Business News
Aerial photography ban amended, concerns continue
After concerns were raised over the initial aerial photography ban, amendments were made, but some continue to question the bill and its implications for other states, should they follow New Hampshire’s lead.

Business News
This web platform for cannabis is blowing up online distribution
(BUSINESS NEWS) Dutchie, a website platform for cannabis companies, just octupled in value. Here’s what that means for the online growth of cannabis distribution.
Business News
Ford adopts flexible working from home schedule for over 30k employees
(BUSINESS NEWS) Ford Motor Co. is allowing employees to continue working from home even after the pandemic winds down. Is this the beginning of a trend for auto companies?
Business News
Unify your remote team with these important conversations
(BUSINESS NEWS) More than a happy hour, consider having these poignant conversations to bring your remote team together like never before.
-
Opinion Editorials3 days ago
3 things to do if you *really* want to be an ally to women in tech
-
Opinion Editorials1 week ago
Questions you wished recruiters would answer
-
Business Entrepreneur4 days ago
15 tips to spot a toxic work environment when interviewing
-
Business Entrepreneur1 week ago
Zen, please: Demand for mental health services surges during pandemic
-
Opinion Editorials3 days ago
4 simple tips to ease friction with your boss while working remotely
-
Opinion Editorials2 days ago
Why robots freak us out, and what it means for the future of AI
-
Opinion Editorials1 week ago
6 skills humans have that AI doesn’t… yet
-
Business Entrepreneur1 week ago
This startup makes managing remote internships easier for all
Christopher Jay Campbell
March 6, 2013 at 1:34 pm
This is an unconstitutional restraint of freedom of expression. If photos cannot be taken from the air, then they can be prohibited anywhere else, too — including tourist spots, businesses, and anywhere else people or man-made structures are visible. It taking pictures of houses from the air is illegal, why should it be considered less invasive to take pictures of the same house from the ground or a cherry picker?
Jim Carroll
March 12, 2013 at 9:46 am
I contacted Rep Kurk, (being an FPV pilot, and wanting to offer him a hands-on demo so the reality of it all might replace the fears) and received a nice response. It now targets only UAS operators who’s cameras can recognize individuals on the ground. A GoPro without a zoom lens should be safe. I’m looking forward to seeing the amended text for myself.