Connect with us

Opinion Editorials

Boomer.email is a scary look into all generations mindsets

(EDITORIAL) Boomer.email exposes problematic email chains circulating amongst the Baby Boomers, and subsequently how relentlessly unforgiving Millennials are of them.

Published

on

boomer.email

Remember email chain letters circa 2002? It was perhaps the predecessor to the meme, where people would receive long emails with jokes, riddles, astrological advice, conspiracy theories, and other Internet-inspired nonsense? Well, they’re back. Or rather, they never left the email ethos for those born roughly 1944 to 1964.

I’m talking about Boomer.email. Boomer.email is the latest provocative content by MSCHF, a Brooklyn-based web-cult of pithy Internet nerds that may or may not classify themselves as a company.

MSCHF creates a new “drop” every two weeks of something completely out-of-pocket and weird, with the aim of producing social commentary prioritized over profit. Their most famous antic was probably the 2019 release of Jesus Shoes – custom Nike Air Max 97s shoes containing holy water from the River Jordan in the soles. The group, which is 90% male and 100% Millennial and Gen Z, produces a “portfolio [which] may amount to a very successful string of viral marketing campaigns, a series of jokes or something like art.”

Boomer.email, according to the website, is “a weekly newsletter where we forward unhinged email chains sourced from thousands of real, anonymous boomers.” The categories are Memes, News, Politics, and NSFW (Not Safe For Work). Email samples include a series of memes with Donald Trump’s face photo-shopped over images of Queen Elizabeth II, a long explanation of the conspiracy theory that China exported the coronavirus as biological warfare, and a supposed telegraph exchange between General MacArthur and President Truman where Truman defines political correctness for the general in order to mask prevent his Japanese racism from reaching the press. The exchange ends with a BUILD A WALL image and the text “Secure The Border” and “Make America Safe Again.”

All published emails are anonymous. Anyone can forward an email to ok@boomer.email.

If the goal at MSCHF (try pronouncing it, and you might get the name of the company, which I at first thought was a clunky acronym) is simply to create social commentary, it’s working. The emails are drawing praise and scorn from every corner of the Internet. Check out the following sound-bytes from articles reviewing the content:

“There is as much hilarity in the Boomer.Email newsletter as there is just pure sadness that a generation that gave us so much in the way of technology, infrastructure and wisdom has relegated itself to no much more than the brunt of jokes based on their ill-informed and quick-react emails.” (Forbes)

“Check out the website to read the first week’s emails in full or sign up to receive further newsletters for more evidence of how [expletive deleted]ed every younger generation will continue to be for at least a few more decades.” (AV Club)

“Unfortunately, many [boomers] don’t think to fact-check their personal emails. And if boomers can’t grasp documented history — which they lived through — with accuracy, it’s easy to understand why MSCHF, along with a majority of their millennial and Gen-Z cohorts, are so anxious about our future.” (New York Post)

And now, my own:

Shaming an entire population of people whose only common trait is their decade of birth is shameful and hypocritical. If Millennials don’t want to be pegged as collectively lazy and entitled, we should not be developing newsletters that paint Boomers as collectively ignorant and politically harmful.

Of course it is important to shine a light on injustice – there is no room to condone content that is downright bigoted (see racist examples above). As Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

But when we are done clucking at the Internet-fueled ignorance of anonymous Baby Boomers, we must recall that civic engagement, productive discourse, and voting for our representation are far more effective and necessary tools for change. When we recall that Boomers are our relatives and colleagues — and if you are a Millennial, probably your parents – are Baby Boomers, Boomer Email presents us with an opportunity. It behooves consumers of this content to be critical, and take the opportunity to fact-check and start dialogue, rather than waste time simply mocking generational fodder.

Heather Buffo is a Cleveland native, a recovering Bostonian, and an Austin newbie. Heather is the Venture Growth & Partnerships Lead at Republic where she works with partners in private investing to democratize access to capital for entrepreneurs. Heather studied neurobiology at Harvard University, and is a City Year Boston AmeriCorps alum. She likes to write for AG, drink Austin beer, and ride around town on her road bicycle. His name is Pippin. Say hello if you see them.

