1 client. 1 home. 1 flip cam.
Hi, what are you looking for?
Subscribe to our mailing list for news sent straight to your email inbox.
Thank you for subscribing.
Something went wrong.
Creeping, stalking, checking...whatever you call it, we all do it. Here's how to look at a LinkedIn profile privately.
Have you ever thought it would be cool to get paid just to scroll on Tiktok? Check out this job posting from Ubiquitous before...
Airtable presents the drawbacks of your current marketing strategy and what changes need to be made to make it work efficiently.
Many social media apps do not give their influencers proper pay or acknowledgement, but Chatwise seeks to give more of a stake in the...
Jennifer in Louisville
July 22, 2008 at 6:50 am
Fun clip. Only a couple areas of improvement IMO:
1. A longer view of the front of the house that was in the middle of the clip. (yes, I realize there is an ability to pause/rewind, but a lot of people won’t do it.)
2. Move the beat up green Neon car thats missing 1 hubcap outside the window at 1:05.
Enjoyable and fun overall though.
July 22, 2008 at 6:56 am
I watched and I got to thinking about the music and wondering what agentgenius readers would have to say…
Do you think the music could potentially turn off a buyer who saw this? Is this the digital age’s version of having a Slayer (google it if you don’t know it and you’ll see why someone might be turned off) poster on your walls when showing it?
Me personally, I see past things like that, but I find that buyers can be turned off by the tiniest of things. Some people don’t see past the seller’s personal effects throughout the house, so will this cause the same result for some people?
Awaiting your opinions…
July 22, 2008 at 7:34 am
Nice Benn! I thought the production was well done and I love the idea of having the client conduct the tour. If he is your typical buyer for this home, I think you’re definitely appealing to him. My wife recently bought be me a Flip so I’m looking forward to trying something similar.
July 22, 2008 at 8:27 am
As a Consumer, first time buyer, if that video came up on the first page of results in my Google search for “homes for sale” + “city name”, I would TOTALLY go see that house in person first! Video is a home run, music is just icing on the cake.
July 22, 2008 at 9:07 am
while I like the video, and the music, this would have to be specifically demographic targeted. This would not be for everyone.
this video would be perfect for attracting the ‘single guy’ who leads a bachelor lifestyle. ie: the focus on the deodorant.
July 22, 2008 at 9:26 am
While I love the FLIP and videos, starting out this show in a pile of dirt and an unprofessional appearing ‘person’ wandering doesn’t seem like the best way to present this home. It does get better though!
July 22, 2008 at 9:51 am
Really? I guess I don’t get it. All I got from that video was that the back yard is dead, the counters need replacing, and they should have cleaned up the bathroom before the video.
There was nothing about that that made me want to see that house any more than any other without a video. I’d rather look at still photos that I can control the pace or a virtual tour that I can skip around on. No price, no information, didn’t do it for me.
Am I missing something that I should be getting?
July 22, 2008 at 11:37 am
He is aware of what needs to be repaired, which is why the home isn’t on the market- I’m positive he will appreciate the feedback, but his goal is a home sold using social media, and he is well on his way.
The reason I’m showing the video, and not so much the home is because it has an enthusiasm to it that I think is really neat. He did it on his own, in his flavor, as a homeowner, and I have a feeling we’ll be seeing a lot more of this personal style and flare in homeowner video from our clients in the future.
I find it refreshing, and overwhelmingly appealing and I’m excited to advise and help him ready his home- This is the before… I’ll soon be showing you the after- my clients way – hgtv style 😉
July 22, 2008 at 12:05 pm
Hey Matt S., at first, that thought came to me, but lets also consider where this video will be featured, it won’t be in the mls, it will more than likely reside on youtube, and other venues that might expect the unexpected. I think that that this video serves up, the unexpected.
Susie, so we should hide our gen y homeowner? 😉 He is actually a very successful public speaker on the subject of social media, and non-profit organizations, namely the american cancer society- social media isn’t stuffy, web2.0 is loose and natural- what you see as unprofessional ‘person’, his peers and probable buyers will relate to him and his down to earth style in many many ways.
