all that again. All I’ll say is that doing all this will do nothing for anyone’s privacy and security. Nothing.

    It’s a hardware issue and your data is being farmed at the hardware / carrier level. It can’t be “opted out” of.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech News

Another thing that can trick iPhone X facial recognition

(TECH NEWS) The iPhone X has had an array of challenges, even with their innovative facial recognition technology.

Published

on

iphone X facial recognition

Yiiiikes, a mask tricked Apple’s new Face ID feature. Vietnamese security firm Bkav Corporation recently held a demo pointing out flaws in the iPhone X’s facial recognition, claiming the technology is not as secure as Apple originally touted.

Bkav Corporation focuses on network security, anti-virus software, and mobile security software. Bkav Corp created a 3D mask that “beat” Face ID in a demonstration. The mask was crafted with a combination of 3D printing and 2D images.

When verifying users, Face ID takes photos using infrared cameras. The first photo creates the surface of the face then the second pic makes a mesh, reproducing the face in 3D. From there, Face ID uses AI technology to distinguish faces.

The 2D/3D hybrid is meant to throw off the AI feature specifically. According to Bkav’s VP of Cyber Security Ngo Tuan Anh, “Apple’s AI can only distinguish either a 100% real face or a 100% fake one. So if you create a ‘half-real half-fake’ face, it can fool Apple’s AI.”

Face ID is supposed to have a one million-to-one chance of false recognition.

Compared to Touch ID’s potential fail rate of fifty thousand-to-one, Face ID is meant to be way more secure. However, the risk of a false recognition increases with identical twins, siblings, and children under the age of thirteen since their facial features aren’t finished developing.

When iPhone X launched, Apple stated they worked with professional Hollywood mask makers and makeup artists to ensure Face ID couldn’t be fooled by masks or other prosthetics. While Apple noted Face ID should still work if users get haircuts, change facial hair, or sometimes wear glasses, masks weren’t part of the good-to-go features for unlocking phones.

If you’re one of the adopters of iPhone X, don’t start freaking out yet though. To create their mask, Bkav had to use a handheld scanner to get pictures of their target’s face. As in, the person whose phone they were trying to hack had to be in the same room to get the initial scans.

Plus, Bkav could have intentionally done a subpar job of setting up the Face ID. The obvious solution if you’re still worried? Add a passcode as well and don’t trust anyone who wants to make a mask of your face.

Read also: Do literally anything with your money besides buy the iPhone X

Continue Reading

Tech News

Well great, now the robots can do acrobatics

(TECH NEWS) Do you want Terminators? Because this is how you get Terminators. Bipedal robots can do backflips now…

Published

on

robots y'all

This is it. It’s happening. Robots.

A year ago Boston Dynamics robot Atlas was learning to stand and falling over while walking. Now, Atlas has been upgraded, allowing it to easily scale blocks parkour style, doing backflips, and even raising its arms triumphantly after nailing a landing.

And I am raising a card with a 10 for the solid execution, albeit shakily, because the first thing that went through my head watching those eerily fluid, human-like movements, was imagining it stomping over piles of human skulls with an AK in its cold, calculating hands.

We can build it. We have the technology.

Let’s hope it doesn’t find videos all those videos on YouTube of its creators tormenting the thing; prodding it with hockey sticks like a lion tamer with a chair, knocking boxes out of its arms, pushing it over, and kicking its robo-dog companions.

Atlas won’t forget that.

Imagine this thing chasing you in the woods, or down the street. In a few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Atlas bots were wearing badges. Atlas is far more spry than the dopey droids you might find in a Star Wars flick, and well on its way to creating Skynet from Boston Dynamics.

Guys, Atlas can do acrobatics now, like a ninja:

Anywhere human feet can tread, an advanced enough droid will be able to go (can we start calling them droids now?). If you knock them over, they get right back up. Those human-powered mechs have nothing on Atlas. Give it enough time, and Atlas will run circles around both Eagle Prime and KURATAS. They won’t need us puny humans for robot battles.

One day, they might not need us at all.

All jokes aside, it’s an incredible, awe-inducing advancement in robotics. Boston Dynamics also recently revealed a smaller, less creepy version of their robo-dog Spot to bring us SpotMini: a small four-legged robot that can climb stairs and moves similarly to the way a dog would romp about.

Just so you know, this is nothing to be afraid of… We’ve only just found out that robots are evolving at an alarming rate.

Continue Reading

Tech News

Social media giants are trying to operate without human controls but are failing

(TECH NEWS) Artificial intelligence (AI) is taking over in fascinating ways, but this big experiment of replacing human tasks is failing. Good news / bad news.

Published

on

ai robot not human

Let me tell you a story. In fact, let me tell you several.

A village in Macedonia had a small economic boom during the 2016 election, plagiarizing and stitching together pro-Trump messages on social media, then publishing the results as “news” in order to profit from Google ad revenue.

Back during the “Keep Calm and…” T-shirt fad, a shirt company went through a thoroughly justified PR apocalypse for selling products labeled “Keep Calm and Hit Her” and “Keep Calm and Rape a Lot.”

The 17th most popular website on Earth occasionally likes to tell women over 30 to freeze their ova.

So! That’s a parade of fail. What’s it got in common, beyond making any reasonable reader consider moving to an Amish community and trying to forget even the word “Internet”?

People. More accurately, their absence.

Veles, Macedonia churned out profitable nonsense about Trump slapping a protester (that didn’t happen) or getting the blessing of the Pope (Pope says nope) because Google ads are programmatic. There’s no QA component, no human eyes reviewing content and asking “is this worth advertising on?” or for that matter “is this blatantly false?”

Likewise the Evil T-Shirt Crisis. The company generated slogans by dropping memes into an algorithm, then throwing the result on Amazon. That ended… poorly.

We, and every other tech and business network in the digital cosmos, have written in depth about all the dang robots taking our jobs. Usually our primary concern is the economic fallout. We’re a business news organization. It’s our job to warn you about that stuff.

But there’s another problem, and it’s a huge problem, especially as media consumption in general continues to rise, and more and more of that media is moderated by algorithms rather than people.

Robots aren’t just taking our jobs. They suck at our jobs. Algorithms may play go, but they aren’t ready to make value judgments yet. A quick Google will yield a dozen more examples of AI failures just as repulsive and/or hilarious as the ones on my list. And the real punchline for all of that?

It’s good news.

For once, the robot apocalypse is cutting us puny humans a break. It’s creating jobs almost as fast as it’s gobbling them up, because at this point, it is excruciatingly clear that robots aren’t ready to produce work people can actually see. They’re not even ready to put ads on work people see, not without causing a PR catastrophe every other month.

AI isn’t a better widget. It also isn’t an employee that doesn’t want benefits or take long lunches.

It’s a product in permanent beta, desperately trying to catch up to the constantly changing nuance of human interaction. It doesn’t work without homo sapiens holding its robot hand.

Let’s call it Salter’s Law: For every application of AI to customer-facing work, you will need to hire at least one human for damage control when the AI screws up.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

The
American Genius
News neatly in your inbox

Join thousands of AG fans and SUBSCRIBE to get business and tech news updates, breaking stories, and MORE!

Emerging Stories