Opinion Editorials

Woman fired for premarital sex, raises questions of company culture

(OPINION / EDITORIAL) This unfortunate circumstance for a former David Ramsey employee has raised the age-old conversation of how to enforce a company culture.

Published

on

Company culture being established around a meeting table with dark colored drinks and notebooks.

America, the land of the free, and the opinionated. And in company culture, this is no different.

Over the years the US has grown and changed. A nation that over the centuries formed from the amalgamation of beliefs and cultures. Now let us be frank, there is a majority in certain beliefs and practices. Those groups can also sometimes come with rather large mouth pieces as well, but that isn’t always a bad thing. People’s moral and cultural compasses influence the world around us. Ultimately, we can create cults or communities. We can be harmful or helpful with how we choose to influence those around us.

When you combine that with economics, though, that’s when things can get tricky. The difficulties of mixing the cooperate world with morals and beliefs can get expensive. There are numerous instances of companies being sued for wrongful termination. Currently, Dave Ramsey’s company has recently come into the spotlight due to a lawsuit being filed against them by a disgruntled employee. The company culture has strict rules against certain extracurricular activities. Now usually people would think they would mean recreational drugs, but not in this case. As of March 8th, Ramsey Solutions has reportedly fired 8 employees over the last 5 years for engaging in premarital sex.

Caitlin O’Connor is the latest employee to deal with this situation. Now, while some of us may have seen this company culture and decided to just keep life and work separate, there’s another difficulty here. Ms. O’Connor has recently become pregnant, which leaves no doubt about her outside of work activities. Now there is a number of different emotions that happen here. A woman who is now pregnant is losing her job. This may be a person who has no desire to get married and now she’s thrust into unemployment for doing nothing but enjoying a part of life. It is a frustrating situation to say the least on her side.

In that frustration on the part of Ms. O’Connor, however, there are also similar issues on the part of the company. While they have set up this company culture and laid down rules for all their employees, they now have to uphold and find a replacement for this resource completely unexpectedly. It was not only clearly laid out in their company guidelines that they do not condone this behavior, nor its implications, but Ms. O’Connor openly admitted that she was aware of the implications of her actions as well. This company has built a community with expectations and is willing to uphold them. That is their right.

I remember growing up there was a cake shop in Colorado that refused to create a cake for a gay couple based upon their religious beliefs. It was back in 2012. In 2018 the Supreme Court ruled that the shop had the right to refuse service based on their beliefs, which to be honest was my expectation. However, in the process of this that particular his business has not flourished. Ultimately one has to decide whether they want to follow their beliefs in the face of economic hardship. It’s a true show of faith of course but also, is it practical.

Living your life, your way, is the point of this country. We have to remember to share that space with those who believe differently. Bringing no harm to others is one thing, but can we truly be a common people if we refuse to go outside of our own beliefs and morals?

Continue Reading

Opinion Editorials

Zoom Escaper offers goofy ‘exit strategies’ for the Zoom-weary

(OPINION / EDITORIAL) Zoom Escaper is basically a get-out-of-Zoom-jail-free card, and it’s hilarious. Though considering the proliferation of Zoom meetings, we kind of get it.

Published

on

Woman on a video call waving to camera and smiling awkwardly on Zoom.

Finally, a way to weasel out of those Zoom meetings with a believable excuse. The concept “Where there’s a will, there’s a way,” has been around since roughly 1640, attributed to George Herbert. One thing humans “will” more often than not is getting out of something unpleasant or tedious. Cue the virtual work meeting. Is it unpleasant? Sometimes. Tedious? Often. Now Zoom Escaper has brought beleaguered or bored remote workers a way out of meetings, conferences, or even virtual happy hours.

This reminds me of the old fail-safe when you are on a date and have someone call you at a pre-designated time to make sure you don’t want to bail early. Likewise, in a live business meeting, you can always have a colleague knock on the door to call you away for an “urgent matter.” Now that everybody and their barking dog are working remotely, Zoom Escaper is the modern day equivalent of those planned distractions.