How many homeowners in a 1.0 world complain about having to stage their bathroom before they leave for work every single day of the week, not to mention clean up before every show… do you really think a homebuyer or other home sellers wouldn’t give his human touch and human pass? I would guess that most would laugh and relate.
just some thoughts…
I’d rather this music than some midi
boarding a plane, will catch up later… nice day guys
Glenn fm Naples
July 22, 2008 at 12:23 pm
Benn – glad to see other agents thinking of video to advertise and promote homes. The video was well done (really didn’t care for the music – but I am 60 yo). But as someone pointed out it – it is demographically appropriate for the targetted market – excellent on your part.
July 22, 2008 at 12:39 pm
Benn – Good point. I guess I was trying to get some responses out of the various agents floating around to see what a general consensus would look like. Me, I’m all for something new and different. I’d buy a house with a Slayer poster in it any day.
Glenn – You may not like the music, but would you say, “hey, this house might be something Client X would like to see.”? Would the music “scare” you away? I think I know your answer, but I’m trying to dig deeper to get a better picture of what today’s agent is thinking. What if you had seen it back in 1995? Just curious.
July 22, 2008 at 1:07 pm
Hi Benn, just giving you feedback on what came to my mind immediately. I am sure the video is appealing to many.. as well as the homeowner!
Jean-Paul Pangalos Bastarrica
July 22, 2008 at 2:11 pm
I have been looking for a useful guide on how to create high quality video presentations of homes. Is there any available that will teach me how to create a video like this?
Thank you in advance.
July 22, 2008 at 2:39 pm
Matt S – I would debate sending that video to some clients. IMO the music would be a turn off to some buyers. At the same time the herky jerky nature of the video would be a turn off to many people. IMO this video didn’t provide anything that 9 quality photos couldn’t do better.
Jennifer in Louisville
July 22, 2008 at 2:46 pm
You all are a bunch of ole sticks in the mud! 😛
Is the vid appropriate for everyone? No, of course not. Its niche marketing. Young music-heads live in homes too, y’know?
Side note – Perhaps he should do a whole series of videos that way he can appeal to all buyer genres:
Put him in a tuxedo with opera/classical.
Big ole straw hat with country music.
Bunch of gold chains, sunglasses with Rap music.
July 22, 2008 at 3:25 pm
The video is a great start and I think will work very well once the next and better version is taken. It was missing views of the front of the house, a view out of the kitchen into the family room, etc. It was also a little rushed (imho).
As for the music, it all depends on the location and demographic of potential buyers. If you were selling a condo in downtown South Beach, you’d have house music in your video. If you were selling a luxury mansion in Northern Virginia, you’d probably want classical music in your video. It just depends…
Glenn fm Naples
July 22, 2008 at 3:49 pm
Matt – If I had a client looking this particular home – I might consider it for the client. The music is irritating to me – but remember I am probably older than a lot of people commenting on this video. If it was back in 1995 – I would have avoided the video at all costs – of course back then I was in a 3 piece suit and highly conservative. Today, I can let down my hair – if I had any. 🙂
July 22, 2008 at 5:05 pm
Matt, The video didn’t do it for me at all. I felt it was way to jerky. The motion distracted from being able to really see the house. As a sales tool I would have much preferred a RealEstateShows.
I liked the music though:)
July 22, 2008 at 6:12 pm
This video and subsequent discussion brings up a very interesting concept of target marketing using video/music/social media….will agents begin to market properties with multiple styles?
What if this video were shot using classical music, slow fade transitions, and steady pans and zooms? Would it then appeal to a more sophisticated buyer, or not? What if it were shot in black and white and blair witch style music played? Would the thrill seeker then be intrigued to go see it? What if the video featured girls in bikinis and the monday night football theme music? Would jocks knock the door down to see inside? What if the backyard scene showed a bar-b-que party with Dr. Dre music playing? Would everyone be turned off because they thought it was ragged out as a party house or be excited to throw their own party next weekend?
