Connect with us

Tech News

Taskstacks is a public to do list app that sounds awful, but has great potential

(BUSINESS NEWS) A to do list that your boss and colleagues can add onto sounds like a nightmare, but it could be great with a few tweaks.

Published

on

taskstacks

User decides the purpose

There are some things that are designed for an original purpose, but once it hits the market, the user finds much more practical utilizations for the product. Take Play-Doh, for example. When it was originally introduced in the 1930’s, the thought process was that it would be a fantastic wallpaper cleaner. And while it achieved modest success, when it was repurposed as a safe clay for pre-school aged kids in the 1950’s, it became an instant success and wildly popular for the past several decades.

It just took a bit of “reimagination” for the new idea to take root and become more successful than ever before.

bar

What Taskstacks does

It might just be the same type of success story for Taskstacks. Taskstacks are public to do lists that can be added to by anyone to whom you provide the link to access it. Billed as a way to crowd source your to do list to “customers, friends, bosses, coworkers, or anyone else that asks you to do things”, it certainly could be used for such a purpose.

While having the ability for everyone who needs a part of your time or who needs to tell you what to do to be able to do so in one place for your review seems like a good idea, the need to set boundaries on its use from the start seems clear.

The snags in the fabric

With you receiving a notification anytime that someone adds a task to your to do list, and with them receiving instant notification once you mark a task complete, the platform does communicate well at the terminal points.

In the spaces in between, however, the burden is now on you to provide a timeline for completion, or to reach back out to them to get information and clarification about what it is that they’ve put on your to do list.

We’ve written before about the fallacy of the Inbox Zero theory, and how a slavish devotion to clearing your inbox can lead to a lesser degree of good customer service and attention.

It’s much the same here; by allowing everyone to add demands on your time, you’re not providing them excellent customer service or attention to detail. Instead, you’re constantly in response mode to tasks that you may not have agreed to take on in the first place, or would have delegated to others on your team.

Great potential

That doesn’t mean that there’s not a future for Taskstacks, however. A better use would be as an internal communications tool within a defined team, or a group of people collaborating together on a common purpose.

For example, in an event planning construct, where many moving parts are managed by multiple people, having the ability to set a Taskstack as pieces of the planning are completed, and with their completion comes new tasks for follow up and execution, any of which may be completed by others as the project nears completion.

Allowing everyone to access your time doesn’t make you more efficient or productive, and trying to be everything to everyone often leaves you drained and incomplete. Use the tools at your disposal to effectively manage your time and to do list, or otherwise they’ll manage you.

#Taskstacks

Roger is a Staff Writer at The American Genius and holds two Master's degrees, one in Education Leadership and another in Leadership Studies. In his spare time away from researching leadership retention and communication styles, he loves to watch baseball, especially the Red Sox!

Tech News

Publishers anticipate price hikes after Facebook’s purge

(SOCIAL MEDIA) Changes to the Facebook News Feed algorithm may lead to price hikes for publishers trying to remain relevant.

Published

on

facebook money

Facebook is changing the way News Feed filters content, putting more focus on posts from friends and family. This will effectively reduce the amount of paid content users see from publishers and brands.

Some agencies think this may increase how much advertisers will need to spend on paid ads to keep the same number of views. Just since last quarter, ad rates increased by thirty five percent.

Facebook’s VP of product management, John Hegeman said advertising will be “unaffected,” but agencies aren’t so sure.

Doug Baker, director of strategic services at AnalogFolk, stated this is the “final nail in the existing coffin” for organic reach.

For years, organic reach has been declining since more content is being shared. Smartphones and tablets lowered the threshold for ease of posting, and users can now share content without being tied to a desktop.

News Feeds are super saturated with content, and it has become increasingly difficult for content creators to organically reach users in the midst of posts from family and friends.

Mass-reach media buys end up seeming like borderline spam, and clog up an already extremely populated stream of content in your feed.

In December, Facebook announced plans to deprioritize “engagement bait” posts that urge users to share, like, or vote to artificially gain greater reach.

Using a machine learning model to detect different forms of engagement, Facebook rolled out Page-level demotion to curb frequency of advertisers using engagement bait.

Facebook noted it will still favor content from reputable publishers while reducing clickbait, spam, and misleading stories.

While engagement is only a small part of ad ranking, advertisers may see serious price hikes to keep the same level of performance.

It looks like Facebook is trying to go back to its roots as a social site, like how Snapchat recently announced a plan to keep news and social more separated on their platform.