Zoom Escaper will play various sounds that make good excuses to leave the call temporarily: Barking dogs, a crying baby, and, bizarrely, a weeping man. It will even play sounds that will make the other video conference attendees insist on cutting the call short: Loud construction sounds, echoes, feedback, wind as though you are in a car, and a bad connection. The strangest and most antisocial sound it plays that may earn you a ticket to a virtual HR meeting, is that of loud and obvious urinating. Why, though? I find myself giggling as I type, but some people will no doubt find it useful on what I am hoping are rare occasions.

The Zoom Escaper is an installable tool run through VB-Cable that will interrupt your call with a litany of annoying sounds. Once you download VB-Cable and readjust your Zoom (or other video conferencing microphone and output settings), you can play the sound(s) on your call.

If you find it hard to believe that people would go so far to get out of a meeting, well you are likely fortunate enough not to have been to many “This could have been an email” meetings. Either that, or you are wide eyed and innocent, and haven’t seen the lengths people will go to to protect their autonomy, even when working from home. We shared about the proliferation of anti-snitchware devices designed to keep the company from spying in ever more sophisticated ways on remote employees.

I’m laughing, but a word of caution. Zoom Escaper, according to its creator, Sam Lavigne, “allows you to self-sabotage your audio stream, making your presence unbearable to others.”

Read that again. Now remember that should you choose to go this route to ditch your video conferences, words like “self-sabotage” and “unbearable to others” are not what hiring managers tend to look for on a resume. Unless, of course, you’re applying to be a Shock Jock talk show host or a political pundit. If you want to crack your friends up on a virtual happy hour, though, hey, go for it.

Continue Reading

Opinion Editorials

Did you change jobs in 2020? New study reveals fascinating data on rollercoaster year

(OPINION / EDITORIAL) Many struggled in 2020, but others also took the opportunity to re-evaluate and change jobs. Here’s what employees at different workplaces had to say.

Published

on

Two people shaking hands across the table, taking the opportunity to change jobs.

The year 2020 was nothing short of unusual. It showed us just how quickly things can change in a relatively brief amount of time. One of those changes came in the form of jobs. Many lost their jobs as unemployment skyrocketed. Others took this time to pivot and change jobs.

A study by Blind found that 48% of professionals voluntarily changed employers in 2020. The anonymous professional networking platform asked over 3,700 of their users a number of questions and complied data based on their responses.

Did you voluntarily change employers in 2020?

  • 48% of professionals say they did voluntarily changed employers in 2020

Has the COVID-19 pandemic stopped you from trying to change jobs?

  • 77% responded no, the COVID-19 pandemic stopped them from trying to change jobs
    • Half of both T-Mobile and Verizon professionals say the COVID-19 pandemic stopped them from trying to change jobs

Are you planning on getting a new job this year?

  • Nearly half (49%) of professionals say they are planning on getting a new job this year
    • 80% of Deloitte professionals say they are planning on getting a new job this year
    • 69% of Visa professionals say they are planning on getting a new job this year
    • 63% of SAP professionals say they are planning on getting a new job this year
    • 0% of Roblox professionals plan on willingly leaving Roblox this year

The economy saw the loss of global working hours equivalent to 255 million full-time employees in 2020, yet voluntary job changes and skills development are still top of mind for employees. When asking about changing jobs, 1,799 (48%) reported “yes” while 1,958 (52%) reported “no” for a grand total of 3,757 responses. Here are the top companies that saw movement over the last year. The question posed was, “Did you voluntarily change employers in 2020?”