I think you could shoot 2 videos and edit them 10 different ways to create a ‘mini-series’ on the house. In the end, I think anything you can do that is different gives you a better chance of succeeding in this industry.
– I’ll buy the Slayer poster, you can keep the house.
July 22, 2008 at 8:03 pm
As someone who also does a lot of public speaking (and media development) in the area of social media, I can assure you that this piece is done exactly right to light a fire under the 25-40 demographic. We’ve been in and out of the real estate market for a while, and if I have to look at one more of those still-photo pan/zoom atrocities with the elevator music I may strangle someone.
(BTW — I’m 53, my wife is 61. Not everyone fits in neat demo slots.)
Of course you’ll have a nice safe little MLS site with pictures and the specs for the plumbing, distance to the end of the driveway, and a list of where all the end tables go. But your audience is looking for an experience and a vision of what living in this home might be, that would differentiate it from the hundreds of others with little cardboard signs out front.
Challenge: show this video to 10 of your friends in the target demo, and ask for reactions. (Don’t telegraph what you think.)
July 22, 2008 at 10:28 pm
i don’t think the music is so much the issue as the volume. You have a purposefully jerky, quick-moving video, and the music matches that. Turn the volume down on the music, then let it ride.
I like the idea, Benn, but not the presentation. The home just didn’t seem to have the wow factor to go with the organic-nature of the video. I’m glad to see you’re working on an after-version though, because I DO think that this kind of targeted advertising can be a huge hit.
Brad gets the Slayer poster, and I’m glad to send an extra hubcap for Green Lantern parked out front.
July 23, 2008 at 12:32 am
1 Guy Running Randomly. 1 Home Not Really Shown in the Best Light. 1 Cheap A$$ Camera with Poor Resolution and a lot of Shake.
Come on… you’re going to make how much off the sale of the house and you bought a flip cam? I hate those things. Why didn’t you just use a cell phone? I mean, the quality is barely better than what you must get from your blackberry (and no, that’s not acceptable either).
About the music: Thank goodness it’s not another jazz piece but I really do not think Phantom has given you rights to use their song Justice pt.II in a commercial endeavor. Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zxsu2-xcvNs
Anyway, just wanted to chime in that I didn’t this production deserved the attention you gave it. Sorry.
How to fix it: Keep the cute humour at the beginning going (it seemed to stop after unlocking the door). Get a better camera (maybe a Canon HV30?). Make your own steady cam (really easy to do) to ease up on the shake. Find some royalty free music that’s decent or just cut the music/audio out entirely since most of us will mute the audio anyways).
July 23, 2008 at 12:39 am
It has been amazing to watch the availability of the internet destroy old standards. The first time I saw one of the old Kinescope shorts, I marvelled that anyone bothered with them. I often feel the same way when watching real estate web videos, but this internet video technology is just so darned sexy!!!
July 23, 2008 at 6:47 am
Love the idea of making it a Gen X/Y kind of social media video, they are buying NOW, and it seems that this is the sort of first time home that a Gen X/Y’er would likely be in the market for. But here’s something to think about…
On a side note, I’m all about using social media to sell homes, but these days those aren’t the only generations on line not to mention all of the different races we represent regularly, so I think we have to be careful about who is portrayed in the video. I have to ask also that in some odd way could this type of a video be considered some form of steering? The idea Brad Nix had about doing a mini series was great but brought to mind that if someone didn’t do some sort of mini-series and featured a specific demographic in a video could it be considered steering? Maybe not, but put yourself in the shoes of the person watching the video that features a particular demographic that is NOT that demographic. Would you be more or less likely to view the home even if it fit all other criteria in your home search? Just my knee jerk thoughts after watching and reading…
July 23, 2008 at 4:46 pm
Fair warning this is long, but I did some research to the ideal demographic that might help those interested in video.
“Challenge: show this video to 10 of your friends in the target demo, and ask for reactions. (Don’t telegraph what you think.)”
Took you up on that challenge. I will not post most of the comments as many are not exactly professional as it was an exchange between friends.
