Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

The Real DailyThe Real Daily

Real Estate Big Data

Huge state Supreme Court ruling against MERS marks yet another chapter in the robo-signing debacle

MERS has won and lost many battles across the states, with yet another state Supreme Court ruling against them. Their role in the mortgage crisis has become more clear in hindsight for many.

justice lawsuit patent troll

The Tennessee Supreme Court has ruled against a mortgage registration business, saying that the business has no constitutionally protected interest in a Hamilton County property.


MERS showdown in Tennessee

The Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) is an electronic registry that automatically tracks and records residential mortgage transfers so that members do not have to record each transfer in the county’s land records.

The property in question was purchased with a loan given by a MERS member lender. The purchasers issued a promissory note secured by the deed of trust. The deed described MERS as “a separate corporation that is acting solely as nominee” or the lender.

MERS foreclosed – was it legal?

Later, the lender sold the promissory note to another lender. When the land owners failed to pay their 2006 taxes, Hamilton County foreclosed on the property, sending notices to the borrowers, the new lender, and the previous lender. They did not send a notice to MERS. The land was then sold at a tax sale to Carlton Ditto.

Courts upholds the first court’s decision

MERS filed suit against Hamilton County and Ditto, claiming that they should have been notified of the sale. MERS claims that they have an “independent interest” in the property. According to due process law under the U.S. constitution, if the government sells someone’s land to pay their taxes, they must notify the taxpayer and the lenders. If they fail to give notice, the sale is void.

MERS would like the court to void the sale of the Hamilton County property, because they feel that they should have been notified. However, the trial court ruled against MERS, saying that MERS was merely an agent of the lender, and did not have constitutionally protected interested in the property. Therefore, Hamilton County was not legally obligated to inform MERS about the sale.

The court of appeals affirmed the court’s first decision, as did the Tennessee Supreme Court, who argued that MERS was an agent of the beneficiary, but a beneficiary itself.


Ellen Vessels, a Staff Writer at The American Genius, is respected for their wide range of work, with a focus on generational marketing and business trends. Ellen is also a performance artist when not writing, and has a passion for sustainability, social justice, and the arts.


The Daily Intel
in your inbox

Subscribe and get news and EXCLUSIVE content to your email inbox.




Multnomah County sees a $9 million victory over MERS for illegal activity. Will this win pave the way for other counties to follow suit?


Christopher King has presented compelling evidence that the banks are still criminally screwing homeowners and taxpayers, and MERS could be behind it all.


After many harrowing incidents, a Pennsylvania court finally tells MERS it has violated state law.


The Real Daily is honest, up to the minute real estate industry news crafted for industry practitioners - we cut through the pay-to-play news fluff to bring you what's happening behind closed doors, what's meaningful to your practice, and what to expect in the future. We're your competitive advantage. The American Genius, LLC Copyright © 2005-2023