Amazon (52% “yes” – 48% “no” – total responses: 395)
Microsoft (42% “yes” – 58% “no” – total responses: 156)
Facebook (56% “yes” – 44% “no” – total responses: 155)
Google (46% “yes” – 54% “no” – total responses: 153)
Apple (61% “yes” – 39% “no” – total responses: 82)
Intel Corporation (40% “yes” – 60% “no” – total responses: 48)
Oracle (63% “yes” – 38% “no” – total responses: 40)
Cisco (53% “yes” – 48% “no” – total responses: 40)
Uber (38% “yes” – 62% “no” – total responses: 39)
LinkedIn (42% “yes” – 58% “no” – total responses: 38)
Indeed.com (35% “yes” – 65% “no” – total responses: 37)
Capital One (31% “yes” – 69% “no” – total responses: 36)
VMware (30% “yes” – 70% “no” – total responses: 33)
Salesforce (44% “yes” – 56% “no” – total responses: 32)
Intuit (43% “yes” – 57% “no” – total responses: 30)
Bloomberg (33% “yes” – 67% “no” – total responses: 30)
PayPal (45% “yes” – 55% “no” – total responses: 22)
Lyft (64% “yes” – 36% “no” – total responses: 22)
Expedia Group (64% “yes” – 36% “no” – total responses: 22)
ServiceNow (43% “yes” – 57% “no” – total responses: 21)
SAP (40% “yes” – 60% “no” – total responses: 20)
Dropbox (45% “yes” – 55% “no” – total responses: 20)
Walmart (32% “yes” – 68% “no” – total responses: 19)
NVIDIA (58% “yes” – 42% “no” – total responses: 19)
eBay (42% “yes” – 58% “no” – total responses: 19)
Adobe (32% “yes” – 68% “no” – total responses: 19)
Tesla Motors (39% “yes” – 61% “no” – total responses: 18)
Visa (41% “yes” – 59% “no” – total responses: 17)
Box (71% “yes” – 29% “no” – total responses: 17)
T-Mobile (38% “yes” – 63% “no” – total responses: 16)
Twitter (44% “yes” – 56% “no” – total responses: 16)
IBM (38% “yes” – 63% “no” – total responses: 16)
American Express (25% “yes” – 75% “no” – total responses: 16)
Netflix (36% “yes” – 64% “no” – total responses: 14)
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (43% “yes” – 57% “no” – total responses: 14)
Snap (77% “yes” – 23% “no” – total responses: 13)
Goldman Sachs (54% “yes” – 46% “no” – total responses: 13)
Airbnb (46% “yes” – 54% “no” – total responses: 13)
Cognizant (54% “yes” – 46% “no” – total responses: 13)
Verizon Media (17% “yes” – 83% “no” – total responses: 12)
Workday (33% “yes” – 67% “no” – total responses: 12)
Mailchimp (50% “yes” – 50% “no” – total responses: 12)
Samsung Electronics (67% “yes” – 33% “no” – total responses: 12)
ExxonMobil (33% “yes” – 67% “no” – total responses: 12)
Credit Karma (25% “yes” – 75% “no” – total responses: 12)
Square (36% “yes” – 64% “no” – total responses: 11)
Deloitte (55% “yes” – 45% “no” – total responses: 11)
Accenture (36% “yes” – 54% “no” – total responses: 11)
Cloudera (45% “yes” – 55% “no” – total responses: 11)
Splunk (70% “yes” – 30% “no” – total responses: 10)
Unity Technologies (20% “yes” – 80% “no” – total responses: 10)
Twilio Inc. (50% “yes” – 50% “no” – total responses: 10)
Zillow Group (40% “yes” – 60% “no” – total responses: 10)
Qualcomm (40% “yes” – 60% “no” – total responses: 10)
Pure Storage (40% “yes” – 60% “no” – total responses: 10)
Flexport (40% “yes” – 60% “no” – total responses: 10)
Activision Blizzard (60% “yes” – 40% “no” – total responses: 10)
Cruise (10% “yes” – 90% “no” – total responses: 10)

For the breakdowns of the other two questions, visit the raw data.

Continue Reading

Our Great Partners

The
American Genius
news neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list for news sent straight to your email inbox.

Emerging Stories

Get The American Genius
neatly in your inbox

Subscribe to get business and tech updates, breaking stories, and more!