To reach users with these new changes, advertisers must optimize and more carefully plan media strategies to make content relevant to target markets.

However, brands may find loopholes in the algorithm, continuing practices that drive artificial engagement. CEO of digital agency TMW Unlimited pointed out that brands may “be tempted to be increasingly controversial or polarizing in order to stimulate conversation.”

Even as Facebook insists it’s not a media company and its advertisers are actually “partners,” it’s likely brands will see significant price increases to remain in the News Feed instead of relegated to side ads.

Continue Reading

Tech News

Facebook’s news feed changes will impact how you reach consumers

(TECH NEWS) Facebook is changing how you see the news feed, but it will also impact how your business reaches consumers.

Published

on

facebook

Once again, Facebook is making some significant changes to the News Feed (you probably know this because people are freaking out). This time, the changes revolve around improving user experience by cutting down on sponsored content — but what does that mean for advertisers and Facebook businesses?

As it turns out, not a ton – just a higher content standard and the accompanying challenge of creating positive, enjoyable content. Maybe.

Anyone who’s spent any time on Facebook in the past few years knows that it’s as much an advertising business as it is a social network. It’s impossible to make it more than a few posts into your News Feed without seeing a “Suggested Post”-type ad, and unless you use an ad-blocker, your sidebar is full of even more blatant attempts to sell or promote products only loosely related to your likes and interests.

It appears that no one is less happy about this than the man himself. Mark Zuckerberg announced plans to dial back advertising posts in favor of user-created content, conversation-inspiring posts, and other non-public items of interest. The goal is to connect you more consistently with the content that you love rather than the content that you tolerate; as you can probably guess, advertisers aren’t thrilled about this notion — some are even considering it an ad-pocalypse.

That’s a little dramatic.

The road to creating engaging, profitable ads for this new Facebook is relatively simple, if not easy. Facebook will be prioritizing posts that objectively bring happiness and positive experiences to users, meaning that your ads will need to be intrinsically fulfilling for your target demographic. While relying on “traditional” marketing strategies like clickbait titles and high initial engagement numbers won’t get you there, retaining people with your content will.

In fact, this move is fundamentally similar to YouTube’s policy wherein creators are paid more for longer audience view times than if their audiences flake out after a few seconds. One might argue that such a policy was put into place to safeguard against meaningless content with catchy titles, and that’s exactly what Facebook appears to be doing here.

With this return to their roots, Facebook is making steps toward bringing positivity back into social media — something we all could benefit from right about now.

Continue Reading

Tech News

Walmart may have just solved the biggest snag in online grocery shopping

(TECH NEWS) Walmart submits a patent for technology that could fix the crack in online grocery shopping.

Published

on

walmart

When online shopping became increasingly popular, it made total sense as it is a huge time saver. However, not being a frequent user of the services, I have questioned how people go about selecting exactly what they want as what will be sent to them, isn’t what’s pictured online.

Apparently, this is a major challenge for services that offer online grocery shopping, as people tend to be particular about their cuts of meats and selection of produce (we’ve all had those moments where we’ve examined each apple in the bunch, admit it).

Walmart, a leading competitor in grocery sales, is looking to eradicate this challenge with a newly submitted patent for their developments. The new system they’re proposing will give online shoppers a look at their actual potential purchase via 3D technology.

The system, dubbed the “Fresh Online Experience” (FOE), will use three-dimensional scanning to show online shoppers images of the products.

First, they will select from a stock image (say they’re looking for an orange). A human worker at the location they’re shopping/delivering from will be notified and will then select an orange and send the shopper a photo.

The image would be sent from a store associate interface and will appear in a communications module where the customer can view it. They are then given the chance to approve or deny, based on the image.

The customer will have a fixed amount of time to approve or deny the item/image. To combat too much back and forth, the customer is only given so many vetoes until they have to choose an orange that’s been previously selected or remove it from the order altogether.

When the orange is approved, it will be stamped with an edible watermark and will be included with the finalized order. While this seems like a lot of work on the associate’s end, Walmart has stated that some of the FOE will include automated aspects, which could save human workers from having to continuously scan fresh items.

This idea comes on the heels of Amazon’s purchase of Whole Foods, making them a giant competitor for Walmart.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

The
American Genius
News neatly in your inbox

Join thousands of AG fans and SUBSCRIBE to get business and tech news updates, breaking stories, and MORE!

Emerging Stories