Some important points; all people I sent the video to are between the ages of 25 and 38, all use technology on a regular basis, and most if not all use social networking. The only text sent to my friends with the link was:
“Tell me what you think of this video. (and linked directly to the video, not this post)”
To make sure that my opinions didn’t influence their comments.
At this point I now have feedback from 16 people.
All agreed the video sucked (much nicer then many of the comments), but they all agreed that the concept was cool. I got responses ranging from did a 6 year old shoot this to why are they so cheap they are using their 1990 camcorder to shoot the video.
Just about all thought the music was incorrect for this home, for example “I understand it may be a licensing thing, but the music didn’t fit my idea of a house I’d like to purchase. A song like “Our House” or something more classic would have made me enjoy it more.” That came from someone who is really into current music and it shocked me that he suggested something more “classic” because it would make it “fit my idea of a house I’d like to purchase”. That was very interesting to me.
Some liked the idea of music (just not that music), others thought there shouldn’t be any.
Across the board people didn’t understand why the homeowner was in the video. The comments here varied, but all thought he should be in there as it was. Some suggested having people actually doing different things in the home, like cooking, watching TV, stepping out of the shower (to follow with the humor of the door entry) (sorry I have some messed up friends, but they are very good at marketing). Others suggested not having anyone in the video as they are buying the house, not the homeowner.
Now I also did a follow up with a really bad tour of one of our properties. This I only have feedback from 9 people on. Across the board they felt the tour was more useful then the video. They also did make a point of saying if the video was better done it could be better then a tour. One thing I hadn’t thought of “One other thing I forgot to mention about the video I really liked is that it helped show the layout of the house. That’s something that is missing from “virtual tours” and I’m too lazy to look at floor plans.”
Hope that helps everyone a little. Figured it was worth sharing as not everyone has 20 people with the correct demographics to send this video off to.
July 24, 2008 at 8:53 am
Ken, I can’t comment on your poll because I’m not able to see what controls you had or have, more specifically their demograpics. Ages just aren’t enough to paint a total picture as my mother in the midwest, would absolutely not get a Seattle 23 yo, much less her own son 😉 – but you do go on to prove my larger point.
“but they all agreed that the concept was cool.”
We can all absolutely agree that we can’t agree on subjective issues like, quality, music, etc… my taste isn’t yours, or anyone elses, always… but these folks that even Ken just polled, when they go to create their video to sell their home may look at that crappy midi based video and wish they had something a little less like everyone elses because as of today, their perception of possibilities have been changed- I bet they will want to do something even more clever, and the cycle of disruption continues… just 3 years ago, a vt was fine, today we’re begging the question, rock or country and holy crap- the SELLER HAS OPTIONS! THAT is a novel concept. 😉
July 24, 2008 at 2:39 pm
Agents should always be looking for new ways to stand out from their competition and video might be the next way to do so.
Production quality will be an important way of standing out as more amateurs dive in. The suggestions made earlier were very helpful. The video above is an example of a kewl concept executed in amateurish fashion. YouTube availablity lowered standards, but standards are rising again now that broadcast quality programming is being distributed directly to the internet. That was the point of my kinescope reference. Novelty forgives content. The novelty of watching people wander through houses, yards, and neighborhoods with flip cams is quickly wearing off. It would be far more helpful to find professional examples instead of amateurish ones.
July 24, 2008 at 3:21 pm
Frank (or anyone else) do you have any quality examples of video tours? From what I have found the quality across the board is fairly low quality not something I would want my name associated with.
Glenn fm Naples
July 25, 2008 at 5:47 am
I bounced this off of 4 people aged 22 to 35. The thoughts were spread across the board from liking the music, but not wanting to see the house to very cool and wanting to see the house.
Each of the 4 individuals had very different educational and economic backgrounds.
This led me to believe, matching the video to the buyer profile is extremely important. The balancing act is how to match the buyer profile with the image we as a real estate agent want to project to the public.
July 28, 2008 at 2:54 pm
While I personally didn’t like the layout of the house if I happened to be looking for a home and I did like the layout I would definitely make the effort to go and view it, probably in large part because of the video. I loved the backyard though, despite the fact it looks like it needs some TLC.